• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제38권1호
• /
• pp.130-148
• /
• 2019

This study compared the characteristics of scientific poems written by scientifically-gifted and general elementary students, and their perceptions of writing scientific poem. To do this, 5~6 graders (n=100) at two gifted science education institutes and 5~6 graders (n=93) at a elementary school in Seoul were selected. Scientific poems written by the students were analyzed according to their numbers and types. Their perceptions of writing scientific poems were also analyzed through a questionnaire and group interviews. The analysis of the results revealed that the general students wrote more scientific poems than the scientifically-gifted students for thirty minutes. The general students mainly named the titles in a direct way, while scientifically-gifted students did it in an implicit way. The free verse poems in both general students and scientifically-gifted students appeared most frequently, and the prose or narrative poems also often appeared. The general and scientifically-gifted students frequently used impersonation, and some students did not use metaphors. They didn't connect the scientific knowledge for multiple grade. While the poems of the general students evenly included the scientific knowledge for various academic fields, those of scientifically-gifted students tended to include the scientific knowledge for physics or chemistry. The poems of scientifically-gifted students tended to include more science process skills, especially in basic inquiry skills, than those of general students. The scientifically-gifted students wrote scientific poems in a more expanded form regarding the scientific knowledge, than the general students. Scientifically-gifted students perceived the educational benefits of writing scientific poems more positively based on various cognitive and affective aspects. However, many scientifically-gifted and general students had also several difficulties in the processes of writing scientific poems. Educational implications of these findings are discussed.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제20권1호
• /
• pp.112-136
• /
• 2000

과학영재교육이 국가와 사회적 책임이라고 인식하는 이 때, 오래전부터 과학영재에 대한 집중적인 연구가 진행되어 왔고 과학영재교육 프로그램이 운영되고 있는 교육선진국의 과학영재교육 프로그램을 분석할 필요가 있다. 따라서 본 연구는 ERIC(Education Research Information Center)에 대한 검색을 실시하여 과학영재 관련 문헌을 선정하고 내용별 분류를 실시한 후 과학영재교육 프로그램 문헌을 분석하였다. 본 연구 결과는 다음과 같다. 1. 1981년에서 1997년까지의 ERIC 검색 결과, 고학영재 관련문헌은 150개로 나타났고, 그 중 과학영재교육 프로그램 문헌은 63개로 42.0%를 차지했다. 2. 학술지논문의 출판형식이 과학영재 관련문헌의 42%, 과학영재교육 프로그램의 65.1%로 가장 많았다. 3. 과학영재교육 프로그램의 71.4%가 중.고등학교 과학영재에게 집중되어있는 것으로 나타났다. 4. 과학영재교육 프로그램의 52.4%가 여름프로그램이나 단기 기숙프로그램 등의 정규 이외의 추가적인 심화 교육과정으로 진행되고 있었고, 정규수업으로 실시되는 과학영재교육 프로그램은 38.1%로 나타냈다. 5. 대학과 전문기관과의 영계가 잘 이루어져 멘토제도, 인턴제도 등이 잘 활용되고 있으며, 과학 관련전공과 직업선택을 독려하는 프로그램이 많이 있었다. 6. 학습능력, 관심, 태도 등 여러 특성이 다른 과학여재들을 효과적으로 지도하기 위하여 개별학습이 잘 이루어지고 있었다.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제44권1호
• /
• pp.113-124
• /
• 2005

In this study, we have analysed and compared the cognitive, affective, and emotional aspects of the mathematically gifted, the scientifically gifted, and common middle school students in cognitive, affective, and emotional aspects. The mathematically gifted students are proved to have better continuous/simultaneous information processing, more positive mathematical disposition, more preference to difficult tasks, and higher EQ than the common students do. On another hand, no difference is found between the mathematically gifted and the scientifically gifted students in creative problem solving ability however, the mathematically gifted have more self-confidence, more curiosity for mathematics, stronger will, and more disposition to monitor and reflect, and more efficient self-control than the scientifically gifted do. In short, the mathematically gifted are superior to common students in mostly all aspects, and better than the scientifically gifted in the affective part.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제30권1호
• /
• pp.22-37
• /
• 2011

