• 대한감각통합치료학회지
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.10-20
• /
• 2017

목적 : 본 연구는 고유-전정감각 중심의 감각통합 중재가 초등학교 저학년 아동의 글씨쓰기와 소근육 능력 향상에 영향을 미치는지 알아보고자 하였다. 연구방법 : 본 연구는 부산 소재 초등학교에 재학 중인 저학년 아동 8명을 대상으로 단일집단 사전-사후 설계(one group pretest-posttest design)를 사용하였다. 2016년 5월에서 10월까지 주 2회, 총 14회기의 고유-전정감각 중심의 감각통합중재를 실시하였으며 글씨쓰기와 소근육 능력에 대한 측정은 한글자모쓰기검사와 Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency (BOTMP)의 Fine motor영역 검사를 실시하였다. 결과 : 중재 후 한글자모쓰기검사 결과 자음쓰기와 전체 총점은 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 나타냈으며 모음쓰기는 통계적으로 유의한 차이는 없었으나 점수의 향상을 나타내 글씨쓰기 능력의 향상을 나타냈다. BOTMP-Fine motor결과 Response Speed항목은 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 나타냈으며 Visual-Motor control항목은 중재 전후로 점수의 증가가 있었으나 통계적으로 유의한 차이는 없었다. 결론 : 본 연구는 고유-전정감각 중심의 감각통합 중재가 초등학교 저학년 아동의 글씨쓰기와 소근육 능력 향상에 긍정적 영향을 미치는 것을 확인하였다.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제63권1호
• /
• pp.1-18
• /
• 2024

본 연구는 고등학교 1학년 노력형 학생들이 (1) 수학 서술형 평가에서 보이는 어려움에 대한 분석과 (2) 이를 극복하기 위한 쓰기 활동 지도 방안을 탐구하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 서술형 문항으로 이루어진 검사를 수행한 후 검사 결과를 바탕으로 학생들과 면담을 진행하고, 15회에 걸쳐 수학 노트 쓰기 활동을 지도하였다. 연구 결과에 따르면 학생들은 서술형 평가에서 20가지의 어려움을 보였다. 이를 '수학적 어려움'과 '서술형 어려움' 등 2가지 범주로 분류한 결과 수학이라는 과목 특성에서 보이는 어려움은 수학 개념과 원리의 이해 부족, 수학 기호 사용의 어려움, 문장제 문항에 대한 어려움, 수학에 대한 고정관념에서 오는 어려움이 있었다. 서술형 문항이라는 특성에서 보이는 학생의 어려움은 객관식 문항과는 다른 평가 방법에서 오는 어려움, 서술형 문항의 풀이 과정 기술의 어려움, 기타 심리적인 어려움이 있었다. 노력형 학생들이 서술형 평가에서 보이는 어려움을 극복할 수 있는 학습전략의 일환으로 개별 수학 노트 쓰기 활동을 지도하였고 (1) 수학적 개념의 내면화, (2) 관계적 이해를 통한 정당화, (3) 다양한 풀이 시도, (4) 수학적 기호 사용, (5) 반성적 사고, (6) 심리적 방해 요소 극복으로 범주화하고 지도 과정 및 효과에 대하여 정리하였다.

• 한국어교육
• /
• 제28권4호
• /
• pp.63-86
• /
• 2017

This research aims to evaluate the effects and the shortcomings of strategies for teaching paraphrasing to foreign university students. For this study, the effects of teaching paraphrasing skills on student's academic writing was investigated through the assessment of pre- and post-test writing tasks and through a focus group interview. The teaching of paraphrasing was divided into 3 instructional sessions and the focus group interview was conducted at the end of the last session. After each instructional session three trained assessors evaluated the outcomes of pre and post task writings; the in-depth focus group interviews were conducted on seven of the students in order to define better positive effects as well as shortcomings. By comparing the scores of pre- and post-task assignments it is possible to affirm that there is a meaningful difference for overall scores; moreover, in an analysis conducted on each single sub-element of the paraphrasing skill, it emerged that except for "task completion", all other four elements of "structure", "understanding core content", "change of expression" and "academic expressions" showed a statistically significant improvement in performance. On the other hand, as a result of the focus group interview, it was possible to individuate as main shortcomings insufficient vocabulary knowledge, poor overall comprehension of the reference material, lack of practice and difficulty in connect sentences organically. It is possible to consider these elements as limiting factors in understanding the reference material and making correct citations by the students. Therefore, we suggest as supplementary instructional strategies a deeper attention to the difficulty level of the text, the introduction of devices to understand better the content of the reference material and an integrated practice of the paraphrasing skill.

