• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제40권1호
• /
• pp.79-87
• /
• 2002

The purpose of this study was to investigate the color stability of composite resins used widely as esthetic restorative material. Surefil(Dentsply, U.S.A.), Esthet X(Dentsply, U.S.A.), Filtek P60(3M, U.S.A.) , Filtek Z250(3M, U.S.A.), Synergy Compact(Coltene, Switzerland), and Synergy Duo(Coltene, Switzerland) were chosen for this study. Thirty six specimens($7mm{\times}2mm$) of each composite resin were fabricated and polished after polymerization. Treatment conditions designed for this study were thermocycling, methylene blue staining, and filtered coffee staining. The color changes before and after treatment were measured by colorimeter(colorimeter, Model Tc-6Fx, Tokyo Denshoku Co.) and analyzed. The followings were drawn from this study: 1. The color changes of Filtek Z250, Surefil, Filtek P60 and Esthet X after thermocycling for 3 weeks were greater than those of the others. 2. The color changes of Surefil and Esthet X after methylene blue stainig and those of Surefil, Filtek Z250 and Filtek P60 after coffee staining were great. 3. The color changes or Synergy Duo and Synergy Compact after thermocycling and coffee staining were relatively lesser than those of other composite resins.

• 대한소아치과학회지
• /
• 제29권3호
• /
• pp.362-370
• /
• 2002

최근 20년간 다양한 종류의 심미 수복재가 개발되었고, 특히 지난 5년 동안에는 그 수에 있어서 극적인 증가추세를 보였다. 최근 들어, ormocer라는 새로운 종류의 광중합형 수복재료가 소개되었는데, 화학 분야에서는 이미 오래 전부터 알려져 있던 성분으로, 광학렌즈 등의 표면경화제로 이용되어 오다가 최근 치과용 수복재에 도입되었다. 'Ormocer' 란 'Organically Modified Ceramics'의 약자로 'Ormosils' (Organically Modified Silicates)로도 알려져 있다. 그러나, 이 새로운 수복재에 대한 연구는 아직 미흡한 실정이다. 본 연구에서는 서로 다른 계통의 광중합형 수복재들(Z-100, Surefil, Tetric Ceram, Dyract AP)과 ormocer(Admira)를 압축강도와 굴곡강도 측면에서 비교 평가하고, 구강내 환경과 유사한 조건에서 수분흡수가 그 물성에 미치는 영향을 평가할 목적으로 시도되어 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 1. 1일 후에 측정한 Admira의 압축강도는 Surefil보다는 낮았으나, 다른 재료들과는 유의한 차이를 나타내지 않았다(p>0.05). 2. 1일 후에 측정한 Admira의 굴곡강도는 다른 4종의 재료에 비해서 낮았다(p<0.05). 2일부터는 3종의 복합레진에 비해서 낮았다(p<0.05). 3. 실험기간(30일) 중 hybrid composite resin군(Z-100, Tetric Ceram)과 packable resin(Surefil)군 간에는 압축강도와 굴곡강도에서 유의한 차이가 없었다(p>0.05). 4. 실험에 사용된 5종의 수복재 모두 압축강도와 굴곡강도가 2일까지 증가하다가 7일부터 감소하였다(p<0.05). 5. 각 재료의 시간에 따른 압축강도와 굴곡강도의 변화양상은 통계적으로 유사하였다(p>0.05).

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제30권6호
• /
• pp.442-449
• /
• 2005

이 논문의 목적은 복합레진과 컴포머에서, 중합수축의 양과 이로 인하여 야기되는 교두변위와의 상관관계를 알아보기 위함이다. 수복재료로서 Dyract AP, Compoglass F, Z100, Surefil, Pyramid, Synergy Compact, Heliomolar와 Heliomolar HB가 사용되었으며, 접착제로서는 SE Bond 가 사용되었다. 수복재료의 중합수축의 양을 측정하기 위하여, 자체 제작한 linometer를 사용하여, 60초간 일어나는 선수축량을 측정하였다. 한 수복재료 당 10회 측정하였으며, one way ANOVA와 사후검정방법으로 Tukey Test를 이용하여 $95\%$ 신뢰수준에서 각 수복재료의 중합수축량의 차이를 비교하였다. 치아에서 일어나는 교두변위의 양을 측정하기 위하여 사람의 상악소구치에 표준화된 MOD 와동을 형성하고(깊이 3mm, 넓이 3.5mm), 접착제를 도포한 후 광조사 시킨 후, 수복재료로 충전하였다 치아를 자체 제작한 교두변위 측정장치에 위치시키고, 광조사 시키고, 이 때 발생하는 교두의 변위를 10분간 측정하였다. 한 수복재료 당 15회를 측정하였으며 one way ANOVA와 사후검정방법으로 Tykey Test를 이용하여 $95\%$ 신뢰수준에서 각 수복재료의 교두변위 량의 차이를 비교하였다. 중합수축의 양과 교두변위의 양의 상관관계를 회귀분석법을 이용하여 분석하였다. 중합수축의 양은 Heliomolar, Surefil < Heliomolar HB < Z100, Synergy Compact < Dyract AP, Pyramid, Compoglass F (p < 0.05), 교두변위의 양은 Heliomolar, Surefil, Z100, Heliomolar HB, Synergycompact < Compoglass F < Pyramid, Dyract AP (p < 0.05) 였다. 중합수축의 양과 교두변위는 높은 상관관계를 나타내었다 (p < 0.001).

