• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제15권21호
• /
• pp.9453-9458
• /
• 2014

Background: Breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death for women in the United States. Differences in survival of breast cancer have been noted among racial and ethnic groups, but the reasons for these disparities remain unclear. This study presents the characteristics and the survival curve of two racial and ethnic groups and evaluates the effects of race on survival times by measuring the lifetime data-based half-normal model. Materials and Methods: The distributions among racial and ethnic groups are compared using female breast cancer patients from nine states in the country all taken from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer registry. The main end points observed are: age at diagnosis, survival time in months, and marital status. The right skewed half-normal statistical probability model is used to show the differences in the survival times between black Hispanic (BH) and black non-Hispanic (BNH) female breast cancer patients. The Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard ratio are used to estimate and compare the relative risk of death in two minority groups, BH and BNH. Results: A probability random sample method was used to select representative samples from BNH and BH female breast cancer patients, who were diagnosed during the years of 1973-2009 in the United States. The sample contained 1,000 BNH and 298 BH female breast cancer patients. The median age at diagnosis was 57.75 years among BNH and 54.11 years among BH. The results of the half-normal model showed that the survival times formed positive skewed models with higher variability in BNH compared with BH. The Kaplan-Meir estimate was used to plot the survival curves for cancer patients; this test was positively skewed. The Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard ratio for survival analysis showed that BNH had a significantly longer survival time as compared to BH which is consistent with the results of the half-normal model. Conclusions: The findings with the proposed model strategy will assist in the healthcare field to measure future outcomes for BH and BNH, given their past history and conditions. These findings may provide an enhanced and improved outlook for the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer patients in the United States.

• Journal of Breast Disease
• /
• 제6권2호
• /
• pp.60-72
• /
• 2018

Purpose: According to American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guidelines, breast cancer is human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive if there is HER2 protein overexpression at a 3+ level on immunohistochemistry (IHC 3+) or gene amplification (more than six copies per nucleus) on fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH+). However, there have been few reports on whether outcomes differ based on diagnosis by these two techniques. In this study, we compared outcomes based on the two methods in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. Methods: This study was a retrospective analysis of HER2-positive breast cancer in 18,304 patients, including 14,652 IHC 3+ patients and 3,652 FISH+ patients from the Korean Breast Cancer Society Registry. We compared breast cancer-specific survival and overall survival based on IHC 3+ and FISH+ status with or without trastuzumab. Results: Breast cancer-specific survival was significantly different between the IHC 3+ and FISH+ groups, with 5-year cumulative survival rates of 95.0% for IHC 3+ and 98.5% for FISH+ patients who did not receive trastuzumab (p=0.001) in Kaplan-Meier methods. However, there were no significant differences in breast cancer-specific survival and overall survival between IHC 3+ and FISH+ groups regardless of trastuzumab treatment in Cox proportional hazards models. Conclusion: The survival outcomes were not affected by the different two diagnostic methods of HER2-positive breast cancer. Further research to evaluate differences in prognosis and other characteristics according to the diagnostic methods of HER2 positivity is needed in the future.

• Journal of Digestive Cancer Research
• /
• 제5권2호
• /
• pp.86-90
• /
• 2017

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate clinicopathologic features of type 3 gastric neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN) by treatment modality. Methods: The Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Cancer conducted the Korean Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Registry, a retrospective registry database of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors from 16 hospitals in Korea. The normal serum gastrin level range was defined as <100 pg/mL, and gastric NEN patients with normal gastrin level were selected for analysis. Results: Among 358 patients with gastric NEN, 21 (5.9%) patients were classified with type 3 gastric NEN. The median age was 53 years (range 30-74). According to the WHO 2010 classification, 13 (61.9%) patients had grade 1, and 8 (38.1%) patients had grade 2 or 3. Endoscopic treatment was performed in 14 (66.7%) patients, and surgery was performed in 7 (33.3%) patients. The tumor size was smaller in the endoscopic treatment group than in the surgery group (0.6 cm vs 1.3 cm, p=0.006). After treatment, there was one recurrence in the surgery group. Conclusion: In small size Type 3 gastric NEN, endoscopic treatment was associated with a good prognosis, compared to surgery. Thus, endoscopic treatment can be used an alternative modality in selected cases of type 3 gastric NEN.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제15권18호
• /
• pp.7653-7664
• /
• 2014