In this study, we investigated the perceptions of elementary school teachers on the use of analogy generation in scientifically-gifted education. The relationships among the perceptions and the self-perception as teacher for scientifically-gifted students were also investigated. A survey was administered to 119 elementary school teachers, and in-depth interviews with some teachers were conducted. The results revealed that the teachers had a relatively good understanding of the advantages/disadvantages of analogy generation in cognitive, affective, and learning environmental aspects. Their perceptions on the usability of analogy generation and their willingness to practice of it in scientifically-gifted education was also positive. They highly perceived on the various factors related to effective uses of it in scientifically-gifted education. Their self-perception as teacher for scientifically-gifted students was comparatively low, and significantly related with the perceptions on the advantages of it, the usability, the practical methods to use, and the various factors related to effective uses in scientifically-gifted education. Educational implications of these findings are discussed.

• 영재교육연구
• /
• 제17권1호
• /
• pp.173-191
• /
• 2007

본 연구에서는 과학영재와 일반학생의 지능, 완벽주의 성향 및 스트레스의 정도를 비교하였다. 연구 결과, 과학영재는 APM 지능 검사에 기초한 지능에서 일반학생보다 높게 나타났다. 또, 과학영재가 일반학생에 비해 완벽주의 성향이 높게 나타났으나, 유의한 차이는 없었다. 그러나 과학영재는 일반학생보다 스트레스 정도가 유의미하게 낮은 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 완벽주의 성향이 높은 영재가 강한 스트레스를 받고 있을 거라는 가설에 기초하여, 완벽주의 성향에 따른 스트레스정도를 분석하였다.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제39권3호
• /
• pp.353-368
• /
• 2020

This study analyzed the teacher's perception for influence of behavioral characteristics of scientifically-gifted students on general students in elementary school science class. To do this, we selected the eight elementary school teachers who were conducting the regular science classes including scientifically-gifted students belonging to the gifted education institutes in Seoul and conducted individual in-depth interviews. The analysis of the results reveal that the teachers mentioned seven behavioral characteristics of scientifically-gifted students in general elementary school science classes.: 'excellent in designing and performing experiments', 'playing a leading role in experiments', 'expressing their abundant prior knowledge frequently', 'attempting their tasks with curiosity and persistence', 'displaying scientific creativity', 'often asking scientific questions in detail', and 'expressing their opinions logically'. These behavioral characteristics of scientifically-gifted students had positive effects on general students, such as 'providing them with a successful experience in conducting experiments', 'improving understanding of science class contents', 'developing scientific thinking and reflective thinking', and 'improving their students' positive experiences about science'. However, the excessive learning-driven behaviors of scientifically-gifted students had negative effects on general students, such as 'limiting opportunities for general students to participate in classes', 'conducting passive exploration centered on results', and 'causing conflicts with general students'. Educational implications of these findings are discussed.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제28권3호
• /
• pp.292-303
• /
• 2009

In this study, we investigated the characteristics of the analogies, the mapping understanding, and the mapping errors on saturated solution of scientifically-gifted and general elementary students. Fifth graders (n=60) at four scientifically-gifted education institutes in Seoul and/or Gyeonggi province and fifth graders (n=91) at three elementary schools in Seoul were selected and assigned to the scientifically-gifted group and the general group respectively. After the students of each group performed the experiment and were taught about the target concept in the first class, they administered the test on the self-generating analogies on the target concept in the second class. The results revealed that the students in the scientifically-gifted group made more analogies, especially verbal/pictorial, structural/functional, enriched, and higher systematic ones, and had deeper understanding of the analogy than those in the general group. The numbers of the shared attributes included in the student-generated analogies and the scores of the mapping understanding of the students in the scientifically-gifted group were significantly higher than those in the general group. The students in the scientifically-gifted group had fewer mapping errors than those in the general group. However, not a few students in the scientifically-gifted group had at least one mapping error. Educational implications of these findings are discussed.

