• International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security
• /
• 제22권7호
• /
• pp.327-331
• /
• 2022

The article aims at studying the institution of human rights in an ever-evolving world in the context of the interdisciplinary approach. The main scientific method was deduction that allowed examining the specific interdisciplinary approach in relation to the institution of human rights on the global scale. To solve the issue set, it is necessary to study legal foundations and features of the interdisciplinary approach to the institution of human rights in the modern world. The article proves there is no theoretical anthropological understanding of the institution of human rights. It has been concluded that the appeal to anthropological jurisprudence requires the identification of the initial theoretical and methodological principles, parameters and axioms of cognition, the integration of a person into the subject field of legal science, linking jurisprudence with the chosen external environment (philosophy, sociology, theology, etc.), predetermining the existence (understanding) of a person, causing qualitative differences and the structure of subject-methodological phenomena. In addition to the identification of such hypotheses, prerequisites and axioms, the basic method (principle) of cognition and its heuristic potential are also being searched (defined). The terminological designation of the formed subject-methodological phenomenon (legal anthropology, anthropology of law, anthropological approach, etc.) reveals its role in the system of interdisciplinary relations of legal science.

• International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security
• /
• 제22권11호
• /
• pp.199-203
• /
• 2022

The article aims at studying the institution of human rights and civil freedoms with due regard to the anthropological approach in the theory of law. To the greatest extent, the provisions of non-classical legal science are confirmed in the Anglo-Saxon legal family, which endows the judge with law-making functions. In this regard, the role of a person in the legal sphere is increasing. The main research method was deduction used to study the anthropological approach to the institution of human rights and freedoms. The article also utilizes the inductive method, the method of systematic scientific analysis, comparative legal and historical methods. To solve the task set, the authors considered the legal foundations and features of human rights and freedoms in the modern world. The article proves that the classical legal discourse, represented by various types of interpretation, reduces the rule of law to the analysis of its logical structure and does not answer the questions posed. It is concluded that the prerequisite for the anthropological approach in the theory of law is the use of human-like concepts in modern legislation (guilt, justice, peculiar ferocity, child abuse, willful evasion, conscientiousness).

• 한국교육학연구
• /
• 제23권2호
• /
• pp.131-155
• /
• 2017

본 연구에서는 '인성'이란 무엇인지를 '문질빈빈(文質彬彬)'을 통해 고찰하고 그것이 삶, 문화, 교육과 어떤 관계를 형성하고 있는지에 관해 밝힘으로써 교육인류학적 함의를 모색해 보고자 했다. 연구결과, 문적인 측면에서 '인성'에는 인간다운 면모와 자질, 성질과 성품, 그리고 덕성의 의미가 내포되어 있으며, '인성교육'을 위해서는 더불어 조화롭게 사는 능력과 같은 사회적 맥락을 고려한 윤리의식을 학교에서 교육할 필요가 있다는 것을 알 수 있다. 질적인 측면에서는 인성의 본질인 '인성다움'을 통해 인성의 선천적인 측면과 후천적인 측면의 양면성을 살펴봄으로써 인성이 양자 모두를 총칭하는 개념임을 확인할 수 있으며, 외부환경에 의해 인성이 영향을 받는다면 교육을 통해 더 나은 방향으로의 개선 가능성을 타진해 볼 수 있다. 그리고 '덜 나은 인간'에서 '더 나은 인간'으로의 목표를 달성하기 위해 교육의 역할이 요청될 수밖에 없으며, 가정 및 학교 교육이 수반되어야만이 인성에 긍정적인 영향을 미칠 수 있다. 가족 간의 인간애에 대한 정직한 마음은 곧 바른 인성이며, 이러한 인성으로 인해 가정을 지키게 되고 사회 질서 유지에 일조한다는 논리가 현대의 법문화전통에까지 영향을 미침으로써 인성의 중요성이 우리 사회에서 인정되고 보호되어야 할 가치로서 여겨지고 있다. 따라서 교육인류학을 통한 학문적 접근은 교수자와 학습자에 대한 인성과 교육, 그리고 문화 간의 관계를 탐색하는 데에 충분한 시론(試論)적 가치가 있으며 학문적 기초를 제공해 주기에도 적절하다고 본다.

• 비교문화연구
• /
• 제30권
• /
• pp.31-51
• /
• 2013

In this paper, I approach corporate social responsibility as a discourse metadiscursively shaping the social relationship between corporations and society. Using a discourse-centered approach to culture, I examine how early discussions (involving legal disputes) on the rights of corporations to give evolved into a public sphere discussion as to how corporations can be viewed and redefined as social actors with capabilities to perform socially meaning actions, which here is "responsibility." I discuss how corporate social responsibility currently operates as a metadiscourse of corporate personhood, ethics, and corporate citizenship. Then, using insights from Mauss, I analyze how corporate social responsibility might be comparable to a Maussian gift exchange. Corporate social responsibility actions that are performed, indeed, are gift exchanges in that they involve the ideology of the free gift and the implicit expectation of a return to the giver. In the meantime, I argue, that in the case of corporate social responsibility, it is not the act of giving gifts (e.g., grants) that can lead to social alliances but rather the talk of gift giving, a departure from the ceremonial gift exchanges observed by Mauss. That is, here, the talk of giving shapes social alliances, thus displacing this function from the act of giving itself. The PR strategies deploy talk of the gift as a metapragmatic strategy, inviting various forms of role alignment on the part of diverse, potential and actual, participants, in a framework of corporate-sponsored gift exchange in which potential recipients compete, again at the level of metapragmatic description, to become the chosen gift recipient.