• Journal of Chest Surgery
• /
• v.41 no.6
• /
• pp.787-790
• /
• 2008

Barrett's esophagus is precancerous lesion of esophageal adenocarcinoma, but this has been rarely reported in Korea. A 81-year-old man with esophageal adenocarcinoma was admitted to our hospital, and we performed a distal esophagectomy and end-to-end esophagogastrostomy. The microscopic examination of the resected tissue revealed the intestinal metaplasia with goblet cells around the esophageal adenocarcinoma, which indicates this was a Barrett's esophagus. We report here on this case along with a review of the relevant literature.

• Journal of Chest Surgery
• /
• v.38 no.11 s.256
• /
• pp.791-794
• /
• 2005

After esophagectomy, the stomach is used most commonly for the method of reconstruction. However, the stomach may not be large enough to be reached the site of anastomosis when it is above the pharynx. We experienced a double primary cancer of the lower esophagus and the larynx. Total laryngectomy and total esophagectomy were done with cervical pharyngojejunogastrostomy for reconstruction. Free jejunal graft is interposed between the oropharyngeal stump and the stomach is pulled-up. We could restore the alimentary track without tension at the anastomotic site and obtain sufficient blood supply.

• Journal of Chest Surgery
• /
• v.33 no.9
• /
• pp.734-737
• /
• 2000

Background: McKeown first described two autopsy cases of esophageal small cell carcinoma (SMC) in 1952; about 230 cases have since been reported in the literature. Small cell carcinoma has been reported to account for 0.4% to 7.6% of all esophageal malignancies. SMC of the esophagus as regarded as having a poor prognosis with frequent systemic dissemination. Choice of treatment remains controversial. Material and Method: From August 1987 to December 1998, a review of the records and histologic sections of 8 patients with primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus seen in 11 years was undertaken. Result: Small cell carcinoma of the esophagus constituted 1.5% of all esophageal cancers. The median age was 61.5 years(range from 42 to 71 years). Seven patients were male, tumor was mainly located in the middle and lower thirds(6 cases) of the esophagus. Pure SMC is 5 cases, and mixed SMC is 3 cases. Operative procedure were as follow: transthoracic esophagectomy with thoracic or cervical reconstructon in 7 patients, transhiated esophagectomy with cervical reconstruction in one. The operative death was none. Adjuvant chemotherapy was performed in 7 patients except one who had poor general condition. Recurrence was observed in 4 patients(mediastinal LN, abdominal LN, SCN, bone). The overall median survival was 15.9 months. Only one patient survived for more than 5 years. Conclusion: We considered that esophageal SMC should be regarded as a systemic disease, and multimodality treatment including chemotherapy should be used. Surgery may be offered in selected patients to manage local disease as part of a chemotherapy based treatment program.

• Journal of Chest Surgery
• /
• v.14 no.3
• /
• pp.195-201
• /
• 1981

The results of reconstruction of the lower esophagus with jejunum in a total of 24 cases of primary carcinoma of the lower third esophagus and gastroesophageal carcinoma were presented, and clinical values of substitution for the esophagus with jejunum were also discussed. They were operated in the department of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, Hanyang University Hospital during the period of 9 years from 1972 to 1981. Surgical managements to lower esophageal reconstruction with jejunum were carded out with not the same procedure in all cases studied, but with three different procedure mentioned below/ In 13 cases of lower third esophagectomy with or without partial `8astrectomy of a total of 24 cases, interposition of jejunum between the esophagus and the stomach were performed after the fashion to esophagojejunostomy with mobilized jejunal loops and 8astro-JeJunostomy with side to side anastomosis. In 7 cases of lower third esophagectomy and total gastrectomy, the continuity of the esophagus were performed the fashion to esophagojejunostomy with mobilized jejunum. In 4 cases of unresectable gastro-esophageal carcinoma, bypass operation of the lower esophagus and the stomach were performed after the fashion to esophagojejunostomy with side to and anastomosis. After the bypass operation, it was observed that oral feeding to the patients was excellent. Following these consecutive series of 20 cases of radical operation for lower esophageal carcinomas and 4 cases of bypass operation for unresectable gastroesophageal carcinomas, no complication such as postoperative leakage and stenosis from anastomotic site or Infection In operating area and operative death were observed.

