• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제24권
• /
• pp.289-332
• /
• 1993

In china, six bibliographies of offical historical books are evaluated at the most important things among the systematically-editing bibliographies. These bibliographies would be usful to study the orign of classical sciences and their development, bibliographic research of Chinese classics, bibliographic judgement on genuine books, titles, authors, volumes. They could be refered to research into graving, correcting, and existence of ancient books. therefore, these bibliographies would be applied to estimation the phase of scientific and cultural development. The study of these bibliographies has been not yet made in Korea. This thesis lays its importance on the background of their appearance, their classification norms, organizing system of their catalogue, and comparison between their difference. 1. Editing and compiling of Chilyak (칠약) by Liu Chin (유흠) and official histories played an important role of entering an apperance of historical book's bibliographies. Chilyak has been lost. However, its classification and compiling system of classical books would be traced by Hansoyemunji(한서예문지) of which basic system is similar to Chilyak. It classified books according to their scientific characteristic. If a few books didn't have their own categories, they were combined by the circles parallel to the books' characteristic. With the books classified under the same scientific characteristic, they were again divided into the scientific schools or structures. It also arranged the same kinds of books according to the chronology. The some books wi th duplicate subjects were classified multiplely by their duplicate subject. 2. Ssu-ma Chon's (사마천) The Historical Records (Saki, 사기) and Pan Ku's (반고) The History of the Former Han Dynasty (Hanso, 한서) has also took effects on appearance of historical books' bibliographies. Covering overall history, Saki was structured by the five parts: The basic annals(본기), the chronological tables (표), the documents (서), the hereditary houses (세가), biographies (열전). The basic annals dealt with kings and courts' affairs according to the chronology. The chronological tables was the records of the annals. The documents described overall the social and cultural systems. The hereditary houses recorded courts' meritorious officials and public figures. The biographies showed exemplars of seventy peoples selected by their social status. Pan Ku(반구)'s The History of the Former Han Dynasty(한서) deserved to be called the prototype for the offical histories after Saki's (사기; The Historical Records) apperance. Although it modelled on Saki, it had set up its own cataloguing system. It was organized by four parts; the basic annals (본기), the chronological tables (표), treatises(지), biographies (열전). The documents in the Hanso(한서) was converted into treatises(지). The hereditary houses and biographies were merged. For the first time, the treatise with The Yemunji could operate function for historical bibliographies. 3. There were six historical bibliographies: Hansoyemunji(한서예문지), Susokyongjeokji (수서경적지), Kudangsokyongjeokji(구당서경적지), Shindangsoyemunji (신당서예문지), Songsayemunji (송사예문지), Myongsayemunji (명사예문지). 1) Modelling on Liu Chin's Chilyak except Chipryak(집략), Hansoyemunji divided the characteristic of the books and documents into six parts: Yukrye(육예), Cheja(제자), Shibu(시부), Pyongsoh(병서), Susul(수술), Pangki(방기). Under six parts, there were thirty eight orders in Hansoyemunji. To its own classification, Hansoyemunji applied the Chilyak's theory of classification that the books or documents were managed according to characteristic of sciences, the difference of schools, the organization of sentences. However the overlapped subjects were deleted and unified into one. The books included into an unsuitable subject were corrected and converted into another. The Hansoyemunji consisted of main preface (Taesoh 대서), minor preface (Sosoh 소서) , the general preface (Chongso 총서). It also recorded the introduction of books and documents, the origin of sciences, the outline of subjects, and the establishment of orders. The books classified by the subject had title, author, and volumes. They were rearranged by titles and the chronological publication year. Sometimes author was the first access point to catalogue the books. If it was necessary for the books to take footnotes, detail notes were formed. The Volume number written consecutively to order and subject could clarify the quantity of books. 2) Refering to Classfication System by Seven Norms (칠분법) and Classification System by Four Norms(사분법), Susokyongjeokji(수서경적지) had accomplished the classification by four norms. In fact, its classification largely imitated Wanhyosoh(완효서)'s Chilrok(칠록), Susokyongjeokji's system of classification consisted of four parts-Kyung(경), Sa(사), Cha(자), Chip(칩). The four parts were divided into 40 orders. Its appendix was again divided into two parts, Buddihism and Taiosm. Under the two parts there were fifteen orders. Totally Susokyongjeokji was made of six parts and fifty five orders. In comparison with Hansoyemunji(한서예문지), it clearly showed the conception of Kyung, Sa, Cha, Chip. Especially it deserved to be paid attention that Hansoyemunji laied history off Chunchu(춘추) and removed history to Sabu(사부). However Chabu(사부) put many contrary subjects such as Cheja(제자), Kiye(기예), Sulsu(술수), Sosol(소설) into the same boundary, which committed errors insufficient theoretical basis. Anothor demerit of Susokyongjeokji was that it dealt with Taiosm scriptures and Buddism scriptures at the appendix because they were considered as quasi-religion. Its compilation of bibliographical facts consisted of main preface(Taesoh 대서), minor preface(Sosoh 소서), general preface (Chongsoh 총서), postscript (Husoh 후서). Its bibliological facts mainly focused on the titles. Its recorded authors' birth date and their position. It wrote the lost and existence of books consecutive to total number of books, which revealed total of the lost books in Su Dynasty. 