• Title/Summary/Keyword: Yokohama City University Hospital case

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.014 seconds

An infertile patient with Y chromosome b1/b3 deletion presenting with congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens with normal spermatogenesis

  • Kuroda, Shinnosuke;Usui, Kimitsugu;Mori, Kohei;Yasuda, Kengo;Asai, Takuo;Sanjo, Hiroyuki;Yakanaka, Hiroyuki;Takeshima, Teppei;Kawahara, Takashi;Hamanoue, Haruka;Kato, Yoshitake;Miyoshi, Yasuhide;Uemura, Hiroji;Iwasaki, Akira;Yumura, Yasushi
    • Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine
    • /
    • v.45 no.1
    • /
    • pp.48-51
    • /
    • 2018
  • We report the case of a 46-year-old Chinese male patient who visited our clinic complaining of infertility. Semen analysis revealed azoospermia, and azoospermia factor c region partial deletion (b1/b3) was detected using Y chromosome microdeletion analysis. Testicular sperm extraction was performed after genetic counseling. The bilateral ductus deferens and a portion of the epididymis were absent, whereas the remaining epididymis was expanded. Motile intratesticular spermatozoa were successfully extracted from the seminiferous tubule. On histopathology, nearly complete spermatogenesis was confirmed in almost every seminiferous tubule. To our knowledge, this is the first case report of b1/b3 deletion with a congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens and almost normal spermatogenesis.

The Criminal Liability of Physicians in the Case of Medical Accidents (의료사고에서의 형사책임 -원내감염사고의 해결을 향하여-)

  • Utsumi, Tomoko
    • The Korean Society of Law and Medicine
    • /
    • v.19 no.2
    • /
    • pp.3-40
    • /
    • 2018
  • Conventionally, there were few cases in which a medical accident became a criminal case in Japan. However, after the serious malpractice such as the Yokohama City University Hospital case, prosecutors came to be less hesitant to prosecute a malpractice. In a medical accident, the attribution of the responsibilities among medical personnel becomes one important element of the proof of negligence. The Supreme Court concluded that, when the attribution of the responsibilities is not established among medical personnel to confirm the identity of the patient like the Yokohama City University Hospital case, all the personnel who were involved bear the responsibilities to identify the patient. For serious cases which requireut most carefulness fortreatment such as the Saitama Medical University Hospital case, not only the chief physician in charge of the case concerned but also the director of the branch at the university hospital bear the responsibilities to confirm the treatment policy of the case. After the acquittal of the Ohno Hospital case, the voice demanding more prudent prosecution of malpractices has become stronger than before. Meanwhile, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare introduced Medical Accidents Investigation System for the prevention of medical accident and, has reinforced the third party inspection of medical accidents.