• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제5권3호
• /
• pp.305-311
• /
• 2013

PURPOSE. Over the past years, the adhesion of fiber posts luted with simplified adhesive systems has been a matter of great interest. The aim of this study was to assess the post retentive potential of a self-adhesive resin cement using different adhesive systems to compare the push-out bond strengths of fiber posts. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The post spaces of 56 mandibular premolar roots were prepared and divided into 4 experimental groups and further divided into 2 subgroups according to testing time (n=7). The fiber posts (Rely X Fiber Post) were luted with a self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX Unicem) and one of the following adhesive systems: no adhesive, a total-etch adhesive resin (Single Bond), a two-step self-etch adhesive resin (Clearfil SE Bond) and a one-step self-etch adhesive resin (Clearfil S3 Bond). Each root was cut horizontally, and 1.5 mm thick six root segments were prepared. Push-out tests were performed after one week or three months (0.5 mm/min). Statistical analysis were performed with three-way ANOVA (${\alpha}$=.05). RESULTS. Cervical root segments showed higher bond strength values than middle segments. Adhesive application increased the bond strength. For one week group, the total-etch adhesive resin Single Bond showed higher bond strength than the self-adhesive resin cement RelyX Unicem applied without adhesive resin at middle region. For 3 months group, the two-step self-etch adhesive resin Clearfil SE Bond showed the highest bond strength for both regions. Regarding the time considered, Clearfil SE Bond 3 months group showed higher bond strength values than one week group. CONCLUSION. Using the adhesive resins in combination with the self-adhesive resin cement improves the bond strengths. The bond strength values of two-step self-etch adhesive resin Clearfil SE Bond improved as time passes.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제37권3호
• /
• pp.155-159
• /
• 2012

Objectives: To investigate the effect of dentin moisture degree and air-drying time on dentin-bond strength of two different one-step self-etching adhesive systems. Materials and Methods: Twenty-four human third molars were used for microtensile bond strength testing of G-Bond and Clearfil $S^3$ Bond. The dentin surface was either blot-dried or air-dried before applying these adhesive agents. After application of the adhesive agent, three different air drying times were evaluated: 1, 5, and 10 sec. Composite resin was build up to 4 mm thickness and light cured for 40 sec with 2 separate layers. Then the tooth was sectioned and trimmed to measure the microtensile bond strength using a universal testing machine. The measured bond strengths were analyzed with three-way ANOVA and regression analysis was done (p = 0.05). Results: All three factors, materials, dentin wetness and air drying time, showed significant effect on the microtensile bond strength. Clearfil $S^3$ Bond, dry dentin surface and 10 sec air drying time showed higher bond strength. Conclusions: Within the limitation of this experiment, air drying time after the application of the one-step self-etching adhesive agent was the most significant factor affecting the bond strength, followed by the material difference and dentin moisture before applying the adhesive agent.

• 대한치과교정학회지
• /
• 제20권3호
• /
• pp.583-591
• /
• 1990

If the bond strength is sufficient to resist orthodontic force, orthodontic brackets can be bonded to restorations. Orthodontic brackets were bonded to composite resin and glass ionomer cement restorations with no-mix adhesive or glass ionomer cement. The shear bond strength of adhesives bonded to restorations was studied in vitro. Orthodontic brackets were bonded to 10 extracted natural teeth, 40 composite resin restorations and 40 glass ionomer restorations. The surfaces of composite resin restorations were roughened or applied with bonding agent (Scothbond) after surface roughening. The surfaces of glass ionomer cement restorations were conditioned with acid etching or applied with Scotchbond to etched surface. The adhesive was no-mix resin or glass ionomer cement. The shear bond strength was measured. The results were as follows: 1. Orthodontic brackets could be bonded to composite resin restorations effectively as they could be bonded to acid etched enamel with no-mix adhesive. The shear bond strength was sufficient to resist orthodontic force and was not affected by bonding agent greatly. 2. The shear bond strength of no-mix adhesive bonded to acid etched glass ionomer cement restorations was sufficient to resist orthodontic force. However. the fracture risk of glass ionomer cement restorations was increased during debonding. The bonding agent couldn't increase the shear bond strength greatly. 3. The shear bond strength of glass ionomer cement bonded to glass ionomer cement restorations was lower than that of no-mix adhesive. The shear bond strength was sufficient to resist orthodontic force and was greatly decreased by bonding agent. 4. The shear bond strength of glass ionomer cement bonded to composite resin restorations was too low to resist orthodontic force.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제32권5호
• /
• pp.445-458
• /
• 2007

