• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제39권5호
• /
• pp.423-429
• /
• 2015

The expansion on the scale of international trade and rapid economic growth in Northeast Asia have caused intense competition among global companies for securing international logistics center in Northeast Asia. Analyzing location competitiveness for international logistics center in Northeast Asia, this paper aims to extract implications for enhancing locational competitiveness. Employing the relative importance among location selection factors extracted from AHP analysis in prior study, we evaluated the major five port-cities in Northeast Asia including Busan, Gwangyang, Shanghai, Qingdao and Tokyo. In the evaluations, Shanghai (3.926) ranked as the first, followed by Busan (3.859), Qingdao (3.555), Tokyo (3.013) and Gwangyang (2.915). Furthermore, the causal relationships between determinants for location choice decision (logistics factor, cost factor, market factor, service factor and environmental factor) and dependent variables (competitiveness of international logistics center, potentiality to growth, present intention to move into and future plan to move into) were analyzed to provide implications. Results provide useful insights for further improvements, and helps strategic agenda for future development of port-cities.

• Journal of Korea Trade
• /
• 제24권3호
• /
• pp.20-36
• /
• 2020

Purpose - As the global product network expands through both internationalization and diversification of the multimodal transportation system, corporate strategies have shifted to emphasize the importance of a high value-added international logistics system. To guide policies and strategies to attract relevant industries, this study aims to analyze the location competitiveness of regional logistics distribution center to serve Northeast Asia. Design/methodology - Multi-criteria techniques are considered to offer a promising framework for evaluating decision-making factors. This paper employed an analytic hierarchy process to analyze the hierarchal structure of determinants for selecting the location of a regional logistics distribution center. Adopting both qualitative and quantitative evaluations, this study suggest political implications for a regional logistics distribution center development, such as the direction of political support, service differentiation and infrastructure development. Findings - This study developed a location competitiveness evaluation model, based on the case study of the major port-cities in Northeast Asia. Evaluation model incorporates five factors underpinning 17 components extracted using factor analysis. The results revealed that the logistics factor is the most significant factor for evaluating the competitiveness of a regional logistics distribution center. The remaining factors were market, costs, and services environment. Comparing qualitative and quantitative evaluations, results provide useful insights for a regional logistics distribution center development in Northeast Asia. Originality/value - This study revealed differences between qualitative and quantitative evaluations. The finding implies that prior works on evaluation models of competitiveness has not successfully measured the gap between quantitative data and expert' evaluations. To overcome this limitation, this paper considered both actual data such as actual distance, cost, the number of companies located, and expert opinions.

• 농업과학연구
• /
• 제45권4호
• /
• pp.871-878
• /
• 2018

The government of Gyeongbuk in Korea increased the financial input in the agricultural sector by 43% from 2008 through 2012. However, the productivity of the agricultural sector in Gyeongbuk rose only about 3.6% during the same period. This study evaluated the agricultural competitiveness of each city or county in Gyeongbuk using six evaluation indices (scale, productivity, finance input, location quotient, technical education, and total) and investigated the relationship between the indices and total values of agricultural productions. The results show that Sangju, Gyeongju, Andong, Uiseong, and Seongju have high competitiveness for the scale index. For the productivity index, Gimcheon, Mungyeong, Ulleung, Yeongju, and Seongju were highly evaluated. For the location quotient index, Yeongcheon, Uiseong, Cheongdo, Seongju, and Sangju have high competitiveness. Uiseong, Yeongdeok, Cheongsong, Gunwi, and Yeongyang were highly evaluated for the agricultural finance input index. For the agricultural technical education index, Chilgok, Sangju, Mungyeong, Uiseong, and Gyeongju have high competitiveness. Finally, Sangju, Euiseong, Yeongcheon, Gyeongju, and Andong were highly evaluated for the total competitive index, while Yeongdeok, Yeongyang, Goryeong, Uljin, and Cheongsong have a low competitiveness for the total competitive index. This study also found that out of five indices, scale, location quotient, and technical education indices have a positive and statistically significant effect on the total values of agricultural production. However, we did not find any statistically significant effect of the productivity and finance input indices on the total values of agricultural production. Hence, we can conclude that the government should focus their agricultural policy on scale, location quotient and education to improve total agricultural production.

• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제30권1호
• /
• pp.119-142
• /
• 2014

연구의 목적은 광양항을 사례로 항만 경쟁력에 영향을 미치는 요인들을 평가하고, 세부 평가요소의 우선순위에 따른 광양항의 경쟁력을 강화하기 위한 중요한 항만정책방향을 규명하는 데 있다. 논문에서는 의사결정기법인 AHP기법을 이용하여 항만입지, 항만운영관리, 항만비용, 항만시설, 배후지여건 등 5가지 주요 평가요인과 14가지 세부평가 요소에 대한 중요도를 파악하였다. 광양항의 항만경쟁력 평가를 위한 주요 평가요인의 중요도는 항만입지, 항만시설, 항만비용, 항만운영관리, 배후지여건 순으로 계산되었다. 세부 평가요소별 복합가중치를 이용한 종합중요도는 배후지역과 연결성, 국제항만과 접근성, 인센티브제도, 터미널의 시설용량. 항만운영인력의 전문성 숙련도, 등의 순서로 확인되었다. 광양항은 배후지와 연결성 및 국제항만과의 접근성을 강화하여 항만의 중심성과 중계성을 제고시겨 항만의 경쟁력을 강화해야 한다. 항만물동량을 창출하기 위해서 다양한 인센티브 제공과 항만비용을 절감시켜 국제거점항만으로서의 경쟁력을 증진해야 한다. 초대형 컨테이너선이 원활하게 하역작업을 수행하도록 하역시스템의 첨단화 및 효율화방안이 강구되며, 항만운영인력의 전문성과 작업도 향상을 위하여 다양한 방안들을 모색해야 한다. 연구의 결과는 관련 학계, 항만당국 및 항만공사 등에 광양항 발전전략에 대한 학술적이며 정책적인 시사점과 지식을 제공하고 있다. 대형항만의 경쟁력 평가에 필요한 이론의 형성, 간단한 분석방법의 틀을 제시하는 데도 연구의 의의가 있다.

• 한국항만경제학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국항만경제학회 2006년도 국제학술대회
• /
• pp.159-179
• /
• 2006

As the current trend to the main index of the port competitiveness evaluation, the competitiveness index of the port service comes to more important than the part of expense, location and facility. To reform the bottleneck of port has an effect on improving port service competitiveness. Therefore, this study shows the importance of analyzing bottlenecks on logistics to improve port competitiveness. It collected recent questionnaire data which are the subject as the Custom Service, the Chamber of Commerce and Industry, the Trade Association about bottlenecks of port logistics for working out bottlenecks of domestic port logistics and it produced the order of priorities of bottlenecks by multiplying each output priorities and weights of each process in user of Incheon inner-outer port which is focused on container freight by analysis of priority and Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP). Unlike existing studies, this study has important values. It presents the priority evaluation only focused on the container freight was produced by port users who are categorized into shipping company, terminal operation company and forwarder, car-ferry in Incheon inner-outer port and making a application of logistics process. It means internal and external competitiveness improvement plan can be presented more concretely and detailed than past competitiveness attributes such as location, facility, service and expense. If the analysis of port logistics bottlenecks which was focused on container freight is extended to the part of general cargo and sundries such as haul grain, car, scrap iron, those studies will be able to provide Incheon port users with useful information and a model of analyzing overall bottleneck of logistics in Incheon port.

• 수산해양교육연구
• /
• 제27권1호
• /
• pp.262-272
• /
• 2015

The aim of this study is to analysis factors that determine the competitiveness of container ports using the KJ and AHP methods. For this, 54 detailed attributing factors were identified both by previous studies and port users. 24 attributing factors were identified by a group of port experts. also, These were grouped 18 detailed attributing factors into 6 attributing factors by a group of port experts using the KJ method. These were made into a model of hierarchical structure with 3 levels, taking 1 goal factor, 6 evaluation factors and 18 detailed evaluation factors. The collected date of questionnaires were analyzed by a group of port experts using the AHP method. The analysis result of the evaluation factors in container port shows that port cargo volume is the most important factor, followed by port location, port cost, port service, port facility and port management. The analysis results of detailed evaluation factors in container port shows that import and export cargo volume is the most important factor, followed by transshipment cargo volume, distance from main trunk, cargo handling cost, distance from the point of importing and exporting, speediness of cargo handling, stability of cargo handling, vessel/cargo cost in port entry and leaving, punctuality in port entry and leaving, number and length of berth, collateral service cost, terminal area, hinterland accessibility, ability of terminal operation company, front depth of berth, etc.

• Journal of Information Processing Systems
• /
• 제19권4호
• /
• pp.407-416
• /
• 2023

In order to effectively relieve the traffic pressure of the city, ensure the smooth flow of freight and promote the development of the logistics industry, the selection of appropriate port logistics location is the basis of giving full play to the port logistics function. In order to better realize the selection of port logistics, this paper adopts the entropy weight method to set up a multi-dimensional evaluation index, and constructs the evaluation model of port logistics location. Then through the actual case, from the environmental dimension and economic competition dimension to make choices and analysis. The results show that port d has the largest logistics competitiveness and the highest relative proximity among the three indicators of hinterland city economic activity, hinterland economic structure, and port operation capacity of different port logistics locations, which has absolute advantages. It is hoped that the research results can provide a reference for the multi-dimensional selection of port logistics site selections.

