• 한국언어정보학회지:언어와정보
• /
• 제14권1호
• /
• pp.25-48
• /
• 2010

The distinction of argument and adjunct has been an important notion in linguistic theories, especially at the interface of syntax and semantics, and this distinction has been believed to be binary and categorical. However, there are some gray-area cases such as instruments and participant locations, for which the distinction does not appear to be so clear. In this paper, I will explore whether the argument/adjunct distinction is categorical by examining the controversial cases, particularly the instrumental PPs. I will review the syntactic, semantic, and psychological criteria and evidence that have been proposed in literature and see if instruments can be categorized as either arguments or adjuncts by those criteria. By showing that different criteria yield contradictory results, I conclude that roles like instruments have characteristics of both arguments and adjuncts, which seems to suggest that the argument/adjunct distinction is not categorical.

• 한국의사학회지
• /
• 제36권1호
• /
• pp.1-9
• /
• 2023

To be an adjunct professor(gyeomgyosu) literally means to act as an instructor while also holding a different position. Adjunct professors were initially introduced under Confucianism. Gradually, technical offices also appointed adjunct professors using Confucian-educated bureaucrats for the purpose of educating lower-level technical officials and cadets. This paper examines the history of the civil service system related to adjunct professors through the Code of Laws, and examines those who have been appointed to the public office described in various documents. This paper argues that changes in the medical office's adjunct professor system reflect changes in the national medical talent training policy. The main basis of specific recognizing medical personnel is to decouple the appointment of Confucian scholars from that of full-time doctors. The replacement of the role of medical educators from Confucian scholars to full-time doctors was largely accomplished during the reign of King Jungjong(中宗) and was completed during the period of King Injo(仁祖). The time when Euiyakdongcham was created and the Office of Euiyakdongcham was established coincided with the period when the adjunct professor was disrupted in the medical office. However, this change in the adjunct professor system of medical authorities is in contrast to interpretation, which is a representative technical field. In the case of interpretation, Moonshin's sayeogwon position as adjunct professor was maintained even in the late Joseon Dynasty, and apart from this, there was a hanhagmunsin in Seungmunwon. Interpreter families had institutional arrangements that prevented them from making interpretation their own monopoly. Therefore, families of medical bureaucrats had more room for institutional growth than those of bureaucratic interpreters. Of course, these institutional devices did not prevent the growth of interpreting bureaucratic families in the late Joseon Dynasty. However, the situation in which medicine was accepted only as a kind of knowledge, not as an object of full-time work for sadaebue, would have been an opportunity to rise for those in technical jobs who were full-time medicine. As medicine became more differentiated and developed in the late Joseon Dynasty, medical knowledge and the knowledge about the medical profession became more important. The politicians could not avoid the use of a philosophically oriented system in which a confucian-educated bureaucrat equipped with only Confucian knowledge might replace a full-time doctor. Thus, the contradiction between the reality and the ideal of ignoring or denying reality was reproduced like other Confucian-centered societies. These contradictions have implications for us living in the modern age. Establishing the relationship between philosophy (or belief) and technology should not end with the superiority of one side or the other.

• Journal of Acupuncture Research
• /
• 제35권4호
• /
• pp.200-206
• /
• 2018

Background: To evaluate whether ${\geq}3$ adjunct acupuncture sessions accompanying embryo transfer, increases the chance of pregnancy amongst post-myomectomy women aged ${\geq}35$ years. Methods: This was a prospective study carried out at Nordica Fertility Center. Following written informed consent, 75 patients undergoing assisted reproduction therapy and who had good quality embryos, were age-matched and grouped into post-myomectomy (n = 24) and normal women who had no evidence of fibroids or previous myomectomy (n = 51). Between 1 and 3 sessions of acupuncture were performed on 6 post-myomectomy and 19 infertile women who had not undergone myomectomy, while > 3 acupuncture sessions were performed on 18 post-myomectomy and on 32 normal patients, approximately 25 minutes before and after embryo transfer. Results: A positive pregnancy test was defined as ultrasonographic evidence indicating presence of a fetal sac 6 weeks after embryo transfer. Of the 5 post-myomectomy women who were pregnant, only 1 (20.0%) received 1-3 adjunct acupuncture sessions whilst the remaining 4 (80.0%) received > 3 acupuncture sessions. Of the 11 normal pregnant women, 5 (45.4%) received 1-3 adjunct acupuncture sessions while 6 (54.5%) received > 3 adjunct acupuncture sessions. Conclusion: Pregnancy rates in infertile post-myomectomy women may be improved by > 3 adjunct acupuncture sessions.

