• 한국정보기술응용학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국정보기술응용학회 2005년도 6th 2005 International Conference on Computers, Communications and System
• /
• pp.293-296
• /
• 2005

This study applies the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to evaluate service quality of Third-Party Logistics (3PL) service providers. For this, we first conceptualize five dimensions of 3PL service quality (i.e. tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, assurance and empathy). We then apply the AHP method to determining the relative weights of five service quality dimensions and eventually selecting the best 3PL service provider. To implement this idea in practice, we conduct an empirical study on four companies providing 3PL services in Korea.

• 산업공학
• /
• 제20권3호
• /
• pp.376-386
• /
• 2007

The analytic hierarchy process (AHP), a well-known and useful decision making method, has been applied to R&D project evaluation and selection. The objective of this study is to propose a new model for evaluating and selecting R&D projects of Samsung Electro-Mechanics, the top manufacturer of electronic components in Korea, using the AHP. To show the validity of the new model, we strived to successively compare the final priorities for R&D projects with the priorities obtained by the existing model and the new model respectively.

• 대한산업공학회지
• /
• 제36권1호
• /
• pp.1-6
• /
• 2010

The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) has been applied widely in various decision making fields. One of advantages of the AHP is the consistency test. However, it has several problems such as the limit of its concept, the limit of 9 scales and stern criteria, contradictory pairwise comparison. In this paper, we propose new criteria for the consistency with more realistic and ideal conditions. To derive the criteria, we conduct the simulation and use the bootstrap method, which is one of resampling techniques in the simulation area.

• 경영과학
• /
• 제13권3호
• /
• pp.75-90
• /
• 1996

This paper presents an improved method of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) when customers are to select the best automobile purchase models. In order to support group decisions and as a different procedure of the conventional AHP, we combine the AHP model with a spreadsheet model that applies the Likert's rating scheme to each alternative. We only consider individual pairwise comparison matrices where the consistency ratio (C.R.) is less than or equal to 0.2. Finally, we regard the weight of each decision maker as a reciprocal number of C.R. As a case study we prioritize three passenger cars of medium size in the domestic market. The major evaluation criteria include:exterior or interior features, performance, safety, pricing, salesman, and after service.

• 한국군사과학기술학회지
• /
• 제12권5호
• /
• pp.557-562
• /
• 2009

Weapon system currently considers the research about effect analysis including cost effectiveness methodology for a budget management and an achievement of the military strategy goal. So that, this study considers the theoretical background, strength and weakness of several Multi-Criteria Decision Making, and an effect analysis of weapon system. And AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) is selected for the best effect analysis methodology of weapon system. Therefore, we applied AHP to the case study of the new generation Multiple Launcher Rocket System, performing the analysis of cost effectiveness methodology. Using AHP and cost effectiveness methodology, we propose the actual and proper decision making result.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제35권3호
• /
• pp.24-31
• /
• 2012

Priority rules or sequencing heuristics conventionally used to determine resource allocation is to maximize the earned value on time and cost. This study provides a effective strategy-oriented approach for the program resource management problem with limited same resource, which systematically connects individual project objectives to the overall organizational goal, by introducing financial values as well as priority rules in a broader context. It deals with the resource allocation problem as the decision making problem in the strategic management paradigm to meet business objective and solves it using the analytic hierarchy process, and explains the method of application and usefulness through some simulation cases.

• 한국철도학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국철도학회 2008년도 춘계학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.1416-1425
• /
• 2008

Urban railway carries large numbers of passengers during the rush hour. According to the announcement of Ministry of Land Transport and Maritime Affairs(MLTM), 221% of the congestion rate is reported in the SeoulMetro No.2 outer circle line from sadang to bangbea between eight and nine o'clock in the morning. This study analyzes the cause of the client's dissatisfaction about SeoulMetro such as the train delay, and decides the preference rank of the alternatives for congestion alleviation and enhancement of the transport capacity using Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP).

• 한국철도학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국철도학회 2006년도 추계학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.1501-1507
• /
• 2006

The accidents are often resulted from multiple causes with hardware failure and human errors. So to ensure the safety of rail operation, human error should be prevented effectively. The purpose of this paper is to present an analysis system on factors of influencing human error in korean rail industry especially for engine driver and train despatcher. To achieve it, ESFs(error shaping factors) classification system was derived from several PSFs(performance shaping factors) classification system. Based on them, two kinds of questionnaires for engine driver and train despatcher each were developed. Then Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) methodology was used to evaluate what factors were critical to human error.

• Geomechanics and Engineering
• /
• 제30권3호
• /
• pp.313-324
• /
• 2022

With the development of the economy, people's utilization of underground space are also improved, and a large number of cities have begun to build subways to relieve traffic pressure. The choice of subway station construction method is crucial. If an inappropriate construction method is selected, it will not only waste costs but also cause excessive deformation that may also threaten construction safety. In this paper, a subway station construction scheme selects model based on the AHP-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. The rationality of the model is verified using numerical simulation and monitoring measurement data. Firstly, considering the economy and safety, a comprehensive evaluation system is established by selecting several indicators. Then, the analytic hierarchy process is used to determine the weight of the evaluation index, and the dimensionless membership in the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is used to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of the construction method. Finally, the method is applied to Liaoyang east road station of Qingdao metro Line 2, and the results are verified by numerical simulation and monitoring measurement data. The results show that the model is scientific, practical and applicable.

• Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society
• /
• 제23권5호
• /
• pp.961-970
• /
• 2012

국방연구개발에 참여하는 업체 중에 특정기술을 일정기간에 개발할 수 있는 역량을 구비한 업체를 선정하기 위해서는 사업목적에 적합한 평가지표를 개발하는 것이 매우 중요하다. 본 연구는 선행연구와 국방 연구개발의 특성, 현재 사용하고 있는 항목을 종합하여 새로운 지표를 개발하고 전문가 인터뷰를 통해 객관화 하였다. 선정항목의 타당성 검증과 계층구조 모형설계를 위해 주축요인분석을 실시하였으며 27개 변수 중 타당성이 없는 10개를 제외하고 17개 변수를 최종 선정하였다. 17개 변수는 계층분석법 (analytic hierarchy process)을 통해 평가지표 항목의 가중치를 부여하였으며, 상위계층에서는 업체능력이 개발계획보다 중요하게 나타났고, 하위계층에서는 고객과의 의사소통 및 협력방안과 현 사업 유사기술 특허 및 논문의 우수성, 소요기술 확보현황 등이 높은 순위로 나타났다. 반면 기술유출 방지대책, 협력업체 전문성 및 관리의 적절성, 소프트웨어 개발방안 등은 낮은 순위로 나타났다.