단일과정 접착제를 이용함에 있어 복합레진과의 부적합성을 개선하고자 중간레진이 결합에 영향을 미칠 것으로 사료된다. Experimental single step system (Bisco Ltd., Schaumburg, IL)을 대조군으로 하고 6종의 중간레진을 접착제의 중합여부, 복합레진의 광중합-자가중합 여부로 분류하였다. 상아질에 대한 광중합 또는 자가중합형 복합레진의 결합강도를 측정하고 접착계면에 대한 투과전자현미경 관찰하여 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다. 1. 중간레진의 적용은 광중합형 복합레진의 결합강도를 증가시키지 않았다. 2. 자가중합형 복합레진의 결합강도는 중간레진을 적용할 경우 증가하였다. 3. 중간레진의 적용 전 접착제의 중합여부는 결합강도의 변화에 영향을 미치지 않았다. 4. 중간레진이 친수성일 때 소수성 중간레진을 적용할 때 보다 높은 결합강도를 나타냈으나 통계적 유의차는 없었다. 광중합형 복합레진의 수복 시 단일과정 접착제를 사용하는 것은 초기 결합강도에 영향을 미치지 않으며, 자가중합형 복합레진을 단일과정 접착제와 사용할 때는 접착층의 투과도를 감소시키는 소수성의 중간레진을 적용하여 부적합성을 해소할 수 있을 것이다.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제19권2호
• /
• pp.633-640
• /
• 1994

The tensile bond strength to dentin was measured for three glass-ionomer cement and composite resin combinations: two light-curing glass-ionomer cements(Vitrebond and XR - Ionomer) and one traditional glass - ionomer cement(Ketac - Bond), two adhesive systems(Scotchbond, and XR - Bonding System), and a corresponding composite resin. The bond strength of this "sandwich" was also compared with that of the same cements used in bulk. Vitredbond showed a significantly higher bond strength in bulk than did the other two cements. Of the sandwiches, the XR - Iomomer and XR - Bond combination showed a bond strength significantly higher than that of the Vitrebond and Scotchbond or Ketac- bond and Scotchbond combination. The fracture of the bond was mainly adhesive for Vitrebond, cohesive for XR - Ionomer when used in bulk and adhesive - cohesive when used in a sandwich, and cohesive for Ketac-Bond.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제8권4호
• /
• pp.275-284
• /
• 2016

PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different surface treatment methods on the microtensile bond strength of resin cement to resin nanoceramic (RNC). MATERIALS AND METHODS. RNC onlays (Lava Ultimate) (n=30) were treated using air abrasion with and without a universal adhesive, or HF etching followed by a universal adhesive with and without a silane coupling agent, or tribological silica coating with and without a universal adhesive, and divided into 6 groups. Onlays were luted with resin cement to dentin surfaces. A microtensile bond strength test was performed and evaluated by one-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD test (${\alpha}$=.05). A nanoscratch test, field emission scanning electron microscopy, and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy were used for micromorphologic analysis (${\alpha}$=.05). The roughness and elemental proportion were evaluated by Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS. Tribological silica coating showed the highest roughness, followed by air abrasion and HF etching. After HF etching, the RNC surface presented a decrease in oxygen, silicon, and zirconium ratio with increasing carbon ratio. Air abrasion with universal adhesive showed the highest bond strength followed by tribological silica coating with universal adhesive. HF etching with universal adhesive showed the lowest bond strength. CONCLUSION. An improved understanding of the effect of surface treatment of RNC could enhance the durability of resin bonding when used for indirect restorations. When using RNC for restoration, effective and systemic surface roughening methods and an appropriate adhesive are required.

• 대한치과교정학회지
• /
• 제28권6호
• /
• pp.955-974
• /
• 1998

적절한 전단접착강도를 가지면서 법랑질손상과 브라켓파절을 적게 일으키는 브라켓-접착제의 그룹을 찾아내기 위하여 전단접착강도, 법랑질손상, 브라켓탈락양상, 브라켓 주위의 밀봉과 법랑질-접착제-브라켓 사이의 긴밀도를 연구하였다. 교정치료 목적으로 발치한 240개의 치아를 각각 10개씩 24개의 군으로 나누어서 브라켓을 접착한 후 48시간 후에 전단접착강도를 측정하고 브라켓 탈락 양상을 조사하였다. 또한 브라켓 주위의 밀봉과 법랑질-접착제-브라켓 사이의 긴밀도를 평가하기 위하여 브라켓이 접착된 치아를 반으로 자른 후 주사전자현미경상에서 관찰하였다. 6종류의 브라켓과 4종류의 접착제가 사용되었으며 브라켓은 Image, Plastic, Crystaline, Fascination, Transcend, metal bracket을 사용하였으며 접착제로는 No-mix, Light-Bond, OrthoLC, Superbond C&B가 사용되었다. 이와같은 연구로부터 다음과 같은 결론을 내렸다. 1. 전단접착강도는 Fascination-Light Bond 군에서 36.58 Kg(410.07 Kg/$cm^2$)으로 가장 높았으며 Image-OrthoLC 군에 서 8.93 B◎ (75.51 Kg/$cm^2$)으로 가장 낮았다. OrthoLC를 접착제로 사용하였을 때 전단접착강도는 다른 접착제를 사용하였을 때 보다 비교적 낮았다. 2. 접착제의 종류에 관계없이 Fascination bracket의 전단접착강도는 비교적 높았으며 Image, Plastic bracket의 전단접착강도는 비교적 낮았다. Crystaline, Transcend bracket의 전단접착강도는 metal bracket의 전단접착강도와 비슷하거나 낮았다. 3. 전단접착강도와 법랑질 파절, 브라켓 파절은 상관관계가 있었으며, 접착강도가 증가할수록 법랑질 파절과 브라켓 파절은 증가하였다. 4. OrthoLC를 접착제로 사용하였을 때 법랑질 파절과 브라켓 파절은 일어나지 않았으나 Superbond C&B를 접착제로 사용하였을 때는 법랑질 파절과 브라켓 파절의 빈도가 높았다. 5. No-mix, Light-Bond를 접착제로 사용하였을 때 브라켓 주위의 밀봉과 법랑질-접착제-브라켓의 긴밀도는 양호하였다. 접착제의 종류에 관계없이 Ceramic bracket에서 접착제-브라켓의 긴밀도는 양호하였다. 6. 적절한 전단접착강도를 가지면서 법랑질 파절과 브라켓 파절을 일으키지 않는 군은 Crystaline-No mix, Crystaline Light Bond, Crystaline-OrthoLC, metal-No mix, metal-Light Bond, metal-OrthoLC군이였다.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제44권4호
• /
• pp.45.1-45.10
• /
• 2019