3) Modelling on the basis of Kokumsorok(고분서록) and Naewaekyongrok(내외경록), Kudangsokyongjeokji(구당서경적지) had four parts and fourty five orders. It was estimated as the important role of establishing basic frame of classification by four norms in classification theory's history. However it had also its own limit. Editing and compling orders of Kudangsokyongjeokji had been not progressively changed. Its orders imitated by and large Susokyongjeokji. In Its system of organizing catalogue, with its minor preface and general preface deleting, Kudangsokyongjeokji by titles after orders sometimes broke out confusion because of unclear boundaries between orders. 4) Shindangsoyemunji(신당서예문지), adding 28,469 books to Kudangsokyongjeokji, recorded 82,384 books which were divided by four parts and fourty four orders. In comparison with Kudangkyongjeokj, Sindangsoyemunji corrected unclear order's norm. It merged the analogical norms four orders (for instance, Kohun 고훈 and Sohakryu 소학류) and seperated the different norms four orders (for example, Hyokyong 효경 and Noneuhryu 논어류, Chamwi 참위 and Kyonghaeryu 경해류, Pyonryon 편년 and Wisaryu 위사류). Recording kings' behaviors and speeches (Kikochuryu 기거주류) in the historical parts induced the concept of specfication category. For the first time, part of Chipbu (집부) set up the order of classification norm for historical and literatural books and documents (Munsaryu 문사류). Its editing and compiling had been more simplified than Kudangsokyongjeokji. Introduction was written at first part of bibliographies. Appendants except bibliographic items such subject, author, title, volume number, total were omitted. 5) Songsayemunji(송사예문지) were edited in the basis of combining Puksong(북송) and Namsong(남송), depending on Sabukuksayemunji(사부국사예문지). Generally Songsayemunji had lost a lot of bibliographical facts of many books. They were duplicated and wrongly classified books because it committed an error of the incorrectly annalistic editing. Particularly Namsong showed more open these defaults. Songsayemunji didin't include the books published since the king Youngchong(영종). Its system of classification was more better controlled. Chamwiryu(참위류) in the part of Kyongbu(경부) was omitted. In the part of history(Sabu 사부), recordings of kings' behaviors and speeches more merged in the annals. Historical abstract documents (Sachoryu 사초류) were seperately arranged. In the part of Chabu(자부), Myongdangkyongmaekryu(명당경맥류) and Euisulryu(의술류) were combined. Ohangryu(오행류) were laied off Shikuryu(시구류). In the part of Chipbu(집부), historical and literatural books (Munsaryu 문사류) were independentely arranged. There were the renamed orders; from Wisa(위사) to Paesa(패사), Chapsa (잡사) to Pyolsa(열사), Chapchonki(잡전기) to Chonki(전기), Ryusoh(류서) to Ryusa(류서). Introduction had only main preface. The books of each subject catalogued by title, the volume number, and author and arranged mainly by authors. Annotations were written consecutively after title and the volume number. In the afternote the number of not-treated books were revealed. Difference from Singdangsohyemunji(신당서예문지) were that the concept and boundary of orders became more clearer. It also wrote the number of books consecutive to main subject. 6) Modelling on Chonkyongdangsomok (경당서목), Myongsayemunji(명사예문지) was compiled in the basis of books and documents published in the Ming Danasty. In classification system, Myongsayemunji partly merged and the seperated some orders for it. It also deleted and renamed some of orders. In case of necessity, combining of orders' norm was occured particulary in the part of Sabu(사부) and Chabu(자부). Therefore these merging of orders norm didn't offer sufficient theretical background. For example, such demerits were seen in the case that historical books edited by annals were combined with offical historical ones which were differently compiled and edited from the former. In the part of Chabu(자부), it broke out another confusion that Pubga(법가), Meongga(명가), Mukga(묵가), Chonghweongka's(종횡가) thoughts were classified in the Chapka(잡가). Scriptures of Taiosim and Buddhism were seperated from each other. There were some deleted books such as Mokrokryu(목록류), Paesaryu(패사류) in the part of history (Sabu 사부) and Chosaryu(초사류) in the part of Chipbu(집부). The some in the each orders had been renamed. Imitating compiling system of Songsayemunji(송사예문지), with reffering to its differ-ence, Myongsayemunji(명사예문지) wrote the review and the change of the books by author. The number of not-treated books didn't appear at the total. It also deleted the total following main subject.

