• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제3권4호
• /
• pp.221-228
• /
• 2011

PURPOSE. Veneering porcelain might be delaminated from underlying zirconia-based ceramics. The aim of this study was the evaluation of the effect of different surface treatments and type of zirconia (white or colored) on shear bond strength (SBS) of zirconia core and its veneering porcelain. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Eighty zirconia disks (40 white and 40 colored; 10 mm in diameter and 4 mm thick) were treated with three different mechanical surface conditioning methods (Sandblasting with $110{\mu}m$ $Al_2O_3$ particle, grinding, sandblasting and liner application). One group had received no treatment. These disks were veneered with 3 mm thick and 5 mm diameter Cercon Ceram Kiss porcelain and SBS test was conducted (cross-head speed = 1 mm/min). Two and one way ANOVA, Tukey's HSD Past hoc, and T- test were selected to analyzed the data (${\alpha}=0.05$). RESULTS. In this study, the factor of different types of zirconia ceramics (P=.462) had no significant effect on SBS, but the factors of different surface modification techniques (P=.005) and interaction effect (P=.018) had a significant effect on SBS. Within colored zirconia group, there were no significant differences in mean SBS among the four surface treatment subgroups (P=0.183). Within white zirconia group, "Ground group" exhibited a significantly lower SBS value than "as milled" or control (P=0.001) and liner (P=.05) groups. CONCLUSION. Type of zirconia did not have any effect on bond strength between zirconia core and veneer ceramic. Surface treatment had different effects on the SBS of the different zirconia types and grinding dramatically decreased the SBS of white zirconia- porcelain.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제7권6호
• /
• pp.454-459
• /
• 2015

PURPOSE. To determine whether the fracture strengths and failure types differed between metal and zirconia frameworks veneered with pressable or layering ceramics. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A phantom molar tooth was prepared and duplicated in 40 cobalt-chromium abutments. Twenty metal (IPS d.SIGN 15, Ivoclar, Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) and 20 zirconia (IPS e.max ZirCAD, Ivoclar) frameworks were fabricated on the abutments. Each framework group was randomly divided into 2 subgroups according to the veneering material: pressable and layering ceramics (n=10). Forty molar crowns were fabricated, cemented onto the corresponding abutments and then thermocycled ($5-55^{\circ}C$, 10,000 cycles). A load was applied in a universal testing machine until a fracture occurred on the crowns. In addition, failure types were examined using a stereomicroscope. Fracture load data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD post-hoc tests at a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS. The highest strength value was seen in metal-pressable (MP) group, whereas zirconia-pressable (ZP) group exhibited the lowest one. Moreover, group MP showed significantly higher fracture loads than group ZP (P=.015) and zirconia-layering (ZL) (P=.038) group. No significant difference in fracture strength was detected between groups MP and ML, and groups ZP and ZL (P>.05). Predominant fracture types were cohesive for metal groups and adhesive for zirconia groups. CONCLUSION. Fracture strength of a restoration with a metal or a zirconia framework was independent of the veneering techniques. However, the pressing technique over metal frameworks resisted significantly higher fracture loads than zirconia frameworks.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제5권2호
• /
• pp.92-97
• /
• 2013

PURPOSE. All-ceramic crowns are subject to fracture during function. To minimize this common clinical complication, zirconium oxide has been used as the framework for all-ceramic crowns. The aim of this study was to compare the fracture strengths of two computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) zirconia crown systems: Lava and Digident. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Twenty Lava CAD/CAM zirconia crowns and twenty Digident CAD/CAM zirconia crowns were fabricated. A metal die was also duplicated from the original prepared tooth for fracture testing. A universal testing machine was used to determine the fracture strength of the crowns. RESULTS. The mean fracture strengths were as follows: $54.9{\pm}15.6$ N for the Lava CAD/CAM zirconia crowns and $87.0{\pm}16.0$ N for the Digident CAD/CAM zirconia crowns. The difference between the mean fracture strengths of the Lava and Digident crowns was statistically significant (P<.001). Lava CAD/CAM zirconia crowns showed a complete fracture of both the veneering porcelain and the core whereas the Digident CAD/CAM zirconia crowns showed fracture only of the veneering porcelain. CONCLUSION. The fracture strengths of CAD/CAM zirconia crowns differ depending on the compatibility of the core material and the veneering porcelain.

