• The korean journal of orthodontics
• /
• v.28 no.2 s.67
• /
• pp.231-236
• /
• 1998

This study was undertaken to evaluate the psychosocial status of the preoperative orthognathic surgery patient through SCL-90-R. Subjects used in this study were composed of 67 patients under presurgical orthodontic treatment. Males are 40 and females are 27. Comparison between the personality characteristics of male and female patients was made by the t-test. From this study, the results were as follows. 1. In preoperative patients group, all T-scores were within the normal range. 2. In male patients group, all T-scores were within the normal range. 3. In female patients group, all T-scores were within the normal range. 4. Only in PHOB scales, the T-scores of male patients group were higher than those of female patients group. 5. Although all T-scores were within the normal range,9 patients($13.4\%$ of all patients) shows abnormal T-scores in at least one scale.($T{\geqq}65$)

• Korean Journal of Psychosomatic Medicine
• /
• v.27 no.1
• /
• pp.42-49
• /
• 2019

Objectives : Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is a life-saving therapy for patients with terminal liver disease. Many studies have focused on recipients rather than donors. The aim of this study was to assess the emotional status and personality characteristics of LDLT donors. Methods : We evaluated 218 subjects (126 male, 92 female) who visited Daegu Catholic University Medical Center from August 2012 to July 2018. A retrospective review of their preoperative psychological evaluation was done. We investigated epidemiological data and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 questionnaire. Subanalysis was done depending on whether subjects actually underwent surgery, relationship with the recipient, and their gender. Results : Mean age of subjects was $32.19{\pm}10.91years$. 187 subjects received LDLT surgery (actual donors) while 31 subjects didn't (potential donors). Donor-recipient relationship included husband-wife, parent-children, brother-sister etc. Subjects had statistical significance on validity scale L, F, K and all clinical scales compared to the control group. Potential donors had significant difference in F(b), F(p), K, S, Pa, AGGR, PSYC, DISC and NEGE scales compared to actual donors. F, D and NEGE scales were found to be predictive for actual donation. Subanalysis on donor-recipient relationship and gender also showed significant difference in certain scales. Conclusions : Under-reporting of psychological problems should be considered when evaluating living-liver donors. Information about the donor's overall psychosocial background, mental status and donation process should also be acquired.