• 구강회복응용과학지
• /
• 제22권2호
• /
• pp.161-171
• /
• 2006

Endosseous implants have restored normal function and dental health to many patients. When implants were introduced as an effective treatment modality, their efficacy was limited by the amount of available bone. Today, various grafting procedures can surgically create bone width and volume. Implants can be placed in more ideal locations for successful prosthetic reconstruction. The use of autogenous bone grafts represents the "gold standard" for bone augmentation procedures. Either intraoral or extraoral sites may be considered for donor sites. Alveolar ridge augmentation using autogenous bone block, can be done during implant placement or staged with implant placement, after bone graft healing. In the staged technique, a better implant positioning and the use of wide diameter implants are possible. Alveolar ridge augmentation using autogenous block graft is a predictable way of treatment, for the atrophic alveolar ridge before implant placement. The cases presented in this article clinically demonstrate the efficacy of using a autogenous block graft in generating effective new bone fill for dental implant placement.

• 대한치과의사협회지
• /
• 제57권3호
• /
• pp.149-160
• /
• 2019

Atrophic alveolar ridge of maxillary anterior area is commonly observed after the extraction of teeth in patients with severely compromised periodontal disease, causing difficulties with implant placement. Successful esthetics and functional implant rehabilitation rely on sufficient bone volume, adequate bone contours, and ideal implant positioning and angulation. The present case report categorized the ridge augmentation techniques using guided bone regeneration (GBR) on the maxillary anterior site by Seibert classification. Case I patient presented for implant placement in the position of tooth #11. The alveolar ridge was considered a Seibert classification I ridge defect. Simultaneous implant placement and GBR were performed. Eight months after implantation, clinical and radiological examinations were performed. Case III patient presented with discomfort due to mobility of the upper maxillary anterior site. Due to severe destruction of alveolar bone, teeth #11 and #12 were extracted. After three months, the alveolar ridge was considered a Seibert classification III ridge defect. A GBR procedure was performed; implantation was performed 6 months later. Approximately 1-year after implantation, clinical and radiological examinations were performed. During the whole treatment period, healing was uneventful without membrane exposure, severe swelling, or infection in all cases. Radiographic and clinical examinations revealed that atrophic hard tissues and buccal bone contour were restored to the acceptable levels for implant placement and esthetic restoration. In conclusion, severely resorbed alveolar ridge of the maxillary anterior area can be reconstructed with ridge augmentation using the GBR procedure so that dental implants could be successfully placed.

• 대한치과의사협회지
• /
• 제55권12호
• /
• pp.850-860
• /
• 2017

Orthodontic treatment with premolar extraction is usually performed to correct bialveolar protrusion. These methods require the use of stiff rectangular working archwire which requires lengthy alignment and leveling before insertion. In this case report, interproximal reproximation was performed instead of extraction. To establish clearance between the archwire and resin domes fixing the archwire, an archwire was inserted into a water-soluble tube before fabricating resin domes. This tube is solved away by the saliva. During fabrication of resin domes, the archwire was deflected intentionally reflecting the displacement of teeth from their ideal position. This can be called as deflection-based bonding (DBB) technique. DBB is different from conventional method of positioning the brackets on its ideal position and then inserting an archwire to align the brackets. Because the orthodontic force of the archwire comes from its deflection from passive configuration, deflecting an archwire as needed can move the teeth more predictably than just bonding brackets on its ideal position. Also, areas with good alignment before orthodontic treatment can be maintained simply by not deflecting the archwire during bonding in these areas. After initial alignment, interproximal reproximation was performed to create 4.8 mm space in the maxillary arch and 4.2 mm space in the mandibular arch. These spaces were closed using orthodontic mini-implant anchorage thus retracting the maxillary incisors 4 mm posteriorly accompanied with 0.7 mm and 0.3 mm distal movement of right and left molars. By using interproximal reproximation and water-soluble tube with DBB, mild bialveolar protrusion was successfully treated without extraction.

• 구강회복응용과학지
• /
• 제33권4호
• /
• pp.278-283
• /
• 2017

목적: 본 연구 목적은 이상적인 임플란트 근원심적 식립 위치 결정에 필요한 정보를 제공하기 위해서 콘빔형 전산화단층영상(cone-beam CT)을 사용하여 건강한 자연치열에서 백악-법랑 경계부와 치조골 흡수를 가정한 그 하방 2 mm에서 전치, 소구치, 대구치의 치간거리를 평가하는 것이다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 원광대학교 치과대학병원에서 cone-beam CT를 촬영한 건강한 치열의 200명 환자를 선정하였다. Cone-beam CT 이미지를 DICOM (digital imaging and communication in medicine) 파일로 전환하여, 3차원 영상으로 재구성하였고, cone-beam CT 이미지를 표준화하기 위하여 head reorientation을 시행한 후, 전용 소프트웨어를 이용해 재구성된 파노라마 이미지를 얻었다. 모든 계측은 3명의 치과의사에 의해 최적화된 파노라마 이미지 상에서 시행되었다. 결과: 백악-법랑 경계부에서 상악 평균 치간거리는 전치 1.84 mm, 소구치 2.07 mm, 대구치 2.08 mm 그리고 하악은 전치 1.55 mm, 소구치 2.20 mm, 대구치 2.36 mm였다. 백악-법랑 경계부 하방 2 mm에서 상악 평균 치간거리는 전치 2.19 mm, 소구치 2.51 mm, 대구치 2.60 mm 그리고 하악은 전치 1.86 mm, 소구치 2.53 mm, 대구치 3.01 mm였다. 결론: 자연치열에서 치간거리는 전치부보다는 구치부에서 더 컸으며, 백악-법랑 경계부보다 그 하방 2 mm에서 더 크게 나타났다. 전 치열에서 가장 좁은 곳은 하악 전치, 가장 넓은 곳은 하악 대구치였다.