• Management Science and Financial Engineering
• /
• 제16권1호
• /
• pp.17-46
• /
• 2010

This paper studies six different AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) approaches and suggests that the features of the approaches are classified by application circumstances in order to contribute to the applicability and quality usage of the AHP. Our study investigates the hierarchical principles and characteristics of the AHP, and historical debates on the AHP evaluation in which the six approaches have been involved. One of six approaches is an ANP (Analytic Network Process) application that is directly connected to AHP usage. The application differences among the six approaches are validated with a plain example. Then, the four circumstances of AHP applications are classified by two dimensions: the first dimension is whether or not the importance (weights) of criteria is independent of restrictively setting alternatives, and the second dimension is whether or not preference (priorities) of alternatives is independent of adding alternative(s) to or removing alternative(s) from the considering set of alternatives. Then featuring way of weighting criteria is classified. We suggest the distinguishing manners and describe the implications of the AHP application. Finally, we discuss rank reversal and multiplicative AHP.

• 한국항행학회논문지
• /
• 제15권6호
• /
• pp.1098-1103
• /
• 2011

클라우드 컴퓨팅의 장점에도 불구하고 보안성에 대한 문제들이 많은 사용자들의 선택에 장애가 되고 있다. 본 논문에서는 클라우드 컴퓨팅의 보안성에 대한 ISO 7498-2 표준의 관련 속성들이 전체 보안 품질에 미치는 상대적 영향도를 평가하였다. 많은 요인들의 영향도를 객관적으로 평가하기 위하여 Fuzzy AHP(Analytic hierarchical process)를 적용하였다. 본 연구는 클라우드 컴퓨팅 서비스의 보안 관련 각 속성들의 상대적 중요성을 구체적으로 수치화 할 수 있었고, 클라우드 컴퓨팅 서비스의 효율적인 선택 및 개발에 필요한 관리 방법을 제시할 수 있었다.

• 기술경영경제학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 기술경영경제학회 2000년도 제17회 하계학술발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.35-46
• /
• 2000

The Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) model developed by Saaty is a very useful decision-making model designed for selecting and evaluating project alternatives through $\ulcorner$pairwise comparison$\lrcorner$ in the context of hierarchical structure. In this paper, we construct a modified AHP model named Analytic Dicho-Hierarchy Process (ADHP) model necessary for evaluating technology alternatives.

• Industrial Engineering and Management Systems
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.49-62
• /
• 2016

In this paper, we propose an integrated data envelopment analysis (DEA) and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) methodology in which the information about the hierarchical structures of input-output data can be reflected in the performance assessment of decision making units (DMUs). Firstly, this can be implemented by extending a traditional DEA model to a three-level DEA model. Secondly, weight bounds, using AHP, can be incorporated in the three-level DEA model. Finally, the effects of incorporating weight bounds can be analyzed by developing a parametric distance model. Increasing the value of a parameter in a domain of efficiency loss, we explore the various systems of weights. This may lead to various ranking positions for each DMU in comparison to the other DMUs. An illustrative example of road safety performance for a set of 19 European countries highlights the usefulness of the proposed approach.

• Journal of Information Technology Applications and Management
• /
• 제13권4호
• /
• pp.303-319
• /
• 2006

Business Information Systems are strategic applications to achieve companies' goals and innovation. This idea make companies invest their time and budget in the Information Systems. However, it is difficult to forecast effects of the investment in Information Systems and it causes hesitation of making decision. Thus, I researched a case so that I could forecast the effect of the information systems using AHP(analytic hierarchical process). In this study, I approached this matter with three views such as intelligence(review of prior literature), design(methodology development), and application. This study is significant in terms of practicality rather than theoretical dimension. Particularly, I suggested a way of quantifying in monetary value the quality aspects through inverting qualitative facts to quantitative facts and calculated the investment feasibility with it.

• 경영과학
• /
• 제16권1호
• /
• pp.75-85
• /
• 1999

In recent, an unfaithful construction bring about many social problems. The bidding process considering bidding price firstly is one of the reasons raising an unfaithfull construction work. Thus, we should consider many other criteria including bidding price in the bidder selection process. This paper suggests an analytic hierarchy process(AHP) model for selecting the best bidder of a large construction project. A questionnaire was used to obtain domain experts' opinion about criteria to be considered in the bidding process. A hierarchical structure of the AHP model is formed using criteria obtained in the survey. The model consists of bidding price, construction capability, financial status, faith, and their 17 sub-attributes. The relative importance of bidders are judged by pairwise comparison or absolute measurement. An illustrative example is given to show the process selecting the best bidder using the suggested AHP model.

