• Human Ecology Research
• /
• 제58권4호
• /
• pp.463-481
• /
• 2020

This study examines the level of consumer knowledge regarding the concept and characteristics of the sharing economy along with the role of the three economic players in the sharing economy. This study develops scales for measuring a consumer's knowledge level and the knowledge level using these scales as well as analyzes the impact of knowledge levels, socio-demographic variables, social capital, and knowledge sharing on participation in the sharing economy. The scales measuring the level of knowledge in the sharing economy were composed of 22 questions for the concept, 30 questions for the characteristics, and 15 questions for the role of the economic parties. Consumer's knowledge level regarding the concept and characteristics of the sharing economy and the role of the economic players was very low. In particular, the knowledge on the concept was insufficient. Women's knowledge on the sharing economy showed higher scores than men. Consumers with higher scores in social capital and knowledge sharing showed higher scores of the knowledge level on the sharing economy than those behind in these two variables. A higher knowledge level of the sharing economy resulted in higher participation in the sharing economy. Issues and directions for future studies on the sharing economy were proposed.

• 한국조경학회지
• /
• 제38권5호
• /
• pp.42-52
• /
• 2010

본 연구는 조경기술사 검정제도의 출제문제에 대하여 수험생들이 인식하는 체감 정도, 즉 문제의 객관성, 적정성, 난이도 등 출제되는 문제의 전반에 대한 경향을 분석 제언하여 검정제도가 학술적, 체계적으로 개선됨으로써, 조경기술사 검정제도의 정착과 조경기술사 자격의 위상 확립, 산업현장에서의 조경분야 지위 향상 등 전반적인 조경발전을 목적으로 이번 연구를 실시하였다. 조사방법은 두 단계로 나누어 전문가 집단을 활용하여 출제되는 과목 및 과목의 배정에 관한 사항을 조사하였고, 수험생 및 자격취득자를 대상으로 출제문제의 수준, 객관성, 난이도, 출제경향 등 출제되는 문제의 전반에 대해 설문조사를 실시하였다. 분석결과, 먼저 조경기술사 검정 시 출제되는 과목이 국가기술자격법 시행규칙에 제시된 시험과목과는 달리 출제되고 있었으며, 과목배정, 시험문제의 객관성, 수준, 난이도 등에서 다양한 문제점을 내포하고 있는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 문제점의 원인은 여러 가지 요인이 있겠지만 충분한 검토 없이 문제출제, 출제위원의 관리 미흡 등 현재 진행되고 있는 검정제도의 시스템을 운영하는데 문제가 있지 않나 판단된다. 따라서 이러한 문제점을 보완하기 위해 '출제되는 시험과목의 정비', '적정한 과목 배정 및 문제의 객관성 확보', '출제문제의 수준 및 난이도 유지', '출제 시스템 개선'등에 대하여 관련부처나 단체에서는 효율적인 개선노력이 필요함을 제언하였다.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제28권7호
• /
• pp.697-712
• /
• 2008

The purpose of this study was to seek strengths and weaknesses from analyzing Korea and U.S. science textbooks in terms of general structural features, contents, cognitive levels of questions and the purpose of questions used in science textbooks. This provided insight into improvement of textbooks that can effectively assist teaching and learning. To investigate organization of unit in textbooks in-depth, the evolution unit was selected and scrutinized as one example. The results showed that the number of pages, activities, vocabulary words, and vocabulary lists are considerably different between Korean and the U.S. Commonly, U.S. textbooks were more laden with information and lacking in coherence than those of the Korean textbooks. The findings on the cognitive levels of questions showed that the majority of questions in both nations are concerned with knowledge. However, the difference between the two nations is great in the ratios of analysis, synthesis, and evaluation questions. Questions are concentrated in review section (45% of Korean and 60.6% of U.S.) in textbooks. It suggested that well-planned questions in a review section can provide the basic guidance for strength in a science classroom.

