• International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security
• /
• 제21권8호
• /
• pp.327-341
• /
• 2021

The knowledge management was considered as the inevitable result of the rule of knowledge in this era, and its importance became clear in being the main source for achieving success, the need to consider and manage knowledge as an independent field that must be addressed with a clear scientific methodology has become intangible - they are very valuable and a strategic asset. On the other hand, the innovation process relates to all parts of the organization, and helps to improve the behavioral patterns of individuals and their attitudes towards adopting modern and innovative ideas, it is a purposeful process adopted by the senior management and works to provide the capabilities and requirements for embodying the innovative behavior in it. In the field of dealing with the market, it is a product of the organization's innovative approach, which aims at advancement, change, and intended and organized renewal. The main objective of this article is to determine the most appropriate ways to integrate knowledge management mechanisms to employ innovation factors within universities based on the role of universities in supporting innovation. This was achieved through reviewing many relevant research and listing the most prominent concepts of knowledge management, its importance, objectives, and processes determining the stages of knowledge management application, the requirements for applying knowledge management, and the obstacles that impede its application; Then the statement "Innovation in universities, through which it addressed the concept of innovation, its importance, stages, and requirements for its application, as well as identifying the most prominent models of innovation, and obstacles to innovation, in addition to that the role of universities in supporting innovation will be identified. From the surveyed study done in this article, we concluded that the relationship among organizational culture, knowledge management and innovation capability can provide useful insights for managers regarding developing a strong culture, promote knowledge management practices effectively and eventually enhance the whole organization's innovation capability. Also, we found that different components of Knowledge Management as Knowledge activities, Knowledge types, transformation of knowledge and technology have a significant positive effect in bringing innovation through transformation of knowledge into knowledge assets in universities.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제42권3호
• /
• pp.477-496
• /
• 2014

Purpose: This paper has examined the impact of open innovation business model in technology commercialization with the data from 30 companies of manufacturing firms in South Korea. Methods: The findings provide support for distinguishing five hypotheses relating to development time, IP management, sales, firm size and R&D intensity. To test the hypotheses, data were collected using via e-mail and fax. Small and medium-sized (less than 300 employees) and large industrial firms were chosen for this study. Results: The result shows that openness in its business model is positively associated with successful technology commercialization. Conclusion: The major findings and the implications are: First, as the business model gets more open, development period of technology will be more favorable which gets benefit from rising costs of innovation. Second, as the business model gets more open, large portion of sales are created from new products. Thus, the problem of shorter product life in the market which affects large portion of market revenue can be solved through an open business model. Third, in general, R&D intensity, firm size and the level of IP management affect determination of business model types. The findings also suggest that companies need to increasingly address their external technology exploitation process instead of focusing on their internal innovation processes.

• 산업공학
• /
• 제16권2호
• /
• pp.125-139
• /
• 2003

This paper reports an empirical study on assessment of R&D best practices. The principles of quality management and their tools such as best practices or benchmarking have been so prevailing in the operational process that the R&D management recently consider extensive use of them for their innovation process. However, characteristics of the two processes may be different each other. Are the principles or the tools that were effective in the operational field still going to be effective in the innovative field? In order to answer the question, we statistically examine how R&D best practices contribute to the innovative performance. Upon literature review on technological innovation, we present a R&D process model whereby we set forth research hypotheses. Using data from 66 successful R&D efforts carried out among Korean firms mostly between 1999-2001, regression analyses reveal that best practices used in most stages throughout the R&D process are found not to significantly contribute to the innovative performance. Only those in technology strategy and prototyping stages are proven effective for technical and commercial performance respectively. Interestingly, efforts in a problem solving and improvement stage are counterproductive in the case of the innovation process. Discussions on our empirical observations are presented followed by some managerial implications.

