• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제26권2호
• /
• pp.27-44
• /
• 2016

The use of program formats has slowly but surely developed into an important component of the television industry. This article examines the surprising gap between the constantly growing, multi-billion-dollar trade of program formats and their unclear and contradictory legal treatment. From both the social and commercial standpoints, television formats are valuable creations. Understanding the two products, the paper and program stages, of a television format and their respective markets, is fundamental to discussions of its legal protection. Interestingly, under current law, the less-developed stages of the process (program ideas and paper formats) are awarded more protection than the aired program format, which accumulates higher levels of investment, creativity, and expression. Internal industry mechanisms, such as vertical integration, damage to reputation, and industry institutions, exist in both markets and are still able to control and influence members' behavior to some extent. However, while the influence of internal industry mechanisms is still strong in the paper format market, in the program format market, which continues to grow, such mechanisms have weakened, amplifying the importance of a clear legal system. The absence of protection will certainly not completely eliminate the production of new program formats. However, these factors do not add up to a case against protection. The changes in the program format market in the last two decades support the theory that the overall effect of providing legal protection for TV formats would promote beneficial competition and encourage more original creations. The underlying question for television formats should not be whether to protect but rather how.

• 한국산업보건학회지
• /
• 제32권3호
• /
• pp.279-286
• /
• 2022

Objectives: South Korea's occupational safety and health legislation appears on the surface to have stronger regulations than any other country, but it is criticized for having many problems when viewed from the perspective of the effectiveness and universality of these regulations. Therefore, it is necessary to consider the validity of the regulatory content and the methods for contract work in South Korea. Methods: The main issues in contract work are compared and analyzed in terms of the occupational safety and health laws systems in South Korea and other developed countries. Based on this, problems related to contract regulation are derived from the perspective of legal policy studies. In addition, effective improvement measures for the derived problems will be proposed. Results: Other developed countries impose obligations suitable for the status and role of persons who entrust work in consideration of the fact that they do not directly manage risks and in terms of the effectiveness of industrial accident prevention. These countries generally impose obligations such as management of facilities and machinery, cooperation and coordination with subcontractors, cooperation and coordination obligations between subcontractors, and guidance obligations on a person who entrusts a work. Conclusions: It is difficult to achieve effectiveness in preventing accidents with based on unreasonable regulations that do not conform to safety principles or legal theory. Regulations on contract work need to be converted to rational cogent regulations based on science and rationality, not ideology and emotion. To this end, the legal system for contract work must have international universality.

• 한국산업정보학회논문지
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.99-113
• /
• 2010

소프트웨어 산업에서 특허권의 취득이 일상화된 과정은 그것이 단기간에 이루어졌다는 점 이외에도, 복잡한 법적 판단의 변천과 치열한 경제적 찬반 논리를 거치며 이루어졌다는 특징을 지닌다. 본 연구에서는 소프트웨어 산업에서 특허를 둘러싼 이론과 현실이 어떻게 진화하여 왔는지를 법적, 경제적 측면에서 통합적으로 살펴본다. 이를 위해 미국을 중심으로 소프트웨어 특허에 대해 전개된 법률적 판단의 주요 사례를 분석하고, 그 과정에서 제기된 경제적 주장의 배경 논리를 소프트웨어 산업의 본원적 특성에 대한 이해를 바탕으로 종합적으로 모색한다. 이러한 연구는 우리나라 특허제도가 역사적으로 미국 특허제도로부터 많은 영향을 받아온 점, 그리고 우리나라의 경영학 및 경제학 문헌에서 관련 논의가 부족한 현실을 감안할 때 중요한 의의를 지닌다.

• 의료법학
• /
• 제10권2호
• /
• pp.343-405
• /
• 2009

This paper is to discuss essential business of hospital business. While the labor world and ILO made continuous recommendation for improvements towards the compulsory arbitration system along with the controversy over unconstitutionality of the system, the Constitutional Court ruled that the system is constitutional on December 23, 1996(90hunba19) and on May 15, 2003 (2001hunga31). Despite this decision from the Constitutional Court, there has been much controversy over whether the compulsory arbitration system infringes the rights of collective action against the principle of trade union & labor relations adjustment which allows Commissioner of the Labor Relations Commission to decide on submission of arbitration by virtue of his/her authority in case where industrial disputes take place in the essential public-service businesses. The revision on the above provision was closely examined from the year 2003 and an agreement was made on the abolition of the compulsory arbitration system and the introduction of essential business with a grand compromise among labor unions, employers and the government on September 11, 2006 followed by revision(Essential business system enacted on January 1, 2008) of the Trade Union & Labor Relations Adjustment Act on December 30 in the same year. Accordingly, in order to perform the essential business, parties to labor relations must have an agreement or obtain a decision by the Labor Relations Commission before taking industrial actions. This paper firstly examined the concept of essential public-service businesses and essential business, legal meaning of essential business, procedures for making agreement and decision and legal effects. Secondly it intensively explored a theory against the principle of the legality which was raised from some part of society. In other words, it is claimed that a theory against the principle of the legality is not consistent with the rule of legislation and some abstract wording is against void for vagueness doctrine because part of crime constitution requirements is delegated to the Presidential Decree or to consultation among parties to labor relations. But analysis on the rule of legislation and void for vagueness doctrine reflected in the decision by the Constitutional Court led that argument for a theory against the principle of the legality is not reasonable. Close examination was done on a formal act of essential business agreement and necessity of prior agreement before submission of decision to the Labor Relations Commission which might have difficulties in performing work. In addition, an example agreement on hospital essential business is attached to help you understand this paper better.