• 한국가정과교육학회지
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.97-115
• /
• 2010

본 연구는 제 7차 교육과정 중학교 "기술.가정" 교과서의 가정 영역에 제시된 질문을 Bloom의 인지적 영역의 수준에 따라 질문의 빈도, 수준, 위치를 분석하는 데 목적이 있다. 이에 임의로 5개의 출판사의 교과서를 선정해 총 15권을 분석하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 가정 교과서에 포함된 Bloom의 인지적 영역 질문은 1학년(36.9%)이 가장 많았고, 2학년(33.6%), 3학년(29.5%)의 순이었으나 그 비율은 세 개의 학년이 비슷하였다. 가정 교과서에 제시된 질문을 Bloom의 인지적 영역에 따라 분류하였을 때 이해 질문(28.9%)과 적용 질문(28.3%)이 많았고, 지식(21.8%), 분석(8.6%), 종합(6.8%), 평가(5.6%) 수준의 질문은 그 비율이 점차 줄어들었다. 학년별로는 1학년과 3학년은 이해 질문과 적용 질문이 많았고, 2학년은 적용 질문이 가장 많은 비중을 차지했다. 둘째, 중학교 가정교과서에서 Bloom의 인지적 영역 질문의 위치는 읽기 후 질문이 49.2%로 가장 많았고, 읽기 중 질문이 36.7%, 읽기 전 질문은 14.1%를 차지하였다. 읽기 전 질문에서는 학습자들의 흥미를 불러일으키고 사전지식을 조성하고 활성화시키는 목적으로써 지식수준(11.4%), 이해수준(43.2%)의 질문이 주로 나타났고, 읽기 중 질문에서는 학습의 이해와 좀 더 폭 넓은 사고를 할 수 있는 수단으로 적용수준(36.7%)의 질문과 이해수준(25.5%)의 질문이 이용되고 있었다 읽기 후 질문에서는 지금까지 학습한 내용의 점검을 하는 역할로서의 질문인 지식수준(33.4%)과 이해수준(26.8%)의 질문이 많이 나타났다.

• 대한방사선기술학회지:방사선기술과학
• /
• 제46권5호
• /
• pp.435-444
• /
• 2023

The purpose of this study was to analyze the factors that demographic factors, radiation knowledge level, and radiation awareness could be affecting the benefits of radiation. From July 2022 to July 2023, after receiving consent to participate by using the link of Naver through Social Network Service (SNS) for the general public, 312 people were surveyed by self-registration method without collecting personal information. The questionnaire consisted of a total of 25 questions following demographic factors (5 questions including age group by life cycle, sex, monthly household income, residence), radiation knowledge level (8 questions including basic physical, biological effects, radiation protection technology), radiation awareness (12 questions including risk, management, benefit). Independent sample T-test and ANOVA tests were performed for significant differences in the average radiation awareness between variables, and hierarchical regression was performed to identify influencing factors on radiation benefits. As a result, the benefit of radiation was significantly high among the radiation awareness, but the awareness of the danger of radiation was insufficient to the level of recognizing it as safe. Men had significantly higher awareness of radiation management and benefits than women, and the awareness of radiation management was significantly higher in the middle class with a monthly household income of 4.31 million won or more. The higher the knowledge level of radiation, the higher the awareness of the benefits of radiation. The factors that had a positive effect on radiation benefits were the high level of radiation knowledge and awareness of radiation management.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제4권1호
• /
• pp.43-51
• /
• 2012

PURPOSE. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of sociodemographic factors on quality of satisfaction towards denture treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS. One hundred subjects (filling inclusion criteria) who were wearing a denture for at least two months were enrolled and divided into five groups on the basis of sociodemographic variables (age, gender, literacy level, socio-economic and marital status). Questionnaires consisting of 38 questions (positive and negative attitude towards denture satisfaction) related to patients' perception of clinical outcome in different domains such as mastication, appearance, speech, comfort, health, denture care and social status were scored by the subjects. Questions reflecting positive attitude were scored as 2, 1, or 0 (yes, uncertain and no, respectively) and reversely for the negative questions. Statistical analysis was done by using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (${\alpha}$= .05). RESULTS. Level of denture satisfaction was higher in age subgroup belonging to 45 - 65 years of age in relation to comfort, health and denture care. Female and male showed significant priority for denture treatment because of esthetic and function respectively. Level of satisfaction was statistically significant with literacy level. Upper high income group showed significantly higher level of satisfaction only in case of social status. Married group showed significantly higher satisfaction level only with comfort. CONCLUSION. Patients' sociodemographic variables were influential factors on denture satisfaction.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제31권2호
• /
• pp.225-238
• /
• 2011