• 지식경영연구
• /
• 제18권4호
• /
• pp.181-211
• /
• 2017

Despite a growing literature focusing on technological development as a key driving force behind the economic performance of a firm or a nation's industy, we still fall short of a comprehensive understanding of how each of the elements required of technological developent and innovation fits togther and leads to economic progress and industry change. This paper seeks to fill this gap by bringing together some of key insights from the theory and research on the coevolutionary process of technology, organizations, and industry, and on the role of institutions in this process. By combining a diverse array of research streams, we provide a broad suvey of foundational work on the following two questions: (1) how the creation and diffusion of innovation occurs and gives rise to structural reconfigurations of the industry, (2) how organisations and technology coevolve, and (3) what is the role of institutions in this coevolutionary process? Based on this literature survey, we also offer a synthesis that can serve as a ground that allows a more nuanced understanding of the sources, dynamics and impacts of technological development and innovation, and interrelationships among technology, organizations and industry change.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제21권1호
• /
• pp.33-63
• /
• 2018

본 연구는 과학기술정책 연구의 정체성 파악과 개념 정립을 위해 과학기술정책 연구가 무엇을 연구하는 학문인가에 대한 해답을 구하고자 하였다. 따라서, 그 동안의 과학기술정책 연구가 어떻게 이루어졌는가에 대한 내용분석을 통한 연구현황과 네트워크 분석을 통한 과학기술정책 연구의 지식구조 및 지식흐름을 파악하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 1993년부터 2016년까지의 기술혁신학회지 및 기술혁신연구에 게재된 논문들의 데이터셋을 구축하고 실증분석하였다. 분석결과, 지금까지의 과학기술정책 연구는 서울 대전 지역, 대학 출연(연)에서 대부분의 연구가 수행되어, 특정 지역이나 연구수행 주체에 편중되기보다는 다양화된 형태로 수행되어야 할 것이다. 연구범위별로는 연구관리 및 기술혁신 분야에서 70% 이상을 차지하고 있어, 향후 '과학기술 공공관리' 및 '과학기술 정책과정' 등에서 더 많은 연구가 수행되어 균형 있는 학문 분야로 성장해 나아가야 할 것이다. 한편 과학기술정책 연구의 지식구조를 파악하기 위해 주제어를 활용한 네트워크 분석결과, 연구관리, 기술혁신, 과학기술 공공관리 및 정책과정 등으로 군집화되어 이찬구 김은미 오현정(2016)이 제시한 지식구조와 크게 다르지 않았음을 재확인할 수 있었다. 지식흐름을 파악하기 위해 정권별로 구분하여 시기별 분석을 수행한 결과, 초기 과학기술정책 연구는 연구자, 연구개발투자 등 일반적인 주제로부터 시작하여 최근 기술혁신체제, 연구성과 활용 등 다양화되고 세분화된 연구가 진행되고 있는 것으로 분석되었다. 따라서 향후 과학기술정책연구는 과학기술 정책과정, 과학기술 공공관리, 연구관리, 기술혁신 측면에서 더욱 확대되어야 하며 체계적인 지식구조를 형성해 나아가야 할 것으로 판단된다.

• 기술혁신연구
• /
• 제14권2호
• /
• pp.93-116
• /
• 2006

The purpose of this study is to contribute reference material that provides insight into innovative process management that increases R&D output in commercializing new products. A model of a process from research to commercialization with the cumulative profit and loss curve is put forward and hypotheses related to success and failure are developed at the stages up to product launch. Seventeen large projects that have resulted in successful product launches have been examined from the initial research stage to commercialization. Prefect duration, standardized cumulative R&D expenditures and research resource concentration are analyzed in terms of statistical method and patterns in cumulative profit and loss curves after product sales, as well as the reasons for and other aspects of success/failure are investigated and analyzed. Consequently, valuable information on future management tasks has been obtained such as: (1) project duration differs depending on market sectors, product types and presence/absence of materials research (2) cumulative profit and loss curves can be categorized into four patterns (3) reasons for failure can be divided into technological and market problem categories and (4) these factors have an impact on product sales.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제46권4호
• /
• pp.761-784
• /
• 2018

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to introduce the development trend of international standard in the innovative management system and propose the application method of the standard for SME certification system. Methods: This study is based on literature studies and case studies considering the initial stage of development of standards as well as lack of domestic and international research examples. In the literature review, we focused on the characteristics of the innovation management system standards at the national, regional and global level. We examined case studies of Spain and Portugal as case studies. Besides, the evaluation items and certification status of domestic innovative SMEs certification were also searched to find out how to introduce them in Korea. Results: The results of this study can be summarized in three major points. First, new international standards of innovation management are being developed under the ISO management system standard and are currently in the DIS stage. Second, in the case of Spain adopting the national innovation management system standard, it has been reported that the innovation management system standard has a significant effect on the innovation ability and management performance. Third, it was not easy to establish a standardized innovation process between the innovation based on creativity and the standardized based product. The Oslo manual was not enough to provide enough guidance in this area. Conclusion: Companies that want to strengthen their organizational innovation capabilities from a management system point of view and Policymakers that want to plan the upgrading and integrated certification operating system of the domestic innovation SME certification need to consider the ISO 50500 series as a global level standard other than the Oslo manual.

