• Journal of Digestive Cancer Research
• /
• 제4권1호
• /
• pp.36-38
• /
• 2016

Biliary tract cancer, a relatively rare disease, is usually found in an unresectable stage. Weekly cisplatin plus gemcitabine has been applied as a standard first-line therapy for advanced biliary tract cancer, but almost up to 3-5% patients experience drug induced renal impairment. Many anticancer medication guidelines recommend drug adjustment when kidneys are damaged, but weekly cisplatin is somewhat low dose so that there is a controversy on reducing the dose. And it is known that the cumulative dose of cisplatin is the most important factor contributing to renal impairment. Therefore, clinicians face troubles whether or not to maintain the chemotherapy. Here, we reported a patient whose renal function (eGFR) had been decreased as the number of chemotherapy increased, so her chemotherapy should be stopped. Since we held the chemotherapy on her, the disease progressed aggressively. Weekly cisplatin regimen is just 25 mg/m², so it may be meaningless to reduce this dose, and it is well known that cumulative dose of cisplatin is the most important factor contributing to renal impairment, it is better not to use cisplatin anymore. Therefore, we recommend that if the patient responds well to weekly cisplatin plus gemcitabine regimen, it would be beneficial to use gemcitabine alone.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제13권8호
• /
• pp.4153-4156
• /
• 2012

Purpose: To investigate the efficacy and toxicity of a combination of gemcitabine with nedaplatin (GN) or cisplatin (GC) for patients with unresectable or recurrent esophagus squamous cell carcinoma. Methods: Gemcitabine was administered at 1 g/m2 intravenously on days 1 and 8; and nedaplatin or cisplatin were administered at 80 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1. We analyzed the response rate, overall survival time, progression-free survival time, and toxicity in 21 patients treated with GN and 27 patients treated with GC. Results: In patients treated with gemcitabine plus nedaplatin, the ORR was 47.6%, the median progression-free survival time was 4.1 months, and the median survival time was 9.3 months. In patients treated with gemcitabine plus cisplatin, the ORR was 48.2%, the median progression-free survival time was 3.9 months, and the median survival time was 9.1 months, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in ORR, PFS and OS between the two groups. In both, the most commonly observed toxicities were thrombocytopenia and fatigue. Nausea and vomiting was more frequent in the GC group than in the GN group. Conclusion: Gemcitabine based chemotherapy was effective and tolerable for patients with unresectable or recurrent esophagus squamous cell carcinoma refractory to first line chemotherapy.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제14권6호
• /
• pp.3711-3717
• /
• 2013

Background: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of Cisplatin plus Gemcitabine combination in patients with brain metastases (BM) from breast cancer (BC). Materials and Methods: Eighteen BC patients with BM who were treated with Cisplatin plus Gemcitabine regimen between 2003-2011 were evaluated. Results: A median of 6 cycles of this regimen were received, in fifteen patients (83.3%) as first-line chemotherapy, in 2 as second-line and in 1 as third-line after diagnosis of BM. Dose reduction was performed in 11 (61.1%) patients; major reasons were neutropenia and leukopenia. Grade III neutropenia and Grade II trombocytopenia rates were 33.3% and 16.7% respectively. Overall response rate (ORR; complete+partial response rate) was 33.4% (n=6) for the entire study population; triple negative patients achieved an 66.6% ORR while hormone receptor (HR) positive patients had 25% and HER2 positive patients 12.5%. Median progression-free survival was 5.6 months (2.4-8.8 months, 95%CI) and longer in patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) (median 7.4 months, 95%CI, 2.4-12.3 months) than the patients with other subtypes (median 5 months for HER2 positive and 3.6 months for HR positive patients). Median PFS of the patients with TNBC who received this regimen as first-line was 9.2 months (5.2-13.2 months, 95%CI). Conclusions: Cisplatin plus Gemcitabine may be a treatment option for patients with BM from breast cancer. Longer PFS and higher response rates are results that support the usage of this regimen especially for the triple negative subtype. However, further prospective and randomized trials are clearly required to provide more exact information.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제13권5호
• /
• pp.1841-1844
• /
• 2012

