• Asia Marketing Journal
• /
• 제15권4호
• /
• pp.131-159
• /
• 2014

Corporate rebranding has been evident in the qualitative corporate rebranding studies as an imposed organizational change that induces mixed reactions and ambivalent attitudes among consumers. Corporate rebranding for the established and familiar corporate brands leads to more ambivalent attitudes as these companies represent larger targets for disparaging information. Consumers are found to hold both positive and negative reactions toward companies and brands that they are familiar with. Nevertheless, the imposed change assumption and ambivalent attitude, in particular corporate rebranding, have never been widely explored in the quantitative corporate rebranding studies. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive empirical examination of the ambivalence towards rebrandingrebranded brand attitude-purchase intention relationships. The author proposes that corporate rebranding for familiar corporate brands is a double-edged sword that not only raises the expectation for better performance, but also induces conflicted and ambivalent attitudes among consumers. These consumers' ambivalent attitudes are influenced by both the parent brands-related and general attitude factors which further affect their rebranded brand attitude and purchase intention. A total of 156 useable questionnaires were collected from Malaysian working adults; and two established Malaysian airfreight operators were utilized as the focal parent brands. The study found a significant impact of prior parent brand attitudes on ambivalence towards rebranding (ATR). The parent brand attitudes served as anchors in influencing how new information was processed (Mazaheri et al., 2011; Sherif & Hovland, 1961) and closely related to behavioral intention (Prislin & Quellete, 1996). The ambivalent attitudes experienced were higher when individuals held both positive and negative reactions toward the parent brands. Consumers also held higher ambivalent attitudes when they preferred one of the parent brands; while disliked the other brand. The study also found significant relationships between the lead brand and the rebranded brand attitude; and between the partner brands and ATR. The familiar but controversial partner brand contributed significantly to the ambivalent attitudes experienced; while the more established lead brand had significant impact on the rebranded brand attitude. The lead and partner brands, though both familiar, represented different meanings to consumers. The author attributed these results to the prior parent brand attitudes, the skepticism and their general ambivalence toward the corporate rebranding. Both general attitude factors (i.e. skepticism and general ambivalence towards rebranding) were found to have significant positive impacts on ATR. Skeptical individuals questioned the possibility of a successful rebranding (Chang, 2011) and were more careful with their evaluations toward 'too god to be true' or 'made in heaven' pair of companies. The embedded general ambivalent attitudes that people held toward rebranding could be triggered from the associative network by the ambiguous situation (Prislin & Quellete, 1996). In addition, the ambivalent rebranded brand attitude was found to lower down purchase intention, supporting Hanze (2001), Lavine (2001) and van Harreveld et al. (2009)'s studies. Ambivalent individuals were found to prefer delay decision making by choosing around the mid-ranged points in 'willingness to buy' scale. The study provides several marketing implications. Ambivalence management is proven to be important to corporate rebranding to minimize the ambivalent attitudes experienced. This could be done by carefully controlling the parent brands-related and general attitude factors. The high ambivalent individuals are less confident with their own conflicted attitudes and are motivated to get rid of the psychological discomfort caused by these conflicted attitudes (Bell & Esses, 2002; Lau-Gesk, 2005; van Harreveld et al., 2009). They tend to process information more deeply (Jonas et al., 1997; Maio et al., 2000; Wood et al., 1985) and pay more attention to message that provides convincible arguments. Providing strong, favorable and convincible message is hence effective in alleviating consumers' ambivalent attitudes. In addition, brand name heuristic could be utilized because the rebranding strategy sends important signal to consumers about the changes that happen or going to happen. The ambivalent individuals will pay attention to both brand name heuristic and rebranding message in their effort to alleviate the psychological discomfort caused by ambivalent attitudes. The findings also provide insights to Malaysian and airline operators for a better planning and implementation of corporate rebranding exercise.

