• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제32권3호
• /
• pp.178-187
• /
• 2009

Six Sigma emphasizes KPI and establishes the present level as well as the goal level through statistical calculation and tries to achieve management innovation through process improvement. But in the area of new product development or service, sufficient data for statistical measurement may not be secured. On the other side, looking for contradictions through problem analysis, TRIZ is a methodology that stresses the process of solving these problems. TRIZ also has its own problems: it is hard to define its initial task, to objectify the measurement of effect, and to optimize the drawn out idea. The purpose of this report is to give a comprehensive understanding about each methodology (Sigma Six and TRIZ) through its analysis, to confirm the need of linking both methodologies, and to suggest a model for this linking process. Also, they will be verified through examples, and the synergy effect will be discussed.

• 대한안전경영과학회지
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.283-292
• /
• 2013

This paper aims to propose a new steps of hypothesis testing using analysis process and improvement process in the six sigma DMAIC. The six sigma implementation models proposed in this paper consist of six steps. The first step is to establish a research hypothesis by specification directionality and FBP(Falsibility By Popper). The second step is to translate the research hypothesis such as RHAT(Research Hypothesis Absent Type) and RHPT(Research Hypothesis Present Type) into statistical hypothesis such as $H_0$(Null Hypothesis) and $H_1$(Alternative Hypothesis). The third step is to implement statistical hypothesis testing by PBC(Proof By Contradiction) and proper sample size. The fourth step is to interpret the result of statistical hypothesis test. The fifth step is to establish the best conditions of product and process conditions by experimental optimization and interval estimation. The sixth step is to draw a conclusion by considering practical significance and statistical significance. Important for both quality practitioners and academicians, case analysis on six sigma projects with implementation guidelines are provided.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제30권4호
• /
• pp.78-84
• /
• 2007

After 6 Sigma administration is introduced in domestic in 1997, many corporations are utilizing by survival strategy and method of administration reform. This is applied in all field that this led to R&D from service industry by the next. Success factors by each field was studied and announced applying in various types of business. The Korail and Korea Post, the Ministry of Environment and various public corporation and governmen and municipal office are introduce and utilizing 6 Sigma administration by innovation method present. But, research about success factor that special quality of public sector is considered up to now was almost no. This treatise analyzed 6 Sigma' success factors and effect relation to public corporation.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제10권8호
• /
• pp.2068-2077
• /
• 2009

6시그마 프로젝트 관리 시스템은 6시그마 추진기업의 지식경영 시스템으로 활용되어 왔지만 벨트의 프로젝트 관리 시스템 활용이 프로젝트 성과에 미치는 영향에 대한 실증적 연구는 전무한 상황이다. 따라서 본 연구는 6시그마 프로젝트 관리시스템의 활용이 프로젝트 균형 성과지표에 미치는 영향을 구조방정식 모형을 통해 실증적으로 분석하였다. 연구 자료의 결과에 의하면 프로젝트 시스템의 활용은 6시그마 프로젝트 학습과 성장관점에 영향을 미치고, 학습과 성장 관점은 내부 프로세스 관점과 고객관점에 영향을 미치는 결과로 나타났다. 내부 프로세스는 고객관점 지표에 영향을 미치고 고객관점 지표는 재무성과에 영향을 미치는 분석의 결과가 도출되었다. 내부 프로세스는 재무성과에 직접적인 인과관계가 없는 것으로 귀결되었다. 연구모형과 더불어 대안모형 분석이 추가로 이루어졌는데 연구모형이 대안모형보다 모형 적합도에서 나은 것으로 나타났다.

• 한국융합학회논문지
• /
• 제10권11호
• /
• pp.149-159
• /
• 2019

식스시그마는 시장과 고객의 패러다임과 트렌드의 변화에 맞추어 모든 사업의 프로세스와 전략을 개선하는 경영 혁신운동이다. 식스시그마 프로젝트 선정에 관한 기존의 연구는 있으나 불완전한 정보환경 하에서 프로젝트 선정을 위한 연구는 거의 없다. 본 연구의 목적은 불완전한 정보 하에서 올바른 프로젝트 선정을 위해 통합 MCDM 기법을 적용 방법을 제안하는 것이다. 식스시그마 프로젝트 선정을 위해 4단계인 1) 평가기준 간 가중치 결정 2) 팀 멤버 간 전문역량의 상대적 중요도 결정 3) 프로젝트 선호도 척도 산정 4) 최종 프로젝트 우선순위 결정 등을 위해 그룹 Fuzzy AHP, 불완전한 정보환경 하에서의 비퍼지화 TrFN 변환, GRA의 통합기법을 제안하였다. 본 연구에서 제안한 식스시그마 프로젝트 선정단계의 적용방안에 대한 이해를 돕기 위해 수치예가 제시되었다.

