• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제32권4호
• /
• pp.343-355
• /
• 2007

4종의 레진시멘트를 통한 상아질과 간접 레진 수복물 간의 인장결합강도를 열순환 시효처리 여부에 따라 측정하여 비교하고, 주사전자현미경 관찰을 통하여 각 레진시멘트의 접착 내구성을 평가하고자 시행하였다. 48개의 건전한 제3대구치의 상아질 표면을 평탄하게 노출시키고 #320 grit Sic Paper로 연마하였다. 복합레진 블록을 제작하여 #600 grit Sic Paper로 연마한 후에 접착면을 Sandblast로 처리하였다. 각각의 레진시멘트로 제조사 지침에 따라 적용하여 복합레진 블록을 상아질 표면에 접착하였다. 이후 제작된 시편을 열순환시키지 않거나, 1,000회, 5,000회 열순환 시킨 후 ($5^{\circ}C\;-\;55^{\circ}C$) 미세인장결합강도를 측정하였다. 열순환 전 시편의 접착계면 (수직절단면)과 파절된 시편의 상아질 파단면을 전자현미경 관찰하여 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다. 1. Variolink II의 결합강도는 다른 실험군보다 높은 결합강도를 보여주었으며, 1,000회 열순환 후 유의성 있게 결합강도가 감소되었다 (p < 0.05). 3. Multilink의 결합강도는 열순환에 가장 많은 영향을 받았으며 1,000회 열순환 이후 유의성 있게 감소되었다 (p < 0.05). 3. Panavia F 2.0과 Rely X Unicem의 결합강도는 열순환에 의하여 감소되지 않았다 (p > 0.05). 4. 접착형 레진시멘트는 복합레진형 레진시멘트에 비해서 열처리 전후 모두 낮은 결합강도를 보여주었다. 5. 결합강도가 높은 Vaviolink II와 Multilink에서는 혼합형 파괴양상을 보였고, 결합강도가 낮은 Panavia F 2.0에서는 접착성 파괴 양상을 나타내었다. 이상의 연구 결과를 토대로 적절한 전처리와 접착제를 도포한다면 복합레진형 레진시멘트는 접착형 레진시멘트보다 결합강도와 그 내구성이 우수하다고 할 수 있을 것이다. 접착성 간접 수복물의 초기 결합강도와 내구성은 레진시멘트의 접착과정과 종류, 형태에 의해 영향을 받기 때문에 이들의 적절한 선택과 올바른 사용이 성공적인 수복을 위해 중요하다.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제27권3호
• /
• pp.299-309
• /
• 2002

The purposes of this study were to evaluate the microtensile bond strength of one-step adhesives accord ing to various dentin surface treatments and to observe the interface between resin(Z-100$^{TM}$) and dentin under SEM. In this study forty-five non-caries extracted human molars and three adhesive systems were used ; AlI-Bond 2(AB), One-Up Bond F(OU), AQ-Bond(AQ). ; In Group 1, 2, 3, AB was used and tooth surfaces were treated by smearing(S), ultrasonic cleansing(US), etching(E) respectively. In Group 4. 5, 6, One-Up Bond F was used and tooth surfaces were also treated as the same way above. In Groups 7, 8, 9, AQ Bond was used and tooth surfaces wet$.$e treated as the same way. Each specimen was prepared for microtensile bond testing, and were stored for 24hrs in 37$^{\circ}C$ distilled water. After that, microtensile bond strength for each specimen was measured. Specimens were fabricated to examine the failure patterns of interface between resin and dentin and observed under the SEM. The results were as follows ; 1. The results(mean$\pm$SD) of microtensile test were group 1, 25.69$\pm$4.31MPa; group 2, 40.93$\pm$10.94MPa; group 3, 47.65$\pm$8.85MPa； group 4, 35.98$\pm$9.14MPa； group 5, 39.66$\pm$8.45MPa; group 6, 43.26$\pm$13.01MPa; group 7, 25.07$\pm$4.2MPa；group 8, 30.4$\pm$4.74MPa；group 9, 33.61$\pm$7.88MPa. 2. One-Up Bond F was showed the highest value of 36.98$\pm$9.14MPa in dentin surface treatment with smearing, and there were significant differences to the other groups (p<0.05). 3. All-Bond 2 was showed the highest value of 40.93$\pm$10.94MPa in dentin surface treatment with ultra-sonic cleansing, but was no significant difference to One-Up Bond F(p>0.05) 4. All-Bond 2 was showed the highest value of 47.65$\pm$8.85MPa in dentin surface treatment with etch ing(10%phosphoric acid), and there were significant differences to the other groups(p<0.05). 5. All-Bond 2 was showed the highest value of 47.65$\pm$8.85MPa in dentin surface treatment according to manufacture's directions. but was no significant difference to One-Up Bond F(p>0.05). 6. AQ Bond was skewed the lowest microtensile bond strength with various dentin surface treatment, and the were significant differences to the other groups(p<0.05).