Background: Colorectal ranked first among cancers reported in males and ranked second amongst females in Jordan, accounting for 12.7% and 10.5% of cancers in males and females, respectively. Colorectal cancer patients can suffer several consequences after treatment that include pain and fatigue, constipation, stoma complications, sexual problems, appearance and body-image concerns as well as psychological dysfunction. There is no published quantitative data on the health-related quality of life and psychological wellbeing of Jordanian colorectal cancer survivors. Method: This project was a cross-sectional study of colorectal cancer survivors diagnosed in 2009 and 2010. Assessment was performed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), the colorectal cancer specific module (EORTC QLQ-CR 29) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Data on potential predictors of scores were also collected. Results: A total of 241 subjects completed the study with mean age of $56.7{\pm}13.6$. Males represented 52.3% of study participants. A majority of participants reported good to high overall health; the mean Global health score was $79.74{\pm}23.31$ with only 6.64% of study participants scoring less than 33.3%. The striking result in this study was that none of the study participants participated in a psychosocial support group; only 4 of them (1.7%) were even offered such support. The mean scores for HADS, depression score, and anxiety score were $8.25{\pm}9$, $4.35{\pm}4.9$ and $3.9{\pm}4.6$, respectively. However, 77.1% of study participants were within the normal category for the depression score and 81.7% were within this category for anxiety score; 5.4% of participants had severe anxiety and 5.4% of them had severe depression. Discussion: Patients with colorectal cancer in Jordan have a good quality of life and psychological wellbeing scores when compared with patients from western countries. None of the colorectal cancer patients managed at the Ministry of Health received any formal counselling, or participated in psychological or social support programmes. This highlights the urgent need for a psychosocial support programme, psychological screening and consultations for patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer at the Ministry of Health Hospitals.

• Korean Journal of Radiology
• /
• 제24권8호
• /
• pp.729-738
• /
• 2023

Objective: When multiple surveillance mammograms are performed within an annual interval, the current guidance for oneyear follow-up to determine breast cancer status results in shared follow-up periods in which a single breast cancer diagnosis can be attributed to multiple preceding examinations, posing a challenge for standardized performance assessment. We assessed the impact of using follow-up periods that eliminate the artifactual inflation of second breast cancer diagnoses. Materials and Methods: We evaluated surveillance mammograms from 2007-2016 in women with treated breast cancer linked with tumor registry and pathology outcomes. Second breast cancers included ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive breast cancer diagnosed during one-year follow-up. The cancer detection rate, interval cancer rate, sensitivity, and specificity were compared using different follow-up periods: standard one-year follow-up per the American College of Radiology versus follow-up that was shortened at the next surveillance mammogram if less than one year (truncated follow-up). Performance measures were calculated overall and by indication (screening, evaluation for breast problem, and short interval follow-up). Results: Of 117971 surveillance mammograms, 20% (n = 23533) were followed by another surveillance mammogram within one year. Standard follow-up identified 1597 mammograms that were associated with second breast cancers. With truncated follow-up, the breast cancer status of 179 mammograms (11.2%) was revised, resulting in 1418 mammograms associated with unique second breast cancers. The interval cancer rate decreased with truncated versus standard follow-up (3.6 versus 4.9 per 1000 mammograms, respectively), with a difference (95% confidence interval [CI]) of -1.3 (-1.6, -1.1). The overall sensitivity increased to 70.4% from 63.7%, for the truncated versus standard follow-up, with a difference (95% CI) of 6.6% (5.6%, 7.7%). The specificity remained stable at 98.1%. Conclusion: Truncated follow-up, if less than one year to the next surveillance mammogram, enabled second breast cancers to be associated with a single preceding mammogram and resulted in more accurate estimates of diagnostic performance for national benchmarks.

• Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
• /
• 제35권3호
• /
• pp.245-254
• /
• 2002

노인에서 $H_2$-RA의 복용과 위암간의 관련성을 밝히기 위한 코호트 내 환자-대조군 연구를 수행하였다. 연구 모집단은 공무원 및 사립학교 교직원을 대상으로 하는 의료보험 관리공단의 피보험자 및 피부양자로서 부산지역에 거주하는 65세 이상의 노인들을 대상으로 구축된 한국노인약물역학코호트의 구성원 중에서 교란변수에 대한 정보 획득을 위해 실시한 설문조사에서 응답한 사람들로 구성된 코호트이었다. $H_2$-RA폭로군은 1993년 1월 1일부터 1994년 12월 31일 사이에 코호트 대상자들이 병원에서 약물을 처방 받아 청구한 자료를 바탕으로 구축한 약물처방 데이터베이스에서 1회 이상 $H_2$-RA를 처방 받은 사람들도 정의하였다. 환자군 76명은 코호트의 위암 환자 확진을 위한 병원방문 조사 자료, 중앙 암등록 자료, 부산 지역 암등록 자료를 이용하여 확인되었다. 대조군은 환자군 확인방법과 동일한 방법을 이용하여 확인하였을 때 암으로 진단받은 병력이 없는 코호트 대상자들 중에서 환자군의 출생 년도와 성별에 따라 1:4의 비율로 개별 짝짓기를 실시하여 뽑은 304명이었다. 잠재적 인 교란변수에 대한 정보는 설문조사를 통해 수집하였다. 조건부 로지스틱 회귀모델을 이용하여 교란변수의 영향을 통제한 상태에서 구한 $H_2$-RA 복용과 위암 발생간의 관련성을 대응비와 95% 신뢰구간으로 제시하였다. 그 결과, 위궤양 증상 여부, 약물 복용력, 체질량 지수의 영향을 통제한 상태에서 $H_2$-RA의 복용은 위암 발생의 위험을 4.6배 증가시키는 것으로 관찰되었다. $H_2$-RA를 7일 이내로 사용한 군은 $H_2$-RA를 사용하지 않은 군에 비해 위암 발생의 위험이 4.6배 증가하는 것으로 관찰되었고 7일 이상 사용한 군은 2.3배 증가하는 것으로 관찰되었다. 투여 경로별로 나누어 보았을 때에는 경구로 투여한 경우에서 유의한 위험 수준의 상승을 관찰하지 못한 반면에 주사로 투여한 경우에서 위험이 4.4배 증가하는 것으로 관찰되었고, 주사와 경구의 두 가지 경로 모두로 $H_2$-RA를 투여 받은 경우 그 위험은 더욱 상승하는 것으로 관찰되었다.시메티딘, 라니티딘, 파모티딘 등의 개별 성분명 별로 위암 발생의 위험에 대한 차이는 관찰되지 않았다. 결론적으로 $H_2$-RA를 사용한 노인에서 사용하지 않은 노인에서 비해 위암 발생의 위험이 더 높아진다는 결론을 얻었으며, 이는 $H_2$-RA투여로 인해 위내에 발생한 무위산증(achlorhydria)이 위암 발생의 위험을 높일 것이라는 기존의 가설을 뒷받침하는 결론이라고 할 수 있었다.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제14권3호
• /
• pp.1234-1244
• /
• 2013

대전지역과 충남지역의 2000-2009년의 암등록 자료를 근거로 암 발생률 변화 및 지역간의 차이와 암등록 자료의 질적 수준을 평가하고자 하였다. 두 지역의 조발생률과 연령표준화 발생률을 비교하였고, 암발생 자료의 타당도는 연령미상률(Age UNK%), 조직학적 확진(HV%)과 DCO%로 보았고, 충실도는 M/I ratio로 평가하였다. 연령표준화 발생률의 발생률 차이는 포아송 분포로 평가하였고, 95% 신뢰구간을 계산하였다. 그리고 성별, 연령별, 지역별 차이는 발생률 곡선으로 비교하였다. 암종별 발생분율에서 위암은 대전이 18.8%, 충남이 21.5%로 가장 높았다. 대전지역 남성의 2000년 연령표준화 발생률은 322.1명, 2009년은 323.9명으로 10년간 0.6% 증가하였다. 여성의 경우 2000년 203.9명에서 2009년 326.8명으로 60.3%의 증가하였다. 충남지역의 남성은 2000년 294.7명에서 2009년 336.97명으로 14.3% 증가하였고, 여성은 2000년 156.5명, 2009년은 267.1명으로 70.7%의 증가하였다. 타당도의 연령미상률은 2000년부터 2009년까지 두 지역 모두 0.0%이었고, 조직학적 확진%는 남성은 71.8%에서 88.5%로 증가하였으며, 여성은 78.1%에서 93.2%로 증가하였다. DCO%는 남성에서 6.4%에서 0.7%로 낮아졌고, 여성은 5.4%에서 0.8%로 낮아졌다. 충실도의 MI%는 15.3%에서 62.1%로서 두 지역 모두 좋은 등록수준을 보였다.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제13권12호
• /
• pp.6059-6062
• /
• 2012

