• Journal of Trauma and Injury
• /
• 제32권3호
• /
• pp.150-156
• /
• 2019

Purpose: To determine whether a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) meets the goals of a low infection rate and long-term use in trauma patients. Methods: From January 2016 to June 2018, the medical records of patients who underwent central venous catheterization at a level I trauma center were retrospectively reviewed. Data collected included age, sex, injury severity score, site of catheterization, place of catheterization (intensive care unit [ICU], emergency department, or general ward), type of catheter, length of hospital stay during catheterization, types of cultured bacteria, time to development of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI), and complications. Results: During the study period, 333 central vein catheters (CVC) were inserted with a total of 2,626 catheter-days and 97 PICCs were placed with a total of 2,227 catheter-days. The CLABSI rate was significantly lower in the PICC group when the analysis was limited to patients for whom the catheter was changed for the first time in the ICU after CVC insertion in the ER with similar indication and catheter insertion times (18.6 vs. 10.3/1,000 catheter-days, respectively, p<0.05). The median duration of catheter use was significantly longer in the PICC group than in the CVC group (16 vs. 6 days, respectively, p<0.05). Conclusions: The study results showed that the duration of catheter use was longer and the infection rate were lower in the PICC group than in the CVC group, suggesting that PICC is a safe and reliable alternative to conventional CVC.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제13권5호
• /
• pp.1873-1875
• /
• 2012

Objective: To compare the complications of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) by a modified Seldinger technique under ultrasound guidance or the conventional (peel-away cannula) technique. Methods: From February to December of 2010, cancer patients who received PICC at the Department of Chemotherapy in Jiangsu Cancer Hospital were recruited into this study, and designated UPICC if their PICC lines were inserted under ultrasound guidance, otherwise CPICC if were performed by peel-away cannula technique. The rates of successful placement, hemorrhage around the insertion area, phlebitis, comfort of the insertion arm, infection and thrombus related to catheterization were analyzed and compared on days 1, 5 and 6 after PICC and thereafter. Results: A total of 180 cancer patients were recruited, 90 in each group. The rates of successful catheter placement between two groups differed with statistical significance (P <0.05), favoring UPICC. More phlebitis and finger swelling were detected in the CPICC group (P <0.05). From day 6 to the date the catheter was removed and thereafter, more venous thrombosis and a higher rate of discomfort of insertion arms were also observed in the CPICC group. Conclusion: Compared with CPICC, UPICC could improve the rate of successful insertion, reduce catheter related complications and increase comfort of the involved arm, thus deserving to be further investigated in randomized clinical studies.

• Journal of Korean Biological Nursing Science
• /
• 제6권1호
• /
• pp.33-42
• /
• 2004

Background : Intravenous(IV) access is becoming an increasingly important part of health care today. The current drive for clinical effectiveness and cost-effective health care serves to increase the need for reliable vascular access. Venous access devices were developed to overcome problems associated with limited peripheral access and frequent venipuncture in patients with long-term therapy. Although the peripherally inserted central catheter(PICC) have become popular during recent years in USA, its procedure is rare in Korea. Purpose : The goal of this study was to analyze the PICC inserted patient data by IV CNS intervention. Method : A Total of 62 PICCs were inserted into 51 patients by the IV CNS during a 10-month period form November, 14, 2002, to October 2, 2002. Data was obtained retrospectively through chart review. Result : The patient population included 34(54.8%) men and 28(45.2%) women, with a mean age 50.6 years. The main indication for PICC placement was to access vein in poor peripheral venous status(40.3%). The mean served interval for PICC insertions was 16.7 days(range, $2{\sim}61$ days). The reasons for removal were completed therapy in 18 cases(29.0%), patient death in 13 cases(21.0%), and mechanical or functional PICC problem in 10cases(16.1%). The three PICCs removed for presumed infection, and one had only positive tip cultures(0.2%). Conclusion : PICCs are rapidly growing popularity and required an extended course of IV therapy.

• Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics
• /
• 제49권8호
• /
• pp.902-905
• /
• 2006

중심 정맥 도관술은 미숙아들의 출생과 생존율의 증가로 현재 신생아실에서 많이 시행 되고 있는 수기이며, 최근 중심 정맥 카테터 사용이 증가함에 따라 혈전이나 색전, 혈관 손상과 파열, 흉막 삼출, 화학적 폐렴과 같은 합병증이 보고되고 있다. 이에 저자들은 경피 중심 정맥 카테터 삽입 후 우측성 흉막 삼출액이 발생하여 시행한 혈관조영술에서 카테터가 홀정맥에 위치하였던 초극소 저출생 체중아에서 경피 중심 정맥 카테터를 제거한 후 흉막 삼출액이 호전되었던 1례를 경험하였기에 보고하는 바이다.

• Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care
• /
• 제17권3호
• /
• pp.179-184
• /
• 2014

목적: 이 연구는 임종기 암환자들에서 말초삽입중심 정맥카테터(peripherally inserted central catheters, PICC)의 안정성 및 효과에 대해 확인하고자 한다. 방법: 2013년 한 해 동안 한전병원에 호스피스 완화의료를 목적으로 입원한 환자들 중, 말초삽입중심정맥카테터를 시행 받은 환자들을 대상으로 후향적으로 의무 기록 관찰하였다. 모든 말초삽입중심정맥카테터는 중재적 방사선의사에 의해 삽입되었다. 결과: 언급한 기간 동안 30명의 임종기 환자에서 말초 삽입중심정맥카테터가 시행되었고, 그들 중 1명의 환자에서 2회의 삽입이 이뤄져, 전체적으로 31회의 말초삽입중심정맥카테터 삽입 횟수와 571일의 거치기간(PICC days)이 분석되었다. 말초삽입중심정맥카테터 거치기간(PICC days)의 중앙값은 14.0일(범위, 1~90일)이었다. 25예는 계획된 시기(퇴원, 전원, 사망 등)까지 유지하였으나, 6예에서는 여러 이유로 계획된 시기보다 조기에 PICC를 제거하였다(PICC 조기 제거율, 19%; 10.5/1000 PICC days). 따라서, 카테터 유지 성공 비율(catheter maintenance success rate)은 81%였다. PICC 조기 제거 6예 중, 섬망 등에 의한 스스로 제거한 경우가 4예였고(13%; 7.0/1000 PICC days), 카테터 관련 혈액 감염 및 혈전증이 각각 1예씩 있었다(3%; 1.8/1000 PICC days). 조기 PICC 제거를 포함한 총 합병증 발생은 8예에서 있었다(26%; 14.1/1000 PICC days). 합병증 발생까지 기간은 중앙값 7일이었다(기간, 2~14일). 말초삽입중심정맥카테터 관련 합병증에 의한 사망은 없었다. 결론: 좋지 않은 전신 상태, 작은 시술 합병증에도 취약함, 제한된 여명등과 같은 임종기 암환자의 특징을 고려할 때, PICC는 임종기 환자에서 안전한 혈관 접근 방법이 될 수 있다.

• Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics
• /
• 제51권12호
• /
• pp.1359-1362
• /
• 2008

혈우병 환자에서 가장 효과적인 치료 방침은 응고 인자의 보충으로, 그를 위해 안전하고 오래 사용할 수 있는 정맥 확보가 필요하다. 그러나 중심 정맥으로의 port는 전신 마취와 일정한 입원이 필요하고, 혈우병 환자에서 시행할 경우 보험 삭감의 문제도 있다. 본 저자는 두 명의 중증 혈우병 항체 환자에게 말초 삽입 중심 정맥관을 삽입하였다. 환자들은 잦은 출혈 소견 때문에 응고 인자를 투여 받았으며, 그로 인하여 혈관 확보에 어려움이 있었다. 환자 나이는 7세와 11세였다. 제 8 응고 인자 활성도는 모두 1% 이하였으며, 제 8 응고 인자 항체 수치는 각각 160과 26.3 BU/mL였다. 말초 삽입 중심 정맥관은 초음파 인도 하에, 외래에서, 국소 마취로 쉽게 삽입되었다. 말초 삽입 중심 정맥관 삽입은 잦은 출혈을 보이는 혈우병 환자에게 사용해 볼 수 있는 방법이다.