• 제목/요약/키워드: attitude toward laboratory works

검색결과 2건 처리시간 0.016초

'비행기' 주제의 과학영재프로그램이 초등영재의 자기주도적 학습 태도, 실험활동에 대한 태도, 창의적 성향에 미치는 영향 (The Effects of 'Airplane' Science Program for the Gifted Elementary Students' Self-Directed Learning Attitude, Attitude toward Laboratory Work and Creative Personality)

  • 김금화;박기수;유미현
    • 과학교육연구지
    • /
    • 제38권2호
    • /
    • pp.415-429
    • /
    • 2014
  • 이 연구의 목적은 Renzulli의 3부 심화학습 모형을 적용한 비행기 주제의 영재프로그램이 초등 영재학생들의 자기주도적 학습 태도, 실험활동에 대한 태도, 창의적 성향에 미치는 영향을 알아보는 것이다. 연구 참여자는 경기도 소재 초등학교 영재 학급에 선발되어 교육받고 있는 37명의 초등영재학생이다. 본 연구의 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 본 프로그램 적용 전후 초등영재 학생의 자기주도적 학습 태도 전체 점수에 유의미한 차이를 나타내었다. 자기주도적 학습 태도 하위영역별에서는 사전-사후 비교한 결과, 학습 개방성, 자아 개념성, 솔선수범성, 책임감, 학습 열정도, 자기 이해도, 창의성, 자기평가력 영역에서 유의미한 향상을 보이고 있다. 둘째, 본 프로그램 적용 전후 초등영재 학생의 실험활동에 대한 태도 전체 점수에 유의미한 차이를 나타내었다. 하위영역별로는 실험가치, 실험효율, 실험활동 흥미, 개별실험 필요 전 영역에서 유의미한 차이를 보이는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 본 프로그램 적용 전후 초등영재 학생의 창의적 성향 전체 점수에 유의미한 차이를 나타내었다. 하위영역별로 살펴본 결과 독립심, 개방성 영역에서 사전-사후 유의미한 차이를 보이고 있다. 넷째, 본 프로그램에 대한 초등영재 학생들의 만족도는 평균 4.52점으로 만족도가 매우 높았으며, 남학생이 여학생보다 프로그램 운영에 대한 평가와 교사활동에 대해 더 높은 만족도를 나타내었다. 또한, 프로그램 개선사항으로는 산출물 발표 준비과정의 어려움과 지도교사의 세부적인 지도 필요, 학습량 조절 등이 제기되었다.

  • PDF

과학동산 운영에 관한 질적 연구 (A Qualitative Study of Running질 Science Garden질)

  • 채동현;이수영
    • 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
    • /
    • 제21권2호
    • /
    • pp.263-288
    • /
    • 2002
  • 'Science Garden' is a science program that develops acquirements of science & technology at an early stage through experiential study and inspire the spirit of scientific inquiry by carrying out laboratory work, science movie, science lecture, scientific work, outdoor activities, computer classes and science experiment which is hard to do through the regular educational course. It is targeted grade 4,5,6 students during summer and winter vacation. 'Science Garden' is conducted by selective participation freely. It is a wholelistic activity that develops children's potential talents or creativities, improves interest and attitude toward science, and also gives opportunity for self-realization by extending capacity for inquiry to show each student's ability. This study is observed and is compared how it is conducted in elementary school using qualitative study. This study is used narrative observation, in-depth interview and document analysis. Objects of narrative observation are two elementary schools, each from Jellabukdo and Gyeonggido, and 7 teachers were interviewed in-depthly. Here are results of the study. 1 A teacher in school G never takes part in student activities, tends to be indifferent to classes, but focuses on observation and experiment in laboratory. And feedback or evaluation about student's activity is never done. On the other hand, a teacher in school S guides students to understand the principals of science on themselves, and wide variety forms of activities such as role playing, discussion, and games are being done. But an effort to evaluate student's activity is not being made properly. 2. Teachers set a high valuation on the need of 'Science Garden'. Observing the way of conducting 'Science Garden', usually teachers who is in charge of science for official work is selected as a teacher in charge, and groan under a heavy burden of conducting it without anyone's help. Participating students are selected by volunteering or teacher's recommendation, but because of low Participation rate, teachers have difficulty in conducting it. Plan for conducting ‘science Garden’ is made 20 days before it, after getting an official document from Office of Education, refering to booklets produced by National Jungang Science Institute, or data from Office of Education, and internet. Teachers evaluate rarely Most school principals have interest in 'Science Garden' but parents are not well aware of it, The budget is made at the same time with the plan, and scale is varied between 200,000∼500,000 won. Because of the improper way of selecting teacher in charge, difficulty in selecting students, heavy works caused by planning, conducting the program, as well as reporting teacher's work, and lack of parents' awareness, 'Science Garden' has been conducted formally and superficially. Next gives you direction to change, for the right way of conducting' Science Garden'. It is important to motivate competent teachers to instruct students actively. For students' active participation, They should publicize thoroughly beforehand, and develope 'Science Garden' program for teachers to be able to make better use of it. Evaluation of student activities and program should be done in the aspect of developing students’ faculties. Beside of school facilities, they need to put diverse local facilities and places to practical use for immediate natural experience. And not only separate schools but also associated form of schools to conduct it is necessary.

  • PDF