• 대한치주과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한치주과학회 2005년도 제45회 종합학술대회 연제초록
• /
• pp.225-225
• /
• 2005

• 대한치과의사협회지
• /
• 제47권4호
• /
• pp.184-190
• /
• 2009

OBJECTIVE The purpose of clinical study was to evaluate the survival of dental implants used in restoring patients with implant supported removable partial dentures (ISRPDs) of different configurations. MATERIALS AND METHODS The sample consisted of 20 consecutively treated partially edentulous patients, who, between 2003 and 2008, had a total of 84implants placed in different arch sites and who were treated with ISRPDs. The mean age was 57 years. Mean follow up time from delivery of ISRPDs was 3 years 2 months (range, 1 to 6 years). Osseointegration failure, postoperative complication of dental prosthesis, and the success rate of ISRPDs were retrospectively evaluated using clinical and radiographic examination. RESULT The overall implant survival rate was 100%. During follow up, the one clasp of removable partial denture was broken in 1 year11 months after prosthesis delivery. All patients were satisfied with their prosthesis. CONCLUSIONS Implant supported removable partial dentures could serve as favorable prognosis. Careful patient selection, with an appropriate maintenance and recall system, is recommended to obtain satisfactory results.

• Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
• /
• 제45권5호
• /
• pp.260-266
• /
• 2019

Objectives: Dental implants shorter than 8 mm, called short dental implants (SDIs), have been considered to have a lower success rate than standard length implants. But recent studies have shown that SDIs have a comparable success rate, and implant diameter was more important for implant survival than implant length. Also, SDIs have many advantages, such as no need for sinus lifting or vertical bone grafting, which may limit use in medically compromised patients. Materials and Methods: In this study, 33 patients with 47 implants 7-mm long were examined over the last four years. All patients had special medical history and were categorized into 3 groups: systemic disorders, such as diabetes mellitus (controlled or uncontrolled), mental disability, and uncontrolled hypertension; oral cancer ablation with reconstruction, with or without radiotherapy; diverse osteomyelitis, such as osteoradionecrosis and bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw. Most of these patients have insufficient residual bone quality due to mandible atrophy or sinus pneumatization. Results: The implant diameters were 4.0 (n=38), 4.5 (n=8), and 5.0 mm (n=1). Among the 47 implants placed, 2 implants failed before the last followup. The survival rate of 7-mm SDIs was 95.74% from stage I surgery to the last follow-up. Survival rates did not differ according to implant diameter. The mean marginal bone loss (MBL) at 3 months, 1 and 2 years was significantly higher than at implant installation, and the MBL at 1 year was also significantly higher than at 3 months. MBL at 1 and 2 years did not differ significantly. Conclusion: Within the limitations of the present study, the results indicate that SDIs provide a reliable treatment, especially for medically compromised patients, to avoid sinus lifting or vertical bone grafting. Further, long-term follow-up is needed.

• Journal of Korean Dental Science
• /
• 제12권2호
• /
• pp.48-57
• /
• 2019

Purpose: To investigate whether there are specific surgical or clinical conditions where the use of autogenous bone (AB) is superior to the use of bone substitutes (BSs) for maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 386 implants after MSFA in 178 patients. The implants were divided into five groups according to the sinus graft material used. Risk factors for implant failure in MSFA, and correlation between residual bone height (RBH) and graft materials in terms of implant survival were investigated. To investigate risk factors for implant failure in MSFA, implant survival according to graft materials, patients' sex/age, surgical site, RBH, healing period prior to prosthetic loading, staged- or simultaneous implantation with MSFA, the crown-to-implant ratio, prosthetic type, implant diameter, and opposite dentition were evaluated. Result: The cumulative 2- and 5-year survival rates of implants placed in the grafted sinus (independent of the graft material used) were 98.7% and 97.3%, respectively. None of the investigated variables were identified as significant risk factors for implant failure. There was also no statistical significance in implant survival between graft materials. Conclusion: There were no specific surgical conditions in which AB was superior to BSs in terms of implant survival after MSFA.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제55권3호
• /
• pp.272-278
• /
• 2017

