• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제18권4호
• /
• pp.10-17
• /
• 2018

대다수의 국내 기업 개인정보보호 담당자는 방송통신위원회가 인정하는 개인정보보호 관리체계(PIMS) 인증 취득에 난이도가 존재한다고 판단한다. 이는 사업자마다 개인정보취급에 대한 고유한 특성과 업무절차가 반영되어 정형화된 업무를 규정하기 힘들고, 인증취득을 위해 거치는 여러 과정에서 인증컨설턴트, 인증심사원의 경험에 상당부분 의존할 수밖에 없기 때문이다. 결과적으로 인증취득 실무경험이 부족한 담당자는 PIMS 인증 초기에 무엇을 우선적으로 이행하고 준비해야 하는지에 많은 난관에 부딪히게 된다. 본 연구에서는 계층적 의사결정 기법(AHP)을 통해 인증취득 실무담당자의 PIMS 인증결함의 보완조치 우선순위를 살펴봄으로서 향후 PIMS 인증취득을 원하는 기업이나 인증결함에 따른 보완조치 시 담당자가 우선적으로 선행할 부분을 검토하고자 한다.

• 융합보안논문지
• /
• 제19권2호
• /
• pp.147-156
• /
• 2019

본 논문의 연구목적은 1950년대 이래 한반도에서 있었던 남북한 간 평화체제 구축을 위한 제안들과 협상중점을 과거와 '9.19 군사분야합의서'로 대변되는 현 문재인 정부의 조치들을 군비통제이론 측면에서 비교 분석하여 남북한 간 군비통제 추진방안을 제시하는 것이다. 이를 위해 현재까지 정립된 이론을 비교 분석하여, 최적의 분석의 틀을 정립하였다. 과거는 주로 1990년 9월 제1차 남북고위급 회담부터 2008년 1월 노무현 정부말기까지를 중점적으로 분석하였으며, 이를 현 문재인 정부에서 추진하고 있는 군비통제 정책과 비교 분석하였다. 그 결과 나타난 특징은 유럽과는 달리 남북한 군비통제 정책은 군사적 신뢰구축이 정치적 신뢰구축과 동시 병행적으로 추진된다는 것이었다. 이를 토대로 한반도 평화정착 과정에서 협의되어야 할 신뢰구축과 군비통제, 군축 추진전략을 제시하였다. 중요한 점은 나아가면 갈수록 군비통제의 필요성은 증대될 것이며, 통일정책과 상호 보완적으로 추진되어야 한다는 것이었다.

• 한국식품영양학회지
• /
• 제22권2호
• /
• pp.252-260
• /
• 2009

According to Article 7 and Annex B of the World Trade Organization(WTO) Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary(SPS) Measures, WTO members are required to notify their newly established or amended SPS measures that might affect international trade. This study analyzed SPS notifications from 1995 to 2008 to identify international trends for food safety measures. The notifications were collected from the SPS information management system and the official document distribution system of WTO. The 153 WTO members represented 37 developed countries, 84 developing countries and 32 least developed countries. The number of overall notifications was 9,820. The annual notifications increased from 198 in 1995 to 1,264 in 2008. The monthly average notifications were from 44.8 in December to 69.5 in June; however, there were no statistical differences among them. The six leading Members in terms of notification submissions were United States(U.S.), Brazil, New Zealand, Canada, European Community and Korea. Among the regular and emergency notifications, 62.7% notifications were concerned with food safety, followed by animal and plant protections. Among animal protection notifications, 54.8% were emergency situations. Of the 4,821 food safety notifications, 60.4% were from developed countries, and 39.3% were from developing countries. Measures concerning pesticide residues and risk assessments were mainly from developed countries. In contrast, 77.5% of the measures concerning zoonoses were from developing countries. However considering the numbers of developing and developed countries, the average number of measures for each country was similar. Food safety measures were mainly involved pesticide residues followed by food additives, zoonoses, new regulations, labeling. As the overall notifications, zoonosis measures were mainly emergency notifications. Measures concerning pesticide residues, food additives, zoonoses, new regulations, veterinary drugs, and labeling were submitted most often by the U.S., Korea, Albania, U.S., Australia, and U.S., respectively. Identifying the exact trends of food safety measures was complicated by a number of factors. However, WTO notifications might be useful tool in providing a general view of international trends.