• Asia Marketing Journal
• /
• 제15권4호
• /
• pp.61-101
• /
• 2014

This study investigates when and how disagreements in online customer ratings prompt more favorable product evaluations. Among the three metrics of volume, valence, and variance that feature in the research on online customer ratings, volume and valence have exhibited consistently positive patterns in their effects on product sales or evaluations (e.g., Dellarocas, Zhang, and Awad 2007; Liu 2006). Ratings variance, or the degree of disagreement among reviewers, however, has shown rather mixed results, with some studies reporting positive effects on product sales (e.g., Clement, Proppe, and Rott 2007) while others finding negative effects on product evaluations (e.g., Zhu and Zhang 2010). This study aims to resolve these contradictory findings by introducing preference heterogeneity as a possible moderator and causal attribution as a mediator to account for the moderating effect. The main proposition of this study is that when preference heterogeneity is perceived as high, a disagreement in ratings is attributed more to reviewers' different preferences than to unreliable product quality, which in turn prompts better quality evaluations of a product. Because disagreements mostly result from differences in reviewers' tastes or the low reliability of a product's quality (Mizerski 1982; Sen and Lerman 2007), a greater level of attribution to reviewer tastes can mitigate the negative effect of disagreement on product evaluations. Specifically, if consumers infer that reviewers' heterogeneous preferences result in subjectively different experiences and thereby highly diverse ratings, they would not disregard the overall quality of a product. However, if consumers infer that reviewers' preferences are quite homogeneous and thus the low reliability of the product quality contributes to such disagreements, they would discount the overall product quality. Therefore, consumers would respond more favorably to disagreements in ratings when preference heterogeneity is perceived as high rather than low. This study furthermore extends this prediction to the various levels of average ratings. The heuristicsystematic processing model so far indicates that the engagement in effortful systematic processing occurs only when sufficient motivation is present (Hann et al. 2007; Maheswaran and Chaiken 1991; Martin and Davies 1998). One of the key factors affecting this motivation is the aspiration level of the decision maker. Only under conditions that meet or exceed his aspiration level does he tend to engage in systematic processing (Patzelt and Shepherd 2008; Stephanous and Sage 1987). Therefore, systematic causal attribution processing regarding ratings variance is likely more activated when the average rating is high enough to meet the aspiration level than when it is too low to meet it. Considering that the interaction between ratings variance and preference heterogeneity occurs through the mediation of causal attribution, this greater activation of causal attribution in high versus low average ratings would lead to more pronounced interaction between ratings variance and preference heterogeneity in high versus low average ratings. Overall, this study proposes that the interaction between ratings variance and preference heterogeneity is more pronounced when the average rating is high as compared to when it is low. Two laboratory studies lend support to these predictions. Study 1 reveals that participants exposed to a high-preference heterogeneity book title (i.e., a novel) attributed disagreement in ratings more to reviewers' tastes, and thereby more favorably evaluated books with such ratings, compared to those exposed to a low-preference heterogeneity title (i.e., an English listening practice book). Study 2 then extended these findings to the various levels of average ratings and found that this greater preference for disagreement options under high preference heterogeneity is more pronounced when the average rating is high compared to when it is low. This study makes an important theoretical contribution to the online customer ratings literature by showing that preference heterogeneity serves as a key moderator of the effect of ratings variance on product evaluations and that causal attribution acts as a mediator of this moderation effect. A more comprehensive picture of the interplay among ratings variance, preference heterogeneity, and average ratings is also provided by revealing that the interaction between ratings variance and preference heterogeneity varies as a function of the average rating. In addition, this work provides some significant managerial implications for marketers in terms of how they manage word of mouth. Because a lack of consensus creates some uncertainty and anxiety over the given information, consumers experience a psychological burden regarding their choice of a product when ratings show disagreement. The results of this study offer a way to address this problem. By explicitly clarifying that there are many more differences in tastes among reviewers than expected, marketers can allow consumers to speculate that differing tastes of reviewers rather than an uncertain or poor product quality contribute to such conflicts in ratings. Thus, when fierce disagreements are observed in the WOM arena, marketers are advised to communicate to consumers that diverse, rather than uniform, tastes govern reviews and evaluations of products.