• 구강회복응용과학지
• /
• 제27권1호
• /
• pp.1-13
• /
• 2011

압축강화형 복합레진($TESCERA^{TM}$ ATL)을 지르코니아 framework에 효과적으로 전장하기 위하여, 표면처리 방법을 여러 가지로 달리한 지르코니아 표면에 압축강화형 복합레진을 전장하여 전단결합강도를 실험적으로 비교하였다. 지르코니아의 표면적 증가를 도모하기 위해 최종소결 전 지름 1.1mm round bur를 사용하여 지르코니아 표면에 pockmark (honey-comb concept)를 형성하였고, 화학적으로는 Primer (Zr-plus primer, Bisco, Inc., Shaumurg, USA)를 도포하여 결합강도 증가를 도모하였다. 지르코니아에 porcelain을 적층하여 대조군으로 삼고 각 군을 5도와 55도 사이에서 10,000회 thermocycling시켜 simulated aging 결과 또한 비교하였다. 전단결합강도를 측정하였고 주사전자현미경을 통해 파절단면을 관찰하였다. Pockmark를 형성한 실험군에 압축강화형 복합레진($TESCERA^{TM}$ ATL) 전장 시 도재 전장과 유사한 전단결합 강도를 발휘하였으며,(p>0.05) 동일 시편을 24시간 수중 보관했을 때에 비해 thermocycling 했을 때의 전단결합강도가 약간 감소하였으나 유의차는 보이지 않았다.(p>0.05) 지르코니아 표면에의 Primer의 도포가 압축강화형 복합레진 ($TESCERA^{TM}$ ATL)과의 결합강도를 증가시키지는 못하였다. 지르코니아 소결 전 표면에 pockmark를 주어 표면적을 증가시키고 요철의 효과를 주는 것은 $TESCERA^{TM}$ ATL과의 결합강도를 증가시켰으며, 이는 임상적으로 지르코니아-포세린의 결합강도에 필적하는 강하고 내구성 있는 결합강도를 가져온다고 판단되었다.

• 대한치과기공학회지
• /
• 제43권4호
• /
• pp.160-167
• /
• 2021

Purpose: In this study, when the etching treatment method, which is a chemical surface treatment method, is applied to colored zirconia, the shear bond strength between the veneering ceramic material and colored zirconia is compared with that without surface treatment, and the fracture type is observed to evaluate the etching treatment effect of colored zirconia. Methods: Experiments were conducted after dividing the study sample into two groups, which are the zirconia control group without surface treatment using colored zirconia blocks (without etching zirconia, NZC group) and the zirconia group treated with a commercially available etching solution (etching liquid zirconia, EZC group). Results: The mean shear bond strength of the NZC group was 20.31±2.32 Mpa, and that of the EZC group was 25.95±2.34 Mpa, and the difference between these two values was statistically significant (p<0.05). Further, the surface roughness Ra value was higher in the EZC group than in the NZC group. In the fracture pattern, cohesive fractures were dominant, and adhesive fractures and cohesive fractures were mixed. Conclusion: The bond strength was significantly higher in the group treated with colored zirconia. The fracture pattern was mostly cohesive failure in the group not treated with etching and changed to mixed failure as the etching treatment progressed.

• 치위생과학회지
• /
• 제13권3호
• /
• pp.290-295
• /
• 2013

본 연구는 심미 치과보철물에 사용되는 지르코니아, lithium disilicate 코어와 전장도재 사이의 전단결합강도를 측정하고, 금속도재관을 대조군으로 설정하여 비교하였다. 직사각기둥 모양의 시편을 각각 10개씩 제작하여 코어와 전장도재 사이의 전단결합강도를 측정한 후 파절면의 양상을 실체현미경을 통해 관찰하였다. 제한된 조건하에 시행된 실험을 통하여 심미보철 분야에 널리 적용되고 있는 치과용세라믹 코어의 전단결합강도를 확인하였으며, 측정 후 비교분석된 결과는 다음과 같다. 2종의 치과용 세라믹 코어와 전장도재 간에 전단결합강도는 금속도재관의 전단결합강도와 유의한 차이가 있었다 (p<0.05). 본 실험 결과를 토대로 ZB군은 임상적으로 받아들여지는 전단결합강도 범위 내 분포를 보이지만, LB군은 임상허용 범위에 못 미치는 결과값을 보였다. 금속도재관과 달리 지르코니아, lithium disilicate 전부도재관은 모두 혼합형 파절양상을 보였다. 결론적으로 전단결합강도 실험에 사용된 시편이 임상적인 치과보철물의 형태와는 달리 실험을 위한 시편의 형태로 제작되어 임상적 결과를 반영하지 못했으며 구강 내의 상황과도 다르다는 한계점을 가지고 있다. 추후에는 이를 보완하여 치과보철물과 유사한 형태의 시편을 이용한 전단결합 강도의 측정과 구강 내 조건을 고려한 추가 실험이 필요하다고 생각된다.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제47권3호
• /
• pp.312-319
• /
• 2009