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제29권4호
• /
• pp.346-352
• /
• 2004

The purpose of present study was to evaluate the polymerization shrinkage stress and cuspal deflection in maxillary premolars resulting from polymerization shrinkage of composites and compomers. Composites and compomers which were used in this study were as follows: Dyract AP, Z100, Surefil. Pyramid, Synergy Compact, Heliomolar, Heliomolar HB, and Compoglass F. For measuring of polymerization shrinkage stress, Stress measuring machine (R&B, Daejon, Korea) was used. One-way ANOVA analysis with Duncan's multiple comparison test were used to determine significant differences between the materials. For measuring of cuspal deflection of tooth, MOD cavities were prepared in 10 extracted maxillary premolars. And reduction of intercuspal distance was measured by strain measuring machine (R&B, Daejon, Korea) One-way ANOVA analysis with Turkey test were used to determine significant differences between the materials. Polymerization shrinkage stress is $\mathbb{\ulcorner}$Heliomolar, Z100, Pyramid < Synergy Compact Compoglass F < Dyract AP < Heliomolr HB, surefil$\mathbb{\lrcorner}$ (P < 0.05). And cuspal delfelction is $\mathbb{\ulcorner}$Z100, Heliomolar, Heliomolar HB, Synergy Compact Surefil. < Compoglass F < Pyramid, Dyract AP$\mathbb{\lrcorner}$ (P < 0.05). Measurements of ploymerization shrinkage stress and those of cuspal deflection of the teeth was different. There is no correlation between polymerization shrinkage stress and cuspal deflection of the teeth(p > 0.05).

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제28권4호
• /
• pp.348-353
• /
• 2003

The purpose of present study was to evaluate the polymerization shrinkage stress and amount of linear shrinkage of composites and compomers for posterior restoration. For this purpose, linear polymerization shrinkage and polymerization stress were measured. For linear polymerization shrinklage and polymerization stress measurement, custom made Linometer (R&B, Daejon, Korea) and Stress measuring machine was used (R&B, Daejon, Korea). Compositers and compomers were evaluated: Dyract AP (Dentsply Detrey, Gumbh. German) Z100 (3M Dental Products, St. Paul. USA) Surefil (Dentsply Caulk, Milford, USA) Pyramid (Bisco, Schaumburg, USA) Synergy Compact (Coltene, Altstatten, Switzerland), Heliomolar (Vivadent/Ivoclar, Liechtenstein), and Compoglass (Vivadent Ivoclar/Liechtenstein) were used. 15 measurements were made for each material. Linear polymerization shrinkage or polymerization stress for each material was compared with one way ANOVA with Tukey at 95% levels of confidence. For linear shrinkage: Heliomolar, Surefil

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제28권4호
• /
• pp.326-333
• /
• 2003

Ormocer has organic-inorganic compound polymers. One of advantages of ormocer is reduced polymerization shrinkage. The purpose of this study was to compare the amount of contraction shrinkage of composite resins and ormocers. Additionally, the time of each material when there is no further change of contraction shrinkage was analysed. Four brands of composite resins (P-60. Surefil, Z-250 and Denfil) and two brands of ormocers (Definite and Admira) were used. 20 seconds, 40 seconds and 60 seconds of curing times were given. Contraction shrinkage of them were measured using a linometer for 80 seconds. The effect of material and curing time to contraction shrinkage at the time of 80 seconds was analysed by two-way ANOVA. The effect of time to contraction shrinkage was analysed by one-way ANOVA and the time when there was no further change of the contraction shrinkage was analysed. The results are as follows: 1. P-60, Definite, Z-250 and Denfil had no further change of contraction shrinkage from the time of 20 seconds, and Surefil and Admira had no further change of contraction shrinkage from the time of 10 seconds. 2. Statistical analysis revealed volumetric shrinkage varied among material (p<0,05). No significant difference of contraction shrinkage among different curing times was found, and there was no effect of interaction between materials and curing times to contraction shrinkage. 3. Definite and Admira showed the statistically same contraction shrinkage with those of Z-250 and P-60. which is higher than that of Surefil and lower than that of Denfil (p<0.05).