• Asia Marketing Journal
• /
• 제15권4호
• /
• pp.103-129
• /
• 2014

Differentiated positioning becomes increasingly difficult when brand salience weakens. Also, the daily increase in new media use and information load has led to a social climate that regards advertising stimuli as spamming. For these reasons, the focus of advertisement-related communication is shifting from persuading consumers through the direct delivery of information to an emphasis on appealing to their emotions using matching stimuli to enhance persuasion effects. Recently, both academia and industry have increasingly shown an interest in storytelling methods that can generate positive emotional responses and attitude changes by arousing consumers' narrative processing. The purpose of storytelling is to elicit consumers' emotional experience to meet the objectives of advertisement producers. Therefore, the most important requirement for storytelling in advertising is that it evokes consumers' sympathy for the main character in the advertisement. This does not involve advertisements directly persuading consumers, but rather, consumers themselves finding an answer through the advertisement's story. Thus, consumers have an indirect experience regarding the product features and usage through empathy with the advertisement's main character. In this study, we took the results of a precedent study as the starting point, according to which consumers' emotional response can be altered depending on the storytelling methods adopted for storytelling ads. Previous studies have reported that drama-type and vignette-type storytelling methods have a considerably different impact on the emotional responses of advertising audiences, due to their different structural characteristics. Thus, this study aims to verify that emotional response aroused by different types of advertisement storytelling (drama ads vs. vignette ads) can be controlled by the socio-psychological gender difference of advertising audiences and that the interaction effects between the socio-psychological gender differences of the audience and the gender stereotype of emotions to which advertisements appeal can exert an influence on emotional responses to types of storytelling in advertising. To achieve this, an experiment was conducted employing a between-group design consisting of 2 (storytelling type: drama ads vs. vignette ads) × 2 (socio-psychological gender of the audience: masculinity vs. femininity) × 2 (advertising appeal emotion type: male stereotype emotion vs. female stereotype emotion). The experiment revealed that the femininity group displayed a strong and consistent empathy for drama ads regardless of whether the ads appealed to masculine or feminine emotions, whereas the masculinity group displayed a stronger empathy for drama ads appealing to the emotional types matching its own gender as well as for vignette ads. The theoretical contribution of this study is significant in that it sheds light on the controllability of the audiences' emotional responses to advertisement storytelling depending on their socio-psychological gender and gender stereotype of emotions appealed to through advertising. Specifically, its considerable practical contribution consists in easing unnecessary creative constraints by comprehensively analyzing essential advertising strategic factors such as the target consumers' gender and the objective of the advertisement, in contrast to the oversimplified view of previous studies that considered emotional responses to storytelling ads were determined by the different types of production techniques used. This study revealed that emotional response to advertisement storytelling varies depending on the target gender of and emotion type appealed to by the advertisement. This suggests that an understanding of the targeted gender is necessary prior to producing an advertisement and that in deciding on an advertisement storytelling type, strategic attention should be directed to the advertisement's appeal concept or emotion type. Thus, it is safe to use drama-type storytelling that expresses masculine emotions (ex. fun, happy, encouraged) when the advertisement target, like Bacchus, includes both men and women. For brands and advertisements targeting only women (ex. female clothes), it is more effective to use a drama-type storytelling method that expresses feminine emotions (lovely, romantic, sad). The drama method can be still more effective than the vignette when women are the main target and a masculine concept-based creative is to be produced. However, when male consumers are targeted and the brand concept or advertisement concept is focused on feminine emotions (ex. romantic), vignette ads can more effectively induce empathy than drama ads.

• Asia Marketing Journal
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.1-22
• /
• 2013

