• 성인간호학회지
• /
• 제20권5호
• /
• pp.731-742
• /
• 2008

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze how a nursing student recognizes PBL with simulation education and its relationship to academic achievement. Methods: The study objects were the students in C college who learn through PBL using simulator for 15 weeks(September 2007 to December 2007). Learning element recognition was developed by Cho(2002) and three key evaluations(performance, self-evaluation, and colleague evaluation) were designed by professors. Results: Learning element recognition ranged from 2.37 to 4.83 with the average at 3.94. For Learning element recognition, students who preferred discussion score 4.15. This was statistically more significant than those who do not. Students who preferred presentations show significantly higher score in colleague evaluation. For Learning element recognition and academic achievement, self-evaluation and colleague evaluation showed relationship to PBL learning element. Conclusion: There was definitely a relationship with PBL learning element and academic achievement after learning the PBL with simulation education.

• Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science
• /
• 제40권3호
• /
• pp.233-240
• /
• 2023

The purpose of this study aims to analyze research trends related to 'evaluation' in Korean medical education through a systematic review. This study used a systematic review method, which is a research methodology for research trends and 'literature analysis.' Researchers searched the Korean journal literature published until the end of December 2020 in the Korean research database with keywords related to medicine and evaluation. Thus, 5,205 cases were identified. Based on these data, 143 papers were selected through a logical screening process, requiring 1 month to complete the data search and analysis process. In terms of publications, medical journals overwhelmingly outnumbered nonmedical journals until 2015; however, after 2016, the number of papers published in nonmedical journals increased, and the number of published papers was similar to that of medical journals. In terms of evaluation-related research, research on student and program evaluations has been very active compared to that on accreditation. As the number of evaluation studies has gradually decreased over the past 10 years, preparing a plan to revitalize them in Korean medical education is necessary. Considering that the role of evaluation in education has been emphasized in recent years, research on reestablishing the concept of evaluation; developing evaluation indicators; analyzing the status of student evaluation, program evaluation, and accreditation; and deriving measures to improve medical education through evaluation is required.

• 의학교육논단
• /
• 제17권2호
• /
• pp.57-59
• /
• 2015

Student research has been proposed as an educational strategy to fulfill the current requirements in basic medical education (BME) and to compatible with the self-directed development of professionalism. It is commonly accepted that the goals of student research are to develop the competencies of critical, reflective, and self-directed thinking; problem-solving; and creativity; as well as to acquire the skills necessary to search for information and analyze the literature; to cultivate the talent of mastering a specialized field through deeply intensified learning; and to establish close relationships between students and supervisors. To successfully implement student research, authorities on BME should to plan the procedure for the student research projects and allocate personal and material resources adequately in order to provide the opportunity for self-evaluation and reflection through the completion of daily records, to develop the habit of consistently evaluating one's own study, and to maintain a collegial relationship between students and supervisors by offering the proper feedbacks in a timely and consistent manner. In conclusion, despite several obstacles and difficulties in the establishment of successful student research projects, student research could provide students the motivation to develop themselves into expert academic researchers, and play a role in educating students to help solve patients' problems based on scientific evidence in the future.

• 대한간호
• /
• 제6권4호통권30호
• /
• pp.88-93
• /
• 1967

• 아동학회지
• /
• 제24권6호
• /
• pp.117-131
• /
• 2003

This study investigated the effects of Child Care and Teaching(CCT) practice on student teachers'(N=361) perceived Efficacy for Child Care an Teaching(ECCT), including relationships between ECCT and generalized self-efficacy. Instruments were the ECCT scale, the generalized self-efficacy scale, and self-evaluation concerning CCT. Research design consisted of pre-test, CCT practices. and post-test. Results showed that ECCT scores increased after CCT practice: ECCT was related with generalized self-efficacy and to self-evaluation concerning CCT. These findings suggested that CCT experience is important to student teachers' perceived ECCT, and ECCT, in turn, is a predictor of actual CCT behavior.

