• Title/Summary/Keyword: Urine sediment microscopy

Search Result 3, Processing Time 0.016 seconds

Comparison of WBCs and RBCs Concordance between the Cobas u 701 Analyzer and Three Manual Microscopy Methods in Urine Sediment (소변 침전물에서 Cobas u 701 Analyzer와 세 가지 수동 현미경검사법의 백혈구와 적혈구의 일치도 비교)

  • Hyeok-Jae LEE;Min-Hyeok LEE
    • Korean Journal of Clinical Laboratory Science
    • /
    • v.55 no.2
    • /
    • pp.82-92
    • /
    • 2023
  • Urine sediments are performed by a microscopic examination of centrifuged urine by medical technologists. This study examined different urine sediment preparation procedures. The 107 fresh urine specimens that tested positive from white blood cells (WBCs) and red blood cells (RBCs) in the urine dipstick test and the cobas u 701 analyzer, respectively, were selected for manual microscopy. This study evaluated an automated urine sediment analyzer and three manual microscopy methods for WBCs and RBCs. The methods were performed according to the test guidelines. The coefficients of determination between the cobas u 701 analyzer and the Korean Association of Quality Assurance for Clinical Laboratory (KAQACL) for WBCs and RBCs were r2=0.977 and r2=0.970, respectively. The concordance rates between the cobas u 701 analyzer and KAQACL for WBCs and RBCs were 74.8% and 77.6%, respectively. A good correlation and concordance with the automatic analyzer were shown when the specimens were prepared and examined using the KAQACL method. Consequently, the differences in the urine sediment preparation procedures affected the sediment concentrations, influencing the cell number per high power field (HPF).

Comparison of the Results of Multistix$^{(R)}$SG and Comber-9-Test$^{(R)}$ RL Urine Dipstick Assay (Multistix$^{(R)}$-SG와 Comgur-9-test$^{(R)}$RL에 의한 요시험지봉검사 성적의 비교)

  • Kim, Dae-Chul;Kim, Kyung-Dong;Jung, Bo-Chan;Kim, Chung-Sook;Cho, Kil-Ho
    • Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science
    • /
    • v.8 no.1
    • /
    • pp.42-52
    • /
    • 1991
  • Two types of urine dipstick assays, Multistix-SG and Combur-9-test RL, were compared for compatibility, accuracy, specificity and predictive values of a positive and negative test in 501 patients urine and artificially prepared specimen. We found that the results of semiquantitative tests of Multistix-SG and Combur-9-Test RL performed were statistically similar in patients specimen. The urinary leukocyte estrase tests of Combur-9-Test RL assays compared with urine sediment microscopy in regard to compatibility, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of a positive and negative test 83.7%, 48.1%, 90.3%, 47.4% and 90.1%, respectively. The urinar nitrite tests of Comber-9-Test RL assays compared with urine culture tests, in regard to compatibility, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of a positive and negative tests were 90.3%, 19.4%, 84.7%, 53.8% and 94.1%, respectively. For the urinary protein, the sulfosalicylic acid method was the most sensitive test for any kinds of protein, and Multistix-SG appeared more sensitive than Compur-9-Test RL for the albuminuria. For the urinary bilirubin and glusose, two dipstick assays were similar in their diganostic efficiency. Finally in the urinary occult blood tests, Combur-9-Test RL assays was more sensitive than Multistix-SG.

  • PDF

A Study on the Standardization of Sample Preparation for Urine Sediment Microscopic Examination (요침사 현미경검사를 위한 표본제작의 표준화 연구)

  • Hyeok Jae LEE;Dae Heon KIM;Min-Hyeok LEE
    • Korean Journal of Clinical Laboratory Science
    • /
    • v.56 no.2
    • /
    • pp.135-146
    • /
    • 2024
  • Urinalysis is a fundamental diagnostic test routinely performed in clinical laboratories. We evaluated two manual microscopy methods, including a novel protocol, against the standardized chamber method. A total of 402 specimens, comprising 201 positive each for red blood cells (RBCs) and white blood cells (WBCs) by the strip test and automated urine sediment analyzer, were selected for the analysis. The correlation coefficients between the standardized chamber method and the novel protocol RBC and WBC test were both r=0.98, indicating a high degree of correlation. The pair-wise agreement rates for the same grade between these two methods were 86.1% for RBCs and 88.6% for WBCs, with rates within one grade difference of both at 99.5%. In contrast, the agreement rates between the standardized chamber method and smaller or medium-sized laboratory methods were notably lower, with the same-grade rates at 11.9% for RBCs and 13.4% for WBCs, and within one grade difference at 67.2% and 74.1%, respectively. Additional analyses using the intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman plots confirmed that the novel protocol exhibited superior agreement compared to the other three manual microscopy methods tested. Therefore, we recommend the novel protocol as a standardized procedure for urine sediment preparation, given its high correlation and agreement with the standardized chamber method.