• 경영과정보연구
• /
• 제39권2호
• /
• pp.145-162
• /
• 2020

본 연구는 AHP 적용상의 문제점을 살펴보고 올바른 적용방법을 위한 'AHP 수정가중치모형'을 개발하는 연구이다. 여기서 AHP는 복잡한 의사결정 문제를 계층화 하여 상위수준요인과 하위수준요인들로 분해하고, 그 요인들에 대한 쌍대비교를 통해서 요인들에 대한 상대적인 가중치를 도출하는 방법이다. 하지만 AHP 계층구조에서 각 상위수준요인(대항목)을 구성하는 하위수준요인(소항목)들의 개수가 같을 경우에는 최종가중치가 바르게 나타나지만 각 대항목을 구성하는 소항목들의 개수가 다른 경우에는 심각한 오류가 발생한다. 이에 본 연구에서는 이를 개선할 수 있는 'AHP 수정가중치모형'을 개발하였다. 구체적으로 AHP 분석의 오류가 소항목의 개수, 즉 규모가 다를 때 발생하는 것에 착안하여 소항목 개수의 규모를 상대적으로 같게 만들어서 그 오류를 제거하였다. 그리고 개발된 모형을 다양한 AHP 계층구조에 적용하여 검증하였다. 구체적으로 첫 번째 모형검증에서는 4개의 대항목과 각각 개수가 다른 소항목으로 구성되어 있으며 대항목과 소항목의 중요도가 같다고 가정하였고, 두 번째 모형검증에서는 2개의 대항목과 각각 개수가 다른 소항목으로 구성되어 있으며 모든 대항목과 소항목의 중요도가 다르다고 가정하였다. 그리고 세 번째 모형검증에서는 실제 선행연구에 적용하였다. 그 결과 본 연구에서 개발된 'AHP 수정가중치모형'이 AHP 분석의 문제점을 효과적으로 해결할 수 있었다.

• 경영과학
• /
• 제19권2호
• /
• pp.139-153
• /
• 2002

The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is known as a very useful decision-making model developed for obtaining the relative weights of alternatives through pairwise comparison in the context of hierarchical structure. In this paper, we propose a method to reflect the reliability of evaluators in the process of pairwise comparison. This method is applied to the evaluation of aerospace technology alternatives. We have conducted a questionnaire survey for S company that is one of the representative aerospace companies in Korea. A questionnaire was designed for obtaining both the priority with considering the reliability of evaluators' importance weights (the modified AHP priority) and the priority with assuming equally reliable evaluators' importance weights (the AHP priority) in order to compare the priority derived by each of two methods. The result shows that there exists the difference hard to neglect between the final priorities gained by two methods.

• 대한안전경영과학회지
• /
• 제17권2호
• /
• pp.207-214
• /
• 2015

The purpose of this paper is an application of AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) in the priority setting of promising technology in division of senior friendly product based on the previous studies. In this paper, the decision criteria for evaluating promising technologies in division of senior friendly product are identified and the hierarchical structure of decision making process is developed systematically. Subsequently the values of weights for relative importance among decision criteria are derived using AHP methodology, and the score of importance of promising technology in division of senior friendly product with respect to each criterion is evaluated. Finally the score of each promising technology in division of senior friendly product is quantified in order to prioritize them. We discuss implications of our results with a viewpoint of technology policy in division of senior friendly product.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제32권3호
• /
• pp.29-44
• /
• 2004

Obtaining and fully understanding the true requirements of customers is hard task. However, successful use of quality function deployment(QFD) depends on capturing customers' requirements and reflecting them during the design of a product. One of common mistakes in QFD is to perform analysis using an inconsistent house of quality(HoQ) chart. This article presents a model for prioritizing customer attributes and design characteristics in order to make a product more attractive to customers. The proposed model modifies the analytic hierarchical process(AHP) with simple pairwise comparison. Our exploration using of QFD identifies how practitioners maintain consistency, whist quantifying HoQ speedily from the customer's perspectives. This paper also identifies and justifies an alternative position on QFD that is supported by statistical examples.