• Journal of KIISE:Software and Applications
• /
• v.36 no.11
• /
• pp.928-935
• /
• 2009

Ontology schema reasoning is used to maintain consistency of concepts and build concept hierarchy automatically. For the purpose, the search of concepts must be inevitably performed. Ontology schema reasoning performs the test of subsumption relationships of all the concepts delivered in the test set. The result of subsumption tests is determined based on the creation of complete graphs, which seriously weighs with the performance of reasoning. In general, the process of creating complete graph has been known as expressive procedure. This process is essential in improving the leading performance. In this paper, we propose a method enhancing the classification performance by identifying unnecessary subsumption test supported by optimized searching method on subsumption relationship test among concepts. It is achieved by propagating subsumption tests results into other concept.

• The Journal of Society for e-Business Studies
• /
• v.20 no.4
• /
• pp.61-76
• /
• 2015

In general, we have utilized the hierarchical concept tree as a crucial data structure for indexing huge amount of textual data. This paper proposes a generality rank-based method that can automatically develop hierarchical concept structures with the Wikipedia data. The goal of the method is to regard each of Wikipedia articles as a concept and to generate hierarchical relationships among concepts. In order to estimate the generality of concepts, we have devised a special ranking function that mainly uses the number of hyperlinks among Wikipedia articles. The ranking function is effectively used for computing the probabilistic subsumption among concepts, which allows to generate relatively more stable hierarchical structures. Eventually, a set of concept pairs with hierarchical relationship is visualized as a DAG (directed acyclic graph). Through the empirical analysis using the concept hierarchy of Open Directory Project, we proved that the proposed method outperforms a representative baseline method and it can automatically extract concept hierarchies with high accuracy.

• Journal of the Korea Institute of Information Security & Cryptology
• /
• v.18 no.2
• /
• pp.49-63
• /
• 2008

RDF is the base ontology model which is used in Semantic Web defined by W3C. OWL expands the RDF base model by providing various vocabularies for defining much more ontology relationships. Recently Jain and Farkas have suggested an RDF access control model based on RDF triple. Their research point is to introduce an authorization conflict problem by RDF inference which must be considered in RDF ontology data. Due to the problem, we cannot adopt XML access control model for RDF, although RDF is represented by XML. However, Jain and Farkas did not define the authorization propagation over the RDF upper/lower ontology concepts when an RDF authorization is specified. The reason why the authorization specification should be defined clearly is that finally, the authorizatin conflict is the problem between the authorization propagation in specifying an authorization and the authorization propagation in inferencing authorizations. In this article, first we define an RDF access authorization specification based on RDF triple in detail. Next, based on the definition, we analyze the authoriztion conflict problem by RDF inference in detail. Next, we briefly introduce a method which can quickly find an authorization conflict by using graph labeling techniques. This method is especially related with the subsumption relationship based inference. Finally, we present a comparison analysis with Jain and Farkas' study, and some experimental results showing the efficiency of the suggested conflict detection method.