• 한국조경학회지
• /
• 제44권2호
• /
• pp.37-51
• /
• 2016

시각중심주의에 편향된 근대의 광학적 메커니즘은 시각의 다채로운 기능을 간과하고 추상적이며, 이성적인 눈으로 사물을 판단하고 공간을 조직함으로써 눈이 사물을 더듬는 기능에 대해서는 간과하였다. 최근에는 시각의 이분법적 지각체계를 넘어서 복합지각에 의해 다른 감각과의 소통을 통한 다양한 경험을 유도하고 있다. 촉지적 지각은 시각뿐만 아니라 다양한 감각과의 상호작용을 통해 주체로 하여금 신체를 동반한 체험을 유도하며, 물성이 가지고 있는 특질과 인간의 다양한 감각적 자극을 꾀하는 역동적인 시각이다. 본 논문은 주체의 능동적 체험을 유도하는 촉지적 지각의 이론적 배경을 고찰하여 촉지적 지각의 주요한 특징을 도출하고 촉지적 지각의 특징이 픽처레스크 정원에서 어떠한 방식으로 나타나는지를 살펴보고자 한다. 촉지적 지각의 주요한 특징을 고찰하기 위해 철학과 미학사에서 아돌프 힐데브란트의 시각론이 알로이스 리글과 빌헬름 보링거, 발터 벤야민, 모르스 메를로 퐁티, 질 들뢰즈에 의해 각각 어떻게 발전, 확장, 재해석되는지를 탐구한다. 이로서 촉지적 지각과 시각적 지각 방식의 주요차이점을 분석하고 촉지적 지각이 가지는 특성을 도출한다. 이후, 촉지적 지각의 특성이 픽처레스크 정원에 어떻게 나타나는지 고찰하기 위해 고전적 정원을 시각적 지각으로 픽처레스크 정원을 촉지적 지각으로 각각 설정하여 분석하고 앞서 도출된 촉지적 지각의 특성을 픽처레스크 정원에 투영하여 고찰한다. 본 연구를 통해 도출된 픽처레스크 정원에 나타난 촉지적 지각에 대한 연구결과는 다음과 같다. 시각적 지각과 대별되는 촉지적 지각의 주요차이점은 경계의 모호함과 애매함, 동적시점의 생성, 불확정적 동선에 의한 운동성 유발, 지각 불가능성에 의한 낯설음과 숭고미로 요약할 수 있다. 픽처레스크 정원에서 경계의 모호함과 애매함은 평면의 불규칙함과 비대칭 요소, 단일시점의 거부로 나타나며, 동적시점의 생성은 서사적 구조의 도입과 회화의 장면구성기법을 재현하면서 기존 정원에 없는 전경, 중경, 원경 요소를 만들면서 공간을 중첩시킴으로써 생성된다. 불확정적 동선에 의한 운동성 유발은 분기하는 동선에 의해 형성되며, 지각 불가능성에 의한 낯설음과 숭고미는 정원에서 다양한 요소의 활용과 '거칠음'과 '불규칙함', '폐허'의 도입으로 나타난다.