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제8권4호
• /
• pp.275-284
• /
• 2016

PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different surface treatment methods on the microtensile bond strength of resin cement to resin nanoceramic (RNC). MATERIALS AND METHODS. RNC onlays (Lava Ultimate) (n=30) were treated using air abrasion with and without a universal adhesive, or HF etching followed by a universal adhesive with and without a silane coupling agent, or tribological silica coating with and without a universal adhesive, and divided into 6 groups. Onlays were luted with resin cement to dentin surfaces. A microtensile bond strength test was performed and evaluated by one-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD test (${\alpha}$=.05). A nanoscratch test, field emission scanning electron microscopy, and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy were used for micromorphologic analysis (${\alpha}$=.05). The roughness and elemental proportion were evaluated by Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS. Tribological silica coating showed the highest roughness, followed by air abrasion and HF etching. After HF etching, the RNC surface presented a decrease in oxygen, silicon, and zirconium ratio with increasing carbon ratio. Air abrasion with universal adhesive showed the highest bond strength followed by tribological silica coating with universal adhesive. HF etching with universal adhesive showed the lowest bond strength. CONCLUSION. An improved understanding of the effect of surface treatment of RNC could enhance the durability of resin bonding when used for indirect restorations. When using RNC for restoration, effective and systemic surface roughening methods and an appropriate adhesive are required.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제27권1호
• /
• pp.34-43
• /
• 2002

The purpose of this study was to compare microleakage and marginal hybrid layer in class V restorations using two one-bottle adhesives and one self-etching adhesive. Class V cavity preparations with occlusal margins in enamel and gingival margins in dentin were pre-pared on buccal and lingual surfaces of 30 extracted human molar teeth. Prepared teeth were randomly divided into three treatment groups (n=30) and restored with three adhesives and composites: Single Bond/Filtek Z-250 (Group 1), Prime&BondNT/Esthet.X (Group 2), UniFil Bond/UniFil F (Group 3). For microleakage, samples were stored in room temperature water for 24 hours, thermocycled stained with 2% methylene blue dye, sectioned into halves, scored and analysed using Mann-whitney test and Wilcoxon signed rank sum test. For marginal hybrid layer, samples were sectioned into halves, treated with 10% phosphoric acid for 5 seconds, stored in 5% NaOCL solution for 24 hours, dried and gold coated. Occlusal and gingival margins of each sample were inspected under SEM. The results of this study were as follows ; 1. Microleakage at the occlusal margins was not evident in group 1 and group 2, but it showed in group 3 (p<0.05). 2. Microleakage in group 1 and group 3 was significantly lower than in group 2 at gingival margins (p<0.05). 3. Microleakage at gingival margins was greater than at occlusal margins in group 1 and group 2, but microleakage at occlusal margins was greater than at gingival margins in group 3 (p<0.05). 4. In group 1 and group 2, no gaps at occlusal margins showed. But gaps showed in group 3. Occlusal margins were free from a hybrid layer in all groups 5. The thickness of the marginal hybrid layers was 2.5~5 $\mu\textrm{m}$ thick in group 5 $\mu\textrm{m}$ thick in group 2 and 1.5 $\mu\textrm{m}$ thick in group 3. 6 There was no corelation between microleakage and thickness of marginal hybrid layer. In coclusion, the effect of dentin adhesives on microleakge in class V composite restorations was excellent when one-bottle adhesives were applied on enamel margin, and it was good when a self-etching adhesive was applied on dentinal margin. There was no corelation between microleakage and thickness of marginal hybrid layer.

