• 제목/요약/키워드: Trunk Flexion Angle

검색결과 74건 처리시간 0.018초

짐볼과 벽면을 이용한 스쿼트 운동이 하지근 활성도에 미치는 영향 (The Effects of Squatting Exercise with Gym Ball and Wall on Lower Extremity Muscles Activation)

  • 오태영
    • 대한물리의학회지
    • /
    • 제8권4호
    • /
    • pp.647-653
    • /
    • 2013
  • PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the lower extremities muscle activation between squatting exercise with gym ball and wall for improving muscle strengthening in lower extremities. METHODS: Participants were 21 university students (males 10, females 11) who didn't have any problem with orthopedic surgery. Participants performed squatting exercise with gym ball and wall. Squatting exercise with gym ball were performed using by gym ball behind back, and the gym ball were fixed in back and wall. We asked participants to push back the gym ball slightly to prevent fall of ball. Wall squatting exercise, we ask participants to contact their back in wall slightly in order to prevent trunk flexion during performed squatting exercise. Each squatting exercise had performed until knee joint were flexed at 60 degree, and maintained five seconds. We collected data from E.M.G of Biceps femoris, Gastrocnemius, Vastus medialis and lateralis, Tibialis anterior of lower extremity in isometric phase of knee joint angle 60 degree of each squatting exercise. We analysed data using by ANOVA and independent t-test of SPSS PC ver.20.0 in order to compare the muscle activation between squatting exercise with gym ball and wall. RESULT: All of lower extremities muscle activation showed more higher value in squatting exercise with gym ball than squatting exercise with wall, especially there was significantly difference of muscle activation in vastus medialis, tibialis anterior between squatting exercise with gymball and with wall. CONCLUSION: On comprehensively considering the results of the present study, we suggested that squatting exercise with gym ball was more effective method improving lower extremity muscle strengthening.

달리기 속도의 변화가 인체 충격 가속도와 생체역학적 변인에 미치는 영향 (Effects of Running Speed on Body Impact Acceleration and Biomechanical Variables)

  • Young-Seong Lee;Jae-Won Kang;Sang-Kyoon Park
    • 한국운동역학회지
    • /
    • 제34권2호
    • /
    • pp.81-92
    • /
    • 2024
  • Objective: The purpose of this study was to analyze the impact acceleration, shock attenuation and biomechanical variables at various running speed. Method: 20 subjects (height: 176.15 ± 0.63 cm, weight: 70.95 ± 9.77 kg, age: 27.00 ± 4.65 yrs.) participated in this study. The subjects ran at four different speeds (2.5 m/s, 3.0 m/s, 3.5 m/s, 4.0 m/s). Three-dimensional accelerometers were attached to the distal tibia, sternum and head. Gait parameters, biomechanical variables (lower extremity joint angle, moment, power and ground reaction force) and acceleration variables (impact acceleration, shock attenuation) were calculated during the stance phase of the running. Repeated measures ANOVA was used with an alpha level of .05. Results: In gait parameters, decreased stance time, increasing stride length and stride frequency with increasing running speed. And at swing time 2.5 m/s and 4.0 m/s was decreased compared to 3.0 m/s and 3.5 m/s. Biomechanical variables statistically increased with increasing running speed except knee joint ROM, maximum ankle dorsiflexion moment, and maximum hip flexion moment. In acceleration variables as the running speed increased (2.5 m/s to 4.0 m/s), the impact acceleration on the distal tibia increased by more than twice, while the sternum and head increased by approximately 1.1 and 1.2 times, respectively. And shock attenuation (tibia to head) increased as the running speed increased. Conclusion: When running speed increases, the magnitude and increasing rate of sternum and head acceleration are lower compared to the proximal tibia, while shock attenuation increases. This suggests that limiting trunk movement and increasing lower limb movement effectively reduce impact from increased shock. However, to fully understand the body's mechanism for reducing shock, further studies are needed with accelerometers attached to more segments to examine their relationship with kinematic variables.