• 수산경영론집
• /
• 제47권1호
• /
• pp.31-45
• /
• 2016

This study aims to evaluate the status of implementation of bilateral-fishery order since the Korea-Japan Fisheries Agreement came into effect in 1999 in order to improve fisheries relationships between two countries. The agreement regulates bilateral-fishery order by the principle of the EEZ regime and mutual benefits among countries. (e.g. the mutual agreed fishing in EEZ and cooperation for resource management). However, the Korea-Japan Fisheries Agreement has some limitations such as reducing quotas of the mutual agreed fishing in EEZ, strengthening Japanese fisheries regulation, insufficient cooperation for fisheries management and joint countermeasures. In order to improve fisheries relationships between the two countries, it is imperative to rebalance quotas for the mutual agreed fishing in EEZ, to establish effective resource management systems in the Intermediate zone, to invigorate fisheries cooperation in the private sector, and to introduce new management systems by species over the all waters around East Asia. To accomplish such measures, it is necessary for Korean and Japanese governments to improve fisheries relationships based on trust and cooperation, achieving a win-win situation. Additionally, it is required to incorporate fisheries management among Korea, China, and Japan.

• 정보보호학회논문지
• /
• 제26권5호
• /
• pp.1269-1277
• /
• 2016

유럽연합은 미국과 개인정보 이전을 위해 맺은 세이프 하버를 유럽사법재판소의 결정에 따라 새로운 협약인 프라이버시 쉴드로 최근 대체하였다. 동(同) 협약은 보다 강화된 개인정보보호 준수 의무, 강력한 법집행, 명확한 보호 요건 및 투명성의 의무, 유럽연합 시민의 권리보호를 위한 효과적인 구제 수단 강구 등을 제시함으로써 이전보다 개선된 것으로 평가받고 있다. 본 논문에서는 유럽연합과 미국의 개인정보 이전을 위한 논의 경과와 현황을 살펴보고 국외이전 관련 제도 정비, 개인정보 국제 협력 활동과 관련한 국내 정책방향을 제시하였다.

• 대한음성학회지:말소리
• /
• 제56호
• /
• pp.49-73
• /
• 2005

This study explores the most important temporal cues in the perception of the voiced/voiceless distinction of English plosives in terms of newly defined measures of perception: original signal to response agreement, unit signal to response agreement, and robustness. Seven native speakers of English and three leveled groups of Korean English learners participated in the present study. The results showed that both native speakers of English and Korean groups failed to successfully perceive the voiced/voiceless distinction of English plosives, particularly alveolar plosives, in word-medial trochaic positions. The results also showed that in word-initial and word-medial iambic positions both native speakers of English and Korean groups employ the information in the release burst and aspiration in the perception of the voiced/voiceless distinction, of English plosives, and that in word-final positions native speakers of English employ the information in the preceding vowel, while Korean groups employ the information in the closure interval.

• Strategy21
• /
• 통권36호
• /
• pp.33-58
• /
• 2015

In 1996, China, Japan and the ROK all became the party to the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). Since then, the UNCLOS has been a fundamental basis for the resolution and management of maritime disputes amongst them. However, there still remain acrimonious disputes in the region. Resources nationalism and the revival of geopolitics aggravates the disputes particularly on sovereignty over disputed islands, maritime delimitation and the legal nature of military activities in other States' Exclusive Economic Zones. Under the circumstances, why have the demands for the conclusion of a regional agreement been raised in this region? A desirable regional agreement regarding ocean affairs should be compatible with the rights and obligations under the UNCLOS, a universal norm regarding ocean affairs. This paper will propose a desirable regional agreement by adopting an incremental approach.

