• 한국생활과학회지
• /
• 제17권3호
• /
• pp.425-437
• /
• 2008

The global trend for women's policy has selected gender mainstreaming to change unequal gender relation. The gender mainstreaming means that the gender perspective is integrated into all policy processes to accomplish gender equality. In other words, 'gender' should be considered as a basic factor such as classes, regions, and races when a policy is established and implemented. The government has implemented various gender mainstreaming policies to integrate gender perspectives. This study is to examine officials' perception about various gender mainstreaming policies. The survey was conducted for Daejeon city officials (699 men and 457 women). Officials' perception is very important, because it is an important means used as a tool in shaping and implementing policies. Variables such as gender, age, position, length of service, work place, etc. were chosen and the differences between variables were analyzed. The analysis showed that gender mainstreaming policies were perceived as ones only for women. Therefore, various education programs according to gender, age, position and length of service should be developed to improve the effectiveness of gender mainstreaming policies. In addition, education programs for officials to improve gender sensitiveness should be developed and expanded.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.288-299
• /
• 2020

성 주류화 전략은 1995년 베이징에서 열린 제4차 UN 세계여성회의에서 공식화되었으며 빠르게 지구적으로 확산된 새로운 성평등 전략이다. 한국영화산업은 핵심창작인력인 감독, 작가, 프로듀서의 남녀 성비가 매우 불균형하다. 스태프도 여성직군과 남성직군으로 나뉘어 있으며 남녀 임금 격차도 나타난다. 한국영화산업에서 성평등을 이루어내기 위해서는 독립적인 의제설정과 핵심성과지표가 수반되는 성 주류화 전략의 수용이 필요하다.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제11권5호
• /
• pp.23-30
• /
• 2013

우리나라는 성평등 실현을 목적으로 성주류화 제도를 도입했다. 성주류화 실행이 체계적이고 지속적으로 작동되기 위해 가장 중요한 것은 모든 사회구성원과 조직, 다양한 집단의 적극적인 참여라 할 수 있다. 본 연구에서는 실효성 있는 성주류화 실행을 위해 여성, 소외계층, 교육기관, 직능단체, NGO, 전문가, 연구기관, 기업, 언론, 정부, 의회, 성별영향분석평가 센터 등이 참여하는 거버넌스 모형과 구축 방안을 제안한다.

• 한국사회복지학
• /
• 제43권
• /
• pp.76-105
• /
• 2000

In the last two decades, the welfare states have undergone the changes of restructuring towards two ways. One is a restructuring of workfare and the other is a restructuring of the gender model of welfare state. In Korea, the workfare is reflecting on the DJ Welfarism 'Productive Welfare', but the gender model has a little effect on the public policies. By the way, It is imported that has the gender perspective in approaching the self-supporting program in the public assistance representing of the DJ Welfarism. Because almost 60% of the beneficiaries of the program are women. The Gender-mainstreaming strategy criticizes for the laws, the public policies, the public programs that considered gender-neutral or gender-blinded, and then complete the equality between women and men through the modification or development of those. The approach of Gender-mainstreaming is very important strategy for not only women who are self-reliance recipient but also successful settlement of self-supporting program. Nowadays that program is not execute yet. Then we hardly have information about recipients and the results that expected from that. At this point of gender-mainstreaming, this report suggest the strategy to development and settlement of the self-supporting program in the basics of analysis for the low-income unemployed and the government policy response to unemployment. For the gender models of the self-supporting program, the most important thing is throwing the male breadwinner model and adoption the dural-earner model (the gender model) about that program. Then we must produce gender-statistics data, develop programs for public work, job replacement, job training, evaluating system, etc. with gender perspective.