• 영재교육연구
• /
• 제26권4호
• /
• pp.699-719
• /
• 2016

창의적 사고와 언어기술을 평가하는데 동형검사로 판명된 대체 그림들이 절실히 요구되고 있다. 본 연구는 창의적 쓰기 과제용으로 최근 개발된 세 그림(이름: 'Dog Owners,' 'Lost Dog,' 'Overslept')이 동형 검사지가 되는지 조사하였다. 183명의 중학생들이 무작위로 배분된 세 그림 중 하나에 의거하여 영어로 이야기를 작성하였다. 작문은 네 가지 쓰기요소(유창성, 어휘 다양성, 구조 복잡성, 그리고 시간성)에 대해 Coh-Metrix와 MANCOVA로 분석되었다. 이 세 그림은 변별력에 있어 대체로 위 모든 요소에 대해 비슷하였다. 그러나 이들의 난이도는 요소별로 볼 때 반드시 같지는 않았다. Dog Owners와 Lost Dog 그림은 변별력과 난이도에 있어 동형으로 판명되었다. 그러므로 이 두 그림은 반복 측정에서 타당한 동형 검사지로 추천된다. Overslept 그림은 다양한 어휘와 시간 연결사들을 유발시키는 데에 다른 두 그림 보다 용이하였다. 그림의 난이도가 다를 수 있다는 결과는 반복시험에서 대체 그림을 사용할 시 이들 그림이 동형 검정을 거치지 않고서는 그 타당성이 의심스러울 수 있음을 환기시켜 준다.

• 의학교육논단
• /
• 제23권2호
• /
• pp.90-103
• /
• 2021

This study examined the current status of the medical professionalism curriculum in Korea to suggest a plan to move towards the formation of a professional identity. Professionalism education data from 28 Korean medical schools were analyzed, including the number of courses, required or elective status, corresponding credits, major course contents, and teaching and evaluation methods. Considerable variation was found in the number of courses and credits in the professionalism curriculum between medical schools. The course contents were structured to expand learners' experiences, including the essence and knowledge of professionalism, understanding of oneself, social interaction with others, and the role of doctors in society and the healthcare system. The most common teaching methods were lectures and discussions, while reflective writing, coaching, feedback, and role models were used by fewer than 50% of medical schools. Written tests, assignments and reports, discussions, and presentations were frequently used as evaluation methods, but portfolio and self-evaluation rates were relatively low. White coat ceremonies were conducted in 96.2% of medical schools, and 22.2% had no code of conduct. Based on the above results, the author suggests that professional identity formation should be explicitly included in learning outcomes and educational contents, and that professional identity formation courses need to be added to each year of the program. The author also proposes the need to expand teaching methods such as reflective writing, feedback, dilemma discussion, and positive role models, to incorporate various evaluation methods such as portfolios, self-assessment, and moral reasoning, and to strengthen faculty development.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제17권3호
• /
• pp.22-33
• /
• 2014

This paper presents a comparative study on the effectiveness of teaching an engineering course using English with Specific Purpose(ESP). A study was performed using student groups; one class using ESP, and one class conducted in English with an English text. The course conducted using ESP showed the greatest improvement in English writing and conversation, and the students reported a greatly increased confidence in their ability to function professionally using English. A self-assessment of each student was conducted before and after the courses. Prior to the course less than 10% in each group felt that they are able to: a) understand a textbook, b) write an email, c) generate a project report, or d) follow a lecture given in English. The survey at the end of the course showed that the ESP teaching style resulted in significant improvements in students ability and confidence with writing and speaking in English, whereas reading skills were similar for both groups. This is due to the ESP method, in which students are required to give presentations and keep journals in English. After a brief review of the ESP principles and a discussion of how they were implemented, the background data of the participants(students) are described. Finally, the end-of-semester survey highlights the efficacy of the ESP approach.

