• Title/Summary/Keyword: obstetrics

Search Result 3,664, Processing Time 0.027 seconds

Research Trends Using Manual Therapy in Obstetrics and Gynecological Diseases (한방부인과 영역에 활용되는 수기요법의 국내외 연구 동향)

  • Kim, Suna;Kim, Min-Kyung;Kim, Su-Jin;Kyung, Da-Hyun;Baek, Ji-Won;Kwon, Miri
    • The Journal of Korean Obstetrics and Gynecology
    • /
    • v.33 no.4
    • /
    • pp.127-142
    • /
    • 2020

  • Objectives: The purpose of this study is to analyze the research trends using manual therapy in obstetrics and gynecological diseases. Methods: We searched for studies that performed manual therapy on diseases related to obstetrics and gynecology. All relevant papers were selected and extracted to be analyzed. Results: 12 Randomized controlled trials, 8 cases, 3 pilot studies, 3 non-comparative studies, and 1 before-after comparative study were collected. The study subjects, results, techniques of manual therapy used were analyzed. There were studies related to pregnancy-related symptoms, postpartum pain, dysmenorrhea, chronic pelvic pain, abnormal uterine bleeding, sexual dysfunction, and childbirth. Conclusions: It has been found that various manual therapies can be used for obstetrics and gynecological diseases.

  • https://doi.org/10.15204/jkobgy.2020.33.4.127 인용 PDF KSCI

A Methodological and Reporting Quality Assessment of the Systematic Reviews in the Journal of Korean Obstetrics and Gynecology (대한한방부인과학회지에 게재된 체계적 문헌고찰의 방법론 및 보고의 질 평가)

  • Seo, Ji-Hye;Kang, So-Hyeon;Hur, Da-Hee;Lee, Dong-Nyung;Kim, Hyeong-Jun
    • The Journal of Korean Obstetrics and Gynecology
    • /
    • v.34 no.2
    • /
    • pp.108-123
    • /
    • 2021

  • Objectives: The purpose of this study is to assess the methodological and reporting quality of the systematic reviews in the Journal of Korean obstetrics and gynecology. Methods: Systematic reviews in the Journal of Korean obstetrics and gynecology were selected from January 1987 to February 2021, by searching Koreanstudies Information Service System (KISS) and the search system of the Society of Korean medicine obstetrics and gynecology. The methodological and reporting quality was assessed using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2) tool and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist. Results: Total of 19 systematic reviews were finally included for this study. The levels of methodological quality were low in 63.2% and very low in 36.8%. As a result of evaluating the reporting quality, 22 to 15 (average 18.6) items out of 27 items (81.5 to 55.6%) were reported. Conclusions: The results of a systematic review are helpful in giving a high level of evidence. In order to improve the quality of systematic reviews published in the Journal of Korean Obstetrics and Gynecology, it is necessary to perform and report according to the the PRISMA checklist and AMSTAR 2.

  • https://doi.org/10.15204/jkobgy.2021.34.2.108 인용 PDF KSCI