• 무역학회지
• /
• 제47권5호
• /
• pp.223-240
• /
• 2022

Anti-circumvention rules were discussed profoundly during the Uruguay Round and the DDA negotiations, although WTO members failed to reached an agreement to introduce it to the WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement. However, as the cases of circumvention of anti-dumping duties increase, a number of countries have enacted anti-circumvention regulations as part of their anti-dumping laws. This study aims to analyze anti-circumvention rules from the perspective of WTO law. After overviewing the object and purpose of anti-dumping and anti-circumvention regulations, it examines anti-circumvention regulations of the US, the EU, and India. Next, the study explores the possible WTO-inconsistent aspects of those regulations. Then, it discusses whether it would be preferable for countries not equipped with anti-circumvention regulations, such as Korea, to have one. Thereafter, this study proposes Korean government to introduce anti-circumvention rules into its anti-dumping law.

• 통상정보연구
• /
• 제19권4호
• /
• pp.95-124
• /
• 2017

이 사건은 아르헨티나가 적용한 금융 조세 외환 등록에 관한 8개의 조치가 서비스무역에 관한 일반 협정(General Agreement on Trade in Services) 하의 최혜국대우 의무, 내국민대우 의무 및 시장접근 보장 의무의 위반에 해당하는지에 관한 다툼이다. 이들 대상조치는 '조세 투명성에 협력하지 않는 국가'의 서비스 및 서비스 공급자와 '조세 투명성에 협력하는 국가'의 서비스 및 서비스 공급자를 달리 대우하는 조치이다. 아르헨티나는 대상조치가 "조세 목적을 위한 투명성 및 정보교환에 관한 글로벌포럼" 및 "국제자금세탁방지기구" 체제에 부합하며 GATS 제XIV조 및 금융서비스부속서의 예외규정에 의해 정당화된다고 주장하였다. 요컨대 이 사건은 정당한 정책목적을 달성하기 위한 규제를 채택할 국가의 권한과 이로 인해 발생하는 경쟁조건의 변화의 문제이며, GATS 전문에서 밝히고 있는 회원국의 권리와 의무 간 균형을 어떻게 맞추어야 할 것인지의 문제이다. 상소기구는 (i) 서비스 및 서비스 공급자의 동종성 심사, (ii) GATS 제II조 및 제XVII조 하의 불리하지 않은 대우 판정 심사, 그리고 (iii) 금융서비스부속서 제2(a) 항이 적용되는 조치의 범위에 대한 판단을 통하여 이러한 균형을 맞추고 있다. 이 글에서는 이 사건의 대상조치와 패널의 판정을 정리하여 배경을 제시한 후 상소기구 판정을 분석한다. 분석은 앞에서 언급한 주요 쟁점을 중심으로 하며 패널의 판정, 기존의 다른 WTO 판정례 및 연구논문 하에서의 논의와 어떠한 차이를 가지는지를 파악하여 그 의미를 논한다.

• 무역학회지
• /
• 제44권4호
• /
• pp.19-34
• /
• 2019

This study investigates the WTO dispute over Japanese fishery products originated from Fukushima and another seven prefectures. Being subject to an import ban and additional radioactive test requirements, Japan complained that the Korean government's trade measures are inconsistent with the principles of the Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures. This paper considered the contrasting judicial decisions made by the Panel and Appellate Body and analyzed the debates with respect to their trade-discriminatory effects (Article 2.4), the relevance of appropriate level of protection (Article 5.6) and the precautionary approaches (Article 5.7). Consistent with the final rulings, this paper identifies the need for a broaden understanding of regional conditions and qualitative aspects of protection in risk analysis. Findings also suggest that Korea has diverted its fishery imports from Japan to other countries, while Japan has created export diversion from Korea to other destinations.