• 한국조경학회지
• /
• 제47권6호
• /
• pp.1-11
• /
• 2019

이 연구는 미국 조경 아카이브의 구축 동향과 특성을 파악하고, 한국 조경 아카이브 구축을 위한 시사점을 찾는 데 목적을 둔다. 미국의 공공·대학·연구기관에서 운영하는 조경 아카이브 일곱 곳을 대상으로 아카이브 형성 배경, 기능, 범위와 대상, 수집 방법, 분류 체계, 활용 방법을 검토한 결과, 미국 조경 아카이브의 특성을 다음과 같이 정리하였다. 첫째, 경관의 가치와 중요성 인식이 아카이브 형성 배경에 주요하게 작용한다. 둘째, 아카이브의 목적은 경관의 다양성과 의미에 대한 대중의 인식 고취와 교육에 있다. 셋째, 아카이브의 대상과 범위는 각 운영기관의 목적에 따라 다양하다. 넷째, 수집 방법으로는 자료 기증이 주를 이루며, 이외에 자료 구매와 기록화 작업 등이 있다. 다섯째, 아카이브의 분류 기준은 사람, 작품 혹은 장소, 자료 유형으로 나눌 수 있지만, 아카이브 대상과 범위에 따라 차별화된 경향을 보인다. 여섯째, 미국의 조경 아카이브는 다양한 전문가와 조직의 참여와 협업, 그리고 안정적이며 지속적인 재정이라는 밑바탕 위에서 구축된다. 이러한 결과를 바탕으로 한국의 조경 아카이브 구축에 대해 세 가지 시사점을 제시하였다. 첫째, 조경 아카이브에 대한 장기적인 비전과 차별화된 주제 설정이 필요하다. 둘째, 적합한 자료 수집, 분류, 기록, 디지털화 방법과 체계를 모색해야 하며, 이를 위해 기초 연구와 시범 아카이브 구축 등이 필요하다. 셋째, 학술과 교육 프로그램과 연계한 아카이브 활용 방안을 개발하고, 재정 확보와 관련 제도 마련을 통해 아카이브의 지속가능성을 확보할 필요가 있다. 본 연구는 한국의 조경 아카이브 구축을 위한 기초 작업으로 후속 연구를 위한 단초를 마련했다는 점에서 의의를 갖는다.

• 기록학연구
• /
• 제12호
• /
• pp.179-235
• /
• 2005

In this article, the task of evaluating the official documents that were created and issued by the Joseon Governor General office during the Japanese occupation period, with new perspectives based upon the Macro-Appraisal approaches developed by the Canadian scholars and personnel, will be attempted. Recently, the Canadian people and the authorities have been showing a tendency of evaluating the meaning and importance of a particular document with perspectives considering the historical situation and background conditions that gave birth to that document to be a more important factor, even than considering the quality and condition of that very document. Such approach requires the archivists to determine whether they should preserve a certain document or not based upon the meaning, functions and status of the entity that produced the document or the meaning of the documentation practice itself, rather than the actual document. With regard to the task of evaluating the official documents created and issued by the Joseon Governor General office and involved the city plans devised by the office back then, this author established total of 4 primary tasks that would prove crucial in the process of determining whether or not a particular theme, or event, or an ideology should be selected and documents involving those themes, events and ideologies should be preserved as important sources of information regarding the Korean history of the Japanese occupation period. Those four tasks are as follow: First, the archivists should study the current and past trends of historical researches. The archivists, who are usually not in the position of having comprehensive access to historical details, must consult the historians' studies and also the trends mirrored in such studies, in their efforts of selecting important historical events and themes. Second, the archivists should determine the level of importance of the officials who worked inside the Joseon Governor General office as they were the entities that produced the very documents. It is only natural to assume that the level of importance of a particular document must have been determined by the level of importance(in terms of official functions) of the official who authorized the document and ordered it to be released. Third, the archivists should be made well aware of the inner structure and official functions of the Joseon Governor General office, so that they can have more appropriate analyses. Fourth, in order to collect historically important documents that involved the Koreans(the Joseon people), the archivists should analyze not only the functions of the Joseon Governor General office in general but also certain areas of the Office's business in which the Japanese officials and the Koreans would have interacted with each other. The act of analyzing the documents only based upon their respective levels of apparent importance might lead the archivists to miss certain documents that reflected the Koreans' situation or were related to the general interest of the Korean people. This kind of evaluation should provide data that are required in appraising how well the Joseon Governor General office's function of devising city plans were documented back then, and how well they are preserved today, utilizing a comparative study involving the Joseon Governor General office's own evaluations of its documentations and the current status of documents that are in custody of the National Archive. The task would also end up proposing a specialized strategy of collecting data and documents that is direly needed in establishing a well-designed comprehensive archives. We should establish a plan regarding certain documents that were documented by the Joseon Governor General office but do not remain today, and devise a task model for the job of primary collecting that would take place in the future.