Background: The majority of patients with pancreatic cancer present with advanced disease. Systemic chemotherapy has limited impact on overall survival (OS) so that eligible patients should be selected carefully. The aim of this study was to analyze prognostic factors for survival in Turkish advanced pancreatic cancer patients who survived more than one year from the diagnosis of recurrent and/or metastatic disease and receiving gemcitabine (Gem) alone or gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GemCis). Methods: This retrospective evaluation was performed for patients who survived more than one year from the diagnosis of recurrent and/or metastatic disease and who received gemcitabine between December 2005 and August 2011. Twenty-seven potential prognostic variables were chosen for univariate and multivariate analyses to identify prognostic factors associated with survival. Results: Among the 27 variables in univariate analysis, three were identified to have prognostic significance: sex (p = 0.04), peritoneal dissemination (p =0.02) and serum creatinine level (p=0.05). Multivariate analysis by Cox proportional hazard model showed only peritoneal dissemination to be an independent prognostic factor for survival. Conclusion: In conclusion, peritoneal metastasis was identified as an important prognostic factor in metastatic pancreatic cancer patients who survived more than one year from the diagnosis of recurrent and/or metastatic disease and receiving Gem or GemCis. The findings should facilitate pretreatment prediction of survival and can be used for selecting patients for treatment.

• Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases
• /
• 제60권2호
• /
• pp.151-159
• /
• 2006

목 적 : 폐암치료에 가장 널리 사용되는 cisplatin은 DNA와 결합하여 DNA 복제를 방해한다. 이렇게 손상된 부위를 복구하는 과정에 excision repair cross complementing gene 1 (ERCC1)이 작용한다. ERCC1이 활성화 되면, 정상세포는 DNA 손상을 줄일 수 있지만 종양세포의 경우 cisplatin의 효과는 감소하게 된다. 비소세포 폐암(non-small cell lung cancer, NSCLC) 환자에서 cisplatin을 포함하는 화학치료를 할 경우 예후인자로서 객담 ERCC1 정량측정의 의의를 조사하였다. 대상 및 방법 : 2001년 4월부터 2003년 8월 사이에 NSCLC로 진단되어 cisplatin과 taxane계(33명) 혹은 cisplatin과 gemcitabine(34명) 복합 화학치료를 받은 환자를 대상으로 하였다. 기관지 내시경검사를 실시한 후에 즉각 채취한 객담을 처리하여 c-DNA를 분리한 후, 객담속의 종양특이 유전자인 melanoma antigen gene (MAGE) 발현 여부는 RT-PCR로, ERCC1의 상대적 정량적 측정은 real-time PCR로 하였다. 환자의 치료반응 및 생존기간과 MAGE 발현여부 및 ERCC1의 발현정도와의 상관관계를 조사하였다. 결 과 : 객담에서 MAGE는 40.2%, ERCC1은 74.6%에서 발현되었다. ERCC1이 중앙값 이상인 경우와 미만인 군으로 나눠서 비교한 결과 ERCC1이 증가된 군의 중앙생존기간이 84주로 미만인 군의 44주보다 길었다(P=0.017). Taxane계를 사용한 군의 중앙생존기간이 79주로 gemcitabine 사용군의 47주에 비해 길었다(P=0.03). MAGE의 발현 여부는 생존기간과 유의한 관계는 없었으나, MAGE 발현군에서 ERCC1이 유의하게 증가되어 있었다(P=0.003). MAGE가 발현되지 않고 ERCC1이 증가된 군의 중앙생존기간은 103주로 그렇지 않은 군의 43주보다 길었고(P=0.008), MAGE가 발현된 경우는 두 군 간에 차이가 없었다(각각 62주 및 44주, P=0.348). 결 론 : NSCLC 환자의 객담에서 ERCC1을 정량 측정하는 것이 화학치료를 받는 환자의 생존기간을 예측하는 한 인자로 유용할 것으로 추정된다.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제16권6호
• /
• pp.2483-2487
• /
• 2015