• Journal of Chest Surgery
• /
• v.14 no.3
• /
• pp.202-209
• /
• 1981

The results of reconstruction of the lower esophagus with jejunum in a total of 24 cases of primary carcinoma of the lower third esophagus and gastroesophageal carcinoma were presented, and clinical values of substitution for the esophagus with jejunum were also discussed. They were operated in the department of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, Hanyang University Hospital during the period of 9 years from 1972 to 1981. Surgical managements to lower esophageal reconstruction with jejunum were carded out with not the same procedure in all cases studied, but with three different procedure mentioned below/ In 13 cases of lower third esophagectomy with or without partial `8astrectomy of a total of 24 cases, interposition of jejunum between the esophagus and the stomach were performed after the fashion to esophagojejunostomy with mobilized jejunal loops and 8astro-JeJunostomy with side to side anastomosis. In 7 cases of lower third esophagectomy and total gastrectomy, the continuity of the esophagus were performed the fashion to esophagojejunostomy with mobilized jejunum. In 4 cases of unresectable gastro-esophageal carcinoma, bypass operation of the lower esophagus and the stomach were performed after the fashion to esophagojejunostomy with side to and anastomosis. After the bypass operation, it was observed that oral feeding to the patients was excellent. Following these consecutive series of 20 cases of radical operation for lower esophageal carcinomas and 4 cases of bypass operation for unresectable gastroesophageal carcinomas, no complication such as postoperative leakage and stenosis from anastomotic site or Infection In operating area and operative death were observed.

• Journal of Chest Surgery
• /
• v.29 no.12
• /
• pp.1392-1397
• /
• 1996

Over the past two years the free jejunal transfer have been used in 7 consecutive patients to restore alimentary tract continuity artier the resection of esophagus. Six patients had squamous cell carcinomas and one had esophageal stricture . The patients underwent partial esophagectomy with modified radicAl neck dissection or mediastinal Iymph node dissection. The microvascular anastomosis was performed to the neck vessels in 4 patients and to the in ercostal vessels in 3 patients. Postoperative complications were graft necrosis in one patient, and a temporary anastomotic leakage with spontaneous closure in one patient. Reconstruction of the esophagus was successful in 6 of 7 patients. We emphasize that esophagectomy followed by transplantation of a free jejunal transfer is suitable for esophageal carcinoma or intractable esophageal stricture, and involvement of the midesophagus is not a contraindication to the use of the free Jejunal transfer.

• Journal of Chest Surgery
• /
• v.35 no.4
• /
• pp.296-302
• /
• 2002

The classic approach for esophagectomy is via the combined thoracic and abdominal approach. Controversy exists whether patients with esophageal carcinoma are best managed with Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy(ILO) as combined thoracic and abdominal approach or transhiatal esophagectomy(THO). The THO approach is known to be superior with respect to operative time, severity of leak, morbidity/mortality, and length of stay, but may represent an inferior cancer operation as a result of survival disadvantage due to inadequate mediastinal clearance compared with ILO. Accordingly, we reviewed the results of our esophageal resections to compare these outcome parameters for each operative approach. Material and Method: From January 1993 to July 2001, We performed a retrospective review of all esophagectomies performed at Keimyung University Dongsan ·Medical Center; 27 underwent THO, and 45 underwent ILO Result: The two groups were comparable in terms of age, sex, and stage of the disease. Mean tumor length and mean operative time were 3.81cm and 354 minutes for THO versus 5.31cm and 453 minutes for ILO, respectively (p<0.01 and p<0.001). Respiratory complications were 11.1% for THO versus 35.6% for ILO(p<0.05). Hospital mortality was 11.1% for THO versus 22.2% for ILO. There were no significant differences between THO and ILO with respect to other types of complications, amount of blood transfusion, leak and stricture rates, and hospital stay. Overall long-term survival at 5 years was 37%, respectively. Conclustion: There was no significant difference in long-term survival of patients of both operative approach. ILO had significant difference in respiratory complications associated with hospital mortality. Hence, THO is a valid alternative to ILO for well selected patients. And either approach appears to be acceptable depending on the surgeons, preferences and experiences.

