• Journal of Oral Medicine and Pain
• /
• v.45 no.2
• /
• pp.23-28
• /
• 2020

Purpose: Temporomadibular disorders (TMDs) can result in chronic pain, which is often associated with psychological and sleep disturbance. Increased levels of psychological and sleep impairments are often related with poor treatment outcomes. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate clinical features, psychological profiles and the prevalence of clinical insomnia in TMD patients with chronic pain and to suggest an effective treatment approach. Methods: A total of 200 TMD patients who had visited the Pusan National University Hospital dental clinic for treatment of their pain were recruited from June 2018 through December 2019. TMD patients were classified into an acute (n=100) and chronic (n=100) group and compared the clinical symptoms. The primary diagnosis of TMD were categorized as TMD with joint pain group (TMD_J), TMD with muscle pain group (TMD_M) and TMD with joint-muscle mixed pain group (TMD_JM). Self- report measures of sleep quality and psychological profiles were evaluated via the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) and the Korean Stress Response Inventory (SRI). Independent t-tests, Mann-Whitney U-tests, and chisquared test were used for the statistical analysis. Results: Chronic TMD patients showed higher pain intensity, as well as higher prevalence of related symptoms (headache, musculoskeletal pain) and myogenous pain. They also had significantly higher scores in all SRI parameters and a higher percentage of clinical insomnia than acute TMD patients. Conclusions: Based on the above results, psychological profiles and sleep quality assessments are necessary to provide essential data that will allow for improved treatment of chronic TMD patients.

• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• v.15 no.4
• /
• pp.322-328
• /
• 1993

The trauma has been known as a major etiologic factor in temporomadibular joint disorders. The endotracheal intubation is suspected as one of the traumatic factor to temporomandibular disorder. But there are few reports about the amount of mouth opening during endotracheal intubation and temporomandibular joint disorder after endotracheal intubation. The authors studied the effects of endotracheal intubation to temporomandibular joint with 70 patients given surgical operation through general anesthesia. The results were as follows. 1. The mean amount of mouth opening for entire patients during endotracheal intubation was 26.3mm (s, d : 2.6), for oral intubation group 25.9mm(s, d : 3.2), for nasal intubation group 26.6mm(s, d : 1.9). There was no difference between two group stastically. (p<0.05) 2. 1 week later endotracheal intubation, the maximum mouth opening increased 1.5mm for entire patients, 1.5mm for oral intubation group, 1.6mm for nasal intubation group than behare endotracheal intubation. 3. Five patients complained the discomforts around temporomandibular joint after endotracheal intubation. The amount of mouth opening during endotracheal intubation was within physiologic range. It seemed that $45^{\circ}$ upward endoscopic lifting for exposure of glottis gave trauma to temporomandibular joint.

• Physical Therapy Rehabilitation Science
• /
• v.9 no.4
• /
• pp.215-221
• /
• 2020

Objective: Tension-type headaches usually occur with temporomandibular disorder, which increases the risk of the chronic tension-type headaches. This study was conducted to investigate the effect of additional temporalmandibular therapy compared to cerivcal joint therapy for tension-type headaches with pericranial tenderness. Design: Randomized controlled trial. Methods: Forty-one patients with chronic tension-type headaches and pericranial tenderness were randomized into the 3 groups, such as the temporomandibular joint therapy group (TMJT group, n=14), cervical manual therapy group (CMT group, n=14) and conservative therapy group (CT group, n=13). All patients were assessed at baseline and after each intervention during the three sessions. The participants in the TMJT group received the temporomadibular joint treatment and cervical manual therapy for 30 minutes, once a week, for 3 weeks. The participants in the CMT group received the cervical manual therapy, and those in the CT group received modalities during same time period. The outcome measurements used were the intensity of headaches measured on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), quality of life measured with the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6), and function of the cervical spine using the Neck Diability Index (NDI). Results: The TMJT group that received temporomandibular joint treatment and cervical manual therapy showed a significant decrease in VAS, HIT-6, and NDI compared with the other 2 groups (p<0.05). Conclusions: This study suggected that temporomandibular joint treatment combined with cervical manual therapy was more effective for the chronic tension-type headaches with pericranial tenderness than the usual cervical therapy alone.