이 연구는 과학 수업 내용에 대한 이해와 질문을 바탕으로 학생들에게 문제를 만들어보게 하는 훈련을 실시한 수업이 전통적인 수업과 비교해 학업성취도, 메타인지, 자기 효능감에 미치는 영향을 알아보고, 이들 요소들과 함께 만들어낸 문제의 수준이 학업성취수준에 따라 어떻게 변하는지에 대해서도 알아보고자 하였다. 연구 대상은 부산시에 소재한 남자 중학교 2학년 65명을 두 개의 집단으로 나누어 실시하였으며 비교 집단은 전통적인 수업을 실시하였으며, 실험집단은 수업이 끝나기 전 15분 정도 1인당 3개의 문제를 스스로 만들어보고 동료 간에 문제를 풀어보도록 하는 문제생성훈련을 통한 수업을 실시하였다. 사전에 실시된 형성평가를 바탕으로 학생들의 성취수준을 상위 중위 하위의 3개 집단으로 나누고 사전 메타인지 검사와 자기 효능감 검사를 실시하였다. 수업 처치가 끝난 후에는 학업성취도 검사, 메타인지 검사, 자기 효능감 검사를 실시하고 이를 분석하기 위해 t-검정을 실시하였으며. 문제수준의 차이를 분석하기 위해서 일원공변량분석(One-way ANCOVA)을 실시하였다. 연구 결과를 보면 문제생성훈련은 메타인지나 자기 효능감 및 학업 성취도에 긍정적인 효과가 있음을 알 수 있었다. 좀 더 상위수준의 문제를 만드는 학생들의 수가 점차 많아짐을 통해 학생들은 성취수준에 상관없이 보다 많은 사고를 필요로 하는 좋은 문제를 만들어 내는 능력을 획득하고 있음을 알 수 있었다.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제26권5호
• /
• pp.551-557
• /
• 2007

The purpose of this study was to examine the questions in the 'Matter' units of elementary science textbooks under the 7th curriculum. For the analysis, a total of 338 questions were extracted from 15 units. Six criteria (recalling, recognizing, predictive, applied, divergent, and evaluative question) were reconstructed for textbook question analysis based on Blosser(1973)'s question category system for science. The results were as follows. First, there were more closed (recalling, recognizing, predictive, or applied) questions (72.2%) than open (divergent or evaluative) questions (27.8%) in elementary science textbooks. Second, cognitive-memory (recalling or recognizing) question type was the most frequently asked in all grade levels. Open (divergent or evaluative) questions increased according to grade level whereas convergent (predictive or applied) questions decreased. Third, question types were applied based on the characteristics of each unit rather than on children's developmental characteristics. Educational implications were discussed based on the results.

• 대한치과기공학회지
• /
• 제32권3호
• /
• pp.211-220
• /
• 2010

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze dental laboratory's working environment and turnover intention level and to examine its correlation. Methods: 180 dental technicians in Seoul, Incheon, and Chungnam area were selected. Survey was carried out from April 6, 2009 to May 20, 2009 by using self-administered questionnaire. As for the tools for this study, the structured questionnaire was used with its proven reliability and feasibility, and the contents of questionnaire consisted of 43 questions on the basis of related references. The questionnaire consisted of total 32 questions which included general attribute of subjects(14 questions), working Environment(20 questions) and turnover intention(9 questions). The data analysis was processed by computerized system with SPSS 12.0. Statistical analysis techniques included frequency, percentage, T-test, F-test analysis and regression analysis. Results: As a result of analyzing the research subjects' working environment level, there was significant difference in the item of health(P<0.05). The average in the working environment was indicated to be high with 1.53. As a result of analyzing the research subjects' turnover intention level, there was difference in the item of working hours a day(Hour), job satisfaction level, plan for task continuity, most difficulty given task(P<0.05). The average of turnover intention was indicated to be high with 2.85. Conclusion: Correlation between working environment and turnover intention, most of variables were indicated to have reverse correlation, thereby having been shown that the worse working environment leads to the more turnover intention.

• International Journal of Quality Innovation
• /
• 제7권3호
• /
• pp.92-97
• /
• 2006

This research deals with the determination of 25 key assessment questions(KAQ) from the Baldrige criteria. It first investigates the performance of all the examination questions through real world applications. The 25 KAQs are then selected based the level of correlation between each of the questions and the overall assessment results. A set of field data are used for validating the key assessment questions in a statistical framework.