연구목적: 지르코니아-도재 수복물에 있어 상부도재와 코어 사이의 결합 실패가 종종 보고되어 왔으며 특히 착색지르코니아 코어는 기존의 백색 지르코니아보다 상부 도재와의 결합력이 약하다고 보고된 바 있다. 이 연구의 목적은 착색 지르코니아 코어 위의 상부도재를 적층식과 열가압식으로 제작하여 그 전단결합강도를 알아보고, 이를 전통적인 금속-도재간 결합강도와 비교하여 그 임상적 안정성을 평가하는 것이다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 금속도재군 (MC)을 대조군으로 하였다. 전통적인 금속도재군 (MC)과 지르코니아 코어를 사용한 두가지 군 (ZB, ZP)에 대하여 각 시스템별로 10개씩, 총 30개의 시편을 제작했다. CAD/CAM을 이용해 직경 12 mm, 높이 2.8 mm의 원판형 지르코니아 코어 (Katana zirconia)를 제작하고, 그 상부에 직경 2.8 mm, 높이 3 mm의 도재를 축성했다. ZB군은 CZR을 이용하여 적층법으로 상부도재를 제작했으며 ZP군은 NobelRondo Press ingot를 열가압하여 제작했다. Shear bond test machine (R&B Inc. Daejeon, Korea)을 이용하여 분당 0.50 mm의 속도로 파절이 일어날 때까지 전단력을 가하여 최대적용력 (N)을 측정하여 전단결합강도를 계산하고, 일원배치 분산분석을 사용하여 유의수준 5%에서 검정하였다. 파절양상을 알아보기 위하여 전자주사현미경을 통해 파절단면을 관찰했다. 결과: 평균 전단강도 (SD)는 MC 대조군 29.14 (2.26); ZB 29.48 (2.30); ZP 29.51 (2.32) 이었다. 실험군과 대조군 사이에 유의한 차이는 없었다. 모든 실험군에서 접착성 실패와 응집성 실패가 혼재된 양상을 보였으며, 응집성 실패가 우세했다. 결론: 1. 착색지르코니아 코어와 상부도재들 간의 전단결합강도는 금속 도재간 전단결합강도와 유의한 차이가 없었다. 2. 착색지르코니아 코어의 상부도재를 제작하는 방식에 있어 적층법과 열가압법 간의 전단결합강도에 유의한 차이는 없었다 (P > .05). 3. 파절양상은 응집성 파절이 우세한 가운데 접착성 파절과 응집성 파절이 혼재되어 나타났다.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제47권2호
• /
• pp.199-205
• /
• 2009

연구목적: 지르코니아 코어의 표면처리가 비니어링 세라믹과 전단결합강도에 미치는 영향을 알아보고자 한다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 지르코니아 블록(IPS e. max ZirCAD; Ivoclar vivadent, N=40, n=10, $10mm{\times}10mm{\times}3mm$)를 제조사의 지시에 따라 소성한 후 세척하였다. 대조군, 샌드블라스팅(4기압하 $50{\mu}m$ 알루미늄옥사이드) 처리군, 라이너(Zirliner; Ivoclar vivadent) 처리군, 샌드블라스팅과 라이너 처리군 네 개의 군으로 나누어 각 각 표면처리한 후 3 mm 두께로 세라믹(IPS e. max Ceram; Ivoclar vivadent)을 축조한다. 인스트론 만능시험기로 전단결합강도를 측정한 후, 일원변량 분산분석(One way ANOVA)과 $Scheff{\acute{e}}$검정법(P<.05)를 시행하였다. 결과: 지르코니아 코어와 세라믹 간 평균 전단결합강도는 샌드블라스팅과 라이너 동시 처리군에서 가장 높게 나타났으며, 지르코니아 코어에 샌드블라스팅과 라이너 단독 표면처리는 결합력에 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았으나(P>.05), 샌드블라스팅과 라이너 동시 표면처리는 두 재료 간 결합력에 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보였다(P<.05). 결론: 지르코니아 코어에 샌드블라스팅과 라이너 동시 처리시 전단결합강도의 증가를 보였다.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제35권4호
• /
• pp.719-741
• /
• 1997