• 대한한의학원전학회지
• /
• 제5권
• /
• pp.151-199
• /
• 1992

A study on Bang-Yak-Hap-Py$\breve{u}$n, one of the most widely-known Korean medicine books, has been conducted and the findings are as follows:the political and social background at the end of Yi-dynasty amidst the inflow of western civilization and the aggression of foreign forces can be seen as a historical period of trial, when civilization and independence had to be preserved at the same time, during the period, the social trend was to pursue a rapid practical solution rather than a profound theory. Responding to this trend, simple and easy medical science became to prevailand the representative medicine book of this kind was Bang-Yak-Hap-Py$\breve{u}$n. 1. Bang-Yak-Hap-Py$\breve{u}$n was written comprising the characteristics of simple and easy medical science with a view to popularizing-collection of logics, easy readability, medical science in time, etc. 2. Bang Yak-Hap-Py$\breve{u}$n, rich and grand in content, came out of Dong-$\breve{U}$i-Bo-Gam at the right moment as a pragmatic guide book of Korea medical practice symbolizing Korean spirit. 3. Do-yun Whang whose pen name was Hye-Am was born in Changwon, Kyungnam-do as the 18th descendant of Changwon Whang family. He engaged in medical practice in Seoul and wrote and edited Boo-Bang-Py$\breve{u}$n-Ram. $\breve{U}$i-Jong-Son-Ik, $\breve{U}$i-J$\breve{u}$ng-Son-Ik-Bu-Yeo, $\breve{U}$i-Bang-Whan-Tu, ect. and made his son, Pil-Su follow him and let him edit Bang-Yak-Hap-Py$\breve{u}$n, which put $\breve{U}$i-Bang-Whal-Tu and Son-Ik-Bon-Cho together. 4. The construct of Bang-Yak-Hap-Py$\breve{u}$n can be subdivied into three parts: herbs of 34 classes and 514 kinds were arranged on the upper part and $\breve{U}$i-Bang-Whal-Tu was arranged on the middle end lower part. Such arrangement can be very effective in clinics. 5. Bang-Yak-Hap-Py$\breve{u}$n as a curative book of Korean medical science has been a necessary another ego for many Korean medical practioners. It also played a great role of enhancing Korean oriental medical science to be widely used by Koreans. On the other hand, it produced a side effect of emergence of employed medical practioner who lacked in scholastic aptitude. 6. Tens or newly edited Bang-Yak-Hap-Py$\breve{u}$n have been issued. Among them, Jung-Jeong, Bang-Yak-Hap-py$\breve{u}$n, J$\breve{u}$ng-Mak-Bang-Yak-Hap-Py$\breve{u}$n. By$\breve{u}$n-J$\breve{u}$ng-Bang-Yak-Hap-Py$\breve{u}$n, and By$\breve{u}$n-J$\breve{u}$ng-Bang-Yak-Jung-Jeon have been widely known. Lately, Bang-Yak-Hap-Py$\breve{u}$n which includes more symptoms and remedies or is translated into Korean came out in several kinds. 7. The number of korea classical medicinal books quoted in Bang-Yak-Hap-Py$\breve{u}$n is 68, among which Dong-$\breve{U}$i-Bo-Gam Occupies the top in the list enlisting 69 medicinal treatment. This Shows that Dong-$\breve{U}$i-Bo-Gam gave birth to Bang-Yak-Hap-Py$\breve{u}$n.

