• 동서간호학연구지
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.63-70
• /
• 2009

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate hospital service utilization by the types of hospitals in Type I Medicaid claims frequently cited by elderly beneficiaries. Methods: Three frequently claimed inpatient diseases were selected: cerebral infarction, hypertension and diabetes mellitus. Relevant data were collected for the year 2008 from the computer database of the National Health Insurance Corporation. The data was analyzed using SPSS by descriptive statistics, ANOVA and coefficient of variation. Results: The coefficient of variance of hospitalization per episode was higher than daily hospital expenditure among hospitals for all three diseases. The coefficient of variance of hospitalization per episode was highest for cerebral infarction. The coefficient of variation of hospital expenditure per hospital day was highest for hypertension. Conclusions: Evaluating of the volume and pattern of hospital service utilization and the appropriateness for hospital admission for Type-I Medicaid elderly beneficiaries is important for Medicaid-based case management.

• 한국ITS학회 논문지
• /
• 제21권6호
• /
• pp.225-240
• /
• 2022

경기도는 도시형, 도농복합형, 농촌형으로 도시형태가 구분되어, 대중교통 서비스 제공도 도시 형태에 따라 다르지만, 대중교통 환승요금제는 단순한 형태의 수평적 형평성을 기준으로 동일한 환승유효시간을 적용하여 운영되고 있다. 이로 인해 대중교통 서비스 공급형태가 열악한 비도심 지역은 버스의 운행간격이 30분 이상으로 환승할인혜택을 받지 못하는 경우가 발생한다. 기회의 형평성 측면에서 기본적으로 불리하게 적용되어 요금할인 혜택을 받지 못하는 것이다. 이에 본 연구는 경기도의 환승요금제의 비형평적 사례를 교통카드를 활용하여 환승비 혜택 현황을 분석하고, 환승비혜택율 지표를 개발하고, 지표를 활용하여 시나리오 분석을 수행하였다. 분석결과 대중교통 서비스 공급 확대가 아닌 수직적 형평성 기준의 제도 개선을 통해 환승혜택의 기회의 균등이 가능하다는 것을 증명하였다. 수직적 형평성 기준을 적용하여 지역별 맞춤형 제도를 운영하는 환승요금제도의 정책 대안을 제시하였다.

• 수산경영론집
• /
• 제33권2호
• /
• pp.49-74
• /
• 2002

This study examines, from an economic perspective, the reasons for introducing a resource taxe system into the Korean off-shore fisheries and the type of charges that can be introduced. Following a review of the charging systems in other advanced fisheries, we consider the types of charging scheme and some implications for the Korean off-shore fishing industry. Charges could be used for recovering part of fisheries management cost from the industry(i.e. administration, enforcement, research, etc). This can be justified on the grounds that the fishing industry is the main beneficiary of management and that it should therefore bear at least part of the cost involved. It is arguable that publicly-funded management is in effect a subsidy to the industry. Using charges to raise revenue in excess of the cost of management would represent the extraction of a public rent from the fishery resource, but the short-run financial consqquences for the industry would be significant. Results from a qualtitative analysis suggest that while any new charge will have a significant financial impact on the industry in the short run, a landings tax would have a lesser impact on fleet structure in the long run. The study also considers the possibility of a capital gains tax on license sales in order to recover some rent from the industry. Despite any short run-financial consequences, making the fishing industry pay for at least some of the cost of management could benefit the industry as a whole if there were more cooperation between industry and managers as a result. It is acknowledged, however, that there could be disputes over the relative management costs of different sectors of the industry. Even though this study makes few specific recommendations about charging the Korean off-shore fishing industry, it does advise that the issue be reviewed on the basis of the entire Korea fisheries. Finally, the study notes that insufficient data are available on the economic performance of the Korean off-shore fishing vessels and it recommands that a comprehensive system for the collection of costs and earnings data be put in place. It also suggests that MOMAF pay much attention to the permit right market and its transactions.