• Structural Engineering and Mechanics
• /
• 제65권4호
• /
• pp.465-476
• /
• 2018

This article investigates buckling behavior of a multi-phase nanocrystalline nanobeam resting on Winkler-Pasternak foundation in the framework of nonlocal couple stress elasticity and a higher order refined beam model. In this model, the essential measures to describe the real material structure of nanocrystalline nanobeams and the size effects were incorporated. This non-classical nanobeam model contains couple stress effect to capture grains micro-rotations. Moreover, the nonlocal elasticity theory is employed to study the nonlocal and long-range interactions between the particles. The present model can degenerate into the classical model if the nonlocal parameter, and couple stress effects are omitted. Hamilton's principle is employed to derive the governing equations and the related boundary conditions which are solved applying an analytical approach. The buckling loads are compared with those of nonlocal couple stress-based beams. It is showed that buckling loads of a nanocrystalline nanobeam depend on the grain size, grain rotations, porosities, interface, elastic foundation, shear deformation, surface effect, nonlocality and boundary conditions.

• Advances in nano research
• /
• 제8권3호
• /
• pp.191-202
• /
• 2020

The article brings the study of nonlocal, surface and the couple stress together to apparent the frequency retaliation of FG nanobeams (Functionally graded). For the examination of frequency retaliation, the article considers the accurate spot of neutral axis. This article aims to enhance the coherence of proposed model to accurately encapsulate the significant effects of the nonlocal stress field, size effects together with material length scale parameters. These considered parameters are assimilated through what are referred to as modified couple stress as well as nonlocal elasticity theories, which encompasses the stiffness-hardening and softening influence on the nanobeams frequency characteristics. Power-law distribution is followed by the functional gradation of the material across the beam width in the considered structure of the article. Following the well-known Hamilton's principle, fundamental basic equations alongside their correlated boundary conditions are solved analytically. Validation of the study is also done with published result. Distinct parameters (such as surface energy, slenderness ratio, as nonlocal material length scale and power-law exponent) influence is depicted graphically following the boundary conditions on non-dimensional FG nanobeams frequency.

• Wind and Structures
• /
• 제27권6호
• /
• pp.431-438
• /
• 2018

This paper presents a free vibration analysis of size-dependent functionally graded (FG) nanobeams with all surface effects considerations on the basis of modified couple stress theory. The material properties of FG nanobeam are assumed to vary according to power law distribution. Based on the Euler-Bernoulli beam theory, the modeled nanobeam and its equations of motion are derived using Hamilton's principle. An analytical method is used to discretize the model and the equation of motion. The model is validated by comparing the benchmark results with the obtained results. Results show that the vibration behavior of a nanobeam is significantly influenced by surface density, surface tension and surface elasticity. Also, it is shown that by increasing the beam size, influence of surface effect reduces to zero, and the natural frequency tends to its classical value.

• 한국전산구조공학회논문집
• /
• 제27권2호
• /
• pp.87-94
• /
• 2014

페리다이나믹 이론은 재료파괴 및 균열진전 해석에 적합하다. 그러나 적분 방정식을 풀기위해 많은 비국부 상호작용을 해석해야만 하기 때문에 일반적으로 사용되는 국부 모델들에 비해 비효율적이다. 따라서 효율적이면서 정확한 해석 모델을 구성하기 위해 페리다이나믹 모델과 다른 국부 모델을 연성하는 연성 해석법의 개발이 필요하다. 연성 방법론 개발을 위해서는 불연속성 혹은 응력 집중이 발생될 것으로 예상되는 영역에는 페리다이나믹 모델을 구성하고 상대적으로 변형 거동이 복잡하지 않은 영역은 국부 모델을 구성하는 방법이 많이 사용된다. 본 연구에서는 최근에 개발된 힘-기반 연성 방법론을 소개한다. 이 방법론에서는 블랜딩 함수를 활용하여 연성 영역을 사이에 두고 페리다이나믹 모델과 탄성체 모델을 연성한다. 수치예제를 통해 연성 모델이 집중하중 해석 혹은 정적파괴 해석 문제를 효율적이고 엄밀하게 해석할 수 있음을 확인하였다. 이와 같은 문제들은 일반적인 탄성체 모델을 사용해서는 엄밀한 해석이 어렵다. 반면에 페리다이나믹 모델은 엄밀한 해석이 가능하지만 계산 시간과 비용이 매우 많이 요구된다는 문제점이 있다.