• 컴퓨터교육학회논문지
• /
• 제22권2호
• /
• pp.29-38
• /
• 2019

SW 개발과 관련된 프로그램 평가는 학생이 작성한 결과물에 대한 정답 여부만을 제공하는 경우가 많다. 본 연구는 프로그램 평가의 내용이 교사의 수업을 지원하고, 부분점수 제공에서 어떤 부분을 중요하게 고려해야 하는지에 대한 기초자료를 제공하기 위한 목적으로 진행되었다. 목적 달성을 위해 본 연구는 자유학기제 운영 중학교 90명을 대상으로 2개월 간 파이썬 수업을 진행하고, 과정에서 수집된 1185개의 소스코드를 분석하였다. 분석 결과, 학생의 실수가 많은 오류는 '문법오류'이며, 교사들은 '논리오류'를 중요하게 고려하였다. 결과를 토대로 학생의 잦은 문법오류를 줄일 필요가 있으며, 교사는 평가에서 논리적 측면에 대한 중요성을 고려하여 학생들의 프로그램을 평가하고, 부분점수를 고안할 필요가 있다. 본 연구는 프로그램 평가를 학습 지원과 평가의 관점으로 고려했다는 점에 의의가 있다.

• Educational Technology International
• /
• 제9권1호
• /
• pp.97-114
• /
• 2008

This research has three purposes: The first purpose is to verify whether SGRs(Student-Generated Rubrics) are effective for learner achievement in higher education or not. The second one is to analyze the agreements between an instructor's evaluations and peer group assessments with SGRs in real classroom situation. The final purpose is to propose the possibility of students' more objective self-evaluation with the use of SGRs. It appears that rubrics are effective tools to improve learner achievement in adult education and to promote the agreement between the instructor's and peer's evaluations, even though learners do not develop SGRs. In addition, this research has demonstrated that most students are not very accurate self-assessors, and they often overestimate themselves. This study can be helpful for novice instructors, especially for those who try to assess their students more fairly, to develop the SGRs as an evaluation tool appropriate for their own situation, and to give more reliable feedback to students.

• 컴퓨터교육학회논문지
• /
• 제7권1호
• /
• pp.89-96
• /
• 2004

일반적으로 형성 평가는 교수-학습 활동이 진행 중에 투입되는 평가활동으로 학습 정보에 대한 피드백과 교정 및 교수 방법의 개선을 위한 평가이다. 본 논문에서는 형성평가에서 학습자 개인의 평가 결과에 따라 서로 다른 피드백을 제공하는 시스템을 제안한다. 이 시스템은 지식, 이해, 적용 등의 영역별 기준에 따라 제작된 문항을 통해 각 학습자를 평가하고 이 결과를 기반으로 구분된 학습자 유형에 따라 서로 다른 피드백을 개별 학습자에게 제공하며 학습자는 이를 통해 부족한 영역을 보완하게 된다. 교수자에게는 문항별 정답 비율뿐만 아니라 학생 개개인에게 제공되었던 피드백 내용도 알려주어 교수방법을 개선하도록 한다.

• 대한가정학회지
• /
• 제48권3호
• /
• pp.31-41
• /
• 2010

This study analyzes the difficulties that student teachers, beginning teachers and experienced teachers face in the field of kindergarten, and urgent support requests. The total of participants was 372 of this number, 122 were student teachers, 118 were beginning teachers and 132 were experienced teachers. The results showed the difference in difficulties and the needed support requests among student teachers, beginning teachers and experienced teachers. Student teachers had the difficulty of time management, but beginning teachers and experienced teachers had trouble due to the nonexistence of assistant teachers. Student teachers required teaching strategies for starting relationships with children within responsibility. Beginning teachers and experienced teachers regarded the plan, practice, and evaluation of a program as the most needed support request. Collectively, the results revealed that expansion of the practice period is necessary for student teachers so that they can gain experience with children, parents, and the children's education institution with various opportunities as a learning course.

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제7권8호
• /
• pp.723-733
• /
• 2020

The study investigates the effects of online instructional facilitator's qualities on student performance of online class activities. The study explores the roles of instructional facilitators who may influence student performance of online class activities and their academic achievement. The study employs a set of aggregated data from 1,362 subjects and 10 facilitators who participated in multiple online classes. The results of independent samples t-test reveal that the student performance in online classes has no association with facilitators' educational background or academic degree, as well as demographic characteristics, student evaluation records and instructional achievement. The results of multiple regression analysis show that the facilitator engagement has a positive relation to the enhancement of student interaction, reading discussion messages, and the quality of discussion messages in online discussions. The results of correlation analysis show that the facilitator engagement has a positive impact on both increasing the number of reading discussion messages and enhancing the quality of discussion messages. The facilitator engagement increases the quantity of reading discussion postings and enhances the quality of discussion messages, which would be a substantial contribution to student performance by facilitators. The findings suggest that student performance and academic achievement in online classes are not independent of facilitator engagement.