• 경영정보학연구
• /
• 제19권1호
• /
• pp.169-183
• /
• 2017

글로벌 경영 환경에서의 경쟁이 심화되고 제품수명주기가 급속히 단축되고 있는 상황에서, 각 기업은 다양한 혁신의 방법으로 경쟁 우위적 기술 혁신을 추구하고자 한다. 본 연구에서는 기업 내부의 연구 개발의 한계를 벗어나 개방형 혁신이 중소기업 기술혁신의 방향을 바꿀 수 있는 계기가 될 수 있음을 전제로 ICT 중소기업을 대상으로 개방형 혁신의 진행 과정과 성과를 분석하고, 중소기업의 개방형 혁신의 활동 과정과 추진 내용, 그리고 성과를 분석하였다. 또한 개방형 기술 혁신의 추진과정에서 발생되는 문제점을 파악하고, 개방형 혁신을 강화하기 위한 방안을 제시하였다. 국내 ICT 중소기업의 기술 경쟁력 제고를 위한 조사 분석을 바탕으로, 혁신 생태계를 제품/서비스 혁신, 조직혁신, 마케팅 혁신의 관점에서 파악하고, ICT 중소기업의 혁신 역량과 혁신 성과의 관계에 대한 현황적 조사 분석을 제시하였다. 선행적 연구 이론 정리를 위하여, 기업의 혁신 역량, 개방형 혁신 이론의 개념과 유형을 정리하고, 국내외 개방형 혁신에 대한 이론을 고찰하였다.

• 대한안전경영과학회지
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.293-301
• /
• 2013

The purpose of this study is to introduce the limit of previously used six sigma quality process evaluation metrics, $Z_{st}$ and $P_{pk}$, and a solution to overcome this drawback by using a metric based on performance evaluation of Z-factor quality innovation. Case analysis on projects from national six sigma contest from 2011 to 2012 is performed and literature review on new drug development HTS (High Throughput Screening) is used to propose innovative performance evaluation metrics. This research shows that experimental study on six sigma evaluation metric, $Z_{st}$ and $P_{pk}$, have no significance difference between industrial type (Manufacturing, Semi-Public Institute, Public Institute) and CTQ type (Product Technology Type CTQ, Process Technology Type CTQ). Following discovery characterize this quality improvement as fixed target type project. As newly developed moving target type of quality innovation performance metric Z-Factor is used for evaluating experimental study, hypothetical analysis suggests that $Z_{st}$ and $P_{pk}$ share different relationship or even show reciprocal relationship. Constraints of the study are relatively small sample size of only 37 projects from past 2 years and conflict on having interview and communication with six sigma quality practitioner for qualitative experimental study. Both moving target type six sigma innovation project and fixed target type improvement project or quality circle enables efficient ways for a better understanding and quality practitioner use by applying quality innovation performance metric. Downside of fixed target type quality performance evaluation metric, $Z_{st}$ and $P_{pk}$, is presented through experimental study. In contrast, advantage of this study is that high throughput requiring product technology, process technology and quantum leap typed innovation effect is evaluated based on precision and accuracy and Z-Factor that enables relative comparison between enterprises is proposed and implemented.

• 경영과학
• /
• 제29권3호
• /
• pp.169-182
• /
• 2012

This study examines the co-evolutionary process between open innovation and firms' absorptive capacity. The effects of open innovation can be maximized through the capacity to absorb the knowledge from the external sources such as universities, government-support research institute, and private R&D centers. This study used data of STEPI technology innovation survey conducted at 2002, 2005, and 2008 (3 points measures). The data were analyzed through a structural equation model. Results suggest that open innovation at t0 point influences positively the absorptive capacity at t1 point, which subsequently enhances the intention of open innovation at t2 point. This result suggests the existence of co-evolutionary process between open innovation and firms' absorptive capacity. When knowledge comes from universities, the co-evolution has sustained; whereas when knowledge comes from private firms' R&D centers, the co-evolution has not effected. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.