• Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society
• /
• 제29권7호
• /
• pp.935-939
• /
• 2000

Objective : Traumatic disc lesion is a lesion with tremendous controversies. The causal relationships of this lesion are not established along with pathogenesis, diagnostic criteria, methods of treatment and the outcome. However, a significant number of patients with back pain after a trauma underwent spinal operations under the diagnosis of traumatic disc lesions. Such an ill-directed operation eventually produce a person with an iatrogenic disability. We present two illustrative cases, and tried to make a preventive method. Methods : We examined the path from mild trauma after a road traffic accident into the iatrogenic disability in two illustrative cases, who requested disability assessment and medical appraisement. We evaluated the reason and background for such an unwanted outcome and tried to find a method to reduce or prevent it by a literature review. Results : These two patients were admitted to the hospital with the diagnosis of lumbar sprain after a road traffic accidents. They eventually underwent spinal surgery under another diagnosis such as traumatic disc herniation or internal disc disruption. They stayed at the hospital for more than six months and finally lost their jobs. They became the disabled at last. Although they complained back pain, they never insisted by themselves that their symptoms were due to the traumatic disc lesion. To prevent such an iatrogenic disability, the doctors should assist them to go-back to the workplace promptly instead of a reckless extension of the treatment period. It may be necessary to evaluate the certificates to extend the treatment period with an additional diagnosis by a medical expert. To reduce the unnecessary long-term admission, a new billing system such as a partial share for the high cost of the treatment by the patients may be needed. Conclusion : It is not the patient but the doctors, who has the responsibility to avoid the unnecessary operations. All treating doctors should try to reduce or prevent such an iatrogenic complication caused by ourselves before we are forced to do so.

• Journal of Trauma and Injury
• /
• 제31권1호
• /
• pp.38-42
• /
• 2018

A case of surgically treated intervertebral disc extrusion with intraoperatively confirmed intradiscal hematoma in a 30-year-old physical trainer is presented. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging revealed downward migrating disc herniation, without definite suggestive findings of intradiscal hematoma. Intervertebral disc herniation with concomitant intradiscal hematoma is extremely rare, but could occur in patients who have excessive axial stress to the spine occupationally. In our case, the patient was an occupational physical trainer who had repetitive minor trauma to the lumbar spine. Although the patient did not have any clear history of major trauma to the spine, the intraoperative findings revealed intradiscal hematoma, which is very rare. The presence of intradiscal hematoma is to be suspected even when preoperative imaging studies shows indefinite findings of hematoma, considering the change in signal intensity of hematoma by time.

• 대한정형외과학회지
• /
• 제52권1호
• /
• pp.59-64
• /
• 2017

목적: 재발성 추간판 탈출증에 대하여 추간판 재절제술의 결과를 분석하고 수술결과에 영향을 줄 만한 요인에는 어떤 것이 있는지 제시하였다. 대상 및 방법: 59명이 재발성 추간판 탈출증에 대하여 추간판 재절제술을 시행받았고 최소 2년 이상 추시관찰하였다. 수술 결과는 visual analogue scale (VAS) 및 Macnab 분류에 따라서 평가하였고, 회복률은 VAS 변화에 따라 계산하였다. 그리고 SPSS를 이용하여 치료결과에 영향을 미치는 요인들에 대한 통계적 분석을 시행하였다. 결과: 재발성 추간판 탈출증으로 인한 수술률은 일차 추간판 절제술을 시행한 전체 환자의 6.0% (59/983예)를 차지하였다. VAS에 따른 첫 번째 수술의 임상적 호전 비율은 77%, 두 번째 수술에서는 71%로 측정되었다. 통계적으로 첫 번째와 두 번째의 평균 임상적 호전 비율 사이에 유의한 차이는 없었다. Macnab 분류에 따르면 96%의 환자가 excellent 또는 good 판정을 받았다. 추간판 재절제술 후 추가적으로 요추 불안정성이 발생된 증례는 없었다. 재수술 시 흡연, 외상력, 당뇨의 요인에 따른 수술 후 임상적 호전 정도에는 일차 수술과 비교하여 유의한 차이가 없었다. 결론: 재발성 추간판 탈출증에 대해 시행한 추간판 재절제술은 일차 추간판 절제술만큼 좋은 임상 결과를 보였다. 흡연, 외상력, 당뇨의 요인들은 추간판 재절제술의 결과에 영향을 거의 미치지 않았다.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제20권10호
• /
• pp.303-308
• /
• 2019