Regional cancer epidemiology is an important basis for determining the priorities for cancer control in different countries worldwide. There is no reliable information about the pattern of head and neck cancer in western Nepal and hence an attempt was here made to evaluate the situation based on hospital data, which provide the only source in the western region of Nepal. A clinicopathological analysis of head and neck cancers treated between 2003 and 2006 in Manipal Teaching Hospital affiliated to Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara, Western Development Region, Nepal was performed. A total of 105 head and neck cancer cases were identified with a male to female ratio of 1.8:1. The median ages of male and female patients were 62 and 64 years, respectively. Ninety-seven (92.4%) of the cancer patients were suffering from carcinoma, three (2.9%) had blastoma, three (2.9%) had sarcoma, and two (1.9%) had lymphoma. The majority (61.9%) of carcinoma cases were squamous cell carcinoma followed by anaplastic carcinoma (7.2%). Of the carcinoma cases, the most common site of primary lesion was larynx (19.6%), followed by the thyroid (14.4%), the tongue and hypopharynx with 10.3% cases each. Comparative analysis among males and females did not reveal any sex difference in type of head and neck cancers. The head and neck cancer pattern revealed by the present study provides valuable leads to cancer epidemiology in western Nepal and useful information for health planning and cancer control, and future research in western Nepal.

• Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
• /
• 제29권6호
• /
• pp.83.1-83.10
• /
• 2018

Objective: We aimed to propose a set of quality indicators (QIs) based on the clinical guidelines for cervical cancer treatment published by The Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology, and to assess adherence to standard-of-care as an index of the quality of care for cervical cancer in Japan. Methods: A panel of clinical experts devised the QIs using a modified Delphi method. Adherence to each QI was evaluated using data from a hospital-based cancer registry of patients diagnosed in 2013, and linked with insurance claims data, between October 1, 2012, and December 31, 2014. All patients who received first-line treatment at the participating facility were included. The QI scores were communicated to participating hospitals, and additional data about the reasons for non-adherence were collected. Results: In total, 297 hospitals participated, and the care provided to 15,163 cervical cancer patients was examined using 10 measurable QIs. The adherence rate ranged from 50.0% for 'cystoscope or proctoscope for stage IVA' to 98.8% for 'chemotherapy using platinum for stage IVB'. Despite the variation in care, hospitals reported clinically valid reasons for more than half of the non-adherent cases. Clinically valid reasons accounted for 75%, 90.9%, 73.4%, 44.5%, and 88.1% of presented non-adherent cases respectively. Conclusion: Our study revealed variations in pattern of care as well as an adherence to standards-of-care across Japan. Further assessment of the causes of variation and non-adherence can help identify areas where improvements are needed in patient care.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제17권1호
• /
• pp.347-352
• /
• 2016

Background: This study used receiver operating characteristic curve to analyze Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) adenosquamous carcinoma data to identify predictive models and potential disparities in outcome. Materials and Methods: This study analyzed socio-economic, staging and treatment factors available in the SEER database for adenosquamous carcinoma. For the risk modeling, each factor was fitted by a generalized linear model to predict the cause specific survival. An area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was computed. Similar strata were combined to construct the most parsimonious models. Results: A total of 20,712 patients diagnosed from 1973 to 2009 were included in this study. The mean follow up time (S.D.) was 54.2 (78.4) months. Some 2/3 of the patients were female. The mean (S.D.) age was 63 (13.8) years. SEER stage was the most predictive factor of outcome (ROC area of 0.71). 13.9% of the patients were un-staged and had risk of cause specific death of 61.3% that was higher than the 45.3% risk for the regional disease and lower than the 70.3% for metastatic disease. Sex, site, radiotherapy, and surgery had ROC areas of about 0.55-0.65. Rural residence and race contributed to socioeconomic disparity for treatment outcome. Radiotherapy was underused even with localized and regional stages when the intent was curative. This under use was most pronounced in older patients. Conclusions: Anatomic stage was predictive and useful in treatment selection. Under-staging may have contributed to poor outcome.