• 대한소아치과학회지
• /
• 제28권4호
• /
• pp.553-565
• /
• 2001

새로운 상아질 결합제인 5세대 상아질 결합제는 산 부식, 전 처치, 그리고 접착의 복잡한 과정을 줄여줌으로써 시술 과정이 간단하고 시간이 단축되며 시술 도중의 오염에 대한 가능성을 줄여준다는 점에서 유용성이 부각되고 있다. One-bottle 상아질 결합제에 관한 기존의 연구들이 아세톤, 에탄올 등의 용매를 포함하는 상아질 결합제를 중심으로 이루어져 본 실험에서는 water-based 상아질 결합제를 우치(牛齒)의 상아질에 적용하여 얻어지는 상아질 결합력을 전단 결합 강도 측정과 주사 전자현미경 관찰을 통해 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다. 1. 전단결합강도의 측정결과 II군 IV군, I군, III군의 순서로 II군에서 다소 높은 전단강도를 보였으나, 모든 군들간에는 유의 차가 없었다(p>0.05). 2. 주사 전자 현미경 소견에서 II군과 IV군에서 서로 유사한 양상의 잘 형성된 혼화층이 관찰되었으며 레진 테그의 측방 가지 또한 다수 관찰할 수 있었다.

• 구강회복응용과학지
• /
• 제18권4호
• /
• pp.289-299
• /
• 2002

The bond strength is one of the most important factor in establishing long-term success of esthetic restorative dentistry. So, various restorative materials have been introduced to improve the esthetic and physical properties. Ormocer (organically modified ceramic) was developed as a result of such efforts. This study was performed to compare the shear bond strength of ormocer based adhesive with that of existing dentin adhesive. In this study $Admira^{(R)}$ and $Admira^{(R)}$ bond of the ormocer system are grouped together for ADM, Single $Bond^{(R)}$ which is an one-bottle adhesive and Z-250TM which is hybrid composite resin of BIS-GMA system for SIN, and $Definite^{(R)}$ of ormocer and Etch & $Prime^{(R)}$ 3.0 which is a self etching priming/ bonding agent for ETC. The results of this study were as follows. : (1) In the comparison of shear bond strength according to different adhesive system, shear bond strength was increased in the order of ETC group, SIN group, ADM group. There was no significant difference between ADM group and SIN group. However, there was a significant level of difference between ADM and ETC groups as well as SIN and ETC groups( p<0.05). (2) Examination by a scanning electron microscope showed a well established hybrid layer and resin tag in both ADM group and SIN group, while ETC group showed a minimal formation of the hybrid layer when compared with ADM and SIN groups. From the above results, it may be reasonable to start the clinical application of ormocer system, and it is recommended that ormocer system should be used along with an ormocer based adhesive because ormocer system showed the lower shear bond strength when it used with other existing self etching priming/bonding agent. The self etching priming/bonding agent showed relatively low shear bond strength, and it is considered that the further study should be needed.

• 대한소아치과학회지
• /
• 제28권4호
• /
• pp.566-574
• /
• 2001

법랑질과 상아질에 대한 접착시스템의 결합력은 타액이나 혈액에 의하여 저하될 수 있다. 제 5세대 상아질 결합제 적용시에 산부식된 치면이 타액에 오염될 경우, 보다 효율적인 치면 처리 방법을 알아보기 위해 여러 가지 치면 처리 방법과 조건을 설정한 다음 수복물의 유지력을 전단결합강도 측정으로 서로 비교 분석하고, 치아와 수복물 사이의 계면을 주사전자 현미경을 이용해 관찰하였다. 그 결과 우치상아질의 산부식후 타액오염된 경우, 물로 10초간 세척한 후 공기로 가볍게 건조하여 수복하면 전단결합강도의 감소가 일어나지 않았으나, Prime & Bond NT의 광중합후에 타액오염된 경우에는 물로 10초간 세척한 후 공기로 완전히 건조를 하여도 레진과의 결합력이 매우 약해지며 Prime & Bond NT를 재적용하더라도 전단결합강도의 상당한 감소를 보였으며, 주사전자 현미경 관찰결과 모든 군에서 유사한 혼화층과 레진태그의 형성을 보였으며 특이할만한 각 군간의 차이를 관찰할 수 없었다.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제28권1호
• /
• pp.1-10
• /
• 2003