• 대한약침학회지
• /
• 제27권2호
• /
• pp.142-153
• /
• 2024

Objectives: This study aimed to analyze the educational needs of interns and residents in Korean medicine as the first step in developing an education program to improve their research competencies. Methods: A mixed-method design, incorporating both quantitative and qualitative data collection methods, was used to investigate the educational needs for research competencies among interns and residents working in Korean medicine hospitals nationwide. Data were collected through online surveys and online focus group discussions (FGDs), and processed using descriptive statistical analysis and thematic analysis. The study results were derived by integrating survey data and FGD outcomes. Results: In total, 209 interns and residents participated in the survey, and 11 individuals participated in two rounds of FGDs. The majority of participants felt a lack of systematic education in research and academic writing in postgraduate medical education and highlighted the need for nationally accessible education due to significant disparities in the educational environment across hospitals and specialties. The primary barrier to learning research and academic writing identified by learners was the lack of knowledge, leading to time constraints. Improving learners' research competencies, relationship building, autonomy, and motivation through a support system was deemed crucial. The study also identified diverse learner types and preferred educational topics, indicating a demand for learner-centered education and coaching. Conclusion: This study provides foundational data for designing and developing a program on education on research competencies for interns and residents in Korean medicine and suggests the need for initiatives to strengthen these competencies.

• 실천공학교육논문지
• /
• 제16권1_spc호
• /
• pp.21-31
• /
• 2024

본 연구는 ChatGPT를 활용한 글쓰기 의사소통 역량을 평가하는 AI 평가도구 개발에 초점을 두었다. 개발 과정에 있어 내용 전문가와 기술 전문가 간의 상호작용을 통해 IT와 인문사회 영역의 융합과정을 탐구하였다. 내용 전문가와 기술 전문가는 긴밀한 소통 및 상호작용을 통해, 글쓰기 의사소통 역량의 채점기준을 탑재하였고 각 영역별(내용의 적절성, 조직의 효과성, 어법의 정확성) 점수와 피드백을 제공하는 AI 평가도구를 개발하였다. 이 과정에서 본 연구는 내용과 기술이 어떻게 결합하는지에 대한 과정을 드러내고, 이후 생성형 AI를 활용한 평가도구 기술 전문가를 포함한 융합연구자들이 유의해야 할 사항 등에 대해 제시하였다.

• 한국어교육
• /
• 제29권1호
• /
• pp.85-108
• /
• 2018

This study pointed out the reality that many novice Korean language teachers who lack rater training are scoring the learners' writing skill. The study performed and analyzed a case where pre-service teachers were educated in order to explore the possibility of promoting rater training in a Korean language teacher training course. The pre-service teachers majoring in Korean language education at the graduate school scored TOPIK compositions and were provided feedback by the FACETS program, which were further discussed at the rater meeting. In three scoring processes, the raters scored with conscious of own rating patterns and showed positive change or over correction due to excessive consciousness. Consequentially, ongoing training can improve rating ability, and considering the fact that professional rater training is hard to progress, the method composed of FACETS analysis and rater training revealed positive effects. On the other hand, the rater training including native Korean and non-native(Chinese) speakers together showed no significant difference by mother tongue but by individual difference. This can be interpreted as a positive implication to the rating reliability of non-native speakers possessing advanced Korean language abilities. However, this must be supplemented through extended research.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제49권4호
• /
• pp.523-540
• /
• 2010

The purpose of the study were to analyze MathThematics textbooks and Korean middle school mathematics and to investigate the difference among the textbooks in the view of mathematical communication. According to the results, the textbook developers made a variety of efforts to develope students' mathematical communication ability. Students were encouraged to communicate with others about their mathematical ideas or problem solving processes in words or writing by means of discussion, oral report, presentation, journal, etc. MathThematics textbooks provided student self-assessment opportunity to improve student performance in problem solving, reasoning, and communication. In communication assessment, students can assess their use of mathematical vocabulary, notation, and symbols, the use of graphs, tables, models, diagrams and equation to solve problem and their presentation skills. The assessment activities would make a positive impact on the development of students' mathematical communication ability. MathThematics textbooks provided a variety of problem situation including history, science, sports, culture, art, and real world as a topic for communication, however, the researcher found that some of Korean textbooks depends heavily on mathematical problem situations.