• 전기저널
• /
• 1호통권85호
• /
• pp.78-80
• /
• 1984

• 한국신뢰성학회지:신뢰성응용연구
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.12-18
• /
• 2015

TRIZ is one of the most famous tools for creative problem solving. However, it is said that TRIZ is complicated and difficult to understand and apply to solve problems. In order to resolve these difficulties, this paper presents S-ARIZ, a simplified ARIZ(the algorithm for inventive problem solving). S-ARIZ revised ARIZ-85C on two ways. First, cause and effect analysis is used to define core technical contradictions and control parameters for the physical contradictions. Second, we add 5 inventive principles which revised SIT(systematic inventive thinking) partially to IFR-1 definition (Step 3-2 of ARIZ-85C) to solve the intensified technical contradictions systematically and effectively. It is expect that S-ARIZ can contribute to the rapid spread of TRIZ.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.111-130
• /
• 2012

Judgment on the validity of patents on the subject of an arbitration does not. In other words, the occurrence of patents generated by the administrative action, and such administrative action by an authorized agency may be treated as legitimate until it is canceled. However, recent Supreme Court judgment on novelty and inventive step as well as judgments about the validity of the patent also made possible by the judiciary. This progress even in the mediation of an arbitral award which is premised on the validity of patents can be seen that possible. However, if the arbitration by an arbitrator if possible a certain portion of the limit exists. In other words, the effect of arbitration between the parties is valid. This patent is valid and invalid in arbitration even if the judgment relative to the effect ceases. In addition, the arbitration award and patent invalidation trial is in progress at the same time, if you consequently will reach a different conclusion. This can cause problems of double track. In addition, by extending the critical target recognition and enforcement in other countries can cause problems. Despite these problems, now about the validity of patents that it is possible intervention is necessary to discuss again.

• 한국산업융합학회 논문집
• /
• 제23권1호
• /
• pp.33-39
• /
• 2020

In this research, Many people understand that the (accidental) tip and the "analogy" that leads to it have played a central role in many instances of creative problem solving.And it has been pursued as a way to get more hints to make a 'knowledge base' which is a collection of many cases. The Unified Systematic Inventive Thinking (USIT), which makes it easier to apply TRIZ, will seek out various ideas through a process of analyzing the current system and examining the ideal system more clearly. In this paper, we describe the rationale and application procedure of the "6 step thinking method" which improves the "4 step thinking method".

• 전자통신동향분석
• /
• 제12권6호통권48호
• /
• pp.136-149
• /
• 1997

본고에서는 발명명세서의 질적향상을 도모하고 진보성에 대한 거절을 명세서 작성시부터 극복함을 통해 권리획득 기간을 줄이기 위하여 특허의 요건인 진보성에 대하여 그 개념파악과 특허청 심사실무를 검토하고 그 대책을 강구하였다. 결국, 출원 명세서의 내용이 목적, 구성, 효과 측면에서 목적의 특이성과 구성의 곤란성, 효과의 현저성이 진보성 있는 발명임을 고려하여 해당기술분야 통상의 지식을 가진 제3자가 용이하게 알 수 있도록 해야 하며, 선행기술을 조사 분석하여 인용예가 발생하지 않도록 주의를 기울여야 할 것이다.

• 한국생산제조학회지
• /
• 제19권1호
• /
• pp.50-56
• /
• 2010

This paper presents a new design algorithm for piece-removing dynamical system, based on 6-Sigma DMADOV technique using ARIZ and Brainstorming. Our design target is the piece-removing system installed on a mobile platform of bead-grinding equipment. The 6-Sigma DMADOV technique guides us design process according to 6 steps, i.e., Define - Measure - Analyze - Design - Optimize - Verify. A Design strategy to reduce the weight of piece-removing dynamical system will be explored by using ARIZ, i.e.,(the abbreviation of Algorithm for Inventive Problem Solving in Russian). The ARIZ will result in a final solution that the height and angle control parts for a cutting tool should be replaced by a kinematical approach, rather than complicated mechatronic approach(using motors). The Optimize step is composed of two sub-steps: (i) Generating process for obtaining several ideas of piece-removing system by using Brainstorming technique, satisfying the final solution derived from the Design step using ARIZ, and (ii) Optimizing process for selecting the most optimal idea of piece-removing system by using Pugh's matrix from the viewpoints of weight, cost and accuracy. The laststep of Verify has shown that the final design obtained by the 6-Sigma DMADOV technique with ARIZ & Brainstormingcan improve an initial design with design requirements satisfied. In this paper, we have shown that ARIZ and Brainstorming can be cooperatively merged into 6-Sigma DMADOV to give us both a formulatedproblem-solving approach and diverse candidate solutions(or ideas) without trial-and-error efforts.

