• Title/Summary/Keyword: Successful bidder determine method

Search Result 3, Processing Time 0.023 seconds

Orders Status Analysis on the Successful Bidder Decision Method of Turnkey Alternative Tendering Construction (턴키·대안입찰공사 낙찰자 결정방식에 의한 수주현황 분석)

  • Park, Hong-Tae;Lee, Yang-Kyu
    • KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research
    • /
    • v.33 no.2
    • /
    • pp.771-780
    • /
    • 2013
  • Inspection system which was performed in the past selected the final winning bidder by separating Pre-Qualification, the basic design evaluation and price evaluation. However, turnkey and alternative bidding construction has selected way to determine the successful bidder as the best design and the most low cost method, comprehensive evaluation method (bid price adjustment, design score adjustments, weights standard), the best design and the fixed amount method from january 1, 2010 to the present. Due to these institutional problems, orders institutions were often a way to determine the successful bidder to apply differently for identical or similar construction. Therefore this study winning bidder selection criteria through analysis of construction the number and construction order performance, order performance by work division and institutional orders, the weights bidder order performance and orders status of turnkey alternative tendering construction to civil part performed in domestic.

Deduction on The Problems and Improve The Way of The Successful Bidder Determination Method for Turnkey·Alternative Bid Construction (턴키·대안입찰공사 낙찰자 결정방식의 문제점 및 개선 방안 도출)

  • Park, Hong-Tae;Lee, Yang-kyu
    • KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research
    • /
    • v.34 no.6
    • /
    • pp.1881-1891
    • /
    • 2014
  • Full system of turnkey deliberation committee in 2010 was abolished and permanent Deliberation committee was introduced. So far, ordering organization selected the best method suitable for the design and comprehensive evaluation method in the turnkey bid construction. Comprehensive evaluation method have bid price design score coordination, weighted basis, the best design approach fixed amount, five successful bidder decision method in addition. Design deliberation branch committee in the successful bidder decision way configured and operated branch members of special design consultation committee, But main agent changed from committee deliberation pull system to permanent committee deliberation, as well as and The lobby burden was not improved. This similar to the past at the portion of the design deliberation and the way of the design deliberation in the turnkey bid construction. Therefore it is necessary to improve the design deliberation system. In other words, design score and technology competition should be adapted to determine a successful bid. This study suggested the operating system of the design deliberation, the decision method problems of the successful bidder and ways to improve the design deliberation.

Orders Status Analysis on the Successful Bidder Decision Method of Civil Turnkey.Alternative Tendering Construction (개선된 낙찰자 결정방식에 의한 토목 턴키.대안입찰공사 수주현황 분석)

  • Park, Hong Taea;Lee, Yang Kyu
    • Journal of the Society of Disaster Information
    • /
    • v.9 no.2
    • /
    • pp.164-177
    • /
    • 2013
  • From 2010 years to 2013, the selection method of successful bidder has been changed design suitable lowest method, comprehensive evaluation method(bid price adjustment, design score adjustments, weight standards), fixed amount best design method. Therefore this study was presented by analyzing the impact on the domestic construction industry according the way to determine the successful bidder, the evaluation order method and the operational issues through the analysis of order status, order number, results of acceptance an order, success rate range, results of acceptance an order according to weight success rate, results of acceptance an order by work type and order institution of a turnkey alternative tendering construction performed in domestic civil part.