• 산업진흥연구
• /
• 제8권3호
• /
• pp.153-162
• /
• 2023

명리학의 격국(格局) 해설서라 불리는 심효첨의 『자평진전(子平眞詮)』의 간명 방법은 격국(格局)을 선정하고 격(格)의 길흉을 구분하여 순역(順逆)의 원리에 따라 상신(相神)을 설정한다. 이때 월지(月支)의 지장간(地藏干)이 두 개 이상 투간(透干)하여 여러 격을 이루게 되어 겸격(兼格)이 되는 경우 격의 주체를 최종적으로 알고 있어야만 상신(相神)을 설정하고 격의 성패(成敗)를 판단할 수 있다. 하지만 『자평진전』에서는 겸격의 구조와 의미만을 설명하였고 겸격의 최종 주체를 결정하는 방법은 기술되지 않았다. 본 연구자는 겸격의 주체를 선정하는 연구를 위해 각종 문헌을 고찰했고 여러 가지 겸격의 실제 사례를 월령과 격국으로 나누어 비교 분석하여 월지와 회합(會合)한 지지(地支)의 종류, 월지의 지장간(地藏干)에서 투간된 천간의 기세(氣勢)와 일간(日干)의 강약(强弱)에 관련되었다는 공통된 결과를 도출했고 그 법칙을 주관적으로 정리했다. 본 연구 결과를 통해 겸격의 혼란을 줄일 수 있는 계기가 될 것으로 사료된다.

• International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology
• /
• 제8권4호
• /
• pp.161-166
• /
• 2020

The primary aim of this paper is to analyze the resultative adjunct clause, i.e., (thus/thereby/hence) ~ing participle and provide explicit syntactic, semantic and sociolinguistic explanation on the question what causes the cause-focused causal construction with resultative (thus/thereby/hence) ~ing participle in English. What comes first is either cause or effect clause. This study explores the recent style shift of causal constructions from the effect-focused pattern to the cause-focused pattern. In this study, we argue that the increasing number of the cause-focused main clause with a resultative ~ing participle clause shows the process of the style evolution improving speech/wring style in many respects including syntactic simplification, clarification of the sentence meaning with impact on the focused clauses, and improvement of the flow of speech/writing. The style shift found in the English resultative adjunct clauses, i.e., (thus/hence/thereby) ~ing participle constructions prove to be the style evolution from syntactic, semantic and sociolinguistic point of views.

• 한국식품과학회지
• /
• 제27권4호
• /
• pp.516-519
• /
• 1995

국내에서 생산된 쌀 6품종의 맥주제조특성을 국내 및 미국의 맥주회사에서 사용되는 쌀과 비교해 볼 때 국내 쌀의 수분함량은 $11.4{\sim}12.6%$로 미국 맥주회사에서 사용되는 쌀의 수분함량 10.7%보다 높았다. 장립종(long grain)이며 Indica품종인 IR36은 전분량이 적으나 단백질 함량이나 amylose함량이 높았다. 맥아 60%에 쌀 40%를 혼합하여 맥즙을 제조한 결과 색, 점도, pH, 수용성 단백질, 추출물함량(% extract), 당의 소성에서 Indica품종은 Japonica품종과 큰 차이를 나타내지 않았다. 국내에서 생산되는 쌀로 제조된 맥즙은 수용성 단백질, pH, 점도 등에서는 미국산 쌀로 제조된 맥즙과 큰 차이를 나타내지 않았으나 추출물함량은 약간 낮은 것으로 나타났다. 쌀을 혼합하여 제조한 맥즙의 glucose와 maltose함량은 맥아만으로 제조된 맥즙보다 더 낮았다.

• 한국언어정보학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국언어정보학회 1998년도 Language, Information and Computation = Selected Papers from the 12th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, Singapore
• /
• pp.348-356
• /
• 1998

• 한국조리학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국조리학회 2006년도 제8차 해외연수및 제3차 국제학술세미나
• /
• pp.152-152
• /
• 2006

• 한국언어정보학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국언어정보학회 1991년도 THE SIXTH JAPANESE-KOREAN JOINT CONFERENCE ON FORMAL LINGUISTICS
• /
• pp.35-48
• /
• 1991

• The Korean Journal of Pain
• /
• 제32권1호
• /
• pp.51-52
• /
• 2019