• 제목/요약/키워드: Tolerancing

검색결과 18건 처리시간 0.022초

분산을 고려한 혼합물 배합비의 최적허용차 결정 (An optimal tolerancing of the mixture ratio with variance considerations)

  • 김성준;박종인
    • 품질경영학회지
    • /
    • 제38권4호
    • /
    • pp.580-586
    • /
    • 2010
  • Performance variations in mixture products such as medicine, food, and chemicals can be caused by their own subcomponents. For instance, a discharge capacity of a lithium-ion battery depends upon the mixture ratio of ethylene, dimethyle, and ethyle-methyle, all of which are subcomponents of an electrolyte solution in the battery. Thus it is crucial to determine tolerances of the mixture ratio in order to maintain the product quality at a desired level. This paper is concerned with the tolerance design of the mixture ratio. In particular, minimizing variance around the mixture ratio is adopted as a decision criterion in this paper. An illustrative example with multiple quality characteristics is given as well.

소형 위성용 고해상도 광학카메라 광학설계 (An optical design of a high resolution earth observation camera for small satellites)

  • 이준호;김용민;이응식;유상근;김이을;최영완;박동조
    • 한국광학회지
    • /
    • 제11권1호
    • /
    • pp.6-12
    • /
    • 2000
  • 위성에 탑재된 지구관측용 카메라는, 지상의 망원경과 같은 원리로, 우주상공에서 지표면 관측을 자동적으로 수행하고 관측정보를 지상으로 전달해 주는 장치다. 이용 목적에 따라 카메라의 해상도 또는 분해능, 관측대역, 관측폭, 위성의 궤도 등의 규격이 결정된다. 고해상도는 카메라 관련 제반 기술 및 경험이 부족한 국내의 여건에 적합한 소형 위성용 고해상도 카메라의 규격을 제시하며 이에 따른 광학 설계와 제작, 조립 및 측정오차를 제시한다.

  • PDF

슬라이드형 휴대전화기 측면 갭의 품질개선을 위한 부품 공차설계 (Tolerance Design for Parts of a Sliding-Type Mobile Phone to Improve Variational Quality of Its Side Gap)

  • 이래우;정하승;지해성;임현준
    • 한국CDE학회논문집
    • /
    • 제17권6호
    • /
    • pp.398-408
    • /
    • 2012
  • This paper investigates the tolerance stack-up in a commercial sliding-type mobile phone model developed by a Korean electronics company, with focus on the dimensional quality of the gap between the sliding top and the main body. The tolerance analysis in this study is done using a commercial software package, which runs Monte Carlo simulations to produce the statistical distributions of the gap size at desired locations. Such an analysis revealed that the original design did not yield the desired dimensional quality of the gap. Through a series of systematic analyses and syntheses, an improved design is proposed for the nominal dimensions and tolerances of selected features of the parts. The proposed design was validated, through tolerance analysis simulation, to meet the desired requirement of the gap quality.

Profile의 Composite와 Multiple Single-Segment Control의 비교 연구 (A Comparison Study between Composite and Multiple Single-Segment Profile Control)

  • 김준호;장성호;라두완
    • 산업경영시스템학회지
    • /
    • 제39권4호
    • /
    • pp.1-6
    • /
    • 2016
  • As manufacturing industries become globalized, product design affects every area of organization. The design sets the goals for a number of different departments, so if it fails to effectively communicate these goals, the entire organization is less efficient. In addition, To communicate clearly, the design must represent a product that meets its technical specification. GD&T (Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing) is one of the most important factors, which has an effect on efficiency of manufacture system, in designing products. However, most of designers in different industries are prone to ignore the importance of GD&T. To analyse the importance of GD&T compliance with international standards for design drawing, a comparison analysis of the difference between two methods, composite profile control and multiple single segment profile control, is performed on three different cases and suggests how it used to be more suitable. Composite profile tolerance is specified by a dual feature control frame that has one profile symbol specified with two lines of tolerance information. Whereas a multiple single segment profile control is when two or more single segment profile callouts are used to define the location and/or orientation and/or size and/or form of a part feature. In this study, the following results will be provided : a clear definition and an obvious difference of the tolerance zone, datums and datums sequence and minimization of tolerances. On this study, composite profile tolerance and multiple single segment profile tolerance were discussed. Next steps of research will consist on reaching more accurate results for profile control. Further research will be focused on dealing with the remaining 14 symbols of GD&T.

쩨르니케 계수의 민감도에 바탕을 둔 광부품 제작 및 조립 공차의 최적 관리 (Optimal Management of Fabrication and Assembly Tolerance of Optical Systems by Analyzing Its Influence on Zernike Coefficients)

  • 김현숙;김진승
    • 한국광학회지
    • /
    • 제26권4호
    • /
    • pp.209-216
    • /
    • 2015
  • 광부품 제작 및 조립 과정을 고려하여 완성된 광학계의 성능을 최적화하는 공차분석 방법을 제안하고 이를 적외선 광각 광학계에 적용하여 그 유용성을 확인하였다. 이 방법은 광학계에서 나오는 파면 오차를 쩨르니케 다항식으로 전개하고, 전개 계수인 쩨르니케 계수가 광부품 및 조립정렬 변수에 대해 변화하는 정도를 나타내는 민감도를 분석한다. 이 민감도를 바탕으로 광부품 제작 공차를 최적값으로 정하고 최선의 조립정렬 보상자를 고른다. 이 방법은 광부품의 제작 및 조립정렬 공차를 최적값으로 잡고, 또 그러한 공차에 의한 성능저하를 예측하고, 대비하므로 실제로 완성될 광학계의 성능을 최상으로 높일 수 있고, 또 정확하게 예측할 수 있다.