Objectives: Self-adhesive resin cements contain functional monomers that enable them to adhere to the tooth structure without a separate adhesive or etchant. One of the most stable functional monomers used for chemical bonding to calcium in hydroxyapatite is 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP). The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the10-MDP concentration on the bond strength and physical properties of self-adhesive resin cements. Materials and Methods: We used experimental resin cements containing 3 different concentrations of 10-MDP: 3.3 wt% (RC1), 6.6 wt% (RC2), or 9.9 wt% (RC3). The micro-tensile bond strength of each resin cement to dentin and a hybrid resin block (Estenia C&B, Kuraray Noritake Dental) was measured, and the fractured surface morphology was analyzed. Further, the flexural strength of the resin cements was measured using the three-point bending test. The water sorption and solubility of the cements following 30 days of immersion in water were measured. Results: The bond strength of RC2 was significantly higher than that of RC1. There was no significant difference between the bond strength of RC2 and that of RC3. The water sorption of RC3 was higher than that of any other cement. There were no significant differences in the three-point bending strength or water solubility among all three types of cements. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, it is suggested that 6.6 wt% 10-MDP showed superior properties than 3.3 wt% or 9.9 wt% 10-MDP in self-adhesive resin cement.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제39권1호
• /
• pp.12-16
• /
• 2014

Objectives: Extensively destroyed teeth are commonly restored with composite resin before cavity preparation for indirect restorations. The longevity of the restoration can be related to the proper bonding of the resin cement to the composite. This study aimed to evaluate the microshear bond strength of two self-adhesive resin cements to composite resin. Material and Methods: Composite discs were subject to one of six different surface pretreatments: none (control), 35% phosphoric acid etching for 30 seconds (PA), application of silane (silane), PA + silane, PA + adhesive, or PA + silane + adhesive (n = 6). A silicone mold containing a cylindrical orifice ($1mm^2$ diameter) was placed over the composite resin. RelyX Unicem (3M ESPE) or BisCem (Bisco Inc.) self-adhesive resin cement was inserted into the orifices and light-cured. Self-adhesive cement cylinders were submitted to shear loading. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (p < 0.05). Results: Independent of the cement used, the PA + Silane + Adhesive group showed higher microshear bond strength than those of the PA and PA + Silane groups. There was no difference among the other treatments. Unicem presented higher bond strength than BisCem for all experimental conditions. Conclusions: Pretreatments of the composite resin surface might have an effect on the bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to this substrate.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제40권3호
• /
• pp.202-208
• /
• 2015

Objectives: This study determined the effect of the air-stream application time and the bonding technique on the dentin bond strength of adhesives with different solvents. Furthermore, the content and volatilization rate of the solvents contained in the adhesives were also evaluated. Materials and Methods:Three adhesive systems with different solvents (Stae, SDI, acetone; XP Bond, Dentsply De Trey, butanol; Ambar, FGM, ethanol) were evaluated. The concentrations and evaporation rates of each adhesive were measured using an analytical balance. After acid-etching and rinsing, medium occlusal dentin surfaces of human molars were kept moist (conventional) or were treated with 10% sodium hypochlorite for deproteinization. After applying adhesives over the dentin, slight air-stream was applied for 10, 30 or 60 sec. Composite cylinders were built up and submitted to shear testing. The data were submitted to ANOVA and Tukey's test (${\alpha}=0.05$). Results: Stae showed the highest solvent content and Ambar the lowest. Acetone presented the highest evaporation rate, followed by butanol. Shear bond strengths were significantly affected only by the factors of 'adhesive' and 'bonding technique' (p < 0.05), while the factor 'duration of air-stream' was not significant. Deproteinization of dentin increased the bond strength (p < 0.05). Stae showed the lowest bond strength values (p < 0.05), while no significant difference was observed between XP Bond and Ambar. Conclusions: Despite the differences in content and evaporation rate of the solvents, the duration of air-stream application did not affect the bond strength to dentin irrespective of the bonding technique.