• 미술이론과 현장
• /
• 제13호
• /
• pp.73-95
• /
• 2012

In terms of element and process, art today has already been fully systemized, yet tends to become even more systemized. All phases of creation and exhibition, appreciation and education, promotion and marketing are planned, adjusted, and decided within the order of a globalized, networked system. Each phase is executed, depending on the system of management and control and diverse means corresponding to the system. From the step of education, artists are guided to determine their styles and not be motivated by their desire to become star artists or running counter to mainstream tendency and fashion. In the process of planning an exhibition, the level of artist awareness is considered more significant than work quality. It is impossible to avoid such systems and institutions today. No one can escape or be freed from the influence of such system. This discussion addresses a serious distortion in the selection system as part of the system connotatively called "art museum system," especially to evaluate artistic achievement and aesthetic quality. Called "studio system" or "art star system," the system distinguishes successful minority from failed absolute majority and justifies the results, deciding discriminative compensations. The discussion begins from work by Hunter Jonakin and Dan Perjovschi. The key point of this discussion is not their art worlds but the shared truth referred by the two as the collusive "art market" and "art star system." Through works based on their experiences, the two artists refer to these systems which restrict and confine them. Jonakin's Jeff Koons Must Die! is avideo game conveying a critical comment on authoritative operation of the museum system and star system. In this work, participants, whether viewer or artist, are destined to lose: the game is unwinnable. Players take the role of a person locked in a museum where artist Jeff Koons' retrospective is held. The player can either look around and quietly observe the works, which causes a game-over, or he can blow the classical paintings to pieces and cause the artist Koons to come out and reprimand the player, also resulting in a game-over. Like Jonakin, Dan Perjovschi's some drawings also focuses on the status of the artist shrunken by the system. Most artists are ruined in a process of competition to survive within the museum system. As John Burger properly pointed out, out of the art systems today, public collections (art museums) and private collections have become "something unbearable." The system justifies the selection system of art stars and its frame of reference, disregarding the problem of producing numerable victims in its process. What should be underlined above all else is that the present selection system seriously shrinks art's creative function and its function of generating meaning. In this situation, art might fall to the level of entertainment, accessible to more people and compromising with popularity. This discussion is based on assumption and consciousness on the matter that this situation might cause catastrophic results for not only explicit victims of the system but also winners, or ones defined as winners. The system of art is probably possible only by desire or distortion stemmed from such desire. The system can be flourished only under the economic system of avarice: quantitatively expanding economy, abundant style, resort economy in Venice and Miami, and luxurious shopping malls with up-to-date facilities. The catastrophe here is ongoing, not a sudden emergence, and dynamic, leading the system itself to a devastating end.