• 과학기술학연구
• /
• 제14권2호
• /
• pp.251-280
• /
• 2014

과학기술의 젠더 불균형을 개선하기 위한 정책적 시도가 이루어져왔음에도 불구하고 한국 과학기술계에서 여성은 여전히 과소대표되고 있다. 과학기술 젠더 불균형 개선을 위해서는 인력 구조의 측면에서만이 아니라 조직 문화, 교육 제도, 연구 환경에 걸친 다양한 분야에서 젠더 포괄성이 성공적으로 증진된 사례를 모아 분석할 필요가 있다. 본 논문은 과학기술계의 젠더 불균형을 개선하기 위해 과학기술 교육, 연구, 직업적 환경의 전반에 걸쳐 시도된 국외의 성공적 사례들을 수집하였다. 논문의 주된 논의는 다음과 같다. 우선 성공적인 젠더 다양성 증진 사례들이 과학기술계의 제도적, 문화적 환경에 대한 성인지(gender-sensitivity)적 관점에 기반을 두고 있음을 논의하고자 한다. 다음으로 성인지 관점에서 출발한 젠더 불균형 개선 시도들이 일부 여성과학기술자들의 지위 향상을 넘어 과학기술의 개선에 기여할 수 있음을 논의할 것이다. 마지막으로 본 논문은 한국의 과학기술 젠더 불균형 개선을 위한 방안을 제시할 것이다.

• International Journal of Human Ecology
• /
• 제4권1호
• /
• pp.55-70
• /
• 2003

The purpose of this paper is to describe the situation of everyday life of women and men in Germany and gender related aspects. Therefore social demographical data, presented tv the Office for European Statistics, Luxembourg and by German statistical data, are used. Based on this data the different roles, responsibilities, and social positions of women and men are interpreted in the context of the idea of mainstreaming gender. In comparison to other European countries, especially to the Scandinavian countries, the situation of women in Germany still has to be improved. It is a prevalent problem for women to arrange family life and working career, because the gender-related role-allocation is still an issue. Women, who are involved in looking after children, are significantly less engaged in business life, as for men caring does not make a difference, whether they are employed or not. In addition to this fact women on average earn less than men, especially for women working in higher positions. To improve the situation of women and men the German government has initiated a ‘Gender Mainstreaming Policy’ in 2000 and has taken important legal measures which make it possible to reconcile family-life and gainful employment. For Home Economists there is a need to integrate the gender dimension into a household analytical approach.

• 대한가정학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한가정학회 2003년도 제56차 춘계학술대회
• /
• pp.1-11
• /
• 2003

The purpose of this paper is to describe the situation of everyday life of women and men in Germany and gender related aspects. Therefore social demographical data, presented by the Office for European Statistics, Luxembourg and by German statistical data, are used. Based on this data the different roles, responsibilities, and social positions of women and men are interpreted in the context of the idea of mainstreaming gender. In comparison to other European countries, especially to the Scandinavian countries, the situation of women in Germany still has to be improved. It is a prevalent problem for women to arrange family life and working career, because the gender-related role-allocationis still an issue. Women, who are involved in looking after children, are significantly less engaged in business life, as for men caring does not make a difference, whether they are employed or not. In addition to this fact women on average earn less than men, especially for women working in higher positions. To improve the situation of women and men the German government has initiated a 'Gender Mainstreaming Policy' in 2000 and has taken important legal measures which make it possible to reconcile family-life and gainful employment. For Home Economists there is a need to integrate the gender dimension into a household analytical approach.