데이텀과 위치공차에 최대실체조건이 적용되었을 경우의 위치공차의 Cp (Calculating Cp of Position Tolerance when MMC Applied at Datum and Position Tolerance)

  • 김준호;장성호
    • 산업경영시스템학회지
    • /
    • 제40권3호
    • /
    • pp.1-6
    • /
    • 2017
  • Process capability is well known in quality control literatures. Process capability refers to the uniformity of the process. Obviously, the variability in the process is a measure of the uniformity of output. It is customary to take the 6-sigma spread in the distribution of the product quality characteristic as a measure of process capability. However there is no reference of process capability when maximum material condition is applied to datum and position tolerance in GD&T (Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing). If there is no material condition in datum and position tolerance, process capability can be calculated as usual. If there is a material condition in a feature control frame, bonus tolerance is permissible. Bonus tolerance is an additional tolerance for a geometric control. Whenever a geometric tolerance is applied to a feature of size, and it contains an maximum material condition (or least material condition) modifier in the tolerance portion of the feature control frame, a bonus tolerance is permissible. When the maximum material condition modifier is used in the tolerance portion of the feature control frame, it means that the stated tolerance applies when the feature of size is at its maximum material condition. When actual mating size of the feature of size departs from maximum material condition (towards least material condition), an increase in the stated tolerance-equal to the amount of the departure-is permitted. This increase, or extra tolerance, is called the bonus tolerance. Another type of bonus tolerance is datum shift. Datum shift is similar to bonus tolerance. Like bonus tolerance, datum shift is an additional tolerance that is available under certain conditions. Therefore we try to propose how to calculate process capability index of position tolerance when maximum material condition is applied to datum and position tolerance.

강체와 비강체 부품의 정의와 지정방법에 대한 제안 (Suggestions of Define Methods by Rigid/Non-Rigid Parts' Definitions)

  • 김재문;장성호;이왕범
    • 산업경영시스템학회지
    • /
    • 제41권3호
    • /
    • pp.115-119
    • /
    • 2018
  • Defining and measuring non-rigid or flexible parts has been controversial in industry for many years. There are two primary areas of controversy. The first is agreeing on what exactly a non-rigid part is. The second is agreeing on how to define and measure a non-rigid part. The subject of non-rigid parts is further complicated by the brief coverage it receives in the national and international standards. This leaves each company to improvise or create its own rules for non-rigid parts. There are some who believe that Geometrical Dimensioning and Tolerancing (GD&T) should not be used on non-rigid parts. This is not true. The ASME Y14.5M standard applies to rigid parts as a default condition. However, there is no definition given for a rigid part. The term rigid part has been used in industry for so long that it has gained a definition by its general use. When most people in industry say rigid part, they are referring to a part doesn't move (deform or flex) when a force (including gravity) is applied. How much force is relative based on the part characteristics. In reality, all parts will deform (or flex) if enough force is applied. Using this logic, all parts would be considered non-rigid. However, we all know that this is not how parts are treated in industry. Although GD&T defaults to rigid parts, it should also be used on non-rigid parts with a few special techniques. Actually 50~60% of all products designed contain parts or features on parts that are non-rigid. Therefore, we try to suggest the definitions of rigid and non-rigid parts and method to measure non-rigid parts.

자동무수차점 방식 널 렌즈 광학계를 이용한 직경 450 mm(f/2.7) 포물면경의 제작 및 측정 평가 (Fabrication Measurement and Evaluation of a Parabolic Mirror with the Diameter of 450 mm(f/2.7) by Autostigmatic Null Lens System)

  • 이영훈;조재흥;임천석;이윤우;양호순;이재협;이인원
    • 한국광학회지
    • /
    • 제17권2호
    • /
    • pp.165-174
    • /
    • 2006
  • 직경 450 mm(f/2.7) 포물면경 제작을 위해 자동무수차점방식의 널 광학계를 설계 및 제작하였으며, 설계프로그램(CODE V)의 공차분석기법을 이용하여 널 광학계의 제작과 정렬 오차에 따른 측정 신뢰도를 이론적으로 검증하였다. 그리고 광학계를 실제로 구축하여 포물면경의 제작에 적용하였다. 또한, 널 렌즈를 사용하지 않고 평면거울만 사용하는 자동시준방식의 측정방법으로 포물경을 재평가하여, 역으로 자동무수차점방식의 널 렌즈 정렬오차에 의한 측정 신뢰도를 확인하였다.