목적: 본 전향적 임상 연구의 목적은 고정성 보철물로 수복 된 Neobiotech 임플란트의 누적생존율 및 임플란트 실패의 위험 인자를 평가하는 것이다. 재료 및 방법: 본 연구는 고려대학교 구로병원 치과 센터에서 2009년 11월부터 2011년 11월까지 Neobiotech 임플란트와 임플란트 지지 고정성 보철치료를 받은 부분 무치악 환자 36명을 대상으로 시행하였다. 관찰 기간은 임플란트 식립일에서 2015년 12월 이전 마지막 방문일까지로 설정하였다. 임플란트 생존율은 Kaplan-Meier 방법을 이용하였으며, 임플란트 실패에 대한 위험 인자 평가는 다중 콕스 비례 분석을 이용하여 분석하였다 (P < .05). 결과: 36명의 환자에게 총 69개의 임플란트가 식립되었으며, 평균 관찰 기간은 45.9개월이었다. 총 69개의 식립된 임플란트 중에 2개의 임플란트가 하중을 가하기 전에 실패하여 97.1%의 5년간 누적 생존률을 보였다. 로그 랭크 테스트 분석 결과 상악에 식립된 임플란트는 하악에 식립된 임플란트보다 낮은 임플란트 생존율을 나타내었다 (상악=91.3%, 하악=100%, P < .05). 하지만 다중 콕스 비례 분석 결과 임플란트 위치와 임플란트 실패는 유의한 상관 관계가 나타나지 않았다 (P > .05). 결론: Neobiotech 임플란트의 5년간의 누적 생존율은 97.1%를 나타내었다.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제9권3호
• /
• pp.195-199
• /
• 2017

PURPOSE. The objective of this study was to determine the cumulative survival rate (CSR) and associated risk factors of Implantium implants by retrospective clinical study. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Patients who received Implantium implants (Dentium Co., Seoul, Korea) at Korea University Guro Hospital from 2004 to 2011 were included. The period between the first surgery and the last hospital visit until December 2015 was set as the observation period for this study. Clinical and radiographic data were collected from patient records, including all complications observed during the follow-up period. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to examine CSR. Multiple Cox proportional hazard model was employed to assess the associations between potential risk factors and CSR. RESULTS. A total of 370 implants were placed in 121 patients (mean age, 56.1 years; range, 19 to 75 years). Of the 370 implants, 13 failed, including 7 implants that were lost before loading. The 10-year cumulative survival rate of implants was 94.8%. The multiple Cox proportional hazard model revealed that significant risk factor of implant failure were smoking and maxillary implant (P<.05). CONCLUSION. The 10-year CSR of Implantium implants was 94.8%. Risk factors of implant failure were smoking and maxillary implant.

• Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science
• /
• 제38권4호
• /
• pp.669-678
• /
• 2008

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate 2 years cumulative survival rate of implants on augmented sinus area using MBCP, mixture of MBCP and ICB, and mixture of MBCP and autogenous bone by means of clinical and radiologic methods. Materials and Methods: In a total of 37 patients, 41 maxillary sinuses were augmented and 89 implant fixtures were installed simultaneously or after a regular healing period. The patients were divided in 3 groups: MBCP only, MBCP combined with ICB, MBCP combined with autogenous bone. After delivery of prosthesis, along 2 years of observation period, all implants were evaluated clinically and radiologically. And the results were as follows. Results: The results of this study were as follows. 1. A 2 year cumulative survival rate of implants placed with sinus augmentation procedure using MBCP was 97.75%. 2. Survival rate of implants using MBCP only was 97.62%, MBCP and ICB was 100%, MBCP and autogenous bone was 95%. There was no statistically significant difference between 3 groups. 3. Only 2 of 89 implants were lost before delivery of prosthesis, so it can be regarded as an early failure. And both were successfully restored by wider implants. Conclusion: It can be suggested that MBCP may have predictable result when used as a grafting material of sinus floor augmentation whether combined with other graft(ICB, autogenous bone) or not. And the diameter, length, location of implants did not have a significant effect on 2 year cumulative survival rate.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제4권4호
• /
• pp.210-217
• /
• 2012

PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to analyze the current literatures and to assess outcomes of implant treatment in patients with generalized aggressive periodontitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Studies considered for inclusion were searched in Pub-Med. The literature search for studies published in English between 2000 and 2012 was performed. Our findings included literature assessing implant treatment in patients with a history of generalized aggressive periodontitis (GAP). All studies were screened according to inclusion criteria. The outcome measures were survival rate of superstructures, marginal bone loss around implant and survival rate of implants. All studies were divided into two follow-up period: short term study (< 5 years) and long term study (${\geq}5$ years). RESULTS. Seven prospective studies were selected, including four short-term and three long-term studies. The survival rates of the superstructures were generally high in patients with GAP, i.e. 95.9-100%. Marginal bone loss around implant in patients with GAP as compared with implants in patients with chronic periodontitis or periodontally healthy patients was not significantly greater in short term studies but was significantly greater in long term studies. In short term studies, the survival rates of implants were between 97.4% and 100% in patients with GAP-associated tooth loss, except one study. The survival rates of implants were between 83.3% and 96% in patients with GAP in long term studies. CONCLUSION. Implant treatment in patients with GAP is not contraindicated provided that adequate infection control and an individualized maintenance program are assured.

• 구강회복응용과학지
• /
• 제25권3호
• /
• pp.267-277
• /
• 2009

구강 내 단일 치아를 상실한 경우 기존에는 고정성 보철물을 이용하여 수복하는 방법이 일반적이었지만, 최근에 와서는 임플란트를 이용하여 수복하는 것이 보편화되고 있다. 본 연구는 단일 치아 결손 시 $TiUnite^{TM}$ 표면 처리한 임플란트를 이용하여 수복한 경우를 후향적으로 조사하여 그 생존율을 분석한 것이다. 2002년 9월부터 2006년 12월까지 삼성서울병원에서 단일 치아 결손 부위에 식립된 총 269개의 $TiUnite^{TM}$ 표면 처리한 임플란트 중 21개는 인접한 임플란트가 있거나, 기록이 누락되거나 관찰 기간이 짧아 연구에서 제외되었다. 248개의 임플란트 중 상악에는 129개(52.0%) 하악에는 119개(48.0%) 식립되었다. 수술 부위에 치조골 재생술을 시행한 경우는 총 100개(40.3%)였으며, 상악동 거상술이 시행된 증례는 총 36개(14.5%)였다. 수술 당일부터 관찰 기간은 평균 $26.0{\pm}11.8$ 개월이었으며, 그 기간 동안 실패한 것으로 간주된 임플란트는 12개로 생존율은 95.2%였다. 그 중 상악에서 실패한 경우가 10개, 하악에서는 2개로 각각의 생존율은 92.2%, 98.3% 이다. 단일 치아 결손 시 $TiUnite^{TM}$ 표면 처리한 임플란트를 이용하여 수복한 경우 단기간 동안 높은 생존율을 보였다.

• 구강회복응용과학지
• /
• 제25권4호
• /
• pp.417-429
• /
• 2009

골유착성 임플란트가 소개된 이후로 부분 및 무치악 부위에서 사용되어 높은 성공률과 함께 예지성 있는 결과를 보여주는 치료방법으로 인정받고 있다. 그러나 국내에서 개발된 임플란트에 대해서는 임상적이고 객관적인 연구 자료가 불충분하다. 본 연구에서는 31명의 환자에게서 임플란트 경부에 미세나사를 지닌 임플란트 식립 후 평균 21개월의 기간 동안 임플란트의 생존율에 관한 조사를 시행하였고 부하가 가해지는 시점을 기준으로 12개월 간 변연골의 변화를 파노라마사진을 이용하여 측정 관찰하여 다음의 결과를 도출하였다. 총 96개의 임플란트에서 3개의 임플란트가 실패하여 96.9%의 생존율을 보였다. 50대 환자에서 85.7%로 가장 작은 생존율을 보였으며 성별 및 연령에 따른 생존율 및 변연골 흡수량에 대한 통계적 유의성은 존재하지 않았다. 상악에서는 95.7% 하악에서는 100%의 생존율을 보였다. 골이식 여부, 보철물의 종류, 매식체의 길이 및 직경에 따른 생존율의 차이는 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다. 기능 부하 후 임플란트 변연골 흡수량은 단일 금관 보철물이 연결 고정 보철물에 비해 증가된 양상을 보였으나 임플란트의 직경, 길이, 골이식의 유무, 식립위치에 의해서는 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다. 이 연구를 통해 경부에 미세나사를 지닌 임플란트 식립 후에 임플란트 변연골 흡수량은 비교적 적게 일어났으며 또한 안정적으로 유지되는 것이 관찰될 수 있었고 이에 따른 장기적인 추적관찰이 필요할 것으로 사료된다.