• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제41권2호
• /
• pp.223-231
• /
• 2003

Statement of problem : Little is known about the effect of a counter-torque device and the internal hexagon of abutment on the tightening torque transmitted to the implant. Purpose : The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of a counter-torque device and the internal hexagon of abutment on the tightening torque transmitted to the implant. Material and Methods : In this study, three types of abutment were used, (1) two-piece conical abutment with hexagon, (2) two-piece conical abutment without hexagon, and (3) one-piece conical abutment without hexagon. The experimental groups were divided into five groups according to the type of abutment and the usage of a counter-torque device. Group I : two-piece conical abutment with internal hexagon was tightened without the use of a counter-torque device. Group II : two-piece conical abutment without internal hexagon was tightened without the use of a counter-torque device. Group III : one-piece conical abutment without internal hexagon was tightened without the use of a counter-torque device. Group IV : two-piece conical abutment with internal hexagon was tightened with the use of a counter-torque device Group V : two-piece conical abutment without internal hexagon was tightened with the use of a counter-torque device. Abutments were tightened 20Ncm torque with the use of manual torque wrench and then torque values were measured by torque-gauge. After the measurement of torque values, all groups were loosened with the use of manual torque wrench and then detorque values were measured by torque-gauge. Results : The results were as follows. 1. There were no differences in torque values among three types of abutment. 2. Regardless of the existence of the internal hexagon of abutment, a counter-torque device decreased the tightening torque transmitted to the implant about 92% 3. In group III showed the highest detorque value, however there were no differences among group I, II, IV and V. Conclusion : Within the limitations of this study, it was concluded that the internal hexagon of abutment has no effect on the tightening torque transmitted to the implant and the detorque value of abutment screw. The use of a counter-torque device is essential to prevent microfracture on the implant-bone interface but has no effect on preload.

• 구강회복응용과학지
• /
• 제24권4호
• /
• pp.317-324
• /
• 2008

이 논문의 목적은 전부주조관에서 교합점의 위치와 교합력의 방향이 합착용 시멘트층 내의 응력에 미치는 영향에 대해서 알아보는 것이다. 하악 제 1대구치상에서 서로 다른 9 개의 교합점과 3가지 교합력 방향을 가진 27가지 조합의 유한요소 모델을 상정하였다. 금관의 소재는 제 3형 금합금이고, 변연의 형태는 chamfer이다. 합착용 시멘트로는 전 층에서 균일하게 $70{\mu}m$의 두께를 가지는 글라스 아이오노머 시멘트가 사용되었다. 금관에는 100N의 하중을 적용하였다. 협측과 설측 변연의 근접도에 따라서 시멘트층 내 응력은 다른 양상을 나타내었다. 협측은 변연으로부터 약 0.5 mm, 설측은 변연으로부터 약 1 mm 내측에서 최대 응력 값을 가졌다. 하중 방향이 치축에 대해 경사가 클수록, 하중점이 교두첨에 근접해 있을수록 더 큰 응력이 발생하였다.