This study investigated the influence of IRM on marginal microleakage of 5th generation adhesives. Class V cavities with gingival margins in dentin were prepared on both buccal and lingual surfaces of 60 extract-ed human molar teeth. Prepared teeth were randomly divided into six groups. Group 1 and 4 received no temporary restoration with IRM. Group 2 and 5 were covered with IRM mixed at P/L ratio(10g/1g). Group 3 and 6 were covered with IRM mixed at P/L ratio(10g/2g). The temporary restorations were removed mechanically with an ultrasonic scaler after one-week storage in distilled water. The cavities were restored using one of two adhesives and composites ; Single Bond/Filtek Z 250(Croup 1, 2 and 3), UniFil Bond/UniFil F(Group 4, 5 and 6). Following one day storage in distilled water, the restored teeth were thermocycled for 500 cycles(between $5^{\circ}C{\;}and{\;}55^{\circ}C$) and immersed in 2 % methylene blue for dye penetration testing. The results were analysed using Kruskal-Wallis Test, Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon signed ranked test at a significance level of 0.05. The results of this study were as follows 1. Ranking of mean microleakage scores at the enamel margins was Group 10.05) 4. At the dentin margins, the microleakage of the group not pretreated with IRM was lower than that of the group pretreated with IRM. And the microleakage of UniFil Bond was lower than that of Single Bond. 5. Compared with microleakages between the enamel and dentin margins of each groups, Group 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 at dentin margin were higher microleakage than those at enamel margin. There were significant difference between enamel and dentin microleakage of Group 2 and 3(p<0.05).

• 대한소아치과학회지
• /
• 제34권4호
• /
• pp.569-578
• /
• 2007

본 연구는 자가 부식과 two-bottle system에 의한 레진 부착시 레이저와 일반 고속 핸드피스에 의한 치아형성 관계를 규명해보고자 하였다. 55개의 유치를 발거한 후 레진에 매몰하여 상아질을 노출시켜 시편을 준비하였고 다음과 같이 분류하였다. I군은 고속핸드피스로 치아 형성 후 $Adper^{TM}$ $Prompt^{TM}$ L-$Pop^{TM}$(3M Unitek, USA)을, II군은 Er:YAG 레이저로 치아 형성 후 $Adper^{TM}$ $Prompt^{TM}$ L-$Pop^{TM}$(3M Unitek, USA)을, III군은 레이저로 형성 후 산부식과 $Adper^{TM}$ Single Bond Plus Adhesive(3M Unitek, USA)를, IV군은 레이저로 형성 후 산부식 없이 $Adper^{TM}$ Single Bond Plus Adhesive(3M Unitek, USA)를 적용하였고 V군은 고속 핸드피스로 치아 형성 후 산부식과 $Adper^{TM}$ Single Bond Plus Adhesive(3M Unitek, USA)를 적용하였다. 레진 $Filtek^{TM}$ Z250(3M Unitek, USA)을 직경 1.5 mm, 길이 3 mm의 투명관에 충전 후 적용하였다. 각 그룹 시편의 전단강도를 측정하였고 레이저와 고속 핸드피스로 치아 형성 후와 각각 산부식을 한 후 주사전자 현미경으로 관찰한 결과 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다. 1. 기존 방법인 고속 핸드피스를 이용한 치아 형성 후 산부식과 $Adper^{TM}$ Single Bond를 이용한 방법이 가장 높은 결합 강도를 보였다. 2. 레이저를 이용한 치아 형성 후 산부식을 하지 않고 $Adper^{TM}$ Single Bond를 이용한 방법은 가장 낮은 결합 강도를 보였다. 3. 고속 핸드피스를 이용한 치아 형성 후 $Prompt^{TM}$ L-$Pop^{TM}$을 이용한 레진 부착을 한 그룹과 레이저를 이용해 치아를 형성한 이후 산부식과 $Adper^{TM}$ Single Bond를 이용한 방법간의 결합 강도는 유의한 차이를 나타내지 않았다. 4. 레이저를 이용한 치아 형성 후 $Prompt^{TM}$ L-$Pop^{TM}$을 이용한 II군은 I, III, V군에 비해서는 결합강도가 낮았으나 IV군에 비해서는 결합강도가 유의성 있게 높았다. 5. 주사전자 현미경 관찰시 레이저로 치아 형성한 상아질 표면은 불규칙한 표면이 두드러졌으며 도말층이 제거되었음을 볼 수 있었고 산부식 후에는 불규칙한 부위가 줄어들고 상아세관이 커짐을 확인했다.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제25권1호
• /
• pp.46-55
• /
• 2000