This study was undertaken to compare by Atomic Force Microscope the effects of various finishing and polishing instruments on surface roughness of filling and veneering composite resins. Seven composite resins were studied : Silux Plus (3M Dental Products, U.S.A.), Charisma (Heraeus Kulzer, Germany), Prisma THP (L.D.Caulk, Dentsply, U.S.A.), Photoclearfil (Kuraray, Japan), Cesead (Kuraray, Japan), Thermoresin LC (GC, Japan), Artglass (Heraeus Kulzer, Germany). Samples were placed and polymerized in holes (2mm thick and 8.5mm in diameter) machined in Teflon mold under glass plate, ensuring excess of material and moulded to shape with polyester matrix strip. Except control group (Polyester matrix strip), all experimental groups were finished and polishied under manufacturer's instructions. The finishing and polishing procedure were : carbide bur (E.T carbide set 4159, Komet, Germany), diamond bur (composite resin polishing bur set, GC, Japan), aluminum-oxide disc (Sof-Lex Pop-On, 3M Dental Products, U.S.A.), diamond-particle disc (Dia-Finish, Renfert Germany), white stone bur & rubber point( composite finishing kit, EDENTA, Swiss), respectively. Each specimens were evaluated for the surface roughness with Atomic Force Microscope (AutoProbe CP, Park Scientific Instruments, U.S.A.) under contact mode and constant height mode. The results as follows : 1. Except Thermoresin LC, all experimental composite resin groups showed more rougher than control group after finishing and polishing(p<0.1). 2. A surface as smooth as control group was obtained by $Al_{2}O_{3}$ disc all filling composite resin groups except Charisma and all veneering composite resin groups except Thermoresin LC(p<0.05). 3. In case of Thermoresin LC, there were no statistically significant differences before and after finishing and polishing(p>0.1). 4. Carbide bur, diamond bur showed rough surfaces in all composite resin groups, so these were inappropriate for the final polishing instruments.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제4권3호
• /
• pp.162-169
• /
• 2012

PURPOSE. Fracture of the veneering material of zirconia restorations frequently occurs in clinical situations. The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the fracture strengths of zirconia crowns veneered with various ceramic materials by various techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A 1.2 mm, $360^{\circ}$ chamfer preparation and occlusal reduction of 2 mm were performed on a first mandibular molar, and 45 model dies were fabricated in a titanium alloy by CAD/CAM system. Forty-five zirconia copings were fabricated and divided into three groups. In the first group (LT) zirconia copings were veneered with feldspathic porcelain by the layering technique. In the second group (HT) the glass ceramic was heat-pressed on the zirconia coping, and for the third group (ST) a CAD/CAM-fabricated high-strength anatomically shaped veneering cap was sintered onto the zirconia coping. All crowns were cemented onto their titanium dies with Rely $X^{TM}$ Unicem (3M ESPE) and loaded with a universal testing machine (Instron 5583) until failure. The mean fracture values were compared by an one-way ANOVA and a multiple comparison post-hoc test (${\alpha}$= 0.05). Scanning electron microscope was used to investigate the fractured interface. RESULTS. Mean fracture load and standard deviation was $4263.8{\pm}1110.8$ N for Group LT, $5070.8{\pm}1016.4$ for Group HT and $6242.0{\pm}1759.5$ N for Group ST. The values of Group ST were significantly higher than those of the other groups. CONCLUSION. Zirconia crowns veneered with CAD/CAM generated glass ceramics by the sintering technique are superior to those veneered with feldspathic porcelain by the layering technique or veneered with glass ceramics by the heat-pressing technique in terms of fracture strength.