• 대한안전경영과학회지
• /
• 제12권2호
• /
• pp.225-230
• /
• 2010

The purpose of the study was to apply and to expand the six sigma to reduce waiting times for computed tomography (CT) examination which manipulated by the department of radiology. It was preceded by DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, and Control). In the stage of definition, it wereselected for total 5 critical to quality (CTQ), which were the kindness, the waiting time, the examination explanation, the waiting day and the waiting stand environment, that increased the reserved time of CT examination. In the stage of measurement, the number of examinations and of reservation waiting days performed and resulted in final CTQ(Y) which measured each 1.68 and 1.85 sigma. In the stage of analysis, the examination concentrated on morning time, non-scheduled examination of the day, the delayed time of booking, frequent telephone contacting and equipment malfunction were determined as variable key causes. In the stage of improvement, it were performed with expansion of the examination in the morning time, integration of laboratories that used to in each steps, developing the ability of simultaneous booking schedule for the multiple examinations, developing program of examination request, and the customer management team operations. For the control, the number of examinations and reserved waiting days were measured each 3.14 and 1.13 sigma.

• 대한안전경영과학회지
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.171-181
• /
• 2007

Over ten years, 6sigma management is applied a lot in the part of indirect business as well as the manufacturing industry. But it has still been used restrictively the technique used on DMAIC that is a basic Roadmap of 6 sigma. This paper finds the improving skills that is used in the parts of manufacturing and indirect business and demonstrates their available scope with 6sigma projects. And this indicates which skills for improving are used valuable on each step of DMAIC with a systematic classification.

• 대한안전경영과학회지
• /
• 제9권4호
• /
• pp.99-112
• /
• 2007

In most recent years, the business competition has spreads over all fields of corporations and their management area regardless of time and place, which makes the survival environment of each enterprise fiercer. In order to secure a high position in the competitive market, the various firms has implemented many methods related to price, quality, and service efficiency. However, the implementation with only low price or high quality might be helpless to hold a high position in modem market. Moreover more attention should be paid to the internal business processes of an organization. Therefore, a new and different method should be searched or developed in order to win the competitive power among other enterprises. This research will focus on the improvement of the business processes within the non-manufacturing industry by applying Lean Six Sigma methodology. DMAIC method will be applied to improve the inbound and outbound logistics processes, manage the inbound and outbound vehicles, and control the receiving and shipping activities.

• Industrial Engineering and Management Systems
• /
• 제11권4호
• /
• pp.346-352
• /
• 2012

While systems engineering has been widely applied to complex system development, some evidences are reported about major budget and schedule overruns in systems engineering applied. On the other hand, many organizations have been deploying Design for Six Sigma (DFSS) to build Six Sigma momentums in the area of design and development for their products and processes. To explore the possibility of having a DFSS complement systems engineering process, this process reviews the systems engineering with their categories of effort and DFSS with its methodologies. A comparison of the systems engineering process and DFSS indicates that DFSS can be a complement to systems engineering for delivering higher quality products to customers faster at a lower cost. We suggest a simplified framework of systems engineering process, that is, PADOV which was derived from the generic systems engineering process which has been applied to the development of T-50 advanced supersonic trainer aircraft by Korea Aerospace Industries (KAI) with technical assistance of Lockheed Martin. We demonstrated that each phase of PADOV framework is comprehensively matched to the pertinent categories of systems engineering effort from various standards.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제40권3호
• /
• pp.316-326
• /
• 2012

Purpose: In this paper, a Design for Six Sigma(DFSS) methodology based on DMADV(Define-Measure-Analyze-Design-Verify) roadmap is presented. Methods: DFSS tools are given for each DMADV phase which is suitable for the aircraft development process. A cost reduction case study of a navigation simulation is demonstrated. Results: DFSS roadmap are presented with implementation tools for each phase. Conclusion: We propose a DFSS methodology which can benefit the design and development personnel to implement DFSS not only in aircraft industry but also in other order-based industries in general.