During bonding procedure of composite resin, the prepared cavity can be contaminated by saliva. In this study, marginal microleakage and shear bond strength of a composite resin to primed enamel and dentin treated with artificial saliva(Taliva$^{(R)}$) were evaluated. For the marginal microleakage test, Class V cavities were prepared in the buccal surfaces of fifty molars. The samples were randomly assigned into 5 groups with 10 samples in each group. Control group was applied with a bonding system (Scotchbond$^{TM}$ Multi-Purpose plus) according to manufacture's directions without saliva contamination. Experimental groups were divided into 4 groups and contaminated with artificial saliva for 30 seconds after priming: Experimental 1 group ; artificial saliva was dried with compressed air only, Experimental 2 group ; artificial saliva was rinsed and dried. Experimental 3 group ; cavities were etched with 35% phosphoric acid for 15 seconds after rinsing and drying artificial saliva. Experimental 4 group ; cavities were etched with 35% phosphoric acid for 15 seconds and primer was reapplied after rinsing and drying artificial saliva. All the cavities were applied a bonding agent and filled with a composite resin (Z-100$^{TM}$). Specimens were immersed in 0.5% basic fuschin dye for 24 hours and embedded in transparent acrylic resin and sectioned buccolingually with diamond wheel saw. Four sections were obtained from one specimen. Degree of marginal leakage was scored under stereomicroscope and their scores were averaged from four sections. The data were analyzed by Kruscal-Wallis test and Fisher's LSD. For the shear bond strength test, the buccal or occlusal surfaces of one hundred molar teeth were ground to expose enamel(n=50) or dentin(n=50) using diamond wheel saw and its surface was smoothed with Lapping and Polishing Machine(South Bay Technology Co., U.S.A.). Samples were divided into 5 groups. Treatment of saliva-contaminated enamel and dentin surfaces was same as the marginal microleakage test and composite resin was bonded via a gelatin capsule. All specimens were stored in distilled water for 48 hours. The shear bond strengths were measured by universal testing machine (AGS-1000 4D, Shimaduzu Co., Japan) with a crosshead speed of 5 mm/minute. Failure mode of fracture sites was examined under stereomicroscope. The data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey's studentized range test. The results of this study were as follows : 1. Enamel marginal microleakage showed no significant difference among groups. 2. Dentinal marginal microleakages of control, experimental 2 and 4 groups were lower than those of experimental 1 and 3 groups (p<0.05). 3. The shear bond strength to enamel was the highest value in control group (20.03${\pm}$4.47MPa) and the lowest value in experimental 1 group (13.28${\pm}$6.52MPa). There were significant differences between experimental 1 group and other groups (p<0.05). 4. The shear bond strength to dentin was higher in control group (17.87${\pm}$4.02MPa) and experimental 4 group (16.38${\pm}$3.23MPa) than in other groups, its value was low in experimental 1 group (3.95${\pm}$2.51 MPa) and experimental 2 group (6.72${\pm}$2.26MPa)(p<0.05). 5. Failure mode of fractured site on the enamel showed mostly adhesive failures in experimental 1 and 3 groups. 6. Failure mode of fractured site on the dentin did not show adhesive failures in control group, but showed mostly adhesive failure in experimental groups. As a summary of above results, if the primed tooth surface was contaminated with artificial saliva, primer should be reapplied after re-etching it.