• 한국정밀공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국정밀공학회 2004년도 추계학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.1057-1060
• /
• 2004

In this study, the wear characteristics of five different dental composite resins cured by conventional halogen light and LED light sources were investigated. Five different dental composite resins of Surefil, Z100, Dyract AP, Fuji II LC and Compoglass were worn against a zirconia ceramic ball using a pin-on-disk type wear tester with 15 N contact force in a reciprocal sliding motion with sliding distance of 10 mm/cycle at 1Hz under the room temperature dry condition. The wear variations of dental composite resins were linearly increased as the number of cycles increased. It was observed that the wear resistances of these specimens were in the order of Dyract AP ＆gt; Surefil ＆gt; Compoglass ＆gt; Z100 ＆gt; Fuji II LC. On the morphological observations by SEM, the large crack formation on the sliding track of Fuji II LC specimen was the greatest among all resin composites. Dyract AP showed the least wear with few surface damage. There is no significant difference in wear performance between conventional halogen light curing and light emitting diodes curing sources. It indicates that a light emitting diodes (LED) source can replace a halogen light source as a curing unit for composite resin restorations.

• Tribology and Lubricants
• /
• 제21권6호
• /
• pp.268-271
• /
• 2005

In this study, the wear characteristics of five different dental composite resins cured by conventional halogen light and LED light sources were investigated. Five different dental composite resins of Surefil, Z100, Dyract AP, Fuji II LC and Compoglass were worn against a zirconia ceramic ball using a pin-on-disk type wear tester with 15N contact force in a reciprocal sliding motion of sliding distance of 10mm/cycle at 1Hz under the room temperature dry condition. The wear variations of dental composite resins were linearly increased as the number of cycles increased. It was observed that the wear resistances of these specimens were in the order of Dyract AP > Surefil > Compoglass > Z100 > Fuji II LC. On the morphological observations by SEM, the large crack formation on the sliding track of Fuji II LC specimen was the greatest among all resin composites. Dyract AP showed less wear with few surface damage. There is no significant difference in wear performance between conventional halogen light curing and light emitting diodes curing sources. It indicates that a light emitting diodes (LED) source can replace a halogen light source as curing unit for composite resin restorations.

• 한국윤활학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국윤활학회 2004년도 학술대회지
• /
• pp.350-354
• /
• 2004

In this study, the wear characteristics of five different dental composite resins cured by conventional halogen light and LED light sources were investigated. Five different dental composite resins of Surefil, Z100, Dyract AP, Fuji II LC and Compoglass were worn against a zirconia ceramic ball using a pin-on-disk type wear tester with 15 N contact force in a reciprocal sliding motion of sliding distance of 10 mm/cycle at 1Hz under the room temperature dry condition. The wear variations of dental composite resins were linearly increased as the number of cycles increased. It was observed that the wear resistances of these specimens were in the order of Dyract AP > Surefil > Compoglass > Z100 > Fuji II LC. On the morphological observations by SEM, the large crack formation on the sliding track of Fuji ?LC specimen was the greatest among all resin composites. Dyract AP showed less wear with few surface damage. There is no significant difference in wear performance between conventional halogen light curing and light emitting diodes curing sources. It indicates that a light emitting diodes (LED) source can replace a halogen light source as curing unit for composite resin restorations.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제25권2호
• /
• pp.254-261
• /
• 2000

본 연구에서는 35개의 구치부 2급 와동에 고밀도 구치부 복합레진(Surefil, Caulk, U.S.A.)을 수복하였다. 단일 충전군은 18개 치아의 인접면 와동을 한꺼번에 충전한 후 광중합하였고 분할 충전군은 17개 치아의 인접면 와동을 두 층으로 나누어 충전 및 광중합하였다. 6개월 후의 임상검사 결과 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다. 1. 기초검사에서 단일 충전군과 분할 충전군 모두 색상조화도(Color match)를 제외한 다른 검사 항목들에서 Alfa로 나타났다. 2. 단일 충전군은 6개월 후 모든 검사(색상 조화도 제외)에서 인접면 접촉도(Proximal contact), 변연부 변색(Marginal discoloration), 술후 과민증(Postoperative sensitivity) 검사에서 소수의 치아가 Bravo, Charlie로 나타났으나 기초 검사와 3개월 후 검사 사이에 통계적으로 유의한 차이는 보이지 않았다. 3. 분할 충전군은 6개월 후 시행된 모든 검사(색상 조화도 제외)에서 인접면 접촉도(Proximal contact), 술후 과민증(Postoperative sensitivity) 검사에서 소수의 치아가 Bravo, Charlie로 나타났으나 기초 검사와 6개월후 검시 사이에 통계적으로 유의한 차이는 보이지 않았다. 4. 모든 검사항목에서 단일 충전군과 분할 충전군을 비교한 결과 통계적으로 유의한 차이는 보이지 않았다. 따라서 고밀도 구치부 복합레진(Surefil, Caulk, U.S.A)은 색상 재현의 어려움을 제외하고는 여러 평가에서 우수하게 나타났으므로 본 연구 결과를 기준으로 보면 이전 복합레진의 단점이 보완되어 구치부 2급 와동에 적절하게 사용될 수 있다고 사료되며 단일 충전군과 분할 충전군 사이에 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보이지 않으므로 시술 시간을 좀 더 단축시킬 수 있을 것으로 사료된다.