• 한국CDE학회논문집
• /
• 제12권6호
• /
• pp.461-465
• /
• 2007

There have been 3E problems of energy, economy and environment since the earth has its history. Especially, the energy and environment problems have been getting serious after the modem industry revolution. Therefore, the demand of gas as an eco-friendly energy source is getting increased. With the demand of gas, the installation and use of gas boiler is also increased, so human life injury by the waste gas(CO) of boiler goes on increasing every year. It is the content about a life of the exhaust tube which is used at Gas boiler in this paper. We explain also the course to apply the 6SC(6 Step Creativity)of practical TRIZ and evaluate the resolution.

• 동력기계공학회지
• /
• 제19권2호
• /
• pp.15-21
• /
• 2015

Bollard installed on the street is a facility that protects pedestrians by restraining cars from entering on the sidewalk. It is basically classified into manual, semiautomatic, automatic type and mostly manual type is widely used because the automatic type is imported and much expensive. However, in case of manual handling type in practice, it is very troublesome and difficult to remove it whenever cars are permitted, and in case of automatic type, since underbody of a bollard is very long, it is difficult to dig a deep hole in the ground because a pipe, a hose or a cable is under the surface. In order to reduce these difficulties, this paper proposed new design of the multistage bollard that moves up and down automatically by using hydraulic system. This is developed by 6 step creativity of TRIZ inventive problem solving and structural analysis. The developed bollard can be installed in shallow hole and allow entry of vehicles through up-and-down movement without its removal manually. Finally, we could see smoothly motion through the manufactured bollard.

• 반도체디스플레이기술학회지
• /
• 제7권1호
• /
• pp.59-65
• /
• 2008

There are no products, systems to manage health and detect security for infant, the old and the weak in Korea. Recently, the concerns of parents are increasing more about all of children(baby, infant, etc) because rate of birth is decreasing gradually. Also, the average span of human life is on an increasing trend according to well-being and evolution of medical treatment. Therefore, this treatise analyzed problems in managing and following-up infant, the old and the weak at present. By using TRIZ to solve problems, we devised new conceptional ideas, detail designs to manage health, detect security, cope with correspondences for them and developed the prototype and tested it. Excellent performances are proved through various field test.

• 법제연구
• /
• 제41호
• /
• pp.201-228
• /
• 2011

대법원은 97후2200에서 균등관계가 성립하기 위한 5가지 요건을 제시하였다. 이 중에서 세 번째 요건인 '치환자명성'이 특허요건 중 하나인 진보성을 판단할 때의 자명성과 같은 수준의 것으로 해석할 수 있는 것인지의 여부에 대하여 논쟁이 있다. 이들을 다르게 해석해야 한다는 입장에서는, 치환자명성 요건이 자명성 요건에 비하여 협소하다고 설명한다. 그리고 이들을 동일하게 볼 경우 특허발명에 대하여 진보성이 인정되지 않는 한 모두 균등영역에 포함되는 것으로 보게 되어 균등침해의 영역을 과도하게 확장하게 되는 문제가 있다고 한다. 반면에 이들을 같은 정도의 것으로 해석해야 한다는 입장에서는, 특허발명으로부터 용이하게 실시할 수 있는 기술 즉, 특허발명에 대하여 진보성이 없는 영역에 속하는 확인대상발명은 모두 균등침해에 해당하는 것으로 보아야 한다고 주장한다. 또한 균등론상 치환자명성과 진보성의 자명성을 서로 다르게 해석할 경우 특허법이 작용할 수 없는 소위 '회색영역'이 존재하게 되는 문제가 있다는 점을 지적한다. 이러한 견해의 차이는 권리범위확인 또는 균등론에 의한 침해 여부를 판단함에 있어서 상반되는 결과를 가져올 수 있다. 즉, 치환자명성 요건을 자명성 요건보다 좁게 보는 경우는 이들을 동일하게 보는 경우에 비하여 특허권의 권리범위를 좁게 해석하기 때문에 회색영역에 속하는 확인대상발명에 대하여 침해를 부인하게 된다. 그러나 반대로 이들을 동일하게 보는 경우 회색영역은 사라지고 확인대상발명은 균등론에 의하여 침해의 영역에 속하게 된다. 이 논문은 이러한 문제를 해결해 보고자 하는 시도에서 출발한 것이다. 이를 위하여 특허요건의 진보성 판단과 균등론의 치환자명성 판단을 각각 검토하고, 이들을 동일하게 보는 경우와 다르게 보는 경우를 기술혁신의 경제학적 관점에서 서로 대비한 결과 동일하게 보는 것이 합리적이라는 결론을 얻을 수 있었다.