This case focuses on Shanghai Tang, the first truly Chinese luxury brand that appeals to both Westerners and, more recently, to Chinese consumers worldwide. A visionary and wealthy businessman Sir David Tang created this company from scratch in 1994 in Hong Kong. Its story, spanned over almost two decades, has been fascinating. It went from what best a Chinese brand could be in the eyes of Westerners who love the Chinese culture, to a nearly-bankrupted company in 1998, before being acquired by Richemont, the second largest luxury group in the world. Since then, its turnaround has been spectacular with a growing appeal among Chinese luxury consumers who represent the core segment of the luxury industry today. The main objective of this case study is to formally examine how Shanghai Tang overcame its downfall and re-emerged as one the very few well- known Chinese luxury brands. More specifically, this case highlights the ways with which Shanghai Tang made a transitional change from a brand for Westerners who love the Chinese culture, to a brand for both, Westerners who love the Chinese culture and Chinese who love luxury. A close examination reveals that Shanghai Tang has followed the brand identity concept that consists of two major components: functional and emotional. The functional component for developing a luxury brand concerns all product characteristics that will make a product 'luxurious' in the eyes of the consumer, such as premium quality of cachemire from Mongolia, Chinese silk, lacquer, finest leather, porcelain, and jade in the case of Shanghai Tang. The emotional component consists of non-functional symbolic meanings of a brand. The symbolic meaning marks the major difference between a premium and a luxury brand. In the case of Shanghai Tang, its symbolic meaning refers to the Chinese culture and the brand aims to represent the best of Chinese traditions and establish itself as "the ambassador of modern Chinese style". It touches the Chinese heritage and emotions. Shanghai Tang has reinvented the modern Chinese chic by drawing back to the stylish decadence of Shanghai in the 1930s, which was then called the "Paris of the East", and this is where the brand finds inspiration to create its own myth. Once the functional and emotional components assured, Shanghai Tang has gone through a four-stage development to become the first global Chinese luxury brand: introduction, deepening, expansion, and revitalization. Introduction: David Tang discovered a market gap and had a vision to launch the first Chinese luxury brand to the world. The key success drivers for the introduction and management of a Chinese luxury brand are a solid brand identity and, above all, a creative mind, an inspired person. This was David Tang then, and this is now Raphael Le Masne de Chermont, the current Executive Chairman. Shanghai Tang combines Chinese and Western elements, which it finds to be the most sustainable platform for drawing consumers. Deepening: A major objective of the next phase is to become recognized as a luxury brand and a fashion or design authority. For this purpose, Shanghai Tang has cooperated with other well-regarded luxury and lifestyle brands such as Puma and Swarovski. It also expanded its product lines from high-end custom-made garments to music CDs and restaurant. Expansion: After the opening of his first store in Hong Kong in 1994, David Tang went on to open his second store in New York City three years later. However this New York retail operation was a financial disaster. Barely nineteen months after the opening, the store was shut down and quietly relocated to a cheaper location of Madison Avenue. Despite this failure, Shanghai Tang products found numerous followers especially among Western tourists and became "souvenir-like" must-haves. However, despite its strong brand DNA, the brand did not generate enough repeated sales and over the years the company cumulated heavy debts and became unprofitable. Revitalizing: After its purchase by Richemont in 1998, Le Masne de Chermont was appointed to lead the company, reposition the brand and undertake some major strategic changes such as revising the "Shanghai Tang" designs to appeal not only to Westerners but also to Chinese consumers, and to open new stores around the world. Since then, Shanghai Tang has become synonymous to a modern Chinese luxury lifestyle brand.

