• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제15권5호
• /
• pp.2095-2100
• /
• 2014

Objective: Most patients with advanced breast cancer experience resistance to endocrine treatment and eventual disease progression. This meta-analysis was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of fulvestrant 250mg with anastrozole 1mg in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. Methods: Electronic literature databases (Cochrane Library, Medline, and Embase) were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published prior to August 2013. Only RCTs that compared fulvestrant 250mg to anastrozole 1mg in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer were selected. The main outcomes were time to treatment failure (TTF), time to progression (TTP), duration of response (DOR), clinical benefit rate, and tolerability. Results: Four RCTs covering 1,226 patients (fulvestrant, n=621; anastrozole, n=605) were included in the meta-analysis. Fulvestrant increased the DOR compared to anastrozole (HR =1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13-1.51). There was no statistically significant difference between fulvestrant and anastrozole in terms of TTF (HR=1.02, 95%CI 0.89-1.17), complete response (RR=1.79, 95%CI, 0.93-3.43), and partial response (RR=0.91, 95%CI 0.69-1.21). As for safety, there was no statistical significance between the two groups for common adverse events. Conclusion: Fulvestrant 250mg is as effective and well-tolerated as anastrozole 1mg treatment for advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women whose disease progressed after prior endocrine treatment. Thus, fulvestrant may serve as a reasonable alternative to anastrozole when resistance is experienced in breast cancer cases.

• 생명과학회지
• /
• 제24권2호
• /
• pp.173-180
• /
• 2014

에스트로겐은 조직세포의 유형과 이들의 생리적 상태에 따라 세포증식을 촉진 또는 억제 시킬 수 있으며, 주로 에스트로겐 수용체(ER)에 의해 매개되는 신호전달 경로를 통해 작용한다. 이 연구는 특히 유방암세포에서 ER에 대한 길항제로 잘 알려진 fulvestrant (Ful)가 CHO 세포주의 증식 및 세포사멸에 미치는 영향과 이들에 대한 $17{\beta}$-estradiol (E2)의 작용에 미치는 효과를 조사하고자 하였다. 이를 위하여 먼저 다양한 농도의 E2, Ful 및 E2 plus Ful의 처리기간에 따라 세포증식에 미치는 효과를 조사하였다. Cell proliferation 분석에서, 6-10일의 처리기간 동안 E2는 1 ${\mu}M$의 농도까지는 세포증식에 영향을 주지 않았지만, 15-40 ${\mu}M$에서는 처리기간의 증가에 따라 점진적으로 현저히 세포증식을 억제하였다. 흥미롭게도 Ful 또한 1 ${\mu}M$의 농도까지는 세포증식에 영향을 주지 않았지만, 10-40 ${\mu}M$에서는 농도 및 시간 의존적인 세포증식 억제효과를 보였다. 뿐만 아니라, Ful은 10일 동안 E2와의 혼합처리에서 E2에 의한 세포증식 억제효과를 감소시키기 보다는 오히려 증대시켰다. 따라서 Ful은 CHO 세포에서 E2의 항 증식작용에 대한 길항적 효과를 갖지 않음을 제시한다. 한편, E2 및 Ful에 의한 DNA 분절효과를 확인하기 위한 TUNEL assay에서 20 ${\mu}M$의 E2로 처리된 CHO 세포주에서는 DAPI로 염색된 거의 모든 핵에서 TUNEL 양성반응이 나타났으며, 40 ${\mu}M$ Ful 및 20 ${\mu}M$ E2 plus 40 ${\mu}M$ Ful로 처리된 CHO 세포주에서는 TUNEL 양성반응을 보였으나, E2 처리군과 비교하여 현저히 낮은 비율로 나타났다. 이러한 결과는 Ful이 CHO 세포에서 E2의 항증식작용에 대한 길항적 효과를 갖지 않으며, E2와 Ful에 의한 세포증식 억제와 DNA 분절을 통한 세포사멸 관련기전은 다른 신호전달 경로를 통해 매개됨을 시사한다.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제14권7호
• /
• pp.4049-4052
• /
• 2013

Resistance to chemotherapy treatment, which may lead to limited efficacy of systemic therapy in breast cancer patients, is multifactorial. Among the mechanisms of resistance to chemotherapy treatment, there are those closely related to estrogen receptor ${\alpha}$, P-glycoprotein, multidrug resistance-related protein, glutathione S-transferase pi and topoisomerase-II. $ER{\alpha}$ is ligand-activated transcription factor that regulates gene expression and plays a critical role in endocrine signaling. In previous preclinical and clinical studies, positive $ER{\alpha}$ expression in breast cancer cells was correlated with decreased sensitivity to chemotherapy. This article reviews current knowledge on the predictive value of $ER{\alpha}$ with regard to response to chemotherapy. Better understanding of its role may facilitate patient selection of therapeutic regimens and lead to optimal clinical outcomes.

• 운동영양학회지
• /
• 제24권4호
• /
• pp.24-27
• /
• 2020

[Purpose] Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) administration reportedly recovers osteoporosis, a bone disorder associated with bone deficiency in postmenopausal women. However, the physiological mechanism of DHEA in osteoporosis remains elusive, especially in terms of intestinal calcium absorption. Therefore, we investigated the effect of DHEA administration on calcium absorption in ovariectomized (OVX) female rats using an estrogen receptor antagonist. [Methods] Female Sprague-Dawley rats (n=23, 6 weeks old) were randomized into three groups: OVX control group (OC, n=7), OVX with DHEA treatment group (OD, n=8), and OVX with DHEA inhibitor group (ODI, n=8) for 8 weeks. [Results] Intestinal calcium accumulation, as well as the rate of absorption, demonstrated no significant differences during the experimental period among investigated groups. The bone mineral density (BMD) of the tibia at the proximal metaphysis was higher in the OD group than that in the OC group (p<0.05); however, BMD of the ODI group showed no significant difference from investigated groups. Furthermore, the BMD of the tibia at the diaphysis did not significantly differ among these groups. [Conclusion] We revealed that DHEA administration does not involve intestinal Ca absorption, although this treatment improves BMD levels in OVX rats. These observations indicate that the effect of DHEA on the bone in postmenopausal women is solely due to its influence on bone metabolism and not intestinal calcium absorption.