• 법제연구
• /
• 제44호
• /
• pp.211-239
• /
• 2013

우리정부는 AFoCO 협정의 이행을 위한 상설 행정조직으로서 AFoCO 사무국을 국내에 유치하였다. 그럼에도 불구하고 우리 정부는 공식적으로 국제기구를 인정하는 기준을 마련하고 있지 않은 상태이며, 국제기구가 국내에서 법인격을 가지고 활동할 수 있는 국내법적 근거나 정부부처 차원의 국제기구 등록이나 국제기구 공인을 위한 법제도적 장치가 없는 현실이다. 이 글은 AFoCO 사무국의 국제기구로서의 지위를 설명하는데 필요한 국제법 이론과 국제기구의 국내법적 지위와 관련된 미국과 일본 등 선진국의 국제기구관련 국내 법제를 실증적으로 검토하였다. 이를 통해 우리나라의 글로벌화 추세 속에 향후 지속적으로 추진될 국제기구의 국내유치에 따른 국제기구 사무국의 국제법적 지위와 국내법인격의 문제의 해결을 위한 시사점을 찾고자 하였다. AFoCO 사무국은 한국과 아세안 회원국정부가 당사국이 되어 합의를 도출하고 국제법의 규율을 받는 조약으로 성립된 AFoCO 협정을 체결하여 설립되었다는 점, 국제기구는 당해 기구의 설립을 위한 국제법적 문서에 의하여 명시적으로 법인격이 부여되지 않아도 설립목적의 달성을 위해 필요한 범위 내에서 법인격을 보유한다는 묵시적 권한이론 등을 고려할 때 국제기구로서의 지위를 가지며 법인격을 향유한다. 따라서 AFoCO 사무국은 산림분야에 있어서 한국과 아세안 국가들 간의 협력사업 수행을 목표로 하는 행정적 기관으로서 한국과 아세안 회원국들이 당사국인 다자간 지역 국제기구라고 할 수 있다. 하지만 우리 정부가 글로벌 시대에 부응하여 좀 더 많은 국제기구를 적극 유치하고자 한다면 유치하는 국제기구에 대하여 사례별로 또는 국제법 이론에 근거하여 국제기구로서의 지위를 갖도록 할 것이 아니라 외교부 소관의 법률로 가칭 '국제기구 유치지원에 관한 법률'을 제정하여 명시적인 국내법 규정에 근거하여 국내 유치 국제기구에 대한 법적 지위를 부여할 뿐만 아니라 국제기구를 국내에 적극적으로 유지하도록 지원하는 방안을 모색해야 할 것이다.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈C:초등수학교육
• /
• 제2권2호
• /
• pp.85-102
• /
• 1998

Since textbooks for elementary school mathematics in accordance with the seventh curriculum are 'Class I' textbooks, which are used as one and only one textbooks throughout the country, the following aspects have been considered： In the legal aspect, the contents including the curriculum for mathematics asked of the Writing Committee by the Ministry of Education were reflected; in the aspect of theory of mathematics education, the textbooks are written in a way appropriate to theory of mathematics education; and in the aspect of application of reality, the textbooks are written to help improving mathematics education in classrooms. Therefore, the main frame of writing the textbooks is to make students feel proud enough to say "I have done mathematics", through helping students rationally solve problems surrounding them by themselves with their experiences and activities. In the above viewpoint the following sentence is reflected upon: "Hundred explanations are not equal to one manipulation activity."