• 동양고전연구
• /
• 제70호
• /
• pp.495-524
• /
• 2018

본고는 장지연(張志淵)의 문학론과 역사 인물 전기 편찬 의식을 탐색하고, 이를 바탕으로 편찬된 "일사유사(逸士遺事)"의 인물 수록 양상과 특성을 살펴보았다. "일사유사"의 특성을 파악하기 위해서, 본고에서는 장지연이 지니고 있었던 서사문학에 대한 인식을 우선적으로 규명하고자 하였다. 장지연은 이른 시기부터 역사 인물 전기에 관심을 가지고 있었다. 하지만 종래 전래되던 고소설 즉 소설 전기에 대해서는 세상 사람들에게 큰 인기를 누리고 있었음에도 불구하고 그 폐해를 들어 부정적인 입장을 분명히 드러내었다. 그가 생각한 좋은 독서물이란 개인의 일과 공부, 심성에는 물론 풍속에도 보탬이 될 만한 것이었던 바, 이러한 장지연의 생각을 집약하여 실재했던 역사 인물 전기의 형식을 취하여 독자들의 현실 생활에 도움을 줄 수 있는 효용의 일환으로 "일사유사"의 편찬을 기획한 것으로 생각된다. "일사유사"를 편찬한 직접적인 동기와 문제의식은 장지연이 남긴 서발문을 통해 확인할 수 있다. 장지연은 조선의 인재 등용 정책의 결과가 망국(亡國)으로 이어지는 계기가 되었음을 지적하며, "일사유사"의 편찬 과정에서 한미한 가문 출신의 선비, 중인 이하의 인물, 함경도 평안도 등의 지방 인사 등에 주목하였다. 이와 더불어 과거의 유산을 후인(後人)들이 살펴볼 수 있도록 해야 한다는 일종의 사명감 같은 것이 "일사유사"의 편찬으로 발현되었다. 이를 통해 장지연은 "일사유사"의 독자들에게 각자의 뜻을 고상하게 하고 본원을 지키면서 살아가는 방편이 무엇인가 하는 좋은 본보기를 제공해 주려고 하였다. "일사유사"의 인물 수록 양상과 특성은 다음의 몇 가지로 정리할 수 있다. 첫째, 이전 시기부터 간행된 여러 역사 인물 전기를 수렴하면서 실재한 여러 유형의 일사들을 총망라하고 있다. 둘째, 중인 평민층 인물에 대한 각별한 관심을 가지고 새로운 인물 유형까지 포괄하였다. 셋째, 여성 인물을 집대성하고 새로운 여성 형상을 그려내고 있다. 넷째, 지역적으로 평안도 함경도 지역을 위시하여 전국 각 지역의 일사들을 두루 포괄하고 있다. 이상 논의를 종합할 때 "일사유사"는 19세기에 이룩된 역사 인물 전기의 제 성과를 발전적으로 계승한 이 방면 유서(類書)의 결정판이라 평가할 수 있다.

• 대순사상논총
• /
• 제39집
• /
• pp.69-97
• /
• 2021

'해체(解體, déconstruction)'는 현대철학을 특징짓는 속성의 하나인 창발성(創發性, emergent property)을 유도하는 개념이다. 고대 그리스 철학의 전통이 탈피를 거듭하여 개체의 자유와 평등에 대한 열망을 낳고 이로부터 르네상스와 계몽주의에 이르러 근대라는 역사적 방점 하에 철학의 종지부를 찍는 듯했다. 하지만 철학은 근대마저도 그러한 해체를 통해 그 이상의 가능성을 바라보고자 했다. 근대철학이 플라톤 철학의 인문적 완성으로 신과 인간의 묘한 동거를 꿈꾼다면 현대철학은 해체를 통해 그마저도 거부한다. 플라톤류의 고전적 형이상학은 절대자를 중심으로 순치된 안정된 체계이기는 하지만 결과적으로는 신과 종교를 토대로 할 수밖에 없고 인간의 자율성 또한 신 아래의 자율성일 뿐이다. 현대철학은 해체를 통해 인간 본연의 목소리로부터 철학을 시작하고자 한 노력의 결과 가운데 하나이다. 형이상학에 종속된 인식론이 아닌 인간 실존으로부터의 인식론을 구축하고 자유라는 말이 가질 수 있는 최고의 선을 해체를 통해 실현하고자 했다. 그렇듯 해체 또한 인간의 자유라는 근대적 화두의 연장선에 있다고 해도 틀리지 않다. 해체와 인간의 자유는 결국 서로 떼어낼 수 없는 하나의 몸인 것이다. 묘하게도 종교적 신앙성과 전통적 보수성을 주된 색채로 할 것만 같은 대순사상은 현대적 창발성을 가지고 있다. 대순사상을 창시한 증산이 활동하던 한국의 시기는 역사를 해석하는 예리한 시각이 있는 이들에게는 보물과 같이 중요한 의미를 가진다. 외세에 의한 답습이 아닌 주체적 문제의식 가운데 새로운 세상과 인간의 자유의 의미를 발견하려는 강렬한 염원에 의한 사상적 활동이 펼쳐진 시기이기 때문이다. 그러한 한국의 자생적 창발성이 낳은 비권력적 사상이 바로 흔히 말하는 한국 근대의 신종교인 셈이다. 그 가운데서 대순사상은 참동학으로서 증산의 명맥을 잇고 증산이 남긴 해원의 개념 속에서 근대를 넘은 현대의 가치를 현실 가운데 펼치고자 한다. 대순사상의 해원은 근대를 넘은 현대성을 담고 있다는 점에서 현대철학의 해체와 상통한다. 해원은 첫째로 단주로부터 발현된 인간 실존의 원초적 억압에 따른 근본 원(冤)의 해소를 의미한다. 두 번째로 대순사상의 해원은 인존이라는 해원적 실존을 중심으로 천지인 삼계의 해원을 아우른다. 데리다의 해체가 인간과 사회 내부에 잠재된 보이지 않는 구조와 속박의 틀을 드러내고 그것을 파기하는 것으로부터 억압을 풀고 인간의 근본 자유를 실현하고자 한 것은 대순사상의 해원이 천지인 삼계를 휘감고 있던 근본 억압을 풀어 삼계의 대립을 상생으로 개방하고자 한 점과 동일한 맥락이라고 할 수 있겠다.