• 이베로아메리카
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.31-72
• /
• 2020

본 연구는 국제규범과 개발협력의 영역에서 논의됐던 도시와 젠더주류화 전략의 개념 및 정책적인 요소를 멕시코의 시각에서 고찰하고 멕시코의 법과 제도 및 멕시코시티의 주요 프로그램을 통해 젠더주류화 전략이 어떻게 통합, 실현되고 있는가를 분석하였다. 본 연구는 문헌 연구를 통해 기존 선행연구에서 다루었던 이론적인 논의를 발전시켰으며 현지 전문가, 정책 및 프로그램의 실무 담당자를 직접적으로 면담했으며 이러한 내용을 연구에 반영하여 현실적인 차원에서 정책적인 함의를 모색했다는 의미가 있다. 멕시코는 연방정부의 국가개발계획과 분야별 정책 및 프로그램에 젠더주류화 전략을 적용하고 있으며 이에 따른 예산의 배정과 평가체계의 구축을 통해 정책의 실효성을 확보하고 있다. 멕시코시티 정부 차원에서 여성과 남성의 실질적인 평등을 위한 법이 구축되어 있으며 노동법의 개혁, 정부프로그램과 도시개발프로그램에 젠더주류화 전략이 적용되고 있다. 또한 성별분리통계, 젠더현황 분석, 젠더훈련, 성인지 예산 등을 담당하는 국가여성연구소(INMUJERES), 멕시코 국립통계지리청(INEGI), 연방공공행정(APF), 재무와 공공차관부(SHCP), 멕시코시티 여성부 등 관련된 부서가 역할하고 있다. 이러한 측면에서 멕시코는 '젠더의 제도화과정' 이루어진 것으로 평가받고 있다. 이처럼 법, 제도의 틀 내에서 멕시코시티에서 추진되는 프로그램들은 도시라는 공간에서 시민으로서 여성의 권리를 실현하고 이들의 기본적인 필요를 충족하는 것을 목표로 하며 도시에 대한 권리의 실현을 위해 시민으로서 참여의 확대를 강조하고 있다. 특히, 멕시코시티 정부는 여성의 취약성을 경제, 공간과 시간의 영역에서 발생하고 있는 불평등으로 고려하면서 여성의 경제적인 자주권 강화에 초점을 두는 정책과 프로그램을 확대하고 있다.

• 대한가정학회지
• /
• 제42권2호
• /
• pp.195-212
• /
• 2004

This research is based on the survey of welfare beneficiaries, aiming to set up the gender-equal welfare policies. Through the survey, this research examines status of women in the family and society and also examines, the degree of perception of women's welfare policies, needs, and satisfaction. According to the survey results, the current welfare policies that are limited to needy women should expand its range, enforcing the infra structure. That employment policy for women turned out to be very important in welfare policies. Demand for more enlarged welfare policies is quite high, especially in housing, employment and elderly care. On the contrary, the degree of satisfaction degree appears quite low because of unrealistic welfare program and benefits. In order to improve the welfare policies, more active and realistic employment policies should be emphasized with the proper support for family life. To raise the status of women, proper policies for women's economic independence should be set up. In addition, consciousness of gender equality should be encouraged in the whole society. Also, women's participation in politics and decision-making process is necessary.

• Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia
• /
• 제18권1호
• /
• pp.94-123
• /
• 2019

Over the past few decades, gender equality has been considered one of the fundamental principles and a significant crosscutting issue in international development. However, beyond applying 'gender equality' as a policy buzzword, there has been a lack of critical reviews on how generally 'gender equality in education' is understood and constructed in Korea's development programs and projects. In this regard, this paper explores the use of vocabularies and semantic meanings of gender equality in the Korean Government's Academic Cooperation Program and its 52 projects. By applying mixed contents analysis as a method, the research resulted in several findings: first, the policy papers recently highlighted Korea's directions on gender mainstreaming and gender-sensitive approaches in international development. Second, 'integrating women and girls' into education institutions was emphasized in various projects; third, the term women rather than gender were used in the texts, highlighting their position as a 'marginalized group.' Lastly, there was a lack of evidence of projects dealing with changing gender-based power relations. The constructed gendered relations and powers were identified throughout projects, usually acting as barriers to project activities. However, they were only identified, not challenged, by the program. In conclusion, whilst Korean international development and educational development discourse actively embrace Women in Development (WID) and Gender and Development (GAD) in their programs, it is time to consider the issue of gender equality from different standpoints, such as identity, rights, and capabilities and a more active engagement with Korea's domestic issues in gender discourse and practices is also needed.