• Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods
• /
• v.11 no.2
• /
• pp.275-285
• /
• 2004

We explore classification analysis using graphical methods such as sliced inverse regression and sliced average variance estimation based on dimension reduction. Some useful information about classification analysis are obtained by sliced inverse regression and sliced average variance estimation through dimension reduction. Two examples are illustrated, and classification rates by sliced inverse regression and sliced average variance estimation are compared with those by discriminant analysis and logistic regression.

• The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics
• /
• v.31 no.6
• /
• pp.835-842
• /
• 2018

The so-called sliced average variance estimation (SAVE) is a popular methodology in sufficient dimension reduction literature. SAVE is sensitive to the number of slices in practice. To overcome this, a fused SAVE (FSAVE) is recently proposed by combining the kernel matrices obtained from various numbers of slices. In the paper, we consider practical applications of FSAVE to large p-small n data. For this, near-infrared spectroscopy of biscuit dough data is analyzed. In this case study, the usefulness of FSAVE in high-dimensional data analysis is confirmed by showing that the result by FASVE is superior to existing analysis results.

• Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society
• /
• v.20 no.6
• /
• pp.2733-2746
• /
• 2018

The two inverse regression estimation methods, SIR and SAVE to estimate the central space are computationally easy and are widely used. However, SIR and SAVE may have poor performance in finite samples and need strong assumptions (linearity and/or constant covariance conditions) on predictors. The two non-parametric estimation methods, MAVE and dMAVE have much better performance for finite samples than SIR and SAVE. MAVE and dMAVE need no strong requirements on predictors or on the response variable. MAVE is focused on estimating the central mean subspace, but dMAVE is to estimate the central space. This paper explores and compares four methods to explain the dimension reduction. Each algorithm of these four methods is reviewed. Empirical study for simulated data shows that MAVE and dMAVE has relatively better performance than SIR and SAVE, regardless of not only different models but also different distributional assumptions of predictors. However, real data example with the binary response demonstrates that SAVE is better than other methods.

• Proceedings of the Korean Statistical Society Conference
• /
• 2003.05a
• /
• pp.213-217
• /
• 2003

In this paper we discuss graphical and diagnostic methods for logistic regression, in which the response is the number of successes in a fixed number of trials.

• Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods
• /
• v.31 no.2
• /
• pp.247-262
• /
• 2024

In this paper, we explore nonlinear sufficient dimension reduction (SDR) methods, with a primary focus on establishing a foundational framework that integrates various nonlinear SDR methods. We illustrate the generalized sliced inverse regression (GSIR) and the generalized sliced average variance estimation (GSAVE) which are fitted by the framework. Further, we delve into nonlinear extensions of inverse moments through the kernel trick, specifically examining the kernel sliced inverse regression (KSIR) and kernel canonical correlation analysis (KCCA), and explore their relationships within the established framework. We also briefly explain the nonlinear SDR for functional data. In addition, we present practical aspects such as algorithmic implementations. This paper concludes with remarks on the dimensionality problem of the target function class.

• Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods
• /
• v.23 no.2
• /
• pp.105-117
• /
• 2016

In the paper, as a sequence of the first tutorial, we discuss sufficient dimension reduction methodologies used to estimate central subspace (sliced inverse regression, sliced average variance estimation), central mean subspace (ordinary least square, principal Hessian direction, iterative Hessian transformation), and central $k^{th}$-moment subspace (covariance method). Large-sample tests to determine the structural dimensions of the three target subspaces are well derived in most of the methodologies; however, a permutation test (which does not require large-sample distributions) is introduced. The test can be applied to the methodologies discussed in the paper. Theoretical relationships among the sufficient dimension reduction methodologies are also investigated and real data analysis is presented for illustration purposes. A seeded dimension reduction approach is then introduced for the methodologies to apply to large p small n regressions.