• 한국지구과학회지
• /
• 제32권3호
• /
• pp.294-305
• /
• 2011

본 연구에서는 과학영재학생들과 일반학생의 행동특성 차이를 알아보고자 하였다. 이를 위하여 과학영재 40명(남 27명, 여 13명)과 일반학생 38명(남 21명, 여 17명)을 연구의 대상으로 선정하고, 논리적 사고력, 과학탐구능력, 창의력, 지구과학창의력, 과학적 태도, 자기주도적 학습능력, 인지양식을 검사하였다. 그 결과 첫째, 과학영재들은 94.74%, 일반학생은 36.36%가 형식적 조작기에 도달해 있다. 둘째, 과학영재들은 일반학생보다 과학탐구능력 8.11점, 창의력 8.27점, 지구과학창의력 6.73점, 과학적 태도 10.79점, 자기주도적 학습능력 21.66점 높게 나타났다. 셋째, 과학영재의 약 70.0%와 일반학생의 약 60.53%가 장독립적인 사고를 하고 있는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 본 연구의 결과는 과학영재교육의 본질과 효율성 극대화를 위해 과학영재의 높은 행동 특성이 반영되어야 함을 의미한다.

• Educational Technology International
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.171-192
• /
• 2010

This study was to investigate the elaborated project based learning model for scientifically gifted in the context of R & E project learning. It is important for the scientifically gifted to provide the appropriate learning environments instead of general learning model for the gifted. Although R & E project learning model is effective, the model has the limitations of managing the course for the scientifically gifted. To improve R & E learning model, the elaborated project based learning model was suggested with integration of both project based learning model and goal based scenario. The elaborated project-based learning model was comprised with 'basic learning process', 'elaboration through inquiry', and 'presentation and reflection'. To measure the satisfaction, eighty scientifically gifted students participated in the class. The result shows that learners were satisfied with the elaborated project-based learning up to 90%, and teachers were satisfied with this model up to 77%.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제25권spc5호
• /
• pp.556-566
• /
• 2007

이 연구의 목적은 초등 학생의 과학 지식 생성과정 중 나타나는 뇌파를 여러 가지 분석 방법을 이용하여 과학 영재아와 일반아를 신경 생리학적으로 판별할 수 있는 척도를 개발하는 것이다. 이를 위해 과학 영재아의 구인 요소로서 지능 검사, 간편 창의성 검사, 과학 지식 생성 검사를 수행하였고, 지필 평가에서 우리가 놓칠 수 있는 과학 영재의 구인 요소를 영재치로 추가하여 개인별 표준화 점수를 산출하였다. 이렇게 산출된 표준화 점수를 종속 변수로 하여 그룹을 구분하고, 독립 변수로서 측정된 뇌파를 선형 분석, 비선형 분석, 상호의존 분석 등을 통해서 다양한 뇌파 판별 요소를 제시하였다. 과학 영재의 특성을 신뢰롭게 예상하고, 설명하는 뇌파 판별 요소를 찾기 위해 다중선형회귀분석을 실시하였다. 이를 통해 뽑아진 뇌파 판별 요소를 통해 다중회귀식을 만들어 여기에서 생성된 함수값을 통해 판별 분석을 실시한 결과, 과학 영재아와 일반아를 신뢰롭게 판별할 수 있는 기초를 제시하였다. 본 연구 결과를 통해 과학 영재아 특성을 예측하는데 기여하고 있는 판별 요소의 대부분은 정보량과 상호 신호의 결맞음의 정도를 보여주는 것으로 두뇌에서 일어나는 상호적 연관성이 판별의 핵심 요인으로 여겨진다.