• 한국재난정보학회 논문집
• /
• 제2권1호
• /
• pp.81-89
• /
• 2006

As the quality of the rising the desire for safety life and the need of safety education to prevent disasters or big safety accident have been shown. Therefore the superintendent of education for safety experience carry out a policy for set up. However, it is unclear the appropriateness of safety education program and safety standard of facilities of introductions in the safety experience center. therefore, in the result of this study will be the basic information for the realities of experience in the place of safety experience education and propose the reform measure.

• 보건교육건강증진학회지
• /
• 제24권4호
• /
• pp.41-64
• /
• 2007

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to verify the validity of the evaluation indicators on safety and health education programs provided to Korean industrial workers, by developing further. Methods: To develop the early evaluation indicator, the secondary analysis was made on 'Survey on Industrial safety & health trends', the national wide survey data product by Korea Occupational Safety & Health Agency, as well as the various examinations on literatures. To validate such developed evaluation indicator, 13 safety and health managers in Focus Group discussion to prove the reliability of the contents were composed. To confirm the face validity, the interview with 6 industrial safety and health education experts was held to study the appropriateness of the content. With the cooperation from Korea Occupational Safety & Health Agency, the structured survey was performed with the safety and health managers from 588 businesses who participated in the education program for the later half of 2006. In this study, the number of responses was randomly divided into 1:1 two groups, in which one group was for the Exploratory Factor Analysis and the other group was for the Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Results: The results were as follows. First, for the Structure category, 18 evaluation indicators were developed into 4 evaluation categories such as a preliminary examination, education staff and organization, education environment and rules/ regulation. Secondly, the Activity category was comprised of 10 evaluation indicators with respect to 2 areas of curriculum satisfaction and program evaluation. Finally, for the Output category, 9 evaluation indicators were developed into 2 evaluation areas such as documentation and information share and education effects. Conclusions: The evaluation indicators developed through this study will possibly develop and be applied to evaluation tools on safety and health education program, which may further become the standardized indicators to better operate the industrial safety and health education programs.

• 한국엔터테인먼트산업학회논문지
• /
• 제15권5호
• /
• pp.115-128
• /
• 2021

본 연구는 배드민턴 생활체육 동호인의 용품구매와 시설 이용 시 생각하고 느낀 중요도와 만족도를 알아보고 이를 기초자료로 활용하여 생활체육 배드민턴 동호인을 확대하고 활성화 방안을 제안하고자 용품, 가격, 프로그램, 시설, 직원, 홍보에 대한 설문조사를 진행하였다. 설문조사 후 중요도와 만족도를 알아보기 위하여 IPA Matrix방법을 적용하여 자료처리를 실시하였으며, 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다. 첫째, 배드민턴 생활체육 동호인의 중요도와 만족도 순위 분석결과 중요도는 1위 직원요인의 강사 및 지도자의 전문성, 2위 시설요인의 시설의 안전성, 3위는 프로그램의 프로그램 내용 및 효과 만족도는 1위 시설요인의 시설의 청결 및 관리, 2위 직원요인의 강사 및 지도자의 전문성, 3위는 직원요인의 직원의 친절성 순으로 나타났다. 둘째, 중요도와 만족도 IPAMatrix 결과 I사분면은 프로그램요인의 강습시간 적절성과 프로그램 내용 및 효과, 시설요인의 주차 공간 규모와 시설의 청결 및 관리, 직원요인의 강사 및 지도자의 전문성, 직원서비스 태도, 직원친절성, 홍보요인의 소비자와의 상담 및 불편사항 해결, II사분면은 가격요인의 가격의 적절성, 가격대비 가치, 할인제도, 용품요인의 소재 및 디자인, III사분면은 용품요인의 용품 A/S 우수성, 프로그램요인의 프로그램 구성의 다양성, 시설요인의 배드민턴 구장 위치 및 접근성, 다양한 편의시설, 홍보요인의 다양한 홍보 및 이벤트 구성과 홈페이지 구성 등 홍보 전략, IV사분면은 용품요인의 용품 브랜드 가치 및 인지도와 용품 브랜드 전문성이 나타났다.