• 대한안전경영과학회지
• /
• 제22권4호
• /
• pp.87-100
• /
• 2020

Economic Development Zone(EDZ) in the province is one of the foreign policy for economic development of North Korea. North Korea has promulgated 27 Economic Development Zones(5 EDZs as central level and 22 EDZs as provincial level) to promote economic growth through the expansion of external opening policy. EDZs of the provinces play an important role in North Korea's national and regional economic growth. The purpose of this study is to select analytical criteria that can be quantified when considering the location conditions of North Korean economic development zones when domestic companies advance into North Korea according to the progress of inter-Korean economic cooperation, and derive the relative importance between the criteria. After that, based on this, we intend to quantify the evaluation of the location priority of the economic development zone. In this study, through AHP analysis results, when domestic companies enter North Korea, we derive the importance and preference of location selection factors when considering the location conditions of North Korean economic development zones. Taking into account the reality of North Korea when the Korean company entered the North economic development zone following location for evaluation. That is, logistics and transportation, industrial infrastructure, competitiveness, and management incentives. And 14 sub-factors were selected and AHP analysis was performed.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제10권2호
• /
• pp.310-333
• /
• 2007

이 논문은 우리나라 주요 대학의 과학기술 분야의 연구개발 활동에 대한 상대적인 비교우위와 종합적인 특성화 정도를 살펴 볼 수 있는 지수들을 통해 정부의 연구개발비 수혜 규모, 수도권과 지방 소재여부, 국공립과 사립으로 구분한 경우 특성화의 정도에 대한 차이가 있을 것인가에 대한 가설을 검증하고 검증 결과에 대한 정책적 의미를 살펴본다. 정부의 재정지원 규모가 클수록 종합적인 특성화의 정도는 약화되는 것으로 분석되었다. 그러나 소재 지역의 구분은 특성화의 차별화에 영향을 주지 않는 것으로 밝혀졌다. 한편, 국공립 형태의 대학군이 종합적인 특성화가 상대적으로 심화되어 있는 것으로 분석되었다. 이 논문의 검증 결과가 주는 정책적 시사점은 추후정부의 특성화 정책 관련 세부추진 방향과 전략에 도움이 될 것으로 판단이 된다. 이를 위해서는 이 연구에서 제안하는 상대비교우위 및 종합적 특성화와 함께 개별 연구주체인 각 대학들의 전반적인 그리고 개별적인 연구개발 활동의 우수성에 대한 분석이 병행되어야 할 것으로 생각한다. 아울러 그동안 정부의 대학 특성화 정책추진 성과에 대한 종합적인 분석이 이루어져 정책에 대한 실효성이 검증이 되어야 한다.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제18권10호
• /
• pp.181-194
• /
• 2020

유통시장의 변화에 따라 농·수·축산물의 보관과 유통 그리고 가공식품 및 신선식품의 보관과 운송에 대한 이슈가 급부상하고 있으며, 이에 따라 콜드체인이 물류 서비스의 한축으로 자연스럽게 주목을 받고 있다. 본 연구는 최근 들어 활기를 띠고 있는 냉동냉장 식품 등 콜드체인 유통과 관련하여 관심을 끌고 있는 수도권 지역 콜드체인 클러스터 구축에 대한 입지 경쟁력 평가를 목적으로 한다. 이를 위해 본 연구는 전문가의 지식을 효율적으로 추출하여 계량화할 수 있는 CFPR(Consistent Fuzzy Preference Relations) 분석기법을 활용하여 수도권 콜드체인 클러스터 후보지에 대한 경쟁력을 평가하였다. 연구 결과, 입지 경쟁력은 인천신항 배후부지, 경기 남부권(용인), 경기 서부권(김포 물류단지), 평택오성물류단지 순으로 우수한 것으로 나타났다. 특히 본 연구는 냉동·냉장 물류창고 운영 전문가의 지식을 추출하여, 수도권 콜드체인 클러스터 후보지에 대한 세부적인 경쟁력 평가를 실시하고, 최적의 클러스터 후보지를 제시하였다는 점에서 기존 연구들과 차별성을 가진다. 향후 연구에서는 설문 대상을 신선식품 물류센터의 소유권을 확보하기 위한 구매 및 구축 결정권을 가진 기업경영자, 대기업군, 공공기업 군 등으로 구분하여 조사할 필요가 있다.