• 제목/요약/키워드: UDIDs

검색결과 2건 처리시간 0.016초

첨단기술 기반기업(NTBF)의 성장 요인 분석 - 역동적 기업 역량(DFC)의 시각에서 -

  • 손찬;정재용
    • 한국기술혁신학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 한국기술혁신학회 2003년도 춘계학술대회
    • /
    • pp.369-388
    • /
    • 2003
  • This research has been focused upon and analyzing Medison, once a leading New Technology-Based Firm (NTBF) in Korea with exceptionally advanced technology in 3D ultrasound diagnostic imaging devices (UDIDs) (armored with 23 subsidiaries at its peak expansion), from the perspective if Dynamic Firm Capability(DFC). The underlying hypothesis is that the various problems from its pointless pursuit of the business styles or precedents of the existing large firms might be traced to its specific characteristics as an NTBF, which should have more preferably been based upon the distinctive competences such as differentiated technologies, institutional linkages, organizational routines, and complementary assets, etc. In conclusion, for the NTBFs with different DFC domains from those of the large firms, the optimal external linkages and comprehensive integration efforts (Process) under their specific organizational characteristics and constraints (Path) are highly recommended for the continuous accumulation of their core capabilities based upon the technological assets (Position).

  • PDF

첨단기술 기반기업(NTBF)의 지속적 성장을 저해하는 주요 요인 분석 -역동적 기업 역량(DFC)의 시각에서- (Impeding on NTBF′s Sustainable Growth: The Case of Medison)

  • 손찬;정재용
    • 기술혁신학회지
    • /
    • 제6권2호
    • /
    • pp.228-252
    • /
    • 2003
  • This research has been focused upon and analyzing Medison, once a leading New Technology-Based Finn (N1BF) in Korea with exceptionally advanced technology in 3D ultrasound diagnostic imaging devices (UDIDs) (armored with 23 subsidiaries at its peak expansion), from the perspective of Dynamic Finn Capability(DFC). The underlying hypothesis is that the various problems from its pointless pursuit of the business styles or precedents of the existing large firms might be traced to its specific characteristics as an NTBF, which should have more preferably been based upon the distinctive competences such as differentiated technologies, institutional linkages, organizational routines, and complementary assets, etc. In conclusion, for the NTBFs with different DFC domains from those of the large firms, the optimal external linkages and comprehensive integration efforts (Process) under their specific organizational characteristics and constraints (path) are highly recommended for the continuous accumulation of their core capabilities based upon the technological assets (Position).

  • PDF