• 대한치과보철학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한치과보철학회 2002년도 춘계학술대회
• /
• pp.53-53
• /
• 2002

• 대한치과보철학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한치과보철학회 2002년도 춘계학술대회
• /
• pp.92-92
• /
• 2002

• 대한치과보철학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한치과보철학회 1999년도 Asian Academy of Prosthodntics. Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
• /
• pp.104-104
• /
• 1999

• 대한치주과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한치주과학회 2000년도 제40회 종합학술대회 연제초록
• /
• pp.111-111
• /
• 2000

• 대한치주과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한치주과학회 2006년도 제46회 종합학술대회 연제초록
• /
• pp.13-14
• /
• 2006

• 대한치과보철학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한치과보철학회 2004년도 춘계학술대회
• /
• pp.50-50
• /
• 2004

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제10권2호
• /
• pp.85-92
• /
• 2018

PURPOSE. This research evaluated clinical outcomes of two types of hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated implants: OT (Osstem TS III-HA, Osstem implant Co., Busan, Korea) and ZM (Zimmer TSV-HA, Zimmer dental, Carlsbad, USA). MATERIALS AND METHODS. The research was conducted on 303 implants (89 of OT, 214 of ZM), which were placed from January 16, 2010 to December 20, 2012. The prognosis was evaluated in terms of success rates, survival rates, annual marginal bone loss, and implant stability quotients (ISQ). The samples were classified into immediate, early, conventional, and delayed groups according to the loading time. RESULTS. Overall, there were no significant differences between OT and ZM in success rates, survival rates, and annual marginal bone loss, except for the result of secondary stability. OT showed $77.83{\pm}8.23ISQ$, which was marginally higher than $76.09{\pm}6.90ISQ$ of ZM (P<.05). In terms of healing periods, only immediate loading showed statistically significant differences (P<.05). Differences between OT and ZM were observed in terms of two indices, the annual marginal bone loss ($0.17{\pm}0.58mm/year$ < $0.45{\pm}0.80mm/year$) and secondary stability ($84.36{\pm}3.80ISQ$ > $82.48{\pm}3.69ISQ$) (P<.05). OT and ZM did not have any statistically significant differences in early, conventional, and delayed loading (P>.05). CONCLUSION. OT (97.75%) and ZM (98.50%) showed relatively good outcomes in terms of survival rates. In general, OT and ZM did not show statistically significant differences in most indices (P>.05), although OT performed marginally better than ZM in the immediate loading and 1-stage surgery (P<.05).

• Archives of Plastic Surgery
• /
• 제48권5호
• /
• pp.473-482
• /
• 2021

Background The increasing number of bilateral breast cancer patients has been accompanied by a growing need for bilateral mastectomy with immediate reconstruction. However, little research has investigated the complications and aesthetic outcomes related to bilateral reconstruction. Therefore, we analyzed retrospective data comparing the outcomes of bilateral reconstruction using deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps or implants. Methods This study included 52 patients (24 DIEP group and 28 implant group) who underwent bilateral mastectomy with immediate reconstruction between 2010 and 2020. Patient demographics, surgical characteristics, and complications were recorded. The difference between the left and right position of the nipple-areolar complex with respect to the sternal notch point at the clavicle was measured, and breast symmetry was evaluated. Results The average weight of breasts reconstructed with DIEP flaps (417.43±152.50 g) was higher than that of breasts with implants. The hospitalization period and operation time were significantly longer in the DIEP group. Early complications were significantly more common in the implant group (36.53%) than in the DIEP group. The angles between the nipples and the horizontal line were 1.09°±0.71° and 1.75°±1.45° in the DIEP and implant groups, respectively. Conclusions Although the surgical burden is lower, breast reconstruction using implants requires greater attention with respect to implant positioning, asymmetry, and complications than DIEP flap reconstruction. DIEP flap reconstruction has a prolonged operation time and a high risk of flap failure, but yields excellent cosmetic results and does not require intensive follow-up. Patients should be consulted to determine the most suitable option for them.

• Archives of Plastic Surgery
• /
• 제46권1호
• /
• pp.7-15
• /
• 2019

Breast animation deformity (BAD) has been reported to occur after submuscular implant placement following breast augmentation and immediate breast reconstruction. Despite its apparent impact on patients' quality of life, BAD has only recently become a topic of general concern. Its incidence and etiology have yet to be established. The aim of this systematic review was to identify papers that clearly defined and classified BAD and described how the degree of animation was assessed. We performed a search in PubMed and Embase. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria that described BAD after implant-based breast augmentation or immediate breast reconstruction were included. After screening 866 publications, four studies were included: three describing BAD after breast augmentation and one describing BAD after immediate breast reconstruction. The median percentage of patients with some degree of BAD was 58%. The highest percentages were found in patients operated on using the Regnault technique or the dual-plane technique (73%-78%). The lowest percentages were found following the dual-plane muscle-splitting technique (30%) and the triple-plane technique (33%). We found no studies meeting the inclusion criteria that analyzed BAD after prepectoral implant placement. This review of the current literature suggests that the degree of BAD is proportional to the degree of muscle involvement. Evidence is scarce, and the phenomenon seems to be underreported. Future comparative studies are warranted.

• Archives of Plastic Surgery
• /
• 제36권2호
• /
• pp.161-166
• /
• 2009

Purpose: Using the implant for the breast reconstruction still remains the options, despite the breast reconstruction using autologous tissue is an ideal method. In this study, we used AlloDerm$^{(R)}$ to extend subpectoral pocket for covering implants to reduce implant related complications. Met hods : From January 2005 to June 2007, 18 breasts in 16 patients were reconstructed using implant and AlloDerm$^{(R)}$ immediately after mastectomy. Hospital records, database files, and clinical photographs were reviewed. A ten - point scale was used to evaluate the patient's satisfaction, with a range from 2(poor) to 10(excellent). Results: Mean age of the patients was 38.7 years at the time of operation. Mean weight of removed breast tissue was 287g. AlloDerm$^{(R)}$ was used to extend subpectoral coverage. Any systemic complication was not reported. Breast complication was developed in 4 cases. Implant removal or change was not experienced. Conclusion: Immediate breast reconstruction using Implant is useful methods for certain conditions, when donor tissue is insufficient and breast is non ptotic with round shape. In those cases, extension of muscle coverage using AlloDerm$^{(R)}$ could reduce complications and lead more acceptable results.