• Asia Marketing Journal
• /
• 제14권1호
• /
• pp.53-81
• /
• 2012

묶음제품의 매력도를 증가시키기 위해 소비자들이 번들 오퍼에서의 가격 제시 프레이밍(framing)에 민감하다는 것을 이해할 필요가 있다. 동일 가격을 할인하더라도 묶음제품 요소 중 어느 요소에 가격할인을 표시하느냐에 따라 소비자의 묶음제품에 대한 지각된 매력도를 바꿀 수 있기 때문이다. 선행연구는 더 중요한 제품 요소에 할인이 할당될 때 효용이 증가한다는 주장과 덜 중요한 제품 요소에 할인을 위치시키는 것이 선호를 증가시킨다는 주장을 동시에 보이고 있다. 본 연구는 선행연구를 보완하여 묶음제품 가격 할인 제시 프레이밍효과에 대한 새로운 기제를 제시한다. 그리고 선행연구에서 믹스드(mixed)된 결론을 보이는 이유를 분석하여 밝힌다. 본 연구는 현실적인 번들링 전략 사용 상황을 고려하였으며, 좀 더 리얼한 번들링 세팅을 이용하여 가격 할인 제시 프레이밍 효과를 조사하고, 순수번들 및 혼합번들을 포함한 다양한 묶음제품을 이용하여 품질 불확실성 지각에 따른 조절효과를 분석하였다. 본 연구 결과, 소비자들은 높은 소비 혜택(high consumption benefit)보다 낮은 소비 혜택(low consumption benefit) 요소에 가격 할인을 위치시키는 것을 더 선호하였다. 가격민감성(price sensitivity)이 주요혜택에서는 낮고, 낮은 혜택에서는 높기 때문에 동일 가격이 할인될 때 낮은 혜택을 할인한 매장 제품에 대한 평가가 더 높게 나타났다. 또한 구매 시점에서 품질의 불확실성(perceived uncertainty of product quality)이 높을수록 가격민감성이 혜택 지각에 가지는 효과가 더 커지고 있었다. 본 연구의 공헌은 소비 혜택 지각 및 가격민감성 기제와 지각된 품질 불확실성의 조절효과를 통해 선행연구를 통합하고, 가격 제시 형태의 프레이밍 효과를 명확하게 설명하였다는 점이다.