• Asia Marketing Journal
• /
• 제15권3호
• /
• pp.117-139
• /
• 2013

Research on purchase intention had showed remarkable progress in contributing to the theory of consumer behavior. Despite the popularity of academic discussions on various issues influencing purchase intention, the mediating role of brand recall and brand attitude on purchase intention, in particular advergames, has not yet been well explored, especially in developing economies such as Malaysia. Furthermore, the influence of self-brand congruity, entertainment and brand placement acceptance as antecedents to brand recall and brand attitude are expected to add value to the brand recall, brand attitude and purchase intention relationships. This paper aims to investigate the impact of the mediating role of brand recall and brand attitude on purchase intention in advergames among Malaysian gamers. The antecedents towards brand recall and brand attitude are also examined to measure their influence on purchase intention. A total of 350 Malaysian gamers were interviewed through online survey in this study. The results showed that brand recall and brand attitude mediate the relationship between self-brand congruity, entertainment and brand placement acceptance with purchase intention. Also, entertainment and brand placement acceptance were found to have a significant relationship with brand recall. As expected, brand recall and brand attitude showed a positive relationship with consumer purchase intention in advergames. It was found that self-brand congruity has a significant influence on brand attitude and purchase intention. When users see the brand which matches with them, they tend to act positively toward the brand exposed in the game. This is consistent with Escalas and Bettman (2005) who suggested that the greater the congruity, the more positive the consumer's attitude toward the brand in question. This leads to game usage and purchase (Davis and Lang, 2013). In the advergaming context, the entertainment value in advergames is very important to determine the level of enjoyment and pleasure experienced by gamers during game-playing. Therefore, the more entertaining the ads, the more it will be remembered and the greater the positive behavior of the consumer towards the advergames - this ultimately stimulates their intention to purchase the brand. This study shows the effect of brand placement on brand recall and brand attitude and also purchase intention. Brand placements might not work in games due to the interactivity involved in game-playing as people could be distracted from noticing the brand placements (Yang et al., 2006). However, the significant influence of brand placements found in this study may provide major promise for advertisers. Game players may or may not explicitly remember the brands they see in the games, but these placements may influence their brand recall and brand attitude and could therefore influence later decisions (Yang et al., 2006). In this study, it was found that self-brand congruity was not significantly related with brand recall. The reason for this could be attributed to the fact that this study examined gamers who are highly involved in the interactive medium of games which force them to focus on game play rather than advertisements; the level of recognition to remember the brand exposed in the game is low and contributes to the "mismatch" between the gamers and the said brand. The present study contributes to the existing literature of the antecedents of brand recall and brand attitude in advergames. This study contributes to the role of brand recall and brand attitude as mediators in purchase behavior theory. Academically, the relationship between brand recall and brand attitude is well known in advergaming research, but their impact as important mediators on purchase intention add new understanding in the interactive communication literature. Their mediating role may provide new insights on how they facilitate the effects of self-brand congruity, entertainment and brand placement on purchase intention. Besides that, the studies on the influence of self-brand congruity on brand recall and brand attitude and also consumer intention to purchase had not well-investigated in advergames. This study contributes to fill those gaps in advergames literature. For practitioners, this study could suggest the use of illustrative or demonstrative placements of new products to help customers remember new brands, and the use of associative placements for existing products to increase consumers' purchase intention (Ho et al., 2011). To advertisers, this study may provide useful information to improve their current advertising strategies in games, for instance, by considering game players' congruity, entertainment value and brand placement factors.

• Asia Marketing Journal
• /
• 제12권2호
• /
• pp.53-81
• /
• 2010

소비자체험에 대해 기업들과 학자들이 많은 관심을 가져 왔지만 브랜드로부터 유발된 총체적인 체험에 대해서는 제한적으로 연구가 진행되어 오고 있다. 구매의사결정의 모든 과정에서 다양한 체험이 이루어질 뿐만 아니라 브랜드 아이덴티티와 브랜드 커뮤니케이션과 같은 브랜드 체험제공 수단들을 통해서도 소비자체험이 유발될 수 있음에도 불구하고 이러한 총체적인 체험에 대한 논의가 부족하였다. 따라서 본 연구는 기존 문헌들을 토대로 브랜드 체험을 개념화하고 브랜드 체험의 유형을 고찰하고자 하였다. 또한 브랜드의 총체적 체험은 소비자와 브랜드의 정서적 유대관계에 영향을 미칠 것이라 가정하고 그 효과를 규명하고자 하였으며, 브랜드 애착이 브랜드 몰입에 미치는 효과도 함께 검증하였다. 연구결과에 의하면 브랜드 체험의 네 가지 유형 가운데 감성적 체험, 행동적 체험, 그리고 지성적 체험이 브랜드 애착에 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으며 특히 행동적 체험의 영향력이 가장 높은 것으로 밝혀졌다. 반면 브랜드의 감각적 체험은 브랜드 애착에 유의한 영향을 미치지 않는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 브랜드 애착의 열정과 자아연관은 브랜드 몰입에 유의한 영향을 미친 반면에 애정은 브랜드 몰입에 유의한 영향을 미치지 않은 것으로 나타났다. 실증분석을 바탕으로 소비자와 브랜드간의 강력한 정서적 유대관계를 형성하기 위해서는 소비자들이 브랜드로부터 감성적, 행동적, 그리고 지성적 체험을 경험해야 하는 것으로 해석할 수 있다. 또한 소비자들이 체험 브랜드와의 관계를 유지하기 위한 의지를 형성하기 위해서는 애정과 자아연관으로 구성된 애착이 선행되어야 함을 알 수 있다.

