• 한국재료학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국재료학회 2008년도 추계학술발표대회 및 제15회 신소재 심포지엄
• /
• pp.37.1-37.1
• /
• 2008

• 대한용접접합학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한용접접합학회 2004년도 추계학술발표대회 개요집
• /
• pp.228-230
• /
• 2004

• 한국재료학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국재료학회 2003년도 추계학술발표강연 및 논문개요집
• /
• pp.89-89
• /
• 2003

• 한국재료학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국재료학회 2003년도 추계학술발표강연 및 논문개요집
• /
• pp.47-47
• /
• 2003

• 한국표면공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국표면공학회 2001년도 춘계학술발표회 초록집
• /
• pp.44-45
• /
• 2001

• 한국표면공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국표면공학회 2002년도 춘계학술발표회 초록집
• /
• pp.28-28
• /
• 2002

• 한국표면공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국표면공학회 1998년도 춘계학술발표회 초록집
• /
• pp.66-66
• /
• 1998

• Corrosion Science and Technology
• /
• 제10권1호
• /
• pp.1-5
• /
• 2011

The major purpose of the present study is to evaluate the performance of various galvanized (GI) or galvannealed (GA) mild steels and AHSS in stamping applications. Finite Element Analysis (FEA) of selected stamping operations was conducted to estimate the critical pressure boundary conditions that exist in practice. Using this information, laboratory tribotests, e.g. Twist Compression (TCT), Deep Drawing (DDT) and Strip Drawing (SDT) Tests, were developed to evaluate the performance of selected lubricants and die materials/coatings in forming galvanized steels of interest. The sheet materials investigated included mild steels and AHSS (e.g. DP600 GI/GA, DP780 GI/GA, TRIP780 GA and DP980 GI/GA). Experimental results showed that galvanized material resulted in more galling, while galvannealed material showed more powdering and flaking. The surface roughness and chemical composition of galvanized sheet materials affected the severity of galling under the same testing conditions, i.e. lubricants and die materials/coatings. The results of this study helped to determine the critical interface pressure that initiates lubricant failure and galling in stamping selected galvanized sheet materials. Thus, to prevent or postpone the critical interface conditions, the results of this study can be used to select the optimum combination of galvanized sheet, die material, die coating and lubricant for forming structural automotive components.

• 한국표면공학회지
• /
• 제31권6호
• /
• pp.371-378
• /
• 1998

The zind bate contaminated in the hot dip galvannealed operation was successfully by appling the dross formation mechanism ; the Fe content was lowered from 0.028% to 0.011% and the dress size was decreased from 15~20$\mu\textrm{m}$ to under 3$\mu\textrm{m}$. The cooled metal from CGL zinc bath during operation of the galvannealed steel strip was remelted in graphite crucible at the lab and agitated after increasing Al content from 0.14% to 0.16% with decreasing the molten metal temperature from $470^{\circ}C$to $445^{\circ}C$. The agitating was done by agitator and nitrogen. The molten was analyed by SEM and EDS. It was considered that the Fe and the bottom dross($FeZN_7$) could react with aluminium to from the float dress($Fe_2Al_5$) according to the molten metal temperature down and the float dress rise to the surface of the zine bath. So the Fe and dross in the bath could be romoved out of the bath. It was confirmed that the proper purication conditions of GA zine bath is 0.02% of Al increasing, bath temperature down from $460^{\circ}C$ to $450^{\circ}C$and agitator and nitrogen.

• 대한기계학회논문집A
• /
• 제32권12호
• /
• pp.1107-1114
• /
• 2008

This paper is aimed to understand the effect of different galvannealing temperatures on the frictional properties and Fe-Zn intermetallic phases of the galvannealed (GA) coatings on steel sheets. Their galvannealing treatments were conducted at 465, 505, 515 and $540^{\circ}C$ for about 10s in the additional heating furnace of an industrial continuous hot-dip galvanizing line. The mechanical and the frictional properties of the coatings were estimated using nanoindentation, nanoscratch, micro vickers hardness tests and flat friction tests, which were performed at contact pressures of 4, 20 and 80MPa. Also, the correlation between the microstructure and the frictional properties of the GA coatings were investigated by SEM observation for the cross-section of the GA coating after and before flat friction tests. The results showed that the mechanical and the frictional properties of the coatings are strongly dependent on their phase distributions and microstructure. Especially, in low contact pressure of 4MPa the frictional properties of the coatings were dependent on the surface phases and morphology, while in high contact pressure of 80MPa it was influenced by their mechanical properties based on the dominant phase distributions.