65세 남자환자에서 전신마취하 관절경 어깨 수술후 갑자기 발생한 사지 마비 증례를 보고하고자 한다. 환자는 술 후 급격한 사지 마비 증상을 보였으며 마취 관리상 특별한 문제는 없었다. 환자의 수술시 자세와 관련하여 마취 유도시에 기관삽관을 위한 과도한 경추 신전은 시행되지 않았으며 수술중 자세에서도 경추부의 과도한 회전이나 신전 또한 진행되지 않았다. 그러나 수술이 종료된 후 근이완의 완전한 회복과 의식 및 자발호흡은 확인되었으나 사지 마비 증상 및 배뇨장애 증상을 보였다. 신속히 시행한 경추부 자기공명 영상에서 경추간판에 의한 척수 신경 압박 소견 보이는 척추성 경추증 증상을 보였다. 환자는 21일간의 고농도 스테로이드 정주 요법을 포함한 보존적 치료 후에 감각 및 운동신경의 완전한 회복을 보이고 다른 신경학적 이상 소견은 보이지 않은 채로 퇴원하였다. 외상과 관련 없이 사지 마비로 나타나는 수술후 척추성 경추증의 발생은 흔하지 않다. 본 증례를 통해 수술후 발생한 비외상성 척추성 경추증 발생에 대해 타 증례 보고와 비교 분석하여 고찰해 보고자 한다. 임상 의사는 60세 이상의 노년층에서의 수술후 사지 마비에 대해 척추성 경추증의 원인 기여에 대해서도 고려하기를 권고한다.

• Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society
• /
• 제61권5호
• /
• pp.574-581
• /
• 2018

Objective : The zero-profile implant (Zero-P) is accepted for use in anterior cervical fusion for the treatment of degenerative cervical disease. However, evidence pertaining to its efficiency and safety in traumatic cervical injury is largely insufficient. This study aimed to compare the overall outcomes of patients who underwent Zero-P for traumatic cervical disc injury. Methods : Data from a total of 53 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for traumatic or degenerative cervical disc disease using the Zero-P were reviewed. Seventeen patients (group A) had traumatic cervical disc injury and the remaining 36 (group B) had degenerative cervical disc herniation. The fusion and subsidence rates and Cobb angle were measured retrospectively from plain radiographs. The patients' clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score and Odom's criteria. Results : The C2-7 Cobb and operative segmental angles increased by $3.45{\pm}7.61$ and $2.94{\pm}4.59$ in group A; and $2.46{\pm}7.31$ and $2.88{\pm}5.49$ in group B over 12 postoperative months, respectively. The subsidence and fusion rate was 35.0% and 95.0% in group A; and 36.6% and 95.1% in group B, respectively. None of the parameters differed significantly between groups. The clinical outcomes were similar in both groups in terms of increasing the JOA score and producing a grade higher than "good" using Odom's criteria. Conclusion : The application of Zero-P in patients with traumatic cervical disc injury was found to be acceptable when compared with the clinical and radiological outcomes of degenerative cervical spondylosis.

• Journal of Trauma and Injury
• /
• 제25권1호
• /
• pp.7-16
• /
• 2012

Purpose: Cervical dislocations with locked facets account for more than 50% of all cervical injuries. Thus, investigating a suitable management of cervical locked facets is important. This study examined factors of close reduction failure in traumatically locked facets of the subaxial cervical spine patients to determine suitable surgical management. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed of the case histories of 28 patients with unilateral/bilateral cervical locked facets from Nov. 2004 to Dec. 2010. Based on MRI evaluation of disc status at the injury level, we found unilateral dislocations in 9 cases, and bilateral dislocations in 19 cases, The patients were investigated for neurologic recovery, closed reduction rate, factors of the close reduction barrier, fusion rate and period, spinal alignment, and complications. Results: The closed reduction failed in 23(82%) patients. Disc herniation was an obstacle to closed reduction (p=0.015) and was more frequent in cases involving a unilateral dislocation (p=0.041). The pedicle or facet fracture was another factor, although some patients showed aggravation of neurologic symptoms, most patients had improved by the last follow up. The kyphotic angle were statistically significant (p=0.043). Sixs patient underwent anterior decompression/fusion, and 15 patients underwent circumferential fusion, and 7 patients underwent posterior fusion. All patients were fused at 3 months after surgery. The complications were 1 case of CSF leakage and 1 case of esphageal fistula, 1 case of infection. Conclusion: We recommend closed reduction be performed as soon as possible after injury to maximize the potential for neurological recovery. Patients fot whom closed reduction of the cervical locked facets have a higher incidence of anatomic obstacles to reduction, including facet fractures and disc herniation. Immediate direct open anterior reduction or circumferential fixation/fusion of locked cervical facets is recommended as a treatment of choice for traumatic locked cervical facet patients after closed reduction failure.