This study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of a combination of gemcitabine and nedaplatin therapy among patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma previously treated with two lines of chemotherapy. Between February 2009 and August 2013, 30 patients were treated with gemcitabine and paclitaxel as a second-line chemotherapy. All had received a first-line chemotherapy consisting of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin. Ten patients who had measurable histologically proven advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder and upper urinary tract received gemcitabine $1,000mg/m^2$ on days 1, 8 and 15 and nedaplatin $70mg/m^2$ on day 2 as a third-line chemotherapy. Tumors were assessed by imaging every two cycles. The median number of treatment cycles was 3.5. One patient had partial response and three had stable disease. The disease-control rate was 40%, the median overall survival was 8.8 months and the median progression-free survival was 5.0 months. The median overall survival times for the first-line and second-line therapies were 29.1 and 13.9 months, respectively. Among disease-controlled patients (n=4), median overall survival was 14.2 months. Myelosuppression was the most common toxicity. There were no therapy-related deaths. Gemcitabine and nedaplatin chemotherapy is a favorable third-line chemotherapeutic option for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Given the safety and benefit profile seen in this study, further prospective trials are warranted given the implications of our results with regard to strategic chemotherapy for patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

• Journal of Digestive Cancer Research
• /
• 제2권2호
• /
• pp.75-77
• /
• 2014

전이성 십이지장 유두암에서 정립된 치료 지침은 아직 없다. 본 증례에서 간 전이 및 국소 림프절 전이가 있는 십이지장 유두암에 대해 단계적 치료를 시행하였다. 원발 부위 종양의 크기를 감소시키고 전이성 병변에 대한 치료를 위해 gemcitabine과 cisplatin 병합 항암화학요법을 시행하였다. 항암화학요법 후 시행한 반응 평가 상에서 원발 병소의 크기가 감소되었고, 추가적으로 전이성 병변이 발생하지 않았음을 확인하고, 내시경적 유두부 절제술로 원발 부위를 국소적으로 제거하였다. 진단 후 12개월 동안 항암화학요법 치료를 시행하였으며, 이 기간 동안 영상학적으로 완전 관해를 유지할 수 있었다. 이후 PPPD 및 Intraoperative RFA를 시행하였으며, 수술 후 병리 소견 상 11개의 국소 림프절 중 1개에서 암세포가 발견되었으나, 원발 부위에서 암은 발견되지 않았다. 환자는 수술 후 7개월째 재발 소견 없이 외래 추적 관찰 중이다. 본 증례의 경우 항암화학요법과 내시경적 유두부 절제술, 그리고 PPPD 및 intraoperative RFA를 통하여 완전 관해를 유도할 수 있었다. 이런 단계적 접근법이 전이성, 국소 진행성 십이지장 유두암에서 생존율 향상을 유도할 수 있을 것으로 사료되어, 이를 증례 보고한다.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제16권15호
• /
• pp.6621-6626
• /
• 2015

Purpose: To evaluate effects of metformin on clinical outcome of non-diabetic patients with stage IV NSCLC. Materials and Methods: A prospective, randomized, open-label, controlled pilot study was conducted on patients with stage IV NSCLC with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) of 0-2, excluding patients with diabetes and lactic acidosis. Thirty chemo-$na\ddot{i}ve$, non-diabetic patients with stage IV NSCLC were enrolled. Fifteen patients received intravenous gemcitabine/cisplatin regimen alone (arm B) while fifteen patients received the same regimen plus daily oral metformin 500mg (arm A). The effect of metformin on chemotherapy-response rates, survival, and adverse events in these patients was evaluated. Results: Objective response rate (ORR) and median overall survival (OS) in arms A and B were 46.7% versus 13.3% respectively, p=0.109 and 12 months versus 6.5 months, respectively, p=0.119. Median progression free survival (PFS) in arms A and B was 5.5 months versus 5 months, p=0.062. No significant increase in toxicity was observed in arm A versus arm B. Percentage of patients who experienced nausea was significantly lower in arm A versus arm B, at 26.7% versus 66.7% respectively, p=0.028. Conclusions: Metformin administration reduced occurrence of chemotherapy induced-nausea. Non-statistically significant improvements in the ORR or OS were observed. Metformin had no effect on PFS.