• Title/Summary/Keyword: U-shaped sprayer

Search Result 1, Processing Time 0.014 seconds

Pest Control Effect and Optimal dose by Pesticide Dispersion Spray Method in the Paprika Cultivation (파프리카 시설재배지에서 약제 살포방법에 의한 해충방제 효과와 최적 살포함량)

  • Jin, Na Young;Lee, You Kyoung;Lee, Bo Ram;Jun, Jun Hack;Kim, Yu Seop;Seo, Mi Ja;Lim, Chi Hwan;Youn, Young Nam;Yu, Yong Man
    • The Korean Journal of Pesticide Science
    • /
    • v.18 no.4
    • /
    • pp.350-357
    • /
    • 2014
  • We studied on pesticide residue and pest control effect when using various types of sprayers on paprika cultivation. Additionally, a test was conducted to optimize chemical content per unit area in condition of optimum pest control. Two types of sprayer were tested (three times) on paprika cultivation which was divided into seven sections. Blind spots were also examined using a water sensitive paper when spraying chemical pesticide, remote controlled sprayer were confirmed to be not effective in terms of its spraying capacity. However, a U-shaped sprayer was confirmed that it sprayed enough on all the parts of a plant in green house including the blind spots. Additionally, it does not exceed the minimum residue limits on the all parts of pesticides residue conditions. When using remote controlled sprayer, water sensitive paper were changed to blue color (82.5% and 81.2%) in terms of controlling Bemisia tabaci and Aphis gossypii based on the two spraying manners. 53.0% and 42.6% of control effect were shown on the fair parts of the plants. However, on the poor parts on which pesticides were not well-sprayed, thus, not-remained, more number of pests increased. Meanwhile, on farming that only one type of pesticide has been used, resistance pests present with very low control effect, even though sufficient amount of pesticide was well-sprayed. On the test of the optimum amount of spraying per a unit area, which shows no differences in the two cases of using 5L and 2.5L of chemical pesticides on 9 plants of paprika that has 81.8% and 84.5% control effect, respectively.