• Asia Marketing Journal
• /
• 제12권3호
• /
• pp.43-62
• /
• 2010

은행서비스에서 고객지향성의 중요성이 더욱 커지고 있다. 조직의 고객지향적 문화와 전략이 급증함에도 불구하고, 국내 마케팅 문헌에서 고객지향성과 그에 따른 성과를 분석한 논문이 제한적이었다. 특히, 최근의 기준금리 상승에 따른 고객들의 금리민감도가 더욱 커질 수 있는 상황에서, 본 연구의 목표는 기업의 마케팅 노력인 고객지향성의 효과를 측정한다. 먼저 고객지향성과 금리민감도, 고객지향성과 고객애호도, 그리고 금리민감도와 고객애호도의 관계를 고찰한다. 또한 예금이자율과 대출이자율의 조절효과를 통해 고개지향성-금리민감도, 고객지향성-고객애호도의 관계에 어떠한 영향을 미치는가를 조사한다. 본 연구의 모형을 테스트하기 위하여, 국내 은행을 이용하는 304명의 고객을 이용하였다. 연구 결과 고객지향성과 고객애호도의 관계는 유의하게 평가된 반면, 고객지향성-금리민감도, 금리민감도와 고객애호도의 관계는 유의하지 않게 나타났다. 고객지향성이 높이 평가되어도 금리변동에 따른 경쟁상품간의 금리비교에 의해 고객의 금리민감도는 고객지향성의 효과가 상쇄되는 결과를 발생시키고, 금리민감도는 고객애호도에 유의한 영향을 미치지 않는다. 무엇보다도, 예금이자율과 대출이자율에 따른 조절효과가 완전히 상반되는 결과를 가져온 것이 흥미롭다. 예금이자율의 경우, 고객지향성-금리민감도, 고객지향성-고객애호도에 영향을 주지 않았으나, 대출이자율은 두 관계에 유의한 조절효과를 나타내었다. 본 연구의 결과는 아직 위의 관계에 대한 조명이 미숙한 상태에서, 향후 은행들이 어떻게 전략을 구축하여야 하는가에 대한 방향을 제공하였다는 점에서 그 연구의 공헌과 의의를 찾을 수 있다.

• Asia Marketing Journal
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.51-84
• /
• 2011

이 연구는 기업가정신이 유발하는 시장지향성이 성과를 유도한다는 기존연구를 확장하여 시장지향성을 매개변수로 하고 성과와 신뢰 요인을 도입하여, 수급사업자의 기업가정신이 원사업자와의 관계를 견인하고 협업적 네트워크를 구축하는데 필요한 수급사업자의 관계몰입을 유도하는 경로를 탐색하고 실증 분석하였다. 시장지향성이 구조적 결합요인인 거래특유자산의 투자를 촉진할 수 있고, 또 사회적 결합요인인 커뮤니케이션에 긍정적 영향을 미칠 수 있음을 식별하고, 기업가정신-시장지향성-커뮤니케이션-신뢰-관계몰입의 경로, 기업가정신-시장지향성-성과-관계몰입의 경로, 기업가정신-시장지향성-거래특유자산투자-신뢰-관계몰입의 경로를 식별하였다. 그런데 기업가정신이 원사업자의 거래특유자산투자에 대한 효과가 없는 것으로 분석되었다. 즉 수급사업자의 기업가정신은 시장지향성을 통해 관계몰입에 영향을 미치는 것으로 탐색되었다. 따라서 원사업자는 수급사업자에게 거래특유자산을 투자하고 커뮤니케이션을 통하여 신뢰를 확보해야 한다. 그리고 수급사업자는 투철한 기업가정신으로 시장지향성을 실현하고 원사업자의 거래특유자산투자와 커뮤니케이션을 유도하고, 또 이익을 실현해야 한다. 이러한 수급사업자의 이익성과와 신뢰, 그리고 원사업자의 거래특유자산투자가 B2B시장에서 원사업자에 대한 수급사업자의 관계몰입을 유도하고 유기적인 기업계열화를 촉진하는 요인이기 때문에 정부도 원사업자의 거래특유자산투자를 유도하여 원사업자와 수급사업자의 신뢰를 촉진하는 정책이 필요하다.

