• Title/Summary/Keyword: clinicalTrials.gov

Search Result 41, Processing Time 0.016 seconds

Effects of GV1001 on Language Dysfunction in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Alzheimer's Disease: Post Hoc Analysis of Severe Impairment Battery Subscales

  • Hyuk Sung Kwon;Seong-Ho Koh;Seong Hye Choi;Jee Hyang Jeong;Hae Ri Na;Chan Nyoung Lee;YoungSoon Yang;Ae Young Lee;Jae-Hong Lee;Kyung Won Park;Hyun Jeong Han;Byeong C. Kim;Jinse Park;Jee-Young Lee;Kyu-Yong Lee;Sangjae Kim
    • Dementia and Neurocognitive Disorders
    • /
    • v.22 no.3
    • /
    • pp.100-108
    • /
    • 2023
  • Background and Purpose: The efficacy and safety of GV1001 have been demonstrated in patients with moderate-to-severe Alzheimer's disease (AD). In this study, we aimed to further demonstrate the effectiveness of GV1001 using subscales of the Severe Impairment Battery (SIB), which is a validated measure to assess cognitive function in patients with moderate-to-severe AD. Methods: We performed a post hoc analysis of data from a 6 month, multicenter, phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with GV1001 (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03184467). Patients were randomized to receive either GV1001 or a placebo for 24 weeks. In the current study, nine subscales of SIB-social interaction, memory, orientation, language, attention, praxis, visuospatial ability, construction, and orientation to name-were compared between the treatment (GV1001 1.12 mg) and placebo groups at weeks 12 and 24. The safety endpoints for these patients were also determined based on adverse events. Results: In addition to the considerable beneficial effect of GV1001 on the SIB total score, GV1001 1.12 mg showed the most significant effect on language function at 24 weeks compared to placebo in both the full analysis set (FAS) and per-protocol set (PPS) (p=0.017 and p=0.011, respectively). The rate of adverse events did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. Conclusions: Patients with moderate-to-severe AD receiving GV1001 had greater language benefits than those receiving placebo, as measured using the SIB language subscale.