요추강화 운동기기의 훈련을 통한 유연성 및 근력 특성 분석 (Characteristic Analysis of Flexibility and Muscle Strength according to Exercise using Lumbar Strengthen Exercise Instrument)

  • 강승록;김경;정구영;문동안;권대규
    • 재활복지공학회논문지
    • /
    • 제4권1호
    • /
    • pp.53-61
    • /
    • 2010
  • 본 연구에서는 요추강화 운동기기를 이용하여 훈련 전후에 대한 유연성 및 근력 특성분석을 고찰하고, 요추 재활운동으로서 가능성을 검증하고자 한다. 요추관련 상해가 없으며 신체 건강한 성인 남녀 20명이 실험에 참여하였으며 각각 10명씩 대조군과 요추강화 운동을 제공받는 훈련군으로 나누었다. 실험에 사용된 요추강화운동기기는 하이스파인(Hi-Spine, 메디컬사이언스, 한국)이며 운동은 하루 40분씩 주 3일, 총 4주간 실시하였다. 또한 본 연구에서 피험자들은 누운 자세, 앉은 자세, 직립 자세, 전신스트레칭자세 등 총 4가지의 운동자세를 각 10분씩 제공받았다. 운동 전 후 요추의 유연성과 근력변화를 알아보기 위해 매주 1회 체간 굴곡 및 신전, 기초체력평가와 요추관절토크를 측정하였다. 실험 결과 훈련군에서 유연성과 근력이 모두 증진되었다. 요추강화운동기기의 플랫폼이 3차원 회전을 함에 따라 피험자들의 근육들은 자극받으며, 회전 방향과 각도에 따라 근긴장성과 근수축 작용을 유도시켜 유연성 및 요추 근력을 증가시키는 것으로 판단된다. 본 연구는 향후 요추관련 상해자 또는 고령자들의 요추 재활운동 프로그램에 적용될 수 있을 것이다.

케틀벨 스윙 시 적당한 케틀벨의 무게는 얼마일까? (What is the Appropriate Kettlebell Mass for a Kettlebell Swing?)

  • Kim, Bo Kyeong;Thau, Dao Van;Yoon, Sukhoon
    • 한국운동역학회지
    • /
    • 제31권4호
    • /
    • pp.308-313
    • /
    • 2021
  • Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of different kettlebell mass (30%, 40%, and 50% of the body mass) on kinematics and kinetic variables of kettlebell swing. Method: Total of 16 healthy male who had at least 1 year of kettlebell training experience were participated in this study (age: 31.69 ± 3.46 yrd., height: 173.38 ± 4.84 cm, body mass: 74.53 ± 6.45 kg). In this study, a 13-segments whole-body model (upper trunk, lower trunk, pelvis, both side of forearm, upperarm, thigh, and shank) was used and 26 reflective markers were attached to the body to identify the segments during the movement. A 3-dimensional motion analysis with 8 infrared cameras and 4 channeled EMG was performed to find the effect of kettlebell mass on its swing. To verify the kettlebell mass effect, a one-way ANOVA with a repeated measure was used and the statistical significance level was set at 𝛼=.05. Results: Firstly, in all lower extremity joints and thoracic vertebrae, a statistically significant change in angle was shown according to an increase in kettlebell mass during kettlebell swing (p<.05). Secondly, in both the up-swing and down-swing phases, the knee joint and ankle joint ROM showed a statistically significant increase as the kettlebell mass increased (p<.05) but no statistically significant difference was found in the hip joint and thoracic spine (p>.05). Lastly, the hamstrings muscle activity was statistically significantly increased as the kettlebell mass increased during up-swing phases (p<.05). Also, as the kettlebell mass increased in P4 of the down swing phase, the gluteus maximus showed a statistically significantly increased muscle activation, whereas the rectus femoris showed a statistically significantly decreased muscle activation (p <.05). Conclusion: As a result of this study, hip extension decreased and knee extension increased at 40% and 50% of body mass, and the spine also failed to maintain neutrality and increased flexion. Also, when kettlebell swings are performed with 50% of body mass, synergistic muscle dominance appears over 30% and 40% of body mass, which is judged to have a risk of potential injury. Therefore, it is thought that for beginners who start kettlebell exercise, swing practice should be performed with 30% of body mass. In addition, even in the case of experienced seniors, as the weight increases, the potential injury risk may increase, so it is thought that caution should be exercised when performing swings with 40% and 50% of body mass. In conclusion, it is thought that increasing the weight after sufficiently training with 30% of the weight of all subjects performing kettlebell swing is a way to maximize the exercise effect as well as prevent injury.