• Journal of Chest Surgery
• /
• v.38 no.6 s.251
• /
• pp.428-433
• /
• 2005

Advanced age in Esophagectomy increases the risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality. However, the recent development of operative technique and perioperative care might have decreased the postoperative morbidity and mortality after esophagectomy. Material and Method: From March 2001 to July 2004, 174 patients underwent esophageal resection for esophageal cancer in the Center for Lung Cancer, National Cancer Center. The patients were divided into two groups : group 1 consisted of 27 patients aged 70 years or more, and group 2 consisted of 147 patients under 70 years of age. The two groups were compared according to preoperative risk factors, postoperative morbidity, operative mortality and survival. Result: The mean age was 63_4. There were 159 men. On histopathological examination, $93.1\%$ had squamous cell carcinoma. On the locations, $78.7\%$ were in mid and lower esophagus. Curative resections for esophageal cancer were possible in $162(93.1\%)$ patients. Mean hospital stay was 19.4 days with out difference between the groups. The overall postoperative morbidity were occurred in 61 patients $(35.1\%)$. The most frequent morbidity was pulmonary complication in $30(17.2\%)$. Preoperative incidence of hypertension, cardiac and pulmonary dysfunction were more common in Group I. However, there was no difference in overall postoperative morbidity, operative mortality and survival rate between the two groups. Conclusion: Esophagectomy for esophageal cancer could be carried out safely in patients over 70 years of age with satisfactory short-term results. Advanced age is no longer a risk factor for esophagectomy.

• Journal of Chest Surgery
• /
• v.29 no.7
• /
• pp.753-758
• /
• 1996

From January 1987 to December 1994, twenty five patients with cancer of the esophagus were t eated surgically at the department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Tae Jeon Eul ll General Hospital. Among them, male was 24 cases, female was 1 case, with age ranged from 40 to 74 years, mean age was 60.4 years. The most common symptoms were dysphagia 92.0%, general weakness 28.0%, subsiernal pain 16.0%, weight loss 16.0 oyo , The tumor locations were the upper third in 2, middle third in 17, lower third in 6. Surgical treatment was done with transthoracic esophagectomy and esophagogastrostomy 1~4 cases, transthoracic esophagectomy and esophagocologastrostomy 5 cases, Transthoracic esophagectomy and jeT junal interposition 2 cases, palliative feeding gastrostomy 4 cases. The postoperative complications included anstomotic leakage in 3 cases, empyema in 3 cases, wound in- fection in 2 cases, atelectasis in 2 cases, pleural effusion in 1 case, hoarseness in 1 case, pneumothorax in 1 case, necrosis of jejunal loop in 1 case, aspiration pneumonia in 1 case. The operative mortal ty were 3 cases (12.0 %) and causes of death were aspiration pneumonia 1 case. sepsis and respiratory failure in each 1 . The mean survival period was 9.75 months. Recurrence of cancer revealed in 3 cases.

• Journal of Chest Surgery
• /
• v.35 no.3
• /
• pp.248-250
• /
• 2002

A 56 year-old man complaining of dry cough, dyspnea, chest pain, fever, and chills was admitted to the emergency room. The patient had a history of esophagectomy and esophagogastrostomy and subsequent radiotherapy because of an esophageal cancer. After the emergency echocardiography revealed a small amount of pericardial effusion and pneumopericardium. Upper GI contrast study showed a fistulous tract between the stomach and the pericardium, and an emergency operation was done under the diagnosis of gastropericardial fistula. The patient expired postoperative seven days later. Gastropericardial fistula caused by a peptic ulcer perforation after the esophagectomy and esophagogastrostomy operation is a very rare complication and brings forth a disastrous result. Early detection using the chest radiography, electrocardiogram, upper Gl study, echocardiography and a review of physical examination, and an immediate treatment are therefore mandatory.