• 전기학회논문지
• /
• 제60권11호
• /
• pp.2165-2170
• /
• 2011

The separate order for the electrical work is an institutional plan to improve the electrical construction quality and strengthen the competitiveness of the electrical contractors. The systematic approach for the policy implementation of the separate ordering system can make its adaptability higher and lead to a policy success. There are many kinds of effects on the implementation of the separate order, but institutional foundation is needed for increasing the policy adaptability. The necessity of the systematic and theoretical foundation was detected in various factors by considering policy implementation theory. In order to fix the separate ordering system, reasonable methods such as finding inducements and offering incentive are more effective than legal procedures. At last, a variety of policy adaptability plans must be founded in order to invigorate the separate ordering system in a view of the policy implementation.

• 의료법학
• /
• 제10권2호
• /
• pp.85-113
• /
• 2009

In this paper, the Judgment 2007DA76290 of the Korean Supreme Court was analysed in two points of the legal theory and litigation. The judgment arouses some issues of medical malpractice liability. They includes the concept of the complications and permanent lesion and the difference between them, some problems in a judge's applying the requirements for the physician's tort liability to the medical malpractice situations, the theory of obligation de moyens related with the burden of proof of the negligent conduct for a physician's liability for misperformance of contract, the influence of a patient's physical conditions on the physician's liability, the breach of duty to disclose in selecting the safer one of the treatment methods bringing about the complications or leaving the permanent lesion and so on. In the situations of the case referred to above, the plaintiff should have tried to establish that a reasonable physician in the specific situation of the case would have substituted the safer method of treatment for the method in the case. If the plaintiff had succeeded in establishing it, he or she could have recovered even the physical harm resulting from the permanent lesion brought about by the complications of the specific treatment in the case. The plaintiff failed to do so and recovered only the emotional distress which the patient suffered owing to the physician's breach of the duty to disclose. Therefore the legal malpractice of the counsel might be found in this case.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.157-179
• /
• 2004

Currently major countries, including the USA, have developed and contrived to activate ADR(Alternative Dispute Resolution) in order to both choose effective means for dispute resolution and establish the reformation of the judicial system; thus meeting people's revamped expectations due to the rapid increase of, and diversification in, civil disputes. This is why there has been some haste in many countries to organize systems for this, so called, 'the Fundamental ADR Act' which regulates the essential structure to accelerate the use of ADR and strengthen the links with trial procedures. For example, in 1999 Germany revised it Civil Procedure Act, to allow for a pre-conciliation process in cases involving only small sums of money. Whilst, with regard to the Civil Procedure Act in France, new regulations have been introduced with regard to actions before either a suit or return to conciliation. In the United Kingdom, as far back as 1988, additions to the legal structure allowed for expansion of regulations applying to ADR. By 1999 the new ADR regulations were part of the legal structure of the UK Civil Procedure Act. The USA passed the federal law for ADR in 1998. Since then the world has tried to enact this model in UNCITRAL on international conciliation. When we consider this recent trend by the world's major countries, it is desirable that the fundamental law on ADR should be enacted in Korea also. This paper traces the object, and the regulatory content required, for the fundamental ADR law to be enacted in Korea's future. Firstly, the purpose of the fundamental ADR law is limited only to the private sector, including administrative and excluding judicial sector and arbitration, because in Korea the Judicial Conciliation of the Civil Disputes Act, the Family Disputes Act and the Arbitration Act already exist. Secondly I will I examine the regulatory content of the basic ADR Act, dividing it into: 1)regulations on the basic ideology of ADR, 2)those on the transition to trial procedures of ADR, and 3)those on the transition to ADR from trial procedures. In addition I will research the regulatory limitations of ADR.

• 정보보호학회논문지
• /
• 제34권2호
• /
• pp.347-363
• /
• 2024

국가정보통신기반시설을 대상으로 하는 사이버공격이 꾸준히 증가함에 따라, 많은 국가들이 관련정책 및 법제도의 제정과 개정을 통해 국가정보통신기반시설의 보호를 강화하고 있다. 이에 본고는 국가정보통신기반시설 보호체계를 구축하고 있는 미국, 영국, 일본, 독일, 호주 등의 국가를 선정하여, 국가별 국가정보통신기반시설 보호정책의 추진체계를 비교·분석하고자 한다. 국가정보통신기반시설 보호체계를 사이버보안 체계와 비교하고 추진 구조를 분석하고 앨리슨 이론(Allison's theory)과 나카무라&스몰우드 이론(Nakamura & Smallwood's theory)을 수정한 정책모형이론에 근거하여 정책결정과 정책집행의 관점에서 국가별 추진체계모형을 분석하였다. 미국, 일본, 독일, 호주의 정책추진 모형은 정책결정과 정책집행이 모두 국가정보통신기반시설 보호 중심으로 체계화된 체계강화모형이며, 영국, 한국의 정책추진 모형은 보다 정책집행에 초점이 맞춰진 집행중심모형으로 나타났다.