• Journal of Digestive Cancer Research
• /
• 제5권2호
• /
• pp.105-112
• /
• 2017

위암 발병에 관여하는 Helicobacter pylori는 위상피세포내에서 많은 miRNA의 변화를 유도하여 발암과정에 역할을 할 것으로 추정하고 있다. 현재까지 H. pylori 감염 시 상피세포에서 miRNA 변화에 대해 명확히 밝혀져 있지 않다. 본 연구의 목적은 H. pylori에 감염된 위상피세포에서 miRNA의 발현 변화를 관찰하고자 하였다. H. pylori에 6시간 동안 감염시킨 AGS 위상피세포주와 AGS 세포주에 3개월 이상 장기간 H. pylori를 감염시켜 얻은 세포주(HS3C)를 대상으로 하였다. 대상 세포주로 부터 miRNA만을 분리한 후, custom microarray를 이용하여 발현 변화를 관찰하였다. 또한 microarray에서 유의한 증감이 관찰된 목표 유전자를 선별하여 real-time PCR을 이용하여 정량적 변화를 확인하였다. miRNA microarray 분석 결과를 토대로 변화가 관찰된 12개의 miRNA를 선별하였다. Real-time PCR 검사로 miRNA의 변화를 검정한 결과, miR-21, miR-221, miR-222은 6시간 동안 감염시킨 AGS 위상피세포주와 HS3C 세포주 모두에서 증가되어 있었다. miR-99b, miR-200b, miR-203b, miR-373은 6시간 동안 감염시킨 AGS 위상피세포주와 HS3C 세포주 모두에서 감소되어 있었다. miR-23a, miR-23b, miR-125b, miR-141, miR-155는 H. pylori에 6시간 동안 감염된 AGS 위상피세포주에서 감소되었으나, HS3C에서는 증가되어 있었다. H. pylori 감염 위상피세포주에서 miR-21, miR-99b, miR-125b, miR-200b, miR-203b, miR-221, miR-222, miR-373의 발현 변화는 위암의 발생기전에 관여할 것으로 추정되며, 각각의 기능과 역할의 규명에 대해서는 후속 연구가 필요하다.

• Journal of Digestive Cancer Research
• /
• 제1권1호
• /
• pp.36-42
• /
• 2013

배경 및 목적: Gemcitabine은 진행성 췌장암 환자의 치료에 우선적으로 사용되며, 다른 항암 약제에 비하여 상대적으로 독성이 적은 것으로 알려져 있다. 그러나 약제의 낮은 반응률과 상대적으로 높은 합병증의 발생률 때문에 많은 소화기암을 다루는 의사들은 췌장암을 가진 노인환자에서 항암치료를 꺼려하는 경항이 있다. 방법: 2007년에서 2010년 사이에 조직학적으로 췌장암을 진단받고, gemcitabine 항암요법을 시행받은 61명의 환자를 후향적으로 임상적, 검사실 및 영상학적 자료를 분석하였다. 환자는 65세 이상군 28명과 65세 미만군 38명으로 나누었다. Gemcitabine은 체표면적당 1,000 mg을 3주 동안 매주 30분에 걸쳐 투여하였고, 다른 항암제인 cisplatin, capecitabine, erlotinib 등을 병합 투여한 경우가 있었다. 결과: 환자의 평균 나이는 65세 이상군에서 71세, 65세 미만군에서 56세 였다. 진단 시 시행한 CA 19-9을 포함한 검사실검사는 두 군 간에 차이가 없었으며, gemcitabine 단독 항암요법을 시행한 경우는 65세 이상군에서 더 많았고(56.5 vs. 26.3%, p=0.029), 2차 혹은 3차 항암요법을 시행한 군은 65세 미만군에서 더 많았다(17.4 vs. 50.0%, p=0.014). 담관염이나 담관스텐트 유치는 양군에서 차이가 없었다. 결과: Gemcitabine 항암화학요법은 진행성 췌장암을 가진 노인환자에서 안전하게 사용할 수 있으며, 젊은 환자들에 견줄만한 치료 반응률과 